Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: proposing Bug 118057 [filter] word 2003 XML (wordml) filters broken as release blocker
2012/6/25 Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org --- Dom 24/6/12, Lin Yuan yuanlin@gmail.com ha scritto: Da: Lin Yuan yuanlin@gmail.com Oggetto: Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: proposing Bug 118057 [filter] word 2003 XML (wordml) filters broken as release blocker A: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, p...@apache.org Data: Domenica 24 giugno 2012, 22:18 2012/6/25 Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org Ugh ... --- Dom 24/6/12, De Bin Lei debin@gmail.com ha scritto: Da: De Bin Lei debin@gmail.com Oggetto: Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: proposing Bug 118057 [filter] word 2003 XML (wordml) filters broken as release blocker A: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Data: Domenica 24 giugno 2012, 20:14 2012/6/20 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com On 6/20/12 10:14 AM, debin lei wrote: 2012/6/20 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com On 6/20/12 8:21 AM, debin lei wrote: +1 from my view. I have checked the fix. It has a very high benefit to risk ratio it could be good for AOO 3.4.1. fix available and reviewed, so it looks fine for me to include it for 3.4.1. Debin, Will you take care of the fix for 3.4.1 on the AOO34 branch ones you have the commit rights ;-) Ok, I will take care of the fix for 3.4.1, when I have the right. perfect, please add the revision of the branch in the issue when you have fixed it. It helps to track it. DONE. The code have checked in 3.4.1 and revision is 1353370. I see the issue appears RESOLVED - FIXED. Was the issue fixed in trunk? In general all fixes should go to trunk first. So the code changes in 3.4.1 branch will not be merged to main trunk automaticly after 3.4.1 released? Not automatically: someone has to do it and if the bug is labelled RESOLVED - FIXED it's likely that someone will forget to do it. That's one of the reasons it's preferable to commit the patches to trunk first. Another reason is that using svn merge will keep track of the revisions that have been merged. Thank your reminder and explanation. I checked the fix in trunk now, the rev is 1353389. Cheers, Pedro. -- Best regards Lei De Bin
Re: [REQUEST][VCLAuto]Create two new modules under SRC_ROOT to place vclauto code.
2012/6/25 De Bin Lei debin@gmail.com: I am volunteered to review the code and help to commit. Zhe, pls update the patch for the issue 119998 based your new requirement. Thank you. Done! Pls review it. 2012/6/25 Zhe Liu aliu...@gmail.com Hi all, Since VCLAuto code is ready, I request to create two new modules under SRC_ROOT to place the code. testcommon: It collects reusable code for testing, e.g. utilities, UNO API helpers and VCLAuto API. Not include any test case. testoo: It stores GUI test cases for OpenOffice. After the code committed in SVN, users can use the following commands to start testing after building AOO. source LinuxX86Env.Set.sh cd testoo ant I created one issue to track it. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119998 Vclauto guide http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto If nobody have objection to it, I ask for some committer to help me to commit the code. In addition, I plan to refactor testing code step by step in future after vclauto is ready. The target is to unify the existing testing code, reduce the modules and make code clearer. I wrote a wiki to explain it. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_Refactor If you find something wrong or have any objection, pls reply me. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com -- Best regards Lei De Bin -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
[QE]About bug 119337 is reproduced in AOO3.4.1 snapshot build
Hi, For bug 119337[1], it's marked as AOO3.4.1 blocker flag. I can reproduce it on Mac 10.7 version using AOO 3.4.1- 1351960. Anyone can tell me if the bug has been fixed in this build? [1]https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119337
Re: [QE]About bug 119337 is reproduced in AOO3.4.1 snapshot build
Hi, Xue Fei The fix is in trunk rev. 1344156. But I can't find the fix in 3.4.1, so you can reproduce it. 2012/6/25 Xue Fei Duan duanx...@gmail.com Hi, For bug 119337[1], it's marked as AOO3.4.1 blocker flag. I can reproduce it on Mac 10.7 version using AOO 3.4.1- 1351960. Anyone can tell me if the bug has been fixed in this build? [1]https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119337 -- Best regards Lei De Bin
Re: [QE]About bug 119337 is reproduced in AOO3.4.1 snapshot build
It's release blocker defect for AOO 3.4.1, so should some one merge ALG's fix from trunk to branch stream. 2012/6/25 Xue Fei Duan duanx...@gmail.com Hi, For bug 119337[1], it's marked as AOO3.4.1 blocker flag. I can reproduce it on Mac 10.7 version using AOO 3.4.1- 1351960. Anyone can tell me if the bug has been fixed in this build? [1]https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119337 -- Thanks Best Regards, Yan Ji
Re: [VCLAuto] How to run under windows?
As written in Wiki,the result will be saved in testoo/../testspace/output,but now in the folder only has logs folder and screen folder,no HTML/XML file. On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:33 AM, Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.huwrote: Hi, I tried to follow the wiki description: http://wiki.services.** openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclautohttp://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto I successfully installed eclispse, created project, run build. No success with running test under windows 7. Please add more detailed version of running process, to wiki page. I can Use VCL explorer, and see results in eclipse. How can I save the results to text file? Thanks, Zoltan
Re: [VCLAuto] How to run under windows?
2012/6/24 Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.hu: Hi, I tried to follow the wiki description: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto I successfully installed eclispse, created project, run build. No success with running test under windows 7. Please add more detailed version of running process, to wiki page. I has updated the wiki. Removed some confusing content. Added some picture to demonstrate the detail. If it still not works, pls show me the screenshot of the problem. I can Use VCL explorer, and see results in eclipse. How can I save the results to text file? Currently, It's not able to output the result. I can add it later. Thanks, Zoltan -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [VCLAuto] How to run under windows?
Thanks~ On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Zhe Liu aliu...@gmail.com wrote: 2012/6/24 Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.hu: Hi, I tried to follow the wiki description: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto I successfully installed eclispse, created project, run build. No success with running test under windows 7. Please add more detailed version of running process, to wiki page. I has updated the wiki. Removed some confusing content. Added some picture to demonstrate the detail. If it still not works, pls show me the screenshot of the problem. I can Use VCL explorer, and see results in eclipse. How can I save the results to text file? Currently, It's not able to output the result. I can add it later. Thanks, Zoltan -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [VCLAuto] How to run under windows?
That report is generated only when you run testing with ANT. As you use Eclipse GUI to start testing, JUnit view will shows the results. 2012/6/25 Du Jing bjduj...@gmail.com: As written in Wiki,the result will be saved in testoo/../testspace/output,but now in the folder only has logs folder and screen folder,no HTML/XML file. On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:33 AM, Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.huwrote: Hi, I tried to follow the wiki description: http://wiki.services.** openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclautohttp://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto I successfully installed eclispse, created project, run build. No success with running test under windows 7. Please add more detailed version of running process, to wiki page. I can Use VCL explorer, and see results in eclipse. How can I save the results to text file? Thanks, Zoltan -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [Call-for-Review] Issue 119922:[From Symphony]Graphic in header and footer can not be displayed correctly.
