/ for advertising
and fundraising. So we are not affected by the OpenOffice.org
fundraising policy.
I read the content of the site you mentionned aboce, and it looks
abandoned : the last articles are not recent IMHO.
Both sites have been in minimal maintenance for years, but not
abandoned at all
Hi Eric,
eric b wrote on 2011-08-16 08:47:
educoo.us and educoo.de are .. I'd say not correctly maintained
(because owned by pro-LO people). As you understood, my concern is
EducOO.it : Marina Latini does a fantastic work and helps us a lot.
now this strikes me.
The German association
Hi Florian,
Le 16 août 11 à 11:42, Florian Effenberger a écrit :
Hi Eric,
eric b wrote on 2011-08-16 08:47:
educoo.us and educoo.de are .. I'd say not correctly maintained
(because owned by pro-LO people). As you understood, my concern is
EducOO.it : Marina Latini does a fantastic work and
Hi Eric,
Von: eric b
Gesendet: 16.08.11 12:10 Uhr
Please don't get me wrong : it is not used, because _nobody_
maintains it, not because we do not want to maintain it :-)
And at the end, we have several possibilities: either it is
unmaintained intentionaly, or people ignore we exist.
Hi Eric,
eric b wrote on 2011-08-16 12:10:
Please don't get me wrong : it is not used, because _nobody_ maintains
it, not because we do not want to maintain it :-)
And at the end, we have several possibilities: either it is
unmaintained intentionaly, or people ignore we exist. Did you invite
eric wrote:
educoo.us and educoo.de are .. I'd say not correctly maintained
(because owned by pro-LO people).
nonsense. educoo.de points to your servers, you're free to post
whatever content you desire there (yes, I've read Florian's and your
answer to this).
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
Hi Thorsten,
Le 16 août 11 à 16:24, Thorsten Behrens a écrit :
eric wrote:
educoo.us and educoo.de are .. I'd say not correctly maintained
(because owned by pro-LO people).
nonsense. educoo.de points to your servers, you're free to post
whatever content you desire there (yes, I've read
Hi,
eric b wrote on 2011-08-16 16:38:
And you are right about educoo.de. Please accept my excuses for the
wrong statement.
c'est la vie. :-) Nevermind. Let's rather look to get content on that
page, that helps everyone.
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering
I don't have any specific comment on this; you might talk to fundraising@.
Ian Lynch wrote on Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:52:40 +0100:
On 15 August 2011 02:20, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Raphael Bircher wrote on Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 08:01:45 +0200:
I assume
a deductible expense, just as donations
are (in some cases).
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.namewrote:
I don't have any specific comment on this; you might talk to fundraising@.
Ian Lynch wrote on Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:52:40 +0100:
On 15 August 2011 02:20
on the moneys so offered, as
professional services is still a deductible expense, just as donations
are (in some cases).
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Daniel Shahaf
d...@daniel.shahaf.namewrote:
I don't have any specific comment on this; you might talk to fundraising@.
Ian Lynch wrote
the problem why no one is willing to give money.
Peopel like to know where where there money go, else they can affort a
Lisence of MS Office.
Higher level question is this: is there any particular reason that we
think AOOo has fundraising needs that are not covered by Apache's
fundraising? Apache
is this: is there any particular reason that we
think AOOo has fundraising needs that are not covered by Apache's
fundraising? Apache provides the servers, the domain registrations,
they have conferences which we are welcome to attend, they have a
press office, etc.
Team OOo paid bursaries for individuals
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Aug 14, 2011 3:33 AM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
I don't follow that reasoning. If (hypothetically) I want to pay for you
to
go to Bermuda for a vacation, it's between you and me
On 14 Aug 2011, at 14:24, Rob Weir wrote:
We have a trademark policy that states what uses are permitted without
additional permission, and which uses may be allowed with specific
permission from Apache. The policy does not differ based the
incorporation status of the requestor. However,
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 14 Aug 2011, at 14:24, Rob Weir wrote:
We have a trademark policy that states what uses are permitted without
additional permission, and which uses may be allowed with specific
permission from Apache. The policy does
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 14 Aug 2011, at 14:24, Rob Weir wrote:
We have a trademark policy that
On 14 Aug 2011, at 16:23, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 14 Aug 2011, at 14:24, Rob Weir
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 14 Aug 2011, at 16:23, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:25 AM,
On 14 August 2011 02:58, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Eike Rathke o...@erack.de wrote:
...
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think an Apache
project can have a private fund, or solicit donations for a 3rd party
one.
Why not?
I've
Raphael Bircher wrote on Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 08:01:45 +0200:
Am 14.08.11 03:58, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Eike Rathkeo...@erack.de wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Saturday, 2011-08-13 10:51:57 -0400, Rob Weir wrote:
Donations went to Team OpenOffice.org, e.V, or to SPI (for
Shane wrote:
Note that the issue of monetary contributions and/or donations is a major
one, especially since there are real policy differences between how
OpenOffice.org used to work under Sun/Oracle and how the ASF does it's
fundraising. In particular, the ASF has a fundrais...@apache.org team
it's
fundraising. In particular, the ASF has a fundrais...@apache.org team and
VP who work on fundraising for all projects; individual projects do not
specifically solicit for funds (other than to link to the ASF Sponsorship
page, etc.).
I would urge the PPMC to start a separate thread dealing
it's
fundraising. In particular, the ASF has a fundrais...@apache.org team and
VP who work on fundraising for all projects; individual projects do not
specifically solicit for funds (other than to link to the ASF Sponsorship
page, etc.).
I would urge the PPMC to start a separate thread dealing
Italian taxpayers, that we invest back in
OpenOffice.org-related activities.
However, on our OpenOffice.org pages http://it.openoffice.org/ we don't
mention this: we only use http://www.plio.it/ for advertising and
fundraising. So we are not affected by the OpenOffice.org fundraising
policy
/foundation/contributing.html#Paypal
I think a donation to Apache in general is different from a donation
specifically to the AOOo project. I didn't see a designated use field
in the PayPal form.
Higher level question is this: is there any particular reason that we
think AOOo has fundraising needs
and the PPMC has no
control over these accounts.
For Team OOo that's correct. For SPI that's presumably correct as well.
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think an Apache
project can have a private fund, or solicit donations for a 3rd party
one.
Why not?
ASF fundraising policy
.
Why not?
ASF fundraising policy prohibits directed donations. Donations of
cash or hardware or significant services may only be made to the ASF
as a whole, and not to individual projects.
You have reasons why you do it like that?
Some projects work with specific vendors to secure donated
On 8/13/2011 6:18 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote:
Am 13.08.11 23:32, schrieb Shane Curcuru:
...snip...
ASF fundraising policy prohibits directed donations. Donations of cash
or hardware or significant services may only be made to the ASF as a
whole, and not to individual projects.
You have
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Eike Rathke o...@erack.de wrote:
Team OOo paid bursaries for individuals that went to OOoCons and
Hackfest, paid hardware for buildbots and pootle servers, paid students
for the OOo internship. Do you think that Apache will cover those
expenses?
It's worth
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.netwrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Eike Rathkeo...@erack.de wrote:
Team OOo paid bursaries for individuals that went to OOoCons and
Hackfest, paid hardware for buildbots and pootle servers, paid
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 01:28 +0100, Simon Phipps wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.netwrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Eike Rathkeo...@erack.de wrote:
Team OOo paid bursaries for individuals that went to OOoCons and
-Original Message-
From: Simon Phipps [mailto:si...@webmink.com]
Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 10:28 AM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fundraising
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Andy Brown andy@the-martin-
byrd.netwrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13
projects, but we don't ask for that.
https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/faq/#booktitle
Apache policies only apply to Apache projects and marks. So any
fundraising done outside isn't an issue, and any fundraising that's not
directly using Apache marks is not an issue for Apache. It's only
-Original Message-
From: Jean Hollis Weber [mailto:jeanwe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 10:44 AM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fundraising
snip
Profits from sales of printed copies of ODFAuthors (formerly OOoAuthors)
books are held
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 11:17 +1000, Gavin McDonald wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jean Hollis Weber [mailto:jeanwe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 10:44 AM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fundraising
snip
Profits from sales of printed copies
-Original Message-
From: Jean Hollis Weber [mailto:jeanwe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, 14 August 2011 11:46 AM
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Fundraising
On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 11:17 +1000, Gavin McDonald wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jean Hollis
.
Higher level question is this: is there any particular reason that we
think AOOo has fundraising needs that are not covered by Apache's
fundraising? Apache provides the servers, the domain registrations,
they have conferences which we are welcome to attend, they have a
press office, etc
corporations, not non-profit corporations.
However, to the extent they use trademarks owned by Apache, like
OpenOffice.org in their name or in their fundraising materials, then
this may be a concern for us as the trademark owners. And depending
on how the funds are used, this may be a concern
Simon Phipps wrote:
I don't follow that reasoning. If (hypothetically) I want to pay for you to
go to Bermuda for a vacation, it's between you and me and no business of the
Bermuda Tourist Commission. So while I can see the hardware donations will
have to end, why is it anything to do with
On Aug 14, 2011 3:33 AM, Andy Brown a...@the-martin-byrd.net wrote:
Simon Phipps wrote:
I don't follow that reasoning. If (hypothetically) I want to pay for you
to
go to Bermuda for a vacation, it's between you and me and no business of
the
Bermuda Tourist Commission. So while I can see the
41 matches
Mail list logo
