Re: Windows Install Issues (was RE: Linux install issues)

2012-05-22 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2012 um 04:31 schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: One more thing about the idea of installing at the m.n level instead of the m level (i.e, m =3, n = 4), is that users can easily keep one or more versions behind and mainly side-by-side. (I think there is some difficulty if they

Re: [UPDATE SERVICE] proposal for a AOO 3.4 update service

2012-05-22 Thread Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
Hi On 21.05.2012 18:20, Roberto Galoppini wrote: [snip] I'd keep it simple. Two main tasks: 1) Identify whether there is an update available for the user's current install 2) Direct the user to that update I'd keep #2 really really simple. We already know there is an update. We

Re: Windows Install Issues (was RE: Linux install issues)

2012-05-22 Thread Xia Zhao
Dennis, 2012/5/22 Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org One more thing about the idea of installing at the m.n level instead of the m level (i.e, m =3, n = 4), is that users can easily keep one or more versions behind and mainly side-by-side. (I think there is some difficulty if they

Re: Please review trial load of Symphony dumpfile

2012-05-22 Thread Yong Lin Ma
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote: Hi Yong Lin Ma; On 05/21/12 00:29, Yong Lin Ma wrote: Yeah, we integrated most enhancement/changes from AOO3.4.  Especially those copyleft module cleanup work. We thought it is mandatory requirement of contribution.

Re: about openoffice insert the picture?

2012-05-22 Thread Xia Zhao
Hi Jian Li, I am totally lost here, what you are asking and what you want to clean up? Hope Ma's reply is helpful. I am QE lead for AOO 3.4 and hope continuous working on this area. If something need clarify, you may find me by hotmail if you want. Best regards, Lily 2012/5/21 jianlizhao

Re: [Comment] Apache software is always free

2012-05-22 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Shane Curcuru wrote: http://www.apache.org/free Any glaring errors? Anything I should add, or express more clearly? I would add, when you state that the Apache License meets the Open Source Initiative's (OSI) Open Source Definition, that it also meets the Free Software Foundation's Free

Did some study and update tool panel internals wiki page

2012-05-22 Thread lin yuan
There is a wiki about how to contribute a tool panel with an extension. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Framework/Article/Tool_Panels But there is no detail document about how it is implemented which may help developers understand the mechanism more clearly. I did some study and update

Re: Please review trial load of Symphony dumpfile

2012-05-22 Thread zhangjf
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:23 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:30 +0800, zhangjf wrote: Some 3rd party codes are not included in this repository, such as ext_libraries, ext_sources, but they are required to build the code base. And some extension modules are not

Re: [UX] Questions for users

2012-05-22 Thread Xia Zhao
+1 for your thoughts. 2012/5/21 Graham Lauder y...@apache.org Hi. 2012/5/21 Paulo de Souza Lima paulo.s.l...@varekai.org 2012/5/21 Albino Biasutti Neto biasut...@gmail.com Hi. 2012/5/20 Raul Pacheco da Silva raulpachecodasi...@gmail.com Yes, like others

Re: [BUILD] How to clean my last build

2012-05-22 Thread Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
Hi, On 22.05.2012 04:07, bo.tian wrote: Do you want to clean a module or all of them? To clean all, you can try cd main dmake clean To clean a module with dmake , try this cdmodule build --frommodule --prepare To clean a module with gbuild , try this cdmodule make clean You may want to see

Re: [Comment] Apache software is always free

2012-05-22 Thread Roberto Galoppini
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Shane Curcuru wrote: http://www.apache.org/free Any glaring errors? Anything I should add, or express more clearly? I would add, when you state that the Apache License meets the Open Source Initiative's (OSI) Open

Re: [HEADS UP] Re: [UPDATE SERVICE] proposal for a AOO 3.4 update service

2012-05-22 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 21/05/2012 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: The redirect is established. Thus, please check in your AOO 3.4 installation, if the update functionality returns that your installation is up to date. [1] http://www.openoffice.org/projects/update38/ProductUpdateService/check.Update [2]

Re: Resigning from PPMC

2012-05-22 Thread Xia Zhao
Eric, Sorry I am crazying with other things these days and no choice to take a look at mail list.. I am so suddently to see your resigning note .. Though you may know less about me but I did know your contribution and your passion to this community. Stongly suggest you reconsidering your

Re: [HEADS UP] Re: [UPDATE SERVICE] proposal for a AOO 3.4 update service

2012-05-22 Thread Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
Hi, On 22.05.2012 09:43, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 21/05/2012 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: The redirect is established. Thus, please check in your AOO 3.4 installation, if the update functionality returns that your installation is up to date. [1]

Re: [HEADS UP] Re: [UPDATE SERVICE] proposal for a AOO 3.4 update service

2012-05-22 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Thus, you got an error in the AOO 3.4 update functionality, because you have an own redirect from openoffice.org to another host. Right? Does the update functionality works, if you do not have your own redirect? I am asking in order to be sure that I got the right

Re: [HEADS UP] Re: [UPDATE SERVICE] proposal for a AOO 3.4 update service

2012-05-22 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Tue, 22 May 2012 10:28:15 +0200 Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Thus, you got an error in the AOO 3.4 update functionality, because you have an own redirect from openoffice.org to another host. Right? Does the update functionality works, if you

Need confirmation on PDF export

2012-05-22 Thread Fernand Vanrie
After installing 3.4 based on a 3.3 On Windows XP there is no difference between Export to PDF directly and the export with PDF-settings. For both menu items there is no PDF-settings menu. When using the Export menu item, there is only 1 choise: PDF (same as for PDF export directly) Do i file a

Re: [Comment] Apache software is always free

2012-05-22 Thread Roberto Resoli
2012/5/22 Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org: Shane Curcuru wrote: http://www.apache.org/free Any glaring errors? Anything I should add, or express more clearly? I would add, when you state that the Apache License meets the Open Source Initiative's (OSI) Open Source Definition, that it

Re: Need confirmation on PDF export

2012-05-22 Thread Reizinger Zoltán
Hi Fernand, 2012.05.22. 11:18 keltezéssel, Fernand Vanrie írta: After installing 3.4 based on a 3.3 On Windows XP there is no difference between Export to PDF directly and the export with PDF-settings. For both menu items there is no PDF-settings menu. When using the Export menu item, there is

Re: [Comment] Apache software is always free

2012-05-22 Thread Shane Curcuru
On 2012-05-22 3:42 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote: On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Andrea Pescettipesce...@apache.org wrote: Shane Curcuru wrote: http://www.apache.org/free Any glaring errors? Anything I should add, or express more clearly? I would add, when you state that the Apache

Re: [Comment] Apache software is always free

2012-05-22 Thread Shane Curcuru
On 2012-05-22 1:41 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: On Mon, 21 May 2012 21:37:54 -0400 Shane Curcurua...@shanecurcuru.org wrote: Since this question is coming up much much more now that we have AOO, I figured we need an official URL and resource to point to when people ask.

Re: [Comment] Apache software is always free

2012-05-22 Thread Roberto Galoppini
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote: On 2012-05-22 3:42 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote: On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Andrea Pescettipesce...@apache.org  wrote: Shane Curcuru wrote: http://www.apache.org/free Any glaring errors? Anything I should

Re: Please review trial load of Symphony dumpfile

2012-05-22 Thread drew
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 15:29 +0800, zhangjf wrote: On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:23 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:30 +0800, zhangjf wrote: Some 3rd party codes are not included in this repository, such as ext_libraries, ext_sources, but they are required to build

Re: [HEADS UP] Re: [UPDATE SERVICE] proposal for a AOO 3.4 update service

2012-05-22 Thread Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
Hi, On 22.05.2012 10:28, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Thus, you got an error in the AOO 3.4 update functionality, because you have an own redirect from openoffice.org to another host. Right? Does the update functionality works, if you do not have your own redirect? I am

Re: [UX] Cross references on Writer

2012-05-22 Thread Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
Hi, On 22.05.2012 12:19, RGB ES wrote: Writer have a powerful and easy to use cross reference system, but there is room for improvements. I agree. For example, I have a document with +60 headings on four levels: in such situation searching the right heading on the cross reference menu is

Re: [HEADS UP] Re: [UPDATE SERVICE] proposal for a AOO 3.4 update service

2012-05-22 Thread Paulo de Souza Lima
2012/5/22 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com Hi, On 22.05.2012 10:35, Rory O'Farrell wrote: On Tue, 22 May 2012 10:28:15 +0200 Andrea Pescettipesce...@apache.org wrote: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Thus, you got an error in the AOO 3.4 update functionality, because you

Re: [HEADS UP] Re: [UPDATE SERVICE] proposal for a AOO 3.4 update service

2012-05-22 Thread Paulo de Souza Lima
2012/5/22 Paulo de Souza Lima paulo.s.l...@varekai.org 2012/5/22 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com Hi, On 22.05.2012 10:35, Rory O'Farrell wrote: On Tue, 22 May 2012 10:28:15 +0200 Andrea Pescettipesce...@apache.org wrote: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Thus, you got

Re: [HEADS UP] Re: [UPDATE SERVICE] proposal for a AOO 3.4 update service

2012-05-22 Thread Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
Hi, On 22.05.2012 14:47, Paulo de Souza Lima wrote: 2012/5/22 Oliver-Rainer Wittmannorwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Thus, you got an error in the AOO 3.4 update functionality, because you have an own redirect from openoffice.org to another host. Right?

Re: Size of page headder

2012-05-22 Thread fabian
Hi Fernand, I programing in Java but I already did what you described below. The pagestyles contain the the property HeaderHeight but as I wrote this always returns 0 independently of how many lines I wrote in the header. There is also the attribute HeaderText which gives me a XText of the

Re: [HEADS UP] Re: [UPDATE SERVICE] proposal for a AOO 3.4 update service

2012-05-22 Thread Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
Hi, On 22.05.2012 14:56, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: On 22.05.2012 14:47, Paulo de Souza Lima wrote: 2012/5/22 Oliver-Rainer Wittmannorwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Thus, you got an error in the AOO 3.4 update functionality, because you have an own

Re: [UPDATE SERVICE] proposal a OOo 3.3 update service

2012-05-22 Thread Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
Hi, On 16.05.2012 13:24, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, as our release AOO 3.4 is out now for more than a week I think it would make sense to reactivate a simple update service for installed OOo 3.3 versions. I have already seen a post on the users mailing list that the update functionality

Re: [UX] Questions for users

2012-05-22 Thread Albino Biasutti Neto
Hi. 2012/5/21 Graham Lauder y...@apache.org First off we need to figure what we want to learn, just asking random questions is no way to endear us to our users. We used to have a survey that the user connected to when s/he selected I want to register during install. That survey, set up by

Re: [HEADS UP] Re: [UPDATE SERVICE] proposal for a AOO 3.4 update service

2012-05-22 Thread Paulo de Souza Lima
2012/5/22 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com Hi, On 22.05.2012 14:56, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: On 22.05.2012 14:47, Paulo de Souza Lima wrote: 2012/5/22 Oliver-Rainer Wittmannorwittmann@**googlemail.comorwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann

Re: [HEADS UP] Re: [UPDATE SERVICE] proposal for a AOO 3.4 update service

2012-05-22 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2012 um 15:53 schrieb Paulo de Souza Lima: 2012/5/22 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com Hi, On 22.05.2012 14:56, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: On 22.05.2012 14:47, Paulo de Souza Lima wrote: 2012/5/22 Oliver-Rainer

Re: [HEADS UP] Re: [UPDATE SERVICE] proposal for a AOO 3.4 update service

2012-05-22 Thread Paulo de Souza Lima
2012/5/22 Juergen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2012 um 15:53 schrieb Paulo de Souza Lima: 2012/5/22 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com Hi, On 22.05.2012 14:56, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: On 22.05.2012 14:47, Paulo de Souza Lima

Re: Need confirmation on PDF export

2012-05-22 Thread Fernand Vanrie
Zoltán, I am using US Englisch, at home i have a frech install on windows 7 i check there also how do i check the install set integrity ? Thanks Fernand Hi Fernand, 2012.05.22. 11:18 keltezéssel, Fernand Vanrie írta: After installing 3.4 based on a 3.3 On Windows XP there is no difference

Re: Need confirmation on PDF export

2012-05-22 Thread RGB ES
2012/5/22 Fernand Vanrie s...@pmgroup.be: Zoltán, I am using US Englisch, at home i have a frech install on windows 7 i check there also how do i  check the install set integrity ? With checksums: http://www.openoffice.org/download/checksums/3.4.0_checksums.html at the bottom of that

Re: Need confirmation on PDF export

2012-05-22 Thread Reizinger Zoltán
2012.05.22. 16:14 keltezéssel, Fernand Vanrie írta: Zoltán, I am using US Englisch, at home i have a frech install on windows 7 i check there also how do i check the install set integrity ? http://www.openoffice.org/download/checksums/3.4.0_checksums.html#howto Zoltan Thanks Fernand Hi

Re: [Comment] Apache software is always free

2012-05-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
Please avoid the loaded term free... Also, you need to differentiate between s/w available directly from the ASF, which is always no-charge, to Apache s/w available from vendors which may have a cost associated with it (What do you mean you're charging me for Hadoop!? Apache sez their s/w is

Re: [Comment] Apache software is always free

2012-05-22 Thread Louis Suárez-Potts
Jim Jagielski wrote: Please avoid the loaded term free... I started to laugh. :-) /me wishes this or that US presidential candidate could read this, or for that matter, George Orwell. :-/ I suggest, then, we use, rather, unencumbered--a term which actually has real meaning. -- Cheers, Louis

Re: [Comment] Apache software is always free

2012-05-22 Thread Rory O'Farrell
On Tue, 22 May 2012 10:46:58 -0400 Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: Please avoid the loaded term free... I started to laugh. :-) /me wishes this or that US presidential candidate could read this, or for that matter, George Orwell. :-/ I suggest, then, we

Re: [UPDATE SERVICE] proposal a OOo 3.3 update service

2012-05-22 Thread Roberto Galoppini
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, On 16.05.2012 13:24, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, as our release AOO 3.4 is out now for more than a week I think it would make sense to reactivate a simple update service for installed OOo

Re: Size of page headder

2012-05-22 Thread Fernand Vanrie
fabian, Your headers have a dynamic height ? Maybe you can move the viewcursor init and calculate the height from its position on start en end of the header ? Hi Fernand, I programing in Java but I already did what you described below. The pagestyles contain the the property HeaderHeight

Re: [UPDATE SERVICE] proposal a OOo 3.3 update service

2012-05-22 Thread Kay Schenk
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, On 16.05.2012 13:24, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, as our release AOO 3.4 is out now for more than a week I think it would make sense to reactivate a simple update service for installed OOo

Re: [Comment] Apache software is always free

2012-05-22 Thread Kay Schenk
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: On May 21, 2012, at 6:53 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: +1 Looking good. I would go with it. It is certainly something that the Apache OpenOffice project can use to refer people too. +1 - as well. I think

[DOC] Re: Windows Install Issues (was RE: Linux install issues)

2012-05-22 Thread Andrew Rist
On 5/21/2012 6:16 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: @Kay, Yes, that installation-guide page is very out of date. Did you ever look at this page:https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Win-en-x86-Setup. Is this the seed for the ALv2 licensed install guide? snip

Re: Windows Install Issues (was RE: Linux install issues)

2012-05-22 Thread Kay Schenk
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Juergen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com wrote: Am Dienstag, 22. Mai 2012 um 04:31 schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: One more thing about the idea of installing at the m.n level instead of the m level (i.e, m =3, n = 4), is that users can easily keep one or more

Re: Windows Install Issues (was RE: Linux install issues)

2012-05-22 Thread Kay Schenk
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: @Kay, Yes, that installation-guide page is very out of date. Did you ever look at this page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Win-en-x86-Setup. I have additional clean screen shots,

Re: [Comment] Apache software is always free

2012-05-22 Thread Dave Fisher
On May 22, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: On May 21, 2012, at 6:53 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: +1 Looking good. I would go with it. It is certainly something that the Apache OpenOffice project can

Apache license (invariant section)

2012-05-22 Thread Guy Waterval
Hi all, Can anyone tell me if the Apache license allows, for a document, the creation of invariant sections, like the GFDL, to require the presence of these sections in all derived versions. On the Contributors page of a document, I would like to include people who contributed, with their name,

Re: [DOWNLOAD][DRAFT] other.html created automatically

2012-05-22 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 05/22/2012 02:29 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: PS: I do see the tables in Chrome. It is still the case that the table of content has a link only for the Important Notes. Yes, there are no labels inside the table, so links in the TOC doesn't make sense. I could try to put some in.

Re: Apache license (invariant section)

2012-05-22 Thread Donald Whytock
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Guy Waterval waterval@gmail.com wrote: On the Contributors page of a document, I would like to include people who contributed, with their name, email, website and a short advertising message describing their activities. I want to protect and enforce this

Re: Apache license (invariant section)

2012-05-22 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Well ... Instead of changing the license to suit your wishes I would suggest using another Category-A license for your contribution: ASL 1.1, for example. best regards, Pedro. --- Mar 22/5/12, Guy Waterval waterval@gmail.com ha scritto: Hi all, Can anyone tell me if the Apache license

Re: Apache license (invariant section)

2012-05-22 Thread Guy Waterval
Hi Donald, 2012/5/22 Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Guy Waterval waterval@gmail.com wrote: On the Contributors page of a document, I would like to include people who contributed, with their name, email, website and a short advertising message

Re: Apache license (invariant section)

2012-05-22 Thread Ross Gardler
On 22 May 2012 20:44, Guy Waterval waterval@gmail.com wrote: Is this possible and if so, how the text of the Apache 2.0 license should it be formulated? It's only possible if you change the license and then it wouldn't be the Apache license. That is there is no built in mechanism to do

RE: [DOC] Re: Windows Install Issues (was RE: Linux install issues)

2012-05-22 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
That page is provided as the result of a QA analysis that I did. What's important for reuse is the screen captures and some text that indicates the related user actions. This page itself was not intended as an install guide. If it is adapted to the MediaWiki for use as an Install Guide, it

RE: [DOWNLOAD][DRAFT] other.html created automatically

2012-05-22 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
The page has not changed in IE9. However, if I select the correct-incompatibility option used for older sites, the page comes through just fine [;). I don't have to do that with the current static page. I suspect this has to do with JavaScript CDATA and comment tricks. It might be good to

Re: [DOC] Re: Windows Install Issues (was RE: Linux install issues)

2012-05-22 Thread Kay Schenk
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: That page is provided as the result of a QA analysis that I did. What's important for reuse is the screen captures and some text that indicates the related user actions. This page itself was not intended as

Re: [DOC] Re: Windows Install Issues (was RE: Linux install issues)

2012-05-22 Thread Kay Schenk
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote: That page is provided as the result of a QA analysis that I did. What's important for reuse is the screen captures and some text that

Re: [DOWNLOAD][DRAFT] other.html created automatically

2012-05-22 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 05/22/2012 11:28 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: The page has not changed in IE9. However, if I select the correct-incompatibility option used for older sites, the page comes through just fine [;). I don't have to do that with the current static page. Interesting. If so, you must have

RE: [DOWNLOAD][DRAFT] other.html created automatically

2012-05-22 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
In IE9, I see the current http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html almost exactly the same with compatible and incompatibility views. All of the information is present; there are slight, harmless changes in some font sizes. None of the links to the hash codes and such are in the download

Re: Did some study and update tool panel internals wiki page

2012-05-22 Thread debin lei
Hi, Lin, It is a good summary. I did some investigation about the Tool Panels before. The wiki help me a lot, thanks a lot! And I input some classes diagrams about the Tool Panel implement in svtools, pls help to review it. 2012/5/22 lin yuan yuanlin@gmail.com There is a wiki about how to

Re: Please review trial load of Symphony dumpfile

2012-05-22 Thread Yong Lin Ma
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:14 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 15:29 +0800, zhangjf wrote: On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:23 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 10:30 +0800, zhangjf wrote: Some 3rd party codes are not included in this repository,

Re: Sneak Peek video: Symphony contribution - clipart

2012-05-22 Thread Nancy K
Drew this is WONDERFUL! Thanks for something I can pass along to friends that they can understand - those using OpenOffice, or those that have never heard of it.   I liked the birds flying, and ready for takeoff...as a retired Air Traffic Controller, 'Ready for departure' and 'Cleared for

Patch for bug 118878, an issue related to crash in writer app

2012-05-22 Thread lin yuan
I had a simple fix for issue *118878*https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118878. It's a crash issue when modify the column value and width value together for a frame object in writer app. Is there anyone can help to review it? Thanks a lot! More details and the root cause analysis can

Re: [UX] Questions for users

2012-05-22 Thread Graham Lauder
Hi. 2012/5/21 Graham Lauder y...@apache.org First off we need to figure what we want to learn, just asking random questions is no way to endear us to our users. We used to have a survey that the user connected to when s/he selected I want to register during install. That