Hi Mathias,
On 22.09.2011 22:35, Mathias Bauer wrote:
Am 21.09.2011 12:07, schrieb Martin Hollmichel:
Hi,
Am 20.09.2011 12:26, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
Hi,
[...]
I will start working on a consolidation of the Windows Build software
requirements as given on
http://ooo
On 9/23/11 2:55 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
I am not recognizing in my mind which service packs are available for
which Windows version.
I am only repeating Martin here thinking that SP2 was the latest SP
for Win XP. Thus, no reason special reason for Win XP SP2.
My opinion is that we
On 9/23/11 4:39 PM, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Sp2is still widely used and installed in low specs computers in developing
countries where no licensed copies of MS exist (and where the use of
unlicensed copies of software is not illegal). These computers are a part of
OOo's market.
Sorry if I am
Yes you are missing something ;-) You are assuming here that MS Windows is
better than OpenOffice. In this case it is a wrong assumption.
Oooh, good for OOo then.
--tml
Am 23.09.2011 09:55, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
Maybe you mixed unicows.dll with the notorious uwinapi.dll that at least
has some value on WinXP, though it's unclear how much.
Hm...
Why do you think I am mixing unicows.dll with uwinapi.dll?
I replied to Martin. :-)
Regards,
Mathias
Hi Martin,
On 21.09.2011 13:56, Martin Hollmichel wrote:
Hi,
- get rid of dependence on instmsiw.exe and instmsia.exe
also this will iirc have some dependencies wrt system requirements, what
do you consider as minimum Windows baseline ? I would be fine with a XP
System SP2,
I would alse be
Hi,
Yes, once I have a corresponding patch ready we have to check it on
the different Windows platforms.
Does the current version of Apache OpenOffice allow the creation of
patches and service packs?
I don't think so and maybe we should avoid that kind of complexity at
this stage, so