I will take care of this issue.. On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:30 PM, jane kang kangjane2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have fixed issue *119922.* Detail info of issue pls refer to https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119922. Patch infor pls refer to https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=78224. Pls review it. Thanks. -- Best Regards,Jianhong Cheng
Re: [BUILDBOT] build breakers
On 22.06.2012 11:37, Andre Fischer wrote: there are build breakers on all three platforms - Windows7 [...] could be caused by missing DLLs when the compiler is called to detect its version. In that case cl does not print anything. I have seen something similar when I tried to use the 2010 dev studio. I made the configure step a bit more verbose and now it shows that the problem is cl.exe: error while loading shared libraries: mspdb100.dll. This might be solved by following the advise given in http://stackoverflow.com/a/2992862 to run path\to\VC\bin\vcvars32.bat before calling the compiler. Herbert
Re: [REQUEST][VCLAuto]Create two new modules under SRC_ROOT to place vclauto code.
Hi Zhe Liu, we already have four test related modules under main/ (test, testautomation, testgraphical, testtools). Would one of these be a good place to add two sub-directories for the new testing code? -Andre On 25.06.2012 07:32, Zhe Liu wrote: Hi all, Since VCLAuto code is ready, I request to create two new modules under SRC_ROOT to place the code. testcommon: It collects reusable code for testing, e.g. utilities, UNO API helpers and VCLAuto API. Not include any test case. testoo: It stores GUI test cases for OpenOffice. After the code committed in SVN, users can use the following commands to start testing after building AOO. source LinuxX86Env.Set.sh cd testoo ant I created one issue to track it. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119998 Vclauto guide http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto If nobody have objection to it, I ask for some committer to help me to commit the code. In addition, I plan to refactor testing code step by step in future after vclauto is ready. The target is to unify the existing testing code, reduce the modules and make code clearer. I wrote a wiki to explain it. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_Refactor If you find something wrong or have any objection, pls reply me.
Re: [REQUEST][VCLAuto]Create two new modules under SRC_ROOT to place vclauto code.
2012/6/25 Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de: Hi Zhe Liu, we already have four test related modules under main/ (test, testautomation, testgraphical, testtools). Would one of these be a good place to add two sub-directories for the new testing code? Are you concerned about too many modules? The new 2 modules are top level modules. qadevoo and testoo depend on testcommon. qadevoo-testcommon testoo - testcommon If qadevoo-test/testcommon test/testoo -test/testcommon I don't know if it works according to the current build system. In addition, I don't want to overwrite the existing code. They are totally different. The 4 modules is maintained by nobody and can be removed in future, I said it in http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_Refactor -Andre On 25.06.2012 07:32, Zhe Liu wrote: Hi all, Since VCLAuto code is ready, I request to create two new modules under SRC_ROOT to place the code. testcommon: It collects reusable code for testing, e.g. utilities, UNO API helpers and VCLAuto API. Not include any test case. testoo: It stores GUI test cases for OpenOffice. After the code committed in SVN, users can use the following commands to start testing after building AOO. source LinuxX86Env.Set.sh cd testoo ant I created one issue to track it. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119998 Vclauto guide http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto If nobody have objection to it, I ask for some committer to help me to commit the code. In addition, I plan to refactor testing code step by step in future after vclauto is ready. The target is to unify the existing testing code, reduce the modules and make code clearer. I wrote a wiki to explain it. http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_Refactor If you find something wrong or have any objection, pls reply me. -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
[Call-for-Review][Calc] Bug 120076[From Symphony]2+ and 2 will be filter out at the same time
Hi, I have fixed issue *120076.* Detail info of issue pls refer to https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120076 Pls review it. Thanks. -- * mailto: *aoo.zhaos...@gmail.com https://google.com/profiles https://google.com/profiles
Re: [VCLAuto] How to run under windows?
2012.06.25. 8:40 keltezéssel, Zhe Liu írta: 2012/6/24 Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.hu: Hi, I tried to follow the wiki description: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto I successfully installed eclispse, created project, run build. No success with running test under windows 7. Please add more detailed version of running process, to wiki page. I has updated the wiki. Removed some confusing content. Added some picture to demonstrate the detail. If it still not works, pls show me the screenshot of the problem. I cleared eclipse workspace, when I import your new code from thw bugreport: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119998 The testoo not created, see screenshot: http://www.flickr.com/photos/48546468@N00/7438663856/in/photostream/lightbox/ Zoltan I can Use VCL explorer, and see results in eclipse. How can I save the results to text file? Currently, It's not able to output the result. I can add it later. Thanks, Zoltan
Re: [QE]About bug 119337 is reproduced in AOO3.4.1 snapshot build
Hi, On 25.06.2012 08:33, Ji Yan wrote: It's release blocker defect for AOO 3.4.1, so should some one merge ALG's fix from trunk to branch stream. Yes, the fix should be merged into branch AOO34 from my point of view. Best regards, Oliver. 2012/6/25 Xue Fei Duanduanx...@gmail.com Hi, For bug 119337[1], it's marked as AOO3.4.1 blocker flag. I can reproduce it on Mac 10.7 version using AOO 3.4.1- 1351960. Anyone can tell me if the bug has been fixed in this build? [1]https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119337
Re: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)
Hi, All: This issue was solved, now call for the reviewers. In general, this is a setting confusion issue. In current saving process, both SID_ENCRYPTIONDATA and SID_PASSWORD are working for setting password on a document. Refer to the SfxObjectShell::ExecFile_Impl() in file SRC/sfx2/source/doc/objserv.cxx:line 595-599 please. And, as what we imagine, after doing the file dialog executing with deselecting the check box of Save with password, the result parameter set, which is to customize saving process, wont record said 2 SID inside anymore, for indicating that the following saving process will not concern about the password stuff anymore. But when performing the exact preparation SaveAs process in SfxobjectShell::PreDoSaveAs_impl(), only the the default SID_PASSWORD was cleared, but SID_ENCRYPTIONDATA was not. The issue happens. For solving it, we just simply add the item SID_ENCRYPTIONDATA clearing in SfxobjectShell::PreDoSaveAs_impl(), similar as the SID_PASSWORD. 2012/6/19 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com On 6/18/12 1:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119366 This is a regression introduced in OOo 3.4 beta but not detected in AOO 3.4 tested. Once a password is set it cannot be removed. Two users have reported it. -Rob can we agree on subject line like [RELEASE][3.4.1]: that makes it easier to track all release relevant things +1 for this issue Juergen
Re: [REQUEST][VCLAuto]Create two new modules under SRC_ROOT to place vclauto code.
On 25.06.2012 10:00, Zhe Liu wrote:
2012/6/25 Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de:
Hi Zhe Liu,
we already have four test related modules under main/ (test, testautomation,
testgraphical, testtools).
Would one of these be a good place to add two sub-directories for the new
testing code?
Are you concerned about too many modules?
Yes.
The new 2 modules are top level modules. qadevoo and testoo depend
on testcommon.
qadevoo-testcommon
testoo - testcommon
If
qadevoo-test/testcommon
test/testoo -test/testcommon
I don't know if it works according to the current build system. In
addition, I don't want to overwrite the existing code. They are
totally different. The 4 modules is maintained by nobody and can be
removed in future, I said it in
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_Refactor
I see. The goal is to remove the modules test, testautomation,
testgraphical, testtools? Then it is OK to ignore them for now.
But then my question is: why not one new module and place testcommon and
testoo as subdirectories into it?
Besides, has the naming scheme (test{common/oo}) anything to do with the
now obsolete distinction between oo and so (the Sun only code parts)?
-Andre
Re: [VCLAuto] How to run under windows?
Oops! I forgot to change project name (testscript-testoo, I think testscript is too confusing). It doesn't matter. According to your screenshot, there is no problem. At next step, you need download junit.jar, put it into testscript/output/lib/junit.jar, and then refresh project. PS, I uploaded the new code. Corrected the project name. You can try the new one. 2012/6/25 Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.hu: 2012.06.25. 8:40 keltezéssel, Zhe Liu írta: 2012/6/24 Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.hu: Hi, I tried to follow the wiki description: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto I successfully installed eclispse, created project, run build. No success with running test under windows 7. Please add more detailed version of running process, to wiki page. I has updated the wiki. Removed some confusing content. Added some picture to demonstrate the detail. If it still not works, pls show me the screenshot of the problem. I cleared eclipse workspace, when I import your new code from thw bugreport: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119998 The testoo not created, see screenshot: http://www.flickr.com/photos/48546468@N00/7438663856/in/photostream/lightbox/ Zoltan I can Use VCL explorer, and see results in eclipse. How can I save the results to text file? Currently, It's not able to output the result. I can add it later. Thanks, Zoltan -- Best Regards From aliu...@gmail.com
[Call-for-Review] Bug 119948 [Windows 8 certification]Windows App Certification Kit - Test for Section 5 Apps must support a clean, reversible installation is failed.
Please review the patch for 119948, for the win 8 certification check. Issue link: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119948 Thanks.
Re: [REQUEST][VCLAuto]Create two new modules under SRC_ROOT to place vclauto code.
2012/6/25 Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de:
On 25.06.2012 10:00, Zhe Liu wrote:
2012/6/25 Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de:
Hi Zhe Liu,
we already have four test related modules under main/ (test,
testautomation,
testgraphical, testtools).
Would one of these be a good place to add two sub-directories for the new
testing code?
Are you concerned about too many modules?
Yes.
The new 2 modules are top level modules. qadevoo and testoo depend
on testcommon.
qadevoo-testcommon
testoo - testcommon
If
qadevoo-test/testcommon
test/testoo -test/testcommon
I don't know if it works according to the current build system. In
addition, I don't want to overwrite the existing code. They are
totally different. The 4 modules is maintained by nobody and can be
removed in future, I said it in
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_Refactor
I see. The goal is to remove the modules test, testautomation,
testgraphical, testtools? Then it is OK to ignore them for now.
But then my question is: why not one new module and place testcommon and
testoo as subdirectories into it?
Do you mean the code structure like the following?
test/testcommon
test/testoo
Jürgen suggested the same code layout. Actually I also prefer to it. I
have one question. test/testoo depends on test/testcommon.
cd test/testoo
build
Is testcommon built automatically? If yes, it's ok.
Besides, has the naming scheme (test{common/oo}) anything to do with the now
obsolete distinction between oo and so (the Sun only code parts)?
No! Do you have better name?
-Andre
--
Best Regards
From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [Call-for-Review] Issue 119922:[From Symphony]Graphic in header and footer can not be displayed correctly.
Hi Jane, If the graphic within the header/footer is replaced with frame or OLE,how about the result of the code fix? They have also the new attributes of Follow text flow..thanks. On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:56 PM, chengjh chen...@apache.org wrote: I will take care of this issue.. On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:30 PM, jane kang kangjane2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have fixed issue *119922.* Detail info of issue pls refer to https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119922. Patch infor pls refer to https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=78224. Pls review it. Thanks. -- Best Regards,Jianhong Cheng -- Best Regards,Jianhong Cheng
Re: [REQUEST][VCLAuto]Create two new modules under SRC_ROOT to place vclauto code.
On 25.06.2012 10:46, Zhe Liu wrote:
2012/6/25 Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de:
On 25.06.2012 10:00, Zhe Liu wrote:
2012/6/25 Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de:
Hi Zhe Liu,
we already have four test related modules under main/ (test,
testautomation,
testgraphical, testtools).
Would one of these be a good place to add two sub-directories for the new
testing code?
Are you concerned about too many modules?
Yes.
The new 2 modules are top level modules. qadevoo and testoo depend
on testcommon.
qadevoo-testcommon
testoo - testcommon
If
qadevoo-test/testcommon
test/testoo -test/testcommon
I don't know if it works according to the current build system. In
addition, I don't want to overwrite the existing code. They are
totally different. The 4 modules is maintained by nobody and can be
removed in future, I said it in
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_Refactor
I see. The goal is to remove the modules test, testautomation,
testgraphical, testtools? Then it is OK to ignore them for now.
But then my question is: why not one new module and place testcommon and
testoo as subdirectories into it?
Do you mean the code structure like the following?
test/testcommon
test/testoo
Jürgen suggested the same code layout. Actually I also prefer to it. I
have one question. test/testoo depends on test/testcommon.
cd test/testoo
build
Is testcommon built automatically? If yes, it's ok.
We have main/test/prj/build.lst for that. There is one line for each
directory that is to be build, together with dependencies on other
modules (in the first line) and on other directories in the same module
(on each line after the '-')
You would probably add two lines similar to these:
te test\source\testcommon nmake - all te_testcommon NULL
te test\source\testoo nmake - all te_testoo te_testcommon NULL
Which state that te_testoo depends on te_testcommon.
Then build the module with
cd main/test
build
(please note that you build in main/test/, not in main/test/testoo or
main/test/testcommon)
-Andre
Besides, has the naming scheme (test{common/oo}) anything to do with the now
obsolete distinction between oo and so (the Sun only code parts)?
No! Do you have better name?
-Andre
Re: [RELEASE] [3.4.1] Bug 119229 as blocker (download new versions of extensions)
On 6/24/12 4:30 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: This bug only affects the build infrastructure, but I propose it as a blocker for 3.4.1: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119229 The build process downloads some extensions, including dictionaries. Unless the build process starts completely clean (and it didn't as of the 3.4.0 builds), the build would reuse an older, cached, version of the extension even if a newer one was specified in extensions.lst; in other words, editing extensions.lst in order to specify to download version 1.1 of the Italian dictionary instead of version 1.0 would have unpredictable effects (one would get version 1.1 in a completely clean build, version 1.0 if he had already built OpenOffice before the change). The fix is obviously low-risk, so it probably makes sense to backport it to 3.4.1. See http://s.apache.org/xkuN for context. I can see a benefit for the source release but not very critical. But don't see the demand for our binary release because we can easy check it. If somebody volunteers to include, built and test it for 3.4.1 then I would support it. Any volunteer? Juergen
Re: [Call-for-Review] Some issue about memory leak in Aoo3.4
Here are the 4th batch for memory leak issue. Please help to review them. Thanks! https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120050 in reviewing https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120072 fixed https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120073 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120074 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120077 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120079 2012/6/21 Chao Huang chao.de...@gmail.com The thrid batch for memory leak issue has been delivered yet. Thanks for Aim's review. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120038 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120040 Propose to put these memory leak fixed into 3.4.1 2012/6/20 Chao Huang chao.de...@gmail.com The second batch for memory leak issue has been delivered yet. Thanks for Herbert and JianFang's review. http://goog_371113529 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120019 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120021 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120028 2012/6/15 Chao Huang chao.de...@gmail.com hi, all I'm Huang Chao from China. My interesting areas are Mac porting, performance(startup, loading, saving, etc), stability, build env. At recent stage, I will focus on memory leak issue in Aoo3.4. Here are the fixed for memory leak defects I opened. Please confirm them and review them. I will continue to work on this area. Thanks! https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119991 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119992 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119996 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119997 Please note that the patches for bug119996 and bug119997 are on the same source file. -- Best regards, Chao Huang -- Best regards, Chao Huang -- Best regards, Chao Huang -- Best regards, Chao Huang
Re: [HELP REQUIRED]: edit reference version on the website
On 6/22/12 4:45 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi Jürgen, My memory was not correct the string to change is in templates/api/ssi.mdtext. I've made this change: @@ -3,5 +3,5 @@ footer: /footer.html topnav: /topnav.html leftnav: /api/leftnav.html -legacy: Content for OpenOffice.org version 3.3. +legacy: Content for Apache OpenOffice version 3.4. home:home thanks for changing the version string. But I can't see the whole string anymore. Juergen You may need to make a trivial change to trigger the rebuild of the api content. Regards, Dave On Jun 20, 2012, at 5:10 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: Look in api/brand.mdtext I'm on board a flight home and will help later. We can totally discuss the CSS. What don't you like? Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone On Jun 20, 2012, at 4:04 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I need some help. I have updated the generated reference documentation on api.openoffice.org. where I have not changed the related css files. Ok I have checked in the files but they are not yet published. On top of the page is a string Content for OpenOffice.org version 3.3.. I haven't found the string and would like to know where I can find and edit it for now. I don't really like the current layout anymore and would like to rework the whole page in the future. But that is a different topic ;-) Thanks Juergen
Re: [VCLAuto] How to run under windows?
2012.06.25. 10:29 keltezéssel, Zhe Liu írta: Oops! I forgot to change project name (testscript-testoo, I think testscript is too confusing). It doesn't matter. According to your screenshot, there is no problem. At next step, you need download junit.jar, put it into testscript/output/lib/junit.jar, and then refresh project. PS, I uploaded the new code. Corrected the project name. You can try the new one. Thanks, Now I can run test cases, but only with java 1.7 versions, under Windows 7. On wiki page you created screenshot, with java 1.6 settings, on preferences. When I start with 1.6.30 the test terminated: java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: testcase/SayHelloToOO : Unsupported major.minor version 51.0 at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method) at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClassCond(ClassLoader.java:631) at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:615) at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:141) at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:283) at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$000(URLClassLoader.java:58) at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:197) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:190) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:306) at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:301) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:247) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.loadClass(RemoteTestRunner.java:693) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.loadClasses(RemoteTestRunner.java:429) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:452) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:683) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:390) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:197) Zoltan 2012/6/25 Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.hu: 2012.06.25. 8:40 keltezéssel, Zhe Liu írta: 2012/6/24 Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.hu: Hi, I tried to follow the wiki description: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/vclauto I successfully installed eclispse, created project, run build. No success with running test under windows 7. Please add more detailed version of running process, to wiki page. I has updated the wiki. Removed some confusing content. Added some picture to demonstrate the detail. If it still not works, pls show me the screenshot of the problem. I cleared eclipse workspace, when I import your new code from thw bugreport: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119998 The testoo not created, see screenshot: http://www.flickr.com/photos/48546468@N00/7438663856/in/photostream/lightbox/ Zoltan I can Use VCL explorer, and see results in eclipse. How can I save the results to text file? Currently, It's not able to output the result. I can add it later. Thanks, Zoltan
Re: [QE]About bug 119337 is reproduced in AOO3.4.1 snapshot build
On 6/25/12 10:19 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 25.06.2012 08:33, Ji Yan wrote: It's release blocker defect for AOO 3.4.1, so should some one merge ALG's fix from trunk to branch stream. Yes, the fix should be merged into branch AOO34 from my point of view. indeed the fix was proposed for 3.4.1 but is not yet integrated. In my role as release manager I expect that the developers who take responsibility for issues will take care of the integration. Juergen Best regards, Oliver. 2012/6/25 Xue Fei Duanduanx...@gmail.com Hi, For bug 119337[1], it's marked as AOO3.4.1 blocker flag. I can reproduce it on Mac 10.7 version using AOO 3.4.1- 1351960. Anyone can tell me if the bug has been fixed in this build? [1]https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119337
Re: [Call-for-Review] Issue 119922:[From Symphony]Graphic in header and footer can not be displayed correctly.
Hi Jian hong, This issue wouldn't happen on frame or OLE in header/footer, since Follow text flow property is unchecked for these two objects when open an odt previous version in Ooo latest version.Thanks. On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:55 PM, chengjh chen...@apache.org wrote: Hi Jane, If the graphic within the header/footer is replaced with frame or OLE,how about the result of the code fix? They have also the new attributes of Follow text flow..thanks. On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:56 PM, chengjh chen...@apache.org wrote: I will take care of this issue.. On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:30 PM, jane kang kangjane2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have fixed issue *119922.* Detail info of issue pls refer to https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119922. Patch infor pls refer to https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=78224. Pls review it. Thanks. -- Best Regards,Jianhong Cheng -- Best Regards,Jianhong Cheng
Re: Question about text clipping mechanism in word processor
Hi, On 22.06.2012 18:18, Fan Zheng wrote: Hi, Oliver: In some degree, I changed my mind following your answer that, we should not change the definition of SvxLineSpacingItem. So based on the discussion we already have, we can do some summary. Now we know, Under the following situations: a. Value of above-paragraph-spacing greater than 0; b. The type of line-spacing is Exactly; c. The value of line-spacing is less than the font height; MS Word will consider the above-paragraph-spacing as the additional line-spacing for the first line. Also, MS Word doing funny stuff commonly because the in-consistent process mechanism, such as the background height and flying object positing stuff. In a further step, we considered that AOO has fidelity issues on representing such kind of MS Word document with the properties settings we talked about, and we want to fix it. So far so good. But what should be the range of the fix? In my opinion, we should consider following candidates: a. Preventing the text presentation clipping in first line in above condition, as ZJ already done perfectly; b. Consistency behavior of paint refresh and cursor selection; The hard point of this one is that, when refreshing a line portion painting (including the selection range stuff), the paint range is clipped already to fit the size of line portion. We may need some kind of breaking method on working with big line spacing. Such method may need to change the VisArea of a SwTxtFrm; c. Following the in-consistent process mechanism that MS Word has; I really do not want it, but without it, the fidelity issues still there. d. Making the documents loaded from ODF files also work like this; So for me, ZuoJun's work maybe acceptable, but it is only a very beginning of big works. I agree to ZhengFan's analysis. Now, we need to discuss how we address these issues. My view one this is the following (propsal for discussion): - Let us separate the stuff regarding the character painting and the object positioning stuff in two issue. 119476 for the character painting, new issue for the object positioning stuff. - Character painting stuff: -- I am in favor of a solution which does not change our intrinsic text formatting and line portion creation algorithm. Thus, to solve the repaint and selection problem we can store additional information - the additional space taken by the character painting - at the SwTxtFrm instance in order to access it during painting and selection actions. The additional space taken for the character painting is already part of the frame area (member SwTxtFrm::aFrm), but not part of the frame printing area (member SwTxtFrm::aPrt). What do other think about it? Best regards, Oliver.
Re: [CODE]: update code signing for Windows
On 6/22/12 4:34 PM, Rob Weir wrote: On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com wrote: On 6/22/12 2:34 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 6/22/12 1:47 PM, O.Felka wrote: Hello Jürgen, Am 22.06.2012 13:03, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: Hi, I analyzed and played with code signing on Windows using a self signed test certificate. Thanks to Andre and his Perl skills I was able to fix a strange build problem with a too long command line triggered from a makefile to perl. Anyway this is solved now. I have now signed a full install set and would like to ask if somebody is interested to test it and give me feedback. I've made some quick tests under XP and Win7. Starting the zipped file for unpacking gives a an unknown distributor in the UAC dialog. I assume that is normal because the self signed certificate can't be verified but I have to collect more info ... I double checked on my machine where the certificate is already known and I get as verified publisher Apache OpenOffice (Dev Build) Is there a way that testers can import the same certificate, so the signature verification works like it would with a real cert? yes I think so, it should be possible to import the cert in a local cert store. I can provide the *.cer file on demand. Please drop me an email. Juergen The same when I start the the setup.exe. The properties of the zipped download file, the msi file and the setup.exe shoa Apache OpenOffice (DevBuild) as 'Signaturgeberinformation'. that is expected Installing the Office and looking at the 'control panel - Add remove and software' shows OpenOffice.org as distributor. mmh, I am not sure where this information comes from. Again I have collect more info... but in the control panel I still get as publisher OpenOffice.org mmh... Could that be a vendor resource string associated with the EXE or DLL header PE header? -Rob Juergen But thanks for the feedback Juergen I fear that this is not what you've wanted. Groetjes, Olaf You can find a signed download file under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/signing_test/Apache_OpenOffice_incubating_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe NOICE: this is a build based on AOO34 branch without the updated version numbers. It's no dev build, please be careful if you test it. I have to check the whole process and probably have to improve some things to make it final. The last important step is triggered manual by now. I use a Personal Information Exchange file (*.pfx) of my self signed certificate with a passcode that is specified during the build process. This seems to be a good approach to handle a certificate in this scenario and during our build process. I will keep you informed... Juergen
Re: [CODE]: update code signing for Windows
On 6/22/12 7:13 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: +1 Installing a small .exe is even better. Hello World is always a good choice. The .exe and the installer both must be signed, though not necessarily at the same time. I am not sure, signing an .exe is no rocket science and the signtool of MS is well documented. I am more interested in a working workflow with a valid signed office setup binary (downloadable .exe) as outcome. Juergen -Original Message- From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 10:06 To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [CODE]: update code signing for Windows [ ... ] Just a suggestion: since you are testing the signing process here, the actual content is irrelevant. So you could make a much smaller file that just installs a text file (or something like that). [ ... ]
Re: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)
Hi, On 25.06.2012 10:20, Fan Zheng wrote: Hi, All: This issue was solved, now call for the reviewers. In general, this is a setting confusion issue. In current saving process, both SID_ENCRYPTIONDATA and SID_PASSWORD are working for setting password on a document. Refer to the SfxObjectShell::ExecFile_Impl() in file SRC/sfx2/source/doc/objserv.cxx:line 595-599 please. And, as what we imagine, after doing the file dialog executing with deselecting the check box of Save with password, the result parameter set, which is to customize saving process, wont record said 2 SID inside anymore, for indicating that the following saving process will not concern about the password stuff anymore. But when performing the exact preparation SaveAs process in SfxobjectShell::PreDoSaveAs_impl(), only the the default SID_PASSWORD was cleared, but SID_ENCRYPTIONDATA was not. The issue happens. For solving it, we just simply add the item SID_ENCRYPTIONDATA clearing in SfxobjectShell::PreDoSaveAs_impl(), similar as the SID_PASSWORD. I have reviewed the patch. Please see my comments in the issue [1] and [2] [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119366#c9 [2] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119366#c11 Best regards, Oliver.
Re: [QE]About bug 119337 is reproduced in AOO3.4.1 snapshot build
Hi, On 25.06.2012 11:45, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 6/25/12 10:19 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 25.06.2012 08:33, Ji Yan wrote: It's release blocker defect for AOO 3.4.1, so should some one merge ALG's fix from trunk to branch stream. Yes, the fix should be merged into branch AOO34 from my point of view. indeed the fix was proposed for 3.4.1 but is not yet integrated. In my role as release manager I expect that the developers who take responsibility for issues will take care of the integration. Thanks for pointing out, I somehow lost this one from my radar. Merged and comitted to AOO34 as r1353458. Juergen Best regards, Oliver. 2012/6/25 Xue Fei Duanduanx...@gmail.com Hi, For bug 119337[1], it's marked as AOO3.4.1 blocker flag. I can reproduce it on Mac 10.7 version using AOO 3.4.1- 1351960. Anyone can tell me if the bug has been fixed in this build? [1]https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119337 Sincerely, Armin -- ALG
Re: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)
o, i miss the situation you mentioned. OK, i will keep on working with this issue. thanks a lot！ 在 2012-6-25 晚上7:11，Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com写道： Hi, On 25.06.2012 10:20, Fan Zheng wrote: Hi, All: This issue was solved, now call for the reviewers. In general, this is a setting confusion issue. In current saving process, both SID_ENCRYPTIONDATA and SID_PASSWORD are working for setting password on a document. Refer to the SfxObjectShell::ExecFile_Impl(**) in file SRC/sfx2/source/doc/objserv.**cxx:line 595-599 please. And, as what we imagine, after doing the file dialog executing with deselecting the check box of Save with password, the result parameter set, which is to customize saving process, wont record said 2 SID inside anymore, for indicating that the following saving process will not concern about the password stuff anymore. But when performing the exact preparation SaveAs process in SfxobjectShell::PreDoSaveAs_**impl(), only the the default SID_PASSWORD was cleared, but SID_ENCRYPTIONDATA was not. The issue happens. For solving it, we just simply add the item SID_ENCRYPTIONDATA clearing in SfxobjectShell::PreDoSaveAs_**impl(), similar as the SID_PASSWORD. I have reviewed the patch. Please see my comments in the issue [1] and [2] [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=119366#c9https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119366#c9 [2] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=119366#c11https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119366#c11 Best regards, Oliver.
Re: Can Apache OpenOffice be used for commercial basis without distribution?
Dear Rob, Thanks for your answer. Actually I'd like to know the plan or product of Apache OpenOffice for Mobile(Android,Tizen, and open-source based OS). Could you let me know the plan or product in Apache OpenOffice? Thanks, 2012/6/24 Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 10:39 PM, tiffany mobileofficehq mobileoffic...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Apache OpenOffice, Always thank for your effort in Apache OpenOffice. I'd like to use Apache OpenOffice for commercial product in Mobile Application. But I hope sell my office sutie for Mobile without distribution of source code. Apache OpenOffice is open source software. The main license is the Apache License 2.0. More information on the license is here: http://www.apache.org/foundation/license-faq.htmlQuestion #2 on that page addresses your question. Donation or Join in communinity is okay for me. Please let me know how to do it. It might help to talk a little more about what you want to accomplish, from a technical perspective. Apache OpenOffice is built today in the project on Windows 32-bit, MacOS, Linux 32 and 64-bit. And there is porting work to BSD and Solaris. But not mobile platforms yet. (Unless we consider Windows 8 now to be a mobile platform). Did you have a specific mobile platform in mind? Regards, -Rob BR, MOHQ
Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: proposing Bug 118057 [filter] word 2003 XML (wordml) filters broken as release blocker
On 6/25/12 8:04 AM, De Bin Lei wrote: 2012/6/25 Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org --- Dom 24/6/12, Lin Yuan yuanlin@gmail.com ha scritto: Da: Lin Yuan yuanlin@gmail.com Oggetto: Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: proposing Bug 118057 [filter] word 2003 XML (wordml) filters broken as release blocker A: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org, p...@apache.org Data: Domenica 24 giugno 2012, 22:18 2012/6/25 Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org Ugh ... --- Dom 24/6/12, De Bin Lei debin@gmail.com ha scritto: Da: De Bin Lei debin@gmail.com Oggetto: Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: proposing Bug 118057 [filter] word 2003 XML (wordml) filters broken as release blocker A: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org Data: Domenica 24 giugno 2012, 20:14 2012/6/20 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com On 6/20/12 10:14 AM, debin lei wrote: 2012/6/20 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com On 6/20/12 8:21 AM, debin lei wrote: +1 from my view. I have checked the fix. It has a very high benefit to risk ratio it could be good for AOO 3.4.1. fix available and reviewed, so it looks fine for me to include it for 3.4.1. Debin, Will you take care of the fix for 3.4.1 on the AOO34 branch ones you have the commit rights ;-) Ok, I will take care of the fix for 3.4.1, when I have the right. perfect, please add the revision of the branch in the issue when you have fixed it. It helps to track it. DONE. The code have checked in 3.4.1 and revision is 1353370. I see the issue appears RESOLVED - FIXED. Was the issue fixed in trunk? In general all fixes should go to trunk first. So the code changes in 3.4.1 branch will not be merged to main trunk automaticly after 3.4.1 released? Not automatically: someone has to do it and if the bug is labelled RESOLVED - FIXED it's likely that someone will forget to do it. That's one of the reasons it's preferable to commit the patches to trunk first. Another reason is that using svn merge will keep track of the revisions that have been merged. Thank your reminder and explanation. I checked the fix in trunk now, the rev is 1353389. thanks, I think the point Pedro was raising here is that we have to be careful and have to ensure that fixes are going in both code bases, the AOO34 branch as base for 3.4.1 and trunk for 3.5. And that we fix an issue in trunk and merge the fix with svn merge into the branch or vice versa. My initial idea was to fix all 3.4.1 issues on the branch and merge the whole branch in trunk afterwards. But even this approach doesn't work for everything. Think about changes to adapt the version number from 3.4 to 3.4.1 or 3.4 to 3.5 I would like to suggest that we simply add the revision numbers in the issue description. That will help us to easy analyze if the fix is in the branch and trunk. Most fixes are probably fixed on trunk first and merged after some discussion on the branch. But do we need a fix direction here? I think no because it really depends on the issue. Keep in mind that we have some general tasks to do for each release that are not necessary on trunk. We should use svn merge to integrate a fix from one code base into another one. Juergen
Re: Propose for 3.4.1: Can't remove password from file (119366)
Hi On 25.06.2012 13:32, Fan Zheng wrote: o, i miss the situation you mentioned. OK, i will keep on working with this issue. thanks a lot！ No problem. I have assigned this issue to you. I am looking forward to see your solution. Best regards, Oliver. 在 2012-6-25 晚上7:11，Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com写道： Hi, On 25.06.2012 10:20, Fan Zheng wrote: Hi, All: This issue was solved, now call for the reviewers. In general, this is a setting confusion issue. In current saving process, both SID_ENCRYPTIONDATA and SID_PASSWORD are working for setting password on a document. Refer to the SfxObjectShell::ExecFile_Impl(**) in file SRC/sfx2/source/doc/objserv.**cxx:line 595-599 please. And, as what we imagine, after doing the file dialog executing with deselecting the check box of Save with password, the result parameter set, which is to customize saving process, wont record said 2 SID inside anymore, for indicating that the following saving process will not concern about the password stuff anymore. But when performing the exact preparation SaveAs process in SfxobjectShell::PreDoSaveAs_**impl(), only the the default SID_PASSWORD was cleared, but SID_ENCRYPTIONDATA was not. The issue happens. For solving it, we just simply add the item SID_ENCRYPTIONDATA clearing in SfxobjectShell::PreDoSaveAs_**impl(), similar as the SID_PASSWORD. I have reviewed the patch. Please see my comments in the issue [1] and [2] [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=119366#c9https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119366#c9 [2] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=119366#c11https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119366#c11 Best regards, Oliver.
Re: Propose Khmer language in download page
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Khoem Sokhem khoemsok...@khmeros.info wrote: Hello All, I am attempting to download Open Office Incubator 3.4 from http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html, but I could not find Khmer language. I have asked in the ooo-users mailing list and I got recommended to ask in this list. Currently, I am still working on translating Open Office into Khmer. Could you please provide Khmer language pack in the official download page of Open Office? HI Khoem, You mentioned on the ooo-users list that you had sent a Khmer translation in April. Where did you send that? To this list? As a Bugzilla attachment? Generally, we include any complete translations in our releases. We have a 3.4.1 release planned for the end of July. So if the Khmer translation is ready, this would be great timing. -Rob Thanks Regards, Sokhem
Re: Propose Khmer language in download page
On 6/25/12 5:39 AM, Khoem Sokhem wrote: Hello All, I am attempting to download Open Office Incubator 3.4 from http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html, but I could not find Khmer language. I have asked in the ooo-users mailing list and I got recommended to ask in this list. Currently, I am still working on translating Open Office into Khmer. perfect, do you need any help? For example do you need the po files for offline translation? Could you please provide Khmer language pack in the official download page of Open Office? we currently provide only full install set for the languages that we releases or plan to release for 3.4.1. But we are open to support more languages when we notice and see a working translation community for a language. That means ideally not only 1 person but a group of people who can actually review the translation ... We can include a Khmer language pack for the upcoming dev snapshots for 3.5 to help you verifying the current state of the translation. Juergen
Re: Propose Khmer language in download page
On 6/25/12 1:44 PM, Rob Weir wrote: On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Khoem Sokhem khoemsok...@khmeros.info wrote: Hello All, I am attempting to download Open Office Incubator 3.4 from http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html, but I could not find Khmer language. I have asked in the ooo-users mailing list and I got recommended to ask in this list. Currently, I am still working on translating Open Office into Khmer. Could you please provide Khmer language pack in the official download page of Open Office? HI Khoem, You mentioned on the ooo-users list that you had sent a Khmer translation in April. Where did you send that? To this list? As a Bugzilla attachment? Generally, we include any complete translations in our releases. We have a 3.4.1 release planned for the end of July. So if the Khmer translation is ready, this would be great timing. maybe I have overseen it and it would be indeed helpful to create bugzilla issue. See for example https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119333 Juergen -Rob Thanks Regards, Sokhem
Re: Propose Khmer language in download page
Rob Weir wrote: On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Khoem Sokhem wrote: Could you please provide Khmer language pack in the official download page of Open Office? You mentioned on the ooo-users list that you had sent a Khmer translation in April. Where did you send that? To this list? As a Bugzilla attachment? Khoem was speaking about April 2011 (OpenOffice.org 3.4-beta); so it's this issue, from the pre-Apache era: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=117933 But some strings will have to be updated for OpenOffice 3.4. Regards, Andrea.
[DISCUSS] Participate in another GSoC like programme
Some may recall that I kept promising the arrival of students from an EU Commission project on a GSoC style pilot in formal education. This was a very long way from successful but there was zero impact on our projects since we asked PMCs to mark GSoC level projects as mentor. This enabled us to provide a list of suitable projects for the students without PMCs needing to do additional work. I've now been approached by another EU Commission project proposal team that wants to do something similar, but this time with students doing the work as part of their assessed coursework (i.e. they have a strong motivation for doing the work). Another, big difference this time is that one of the partner organisations has ASF committers (2 of) and there are three open source savvy commercial organisations on the bid (DISCLOSURE: one of them is my little consultancy company). Given the way these proposals get written, there is a very tight deadline on this (2 days). I got a first draft of the proposal this weekend and I am now satisfied that what is being asked of associate partners is acceptable (i.e we won't be responsible for students education). However, there isn't enough time for a proper discuss then vote process. I'm therefore running these in parallel. If anyone has *any* serious concerns about rushing like this please vote -1 and I'll go back to plan B which is simply to highlight my engagement with the ASF as an individual. Note that I will not be voting given the obvious conflict of interest. However, if the funding is approved I will be taking full responsibility for all aspects of administration within the ASF (and other associate partners). Note I have also notified board@ and will cancel the vote if the board raises a concern. In terms of deliverables from the project think of GSoC where the students get credits towards their degree rather than cash (Semester of Code rather than Summer of Code). If successful the project will provide a manual for other universities wishing to offer such real world experience to their students. Our PMCs will choose to offer mentors based on the quality of student applications - if there are no students that look interesting we have no further commitments. Here is the text of the letter of intent I propose to sign if the ComDev PMC approves: start copied text --- The Apache Software Foundation (ASF) provides support for the Apache community of open-source software projects. That community provide software products for the public good. The ASF is made up of over 100 top level projects that cover a wide range of technologies. Chances are that if anyone is looking for a rewarding experience in Open Source, you are going to find it here. The Apache projects are defined by collaborative consensus based processes, an open, pragmatic software license and a desire to create high quality software that leads the way in its field. We are recognized as one of the most influential software organisations of our time and are often seen as the gold standard of open source software development. We have participated in the Google Summer of Code programme since its inception and continue to mentor around 40 students per year. We have had great success with this programme with some of our earliest students still working with us. The OSKA project has the potential to extend the benefits of the Google Summer of Code programme into formal education whilst still allowing our communities to work alongside students in real world open source projects. As a voluntary organisation we cannot guarantee that students will succeed, but we can provide an environment in which any sufficiently able student will find our projects supportive and educational. We look forward to extending our Google Summer of Code efforts to support the OSKA trial. -- Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Re: [REQUEST][VCLAuto]Create two new modules under SRC_ROOT to place vclauto code.
2012/6/25 Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de:
On 25.06.2012 10:46, Zhe Liu wrote:
2012/6/25 Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de:
On 25.06.2012 10:00, Zhe Liu wrote:
2012/6/25 Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de:
Hi Zhe Liu,
we already have four test related modules under main/ (test,
testautomation,
testgraphical, testtools).
Would one of these be a good place to add two sub-directories for the
new
testing code?
Are you concerned about too many modules?
Yes.
The new 2 modules are top level modules. qadevoo and testoo depend
on testcommon.
qadevoo-testcommon
testoo - testcommon
If
qadevoo-test/testcommon
test/testoo -test/testcommon
I don't know if it works according to the current build system. In
addition, I don't want to overwrite the existing code. They are
totally different. The 4 modules is maintained by nobody and can be
removed in future, I said it in
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_Refactor
I see. The goal is to remove the modules test, testautomation,
testgraphical, testtools? Then it is OK to ignore them for now.
But then my question is: why not one new module and place testcommon and
testoo as subdirectories into it?
Do you mean the code structure like the following?
test/testcommon
test/testoo
Jürgen suggested the same code layout. Actually I also prefer to it. I
have one question. test/testoo depends on test/testcommon.
cd test/testoo
build
Is testcommon built automatically? If yes, it's ok.
We have main/test/prj/build.lst for that. There is one line for each
directory that is to be build, together with dependencies on other modules
(in the first line) and on other directories in the same module (on each
line after the '-')
You would probably add two lines similar to these:
te test\source\testcommon nmake - all te_testcommon NULL
te test\source\testoo nmake - all te_testoo te_testcommon NULL
Which state that te_testoo depends on te_testcommon.
Then build the module with
cd main/test
build
(please note that you build in main/test/, not in main/test/testoo or
main/test/testcommon)
-Andre
OK. I accept. Thanks for your advice, Andre.
De Bin, what's your opinion?
Besides, has the naming scheme (test{common/oo}) anything to do with the
now
obsolete distinction between oo and so (the Sun only code parts)?
No! Do you have better name?
-Andre
--
Best Regards
From aliu...@gmail.com
Re: [DISCUSS] Participate in another GSoC like programme
My apologies, I sent this to the wrong list (damned autocomplete) please ignore (or pick it up on d...@community.apache.org if you are interested) On 25 June 2012 13:15, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: Some may recall that I kept promising the arrival of students from an EU Commission project on a GSoC style pilot in formal education. This was a very long way from successful but there was zero impact on our projects since we asked PMCs to mark GSoC level projects as mentor. This enabled us to provide a list of suitable projects for the students without PMCs needing to do additional work. I've now been approached by another EU Commission project proposal team that wants to do something similar, but this time with students doing the work as part of their assessed coursework (i.e. they have a strong motivation for doing the work). Another, big difference this time is that one of the partner organisations has ASF committers (2 of) and there are three open source savvy commercial organisations on the bid (DISCLOSURE: one of them is my little consultancy company). Given the way these proposals get written, there is a very tight deadline on this (2 days). I got a first draft of the proposal this weekend and I am now satisfied that what is being asked of associate partners is acceptable (i.e we won't be responsible for students education). However, there isn't enough time for a proper discuss then vote process. I'm therefore running these in parallel. If anyone has *any* serious concerns about rushing like this please vote -1 and I'll go back to plan B which is simply to highlight my engagement with the ASF as an individual. Note that I will not be voting given the obvious conflict of interest. However, if the funding is approved I will be taking full responsibility for all aspects of administration within the ASF (and other associate partners). Note I have also notified board@ and will cancel the vote if the board raises a concern. In terms of deliverables from the project think of GSoC where the students get credits towards their degree rather than cash (Semester of Code rather than Summer of Code). If successful the project will provide a manual for other universities wishing to offer such real world experience to their students. Our PMCs will choose to offer mentors based on the quality of student applications - if there are no students that look interesting we have no further commitments. Here is the text of the letter of intent I propose to sign if the ComDev PMC approves: start copied text --- The Apache Software Foundation (ASF) provides support for the Apache community of open-source software projects. That community provide software products for the public good. The ASF is made up of over 100 top level projects that cover a wide range of technologies. Chances are that if anyone is looking for a rewarding experience in Open Source, you are going to find it here. The Apache projects are defined by collaborative consensus based processes, an open, pragmatic software license and a desire to create high quality software that leads the way in its field. We are recognized as one of the most influential software organisations of our time and are often seen as the gold standard of open source software development. We have participated in the Google Summer of Code programme since its inception and continue to mentor around 40 students per year. We have had great success with this programme with some of our earliest students still working with us. The OSKA project has the potential to extend the benefits of the Google Summer of Code programme into formal education whilst still allowing our communities to work alongside students in real world open source projects. As a voluntary organisation we cannot guarantee that students will succeed, but we can provide an environment in which any sufficiently able student will find our projects supportive and educational. We look forward to extending our Google Summer of Code efforts to support the OSKA trial. -- Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com -- Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
[VOTE] Participate in another GSoC like project
This is an unusual vote in that it is running in parallel to the DISCUSS thread as a result of external time restraints. It is also unusual in that I am not likely to be able to leave it running for a full 72 hours for the same reason (minimum 36 hours, will push as late as I can). For this reason please feel free to vote -1 if you feel this is insufficient time to properly evaluate (I've even provided this as a vote option) Please see the parallel DISCUSS thread before voting (in particular note the DISCLOSURE there which means I have a conflict of interest in this vote and thus will not be voting). [ ] +1 Agree to sign a non-binding letter of intent to participate in a GSoC like pilot project as described in this votes DISCUSS thread [ ] -1 Do not participate in the OSKA pilot project due to limited time for appropriate consensus building [ ] -1 Do not sign because ... -- Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Re: [VOTE] Participate in another GSoC like project
Again - sorry - wrong list - not sure what is going on this mornig (see d...@community.apache.org if you want to vote) On 25 June 2012 13:30, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: This is an unusual vote in that it is running in parallel to the DISCUSS thread as a result of external time restraints. It is also unusual in that I am not likely to be able to leave it running for a full 72 hours for the same reason (minimum 36 hours, will push as late as I can). For this reason please feel free to vote -1 if you feel this is insufficient time to properly evaluate (I've even provided this as a vote option) Please see the parallel DISCUSS thread before voting (in particular note the DISCLOSURE there which means I have a conflict of interest in this vote and thus will not be voting). [ ] +1 Agree to sign a non-binding letter of intent to participate in a GSoC like pilot project as described in this votes DISCUSS thread [ ] -1 Do not participate in the OSKA pilot project due to limited time for appropriate consensus building [ ] -1 Do not sign because ... -- Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com -- Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
Re: [REQUEST][VCLAuto]Create two new modules under SRC_ROOT to place vclauto code.
2012/6/25 Zhe Liu aliu...@gmail.com
2012/6/25 Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de:
On 25.06.2012 10:46, Zhe Liu wrote:
2012/6/25 Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de:
On 25.06.2012 10:00, Zhe Liu wrote:
2012/6/25 Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de:
Hi Zhe Liu,
we already have four test related modules under main/ (test,
testautomation,
testgraphical, testtools).
Would one of these be a good place to add two sub-directories for the
new
testing code?
Are you concerned about too many modules?
Yes.
The new 2 modules are top level modules. qadevoo and testoo depend
on testcommon.
qadevoo-testcommon
testoo - testcommon
If
qadevoo-test/testcommon
test/testoo -test/testcommon
I don't know if it works according to the current build system. In
addition, I don't want to overwrite