Andrew Rist wrote:
If anyone is concerned about sending their list to ooo-dev, you can send
it to Ross ( rgardler at apache) instead, and at the end of the period
(next Sunday), he will send an anonymized summary
Perfect. This is a simple, efficient solution that will help people who
prefer
On 17/09/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a says
---
For the purposes of being a dependency to an Apache product, which licenses
are considered to be similar in terms to the Apache License 2.0?
Hi,
On 18.09.2012 18:16, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
I am building trunk, rev. 1386983 on Windows in my environment and I got a
build breaker in module setup_native.
The build breaks in
/main/setup_native/source/win32/customactions/shellextensions - below you
find my error output.
It
Hi Pedro,
On 18.09.2012 22:03, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
- Original Message -
Subject: [OT] Re: [code] building trunk, rev. 1386983 break in setup_native
Hi Pedro,
On 18.09.2012 21:34, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi Oliver, *
...
BTW, I had seen
Hi,
On 19.09.2012 04:50, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi again;
I tried something in revision 1387438: basically I preserved some
configuration changes from the previous patchset.
Thanks
I will try.
Best regards, Oliver.
- Original Message -
From: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
On 17/09/2012 09:50, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
15. The next time I ran an e-mail check, I received an Amazon.com Order
Confirmation for my $0.00 purchase. It also reminds me where I can go to
download the software
On 17/09/2012 19:01, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Sep 15, 2012, at 12:45 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
8. Going through the one-click purchase of the $0.00 software, I was not sent
the executable. Instead, I was sent an Amazon OpenOffice 34 by Apache
downloader executable. I ran it. It is a
On 18/09/2012 02:13, Rob Weir wrote:
I've recently seen a few requests for ability to download AOO via a
torrent. something we do not currently provide.
I see that OOo did this for legacy versions:
http://www.openoffice.org/distribution/p2p/
According to the scripts on this page, it looks
On 18/09/2012 02:23, Rob Weir wrote:
This brought to our attention on Google+:
https://plus.google.com/b/114598373874764163668/116726439814896173562/posts/b9ydzhxmZKs
If I understand correctly, the contents of the roaming profile are
copied to the local machine at login time, and then copied
On 9/18/2012 2:11 AM, Andrew Rist wrote:
This is the discussion thread - reply to the other thread with your list!
I am opening up a thread for Proposed PMC Lists.
* I have included below the last pass of the Active/Inactive/Retired
list. This is for reference, as nothing in that list
What a great news!
Congratulations!
- Simon
2012/9/19 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
InfoWorld is out with their 2012 Bossie awards (Best of Open Source).
As far as I can see we are the only open source project that won two
awards!
In the desktop applications category we received an award
Here's my list of 10:
Andrew Rist (arist)
Ariel Constenla-Haile (arielch)
Donald P. Harbison (dpharbison)
Jürgen Schmidt (jsc)
Kazunari Hirano (khirano)
Pedro Giffuni (pfg)
Raphael Bircher (rbircher)
RGB.ES (rgb-es)
Yang Shih-Ching (imacat)
Yong Lin Ma (mayongl)
(Would have been easier if I were
Dear all,
I know that we can add a customized panel to Task Panel of presentation by
a extension.
Is there any ways that can let me add the similar customized panel to
document and spreadsheet?
Another words, is there any ways that can let me add a customized side
panel to document and
Hi,
On 19.09.2012 08:44, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 19.09.2012 04:50, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi again;
I tried something in revision 1387438: basically I preserved some
configuration changes from the previous patchset.
Thanks
I will try.
The build with --enable-dbgutil still
On 17 September 2012 22:16, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Ian Lynch ianrly...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm organising the Open clipart library into categories. We could use
this then as a useful resource to complement AOO. Any thoughts about
the best way to
On 9/19/12 10:12 AM, Dali Liu wrote:
Dear all,
I know that we can add a customized panel to Task Panel of presentation by
a extension.
Is there any ways that can let me add the similar customized panel to
document and spreadsheet?
Another words, is there any ways that can let me add a
I don't think I could do this fairly so I'm abstaining :-)
For me, if people think I can be useful I'm happy to be included but
equally I understand there are people much more qualified and with
more time and resource to commit than I can so no real problem for me
to be excluded.
On 19 September
On 9/19/12 11:28 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 9/19/12 10:12 AM, Dali Liu wrote:
Dear all,
I know that we can add a customized panel to Task Panel of presentation by
a extension.
Is there any ways that can let me add the similar customized panel to
document and spreadsheet?
Another words,
Hi Jürgen, Dali,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:28:00AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 9/19/12 10:12 AM, Dali Liu wrote:
Dear all,
I know that we can add a customized panel to Task Panel of presentation by
a extension.
Is there any ways that can let me add the similar customized panel to
On 9/19/12 12:57 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Jürgen, Dali,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:28:00AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 9/19/12 10:12 AM, Dali Liu wrote:
Dear all,
I know that we can add a customized panel to Task Panel of presentation by
a extension.
Is there any ways that
On 9/19/12 1:08 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 9/19/12 12:57 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Jürgen, Dali,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:28:00AM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 9/19/12 10:12 AM, Dali Liu wrote:
Dear all,
I know that we can add a customized panel to Task Panel of presentation
Hello,
Another words, is there any ways that can let me add a customized side
panel to document and spreadsheet by extension?
An issue exists: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=41087
See my comment to the bottom: an extension allows a workaround
Hi all,
I notice a quality problem in bugzilla. Far too many issues are in
status CONFIRMED which should not be there.
For comparing do a search with:
Bug created 'greater or equal' 2008-09-18 and 'less than' 2009-09-18
and status changed from CONFIRMED
and resolution is any of DUPLICATE,
On 9/19/12 1:47 PM, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi all,
I notice a quality problem in bugzilla. Far too many issues are in
status CONFIRMED which should not be there.
For comparing do a search with:
Bug created 'greater or equal' 2008-09-18 and 'less than' 2009-09-18
and status changed from
Hi Regina,
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
i am pretty sure that i did not set the confirmed status when submitting a
new issue,
default status is confirmed - and you have to select Show Advanced
From the ASF perspective the proposal below is good to go. We do need to
ensure the decision making process is documented and recorded.
We also need to ensure we work with the treasurer to get the money to
individuals.
From a mobile device - forgive errors and terseness
On Sep 18, 2012 4:37 PM,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
Hi Regina,
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
i am pretty sure that i did not set the confirmed status when submitting a
new
On 9/19/12 2:34 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
Hi Regina,
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
i am pretty sure that i did not set the
Hi,
On 19.09.2012 14:25, Ross Gardler wrote:
From the ASF perspective the proposal below is good to go. We do need to
ensure the decision making process is documented and recorded.
Thanks for the feedback.
As the ApacheCon EU 2012 is not far away, I will make up my mind already about a
Hi,
On 19.09.2012 14:41, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 9/19/12 2:34 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
Hi Regina,
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating
Am 19.09.2012 14:34, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
I agree with Oliver, the default status should be set to UNCONFIRMED
even if the reporter has canconfirm
I would agree with Peter's list but would ask that Ian Lynch be considered.
Here's why: Whom do we have speaking on behalf of education and ecosystem
development? As I'm not on this list—and I'm not suggesting I ought to be—I
think that someone like Ian, who's work is so involved with OO and
On 9/19/12 3:56 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
I would agree with Peter's list but would ask that Ian Lynch be considered.
Here's why: Whom do we have speaking on behalf of education and ecosystem
development? As I'm not on this list—and I'm not suggesting I ought to be—I
think that someone
2012/9/19 O.Felka olaf-openoff...@gmx.de:
Am 19.09.2012 14:34, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
I agree with Oliver, the default status should be set to UNCONFIRMED
Hi Olaf,
O.Felka schrieb:
Am 19.09.2012 14:34, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
I agree with Oliver, the default status should be set to UNCONFIRMED
even if the
-1
This procedure lacks transparency and accountability. It is incompatible with
how project governance is accomplished.
My recommendation is that those who have some reason to require anonymity with
regard to their nominations (that is what it is, individuals are asked to make
10
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:52:44PM +0200, O.Felka wrote:
Am 19.09.2012 14:34, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
I agree with Oliver, the default status should be
On 9/19/2012 07:47, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi all,
I notice a quality problem in bugzilla. Far too many issues are in
status CONFIRMED which should not be there.
For comparing do a search with:
Bug created 'greater or equal' 2008-09-18 and 'less than' 2009-09-18
and status changed from
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com wrote:
What a great news!
Congratulations!
I'm especially proud of the recognition the community received for the
OpenOffice Templates website. This almost did not happen. It
required a lot of effort, especially by SourceForge
On 12-09-19, at 10:05 , Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/19/12 3:56 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
I would agree with Peter's list but would ask that Ian Lynch be considered.
Here's why: Whom do we have speaking on behalf of education and ecosystem
development? As I'm not on
On 2012-09-14, at 3:38 PM, Juergen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
Am Freitag, 14. September 2012 um 20:56 schrieb Daniel Vandersluis:
I apologize if this is the wrong place for this message.
I am trying to compile a Ruby gem that connects to OpenOffice through UNO. I
have it working
+1 - great news!
On 19 September 2012 16:23, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com wrote:
What a great news!
Congratulations!
I'm especially proud of the recognition the community received for the
OpenOffice Templates website.
Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2012 um 17:10 schrieb O.Felka:
We have a lot of professional QA folks here: They know how to verify
their findings and issues. That's a lot of overhead if someone has
to re-test to confirm a well tested bug.
So we should trust the QA who has 'canconfirm'
I believe default status is CONFIRMED or not is not Regina's concern. To
reduce DUPLICATED defect, it require reporter search BZ carefully to find
if there is any similar defect opened before, but how to query BZ it
depends on reporter's knowledge and which keyword he used. We cannot make
zero
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12-09-19, at 10:05 , Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/19/12 3:56 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
I would agree with Peter's list but would ask that Ian Lynch be considered.
Here's why: Whom do we
Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2012 um 17:23 schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com wrote:
What a great news!
Congratulations!
I'm especially proud of the recognition the community received for the
OpenOffice Templates website. This almost did
Ok, Andrew persuaded me ;-)
Andre Fischer (af)
Andrea Pescetti (pescetti)
Andrew Rist (arist)
Armin Le Grand (alg)
Donald P. Harbison (dpharbison)
Jürgen Schmidt (jsc)
Kazunari Hirano (khirano)
Louis Suarez-potts (louis)
Marcus Lange (marcus)
Peter Junge (pj)
But I can think of several others
Did you mean to do this on the [PMC] Proposed PMC List thread, not the
[DISCUSS] thread?
-Original Message-
From: Ian Lynch [mailto:ianrly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 09:22
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PMC] Proposed PMC List
Ok, Andrew
On 09/18/2012 05:25 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
InfoWorld is out with their 2012 Bossie awards (Best of Open
Source).
As far as I can see we are the only open source project that won two
awards!
In the desktop applications category we received an award for the
OpenOffice application:
Hi,
On 12-09-19, at 10:29 , Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
-1
This procedure lacks transparency and accountability. It is incompatible
with how project governance is accomplished.
My recommendation is that those who have some reason to require anonymity
with regard to
On 12-09-19, at 12:09 , Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
How would you deal with opacity here as to how these names were
suggested? These are individual's stated preferences. Nothing more,
nothing less. Unless we require that everyone give a complete,
detailed justification for every
Hi,
On 19.09.2012 17:01, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi,
On 19.09.2012 08:44, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 19.09.2012 04:50, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Hi again;
I tried something in revision 1387438: basically I preserved some
configuration changes from the previous patchset.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts lo...@apache.org wrote:
On 12-09-19, at 12:09 , Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
How would you deal with opacity here as to how these names were
suggested? These are individual's stated preferences. Nothing more,
nothing less. Unless
Hi Jürgen,
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 01:13:23PM +0200, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
But more important is the question how we can move forward with the
already planned improvements of this feature (see the wiki pages).
I guess in the usual way: someone sits down, and writes code ;)
Especially the
On 09/19/2012 10:38 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
On 12-09-19, at 12:09 , Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
How would you deal with opacity here as to how these names were
suggested? These are individual's stated preferences. Nothing
more, nothing less. Unless we require that everyone
I have been provided patches necessary to apply the following CWSes to
AOO trunk:
ause131
ause130
writerfilter10
gnumake4
sd2gbuild
As I understand it this is mostly gbuild stuff that we did not want to
apply to 3.4.x as it might destabilize the build.
This was provided to me
Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2012 um 21:26 schrieb Kay Schenk:
On 09/19/2012 10:38 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
On 12-09-19, at 12:09 , Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
How would you deal with opacity here as to how these names were
suggested? These are individual's stated
2012/9/19 Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org
+1
There is absolutely nothing wrong with a list process for individuals
nominating 10 persons for the PPMC. Furthermore, let's have just one
procedure in place at a time. When this one is concluded, there will be
occasion to reflect and
Hi at all
I have a bit a crazy Idea. I plane a Tour across same Countrys of
Europe, only with my floorball sick, my bicycle and my computer. The
main goal is to go from floorball club to floorball club and make a
training together. The traveling I will do all with my bicycle. The
focus is clarly
Here's my list. Limiting to 10 is indeed a challenge, there are about 5
other people that I would definitely have nominated...
Ariel Constenla-Haile (arielch)
Drew Jensen (atjensen)
Kay Schenk (kschenk)
Jürgen Schmidt (jsc)
Marcus Lange (marcus)
Pedro Giffuni (pfg)
Regina Henschel (regina)
Hi,
Ji Yan schrieb:
I believe default status is CONFIRMED or not is not Regina's concern.
Yes. It is about the fact, that people who are not simple users but
involved here in the project produce a lot of duplicate or invalid issues.
To
reduce DUPLICATED defect, it require reporter search
I don't object to this process. But lets be clear, PMC membership is
*not* a popularity contest, it's a recognition of merit. So the number
of nominations is irrelevant, more nominations just means that the
individual has been seen by more people. Sometimes merit stuff is not
visible to many, e.g.
R,
On 12-09-19, at 16:06 , Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote:
Hi at all
I have a bit a crazy Idea. I plane a Tour across same Countrys of
Europe, only with my floorball sick, my bicycle and my computer. The
main goal is to go from floorball club to floorball club and make a
training
On 09/19/2012 08:34 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
Hi Regina,
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
i am pretty sure that i did not set
Hi,
On 12-09-19, at 22:05 , Yong Lin Ma mayo...@apache.org wrote:
Louis,
You are on the list. So to Ian. You may understand the process. There
will be far more ten
on the final PMC roster. This is a chance to give others credits,
especially those not been mentioned on any lists yet.
As
On 12-09-19, at 17:05 , Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
I don't object to this process. But lets be clear, PMC membership is
*not* a popularity contest, it's a recognition of merit. So the number
of nominations is irrelevant, more nominations just means that the
individual has
On 19.09.2012 20:34, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 02:24:11PM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
Hi Regina,
Your own new issue should be UNCONFIRMED. Someone else should confirm
your issue, if possible on a different operating system.
i am pretty sure that i did not set
On 9/20/2012 11:13 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
Hi,
On 12-09-19, at 22:05 , Yong Lin Ma mayo...@apache.org wrote:
Louis,
You are on the list. So to Ian. You may understand the process. There
will be far more ten
on the final PMC roster. This is a chance to give others credits,
especially
68 matches
Mail list logo
