Op 22-10-2011 6:26, Dennis E. Hamilton schreef:
The vote to accept the proposal for governance and operation of the
OpenOffice.org Forums ended at midnight, Friday 2011-10-21T24:00Z.
There were a total of 27 +1 votes cast. There was one +0 vote and no -1
votes.
The proposal is accepted.
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 9:07 AM, floris v floris...@gmail.com wrote:
Op 22-10-2011 6:26, Dennis E. Hamilton schreef:
Peter,
Heck, I also voted +1, 10/18, but apparently also in the wrong list - VOTE
DISCUSS
Sorry about that.
By the way, as the option +0 wasn't included, that vote is invalid,
Op 22-10-2011 9:24, Christian Grobmeier schreef:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 9:07 AM, floris vfloris...@gmail.com wrote:
Op 22-10-2011 6:26, Dennis E. Hamilton schreef:
Peter,
Heck, I also voted +1, 10/18, but apparently also in the wrong list - VOTE
DISCUSS
Sorry about that.
By the way, as the
No, it is valid.
http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Reason 1: Votes on procedural issues follow the common format of
majority rule unless otherwise stated
Reason 2: +0: 'I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with this.'
Therefore you can consider this decision passed and
Am 10/22/2011 02:33 AM, schrieb Kazunari Hirano:
Hi Rob and all,
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
So these are user lists. Will we want language-specific translation
and localization lists at some point? That is why I thought it would
make sense to have
Am 10/22/2011 02:25 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
It is unlikely that historical downloads will be available from the same
download location as the Apache OOo podling and Apache OOo TLP releases. At
the same time, it is important to preserve the historical downloads. And also
This is
Am 10/22/2011 01:56 AM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 10/22/2011 01:37 AM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Oct 21, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 10/21/2011 08:35 PM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
(2) downloads.services.oo.o goes away this needs attention. This is
the major unknown.
We do have a
Hi Rob, Kazunari-san, Marcus, *
2011/10/22 Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de
Am 10/22/2011 02:33 AM, schrieb Kazunari Hirano:
Hi Rob and all,
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
So these are user lists. Will we want language-specific translation
and
Am 10/22/2011 12:16 PM, schrieb Manfred A. Reiter:
Hi Rob, Kazunari-san, Marcus, *
2011/10/22 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
Am 10/22/2011 02:33 AM, schrieb Kazunari Hirano:
Hi Rob and all,
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.orgwrote:
So these are user lists.
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
and...@pitonyak.org wrote:
Are you aware of the number of changes that have already been applied to the
LibreOffice code base? It is very large. So, although it seems
On 22 October 2011 12:09, Christian Lohmaier cl...@openoffice.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
and...@pitonyak.org wrote:
Are you aware of the number of changes that have already been
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Christian Lohmaier
cl...@openoffice.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak
and...@pitonyak.org wrote:
Are you aware of the number of changes that have already been
Hi Marcus, *
2011/10/22 Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 10/22/2011 12:16 PM, schrieb Manfred A. Reiter:
Hi Rob, Kazunari-san, Marcus, *
2011/10/22 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
[...]
A users list for talkings and a general list to discuss development wrt the
specific language
In Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Manfred A. Reiter ma.rei...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Marcus, *
2011/10/22 Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 10/22/2011 12:16 PM, schrieb Manfred A. Reiter:
Hi Rob, Kazunari-san, Marcus, *
2011/10/22 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
[...]
A users list
Hi Rob and all,
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Remember, we're starting with the existing lists that are already
active. So if we already have an active German users list, or an
active Dutch users list, then we don't need to guess.
Sure.
Let German users
Hi Rob and all,
Portuguese (pt) :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portuguese_language
Brazilian Portuguese (pt-BR) :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brazilian_Portuguese
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
How different is written br_pt and br_pt?
:)
I think br_pt and
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Kazunari Hirano khir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rob and all,
Portuguese (pt) :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portuguese_language
Brazilian Portuguese (pt-BR)
:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brazilian_Portuguese
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Rob Weir
We have some strong diferences between both languages, and in Brazil there is
some cool jokes about the names used on old OpenOffice (and StarOffice) menus.
This was btw the first barrier we've had for a massive adoption of the tool
here, and it just grow up when the first pt-br version was
Hi Marcus and all,
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Wouldn't this also mean tell us which MLs you need additionally and we (the
PPMC) will create them.
No. We don't say tell us but they tell us what kind of language
list they need, and they propose it
Really, the differences are very strong, as Jomar said.
Luiz
2011/10/22 Jomar Silva homem...@gmail.com
We have some strong diferences between both languages, and in Brazil there
is some cool jokes about the names used on old OpenOffice (and StarOffice)
menus.
This was btw the first barrier
On 22 October 2011 16:23, Kazunari Hirano khir...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Marcus and all,
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
Wouldn't this also mean tell us which MLs you need additionally and we
(the
PPMC) will create them.
No. We don't say tell us
Am 10/22/2011 05:23 PM, schrieb Kazunari Hirano:
Hi Marcus and all,
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Wouldn't this also mean tell us which MLs you need additionally and we (the
PPMC) will create them.
No. We don't say tell us but they tell us what
No objections were received . I've added Juergen to the ooo-security list.
-Rob
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
ooo-security is the project's private list for receiving and resolving
security vulnerability reports. Juergen has volunteered to
participate
TJ--
Thanks for answering my questions and the update on all this!
Great that you're on top of all this! :)
On 10/21/2011 04:37 PM, TJ Frazier wrote:
On 10/21/2011 18:48, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 10/21/2011 01:31 PM, TJ Frazier wrote:
Dave,
I want to be very sure about this, because I can
Hi Jomar, all,
2011/10/22 Jomar Silva homem...@gmail.com:
We have some strong diferences between both languages, and in Brazil there is
some cool jokes about the names used on old OpenOffice (and StarOffice) menus.
This was btw the first barrier we've had for a massive adoption of the tool
--- On Wed, 10/19/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Pedro Giffuni wrote:
FWIW,
If it were possible to preserve the history of the
deceased MySpell in the ooo-myspell SVN at apache-extras it
would be nice. Just for historic purposes.
Is MySpell in legacy SVN? Or would we need
Am 10/22/2011 05:24 PM, schrieb Luiz Oliveira:
Really, the differences are very strong, as Jomar said.
OK, then lets keep the language difference between pt and pt-br as it
was before and grant them (at least) 2 mailing lists.
I've corrected it in the Wiki:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
--- On Wed, 10/19/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Pedro Giffuni wrote:
FWIW,
If it were possible to preserve the history of the
deceased MySpell in the ooo-myspell SVN at apache-extras it
would be nice. Just
First, no votes that were not on the [VOTE] thread are reflected in the report.
The [VOTE] announcement stated that only votes on that one thread would be
counted. (I know that got trimmed on various threads, but I can't do anything
about that.)
I am sorry that two voters placed their votes
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
I merged some fixes from bugzilla
that may be shared, and they have taken a lot of code that
they tagged as contributed by Oracle.
Are you sure about that? please read the CLA which many of the said
bugzilla patches are
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
I merged some fixes from bugzilla
that may be shared, and they have taken a lot of code that
they tagged as contributed by Oracle.
Are you sure
Hi all,
I'm mainly a lurker and I don't really want to add/take anything that
was previously said before, neither this is my playground, and for me
most I'm just another theorical (my academical formation is actually
on marketing management), but I felt like leaving a few words:
* The auto
--- On Sat, 10/22/11, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 9:26 PM,
Pedro Giffuni wrote:
I merged some fixes from bugzilla
that may be shared, and they have taken a lot of code
that
they tagged as contributed by Oracle.
Are you sure about that? please
Hi Jomar, *,
2011/10/22 Jomar Silva homem...@gmail.com:
I think we should distinguish two cases:
1. bulids ...
imho obvious to have two builds: br-pt and the pt-pt ...
Agreed.
fine
2. user-mailinglists
the question is, wheather we could start with only one mailingt
Not sure if it will work
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
It just seems that there are too many individual interests
outweighing such a goal at present.
Apache OOo fork is born out of 'corporate' interest not 'individual'
interests. Hence the fatal license road block.
On 22/10/2011 Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 10/22/2011 02:25 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
It is unlikely that historical downloads will be available from the same
download location as the Apache OOo podling and Apache OOo TLP
releases. At
the same time, it is important to preserve the historical
On 10/21/2011 04:52 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Kay Schenkkay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/20/2011 04:04 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 10/20/2011 09:04 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
Proposal:
1) Create a single user-language list for each native language where
there is
Am 10/23/2011 12:17 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 22/10/2011 Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 10/22/2011 02:25 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton:
It is unlikely that historical downloads will be available from the same
download location as the Apache OOo podling and Apache OOo TLP
releases. At
the same
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
The vote to accept the proposal for governance and operation of the
OpenOffice.org Forums ended at midnight, Friday 2011-10-21T24:00Z.
There were a total of 27 +1 votes cast. There was one +0 vote and no -1
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
-1
The Apache Foundation *IS* neutral.
Beyond the evident open wounds the previous relationship with SUN/Oracle
may have left in the community, the
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org
wrote:
The vote to accept the proposal for governance and operation of the
OpenOffice.org Forums ended at midnight, Friday 2011-10-21T24:00Z.
There
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
-1
The Apache Foundation *IS* neutral.
Beyond the evident open wounds the
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org
wrote:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org
wrote:
The vote to accept the proposal for governance and operation of
These are my personal observations and I will report them to the Forum
Administrators also. Any of the Forum operators can chime in here.
There is not a formal vote that I can see. There was a poll that ended up 63%
in favor, 37% opposed on the English Language forums, and I understand that
44 matches
Mail list logo
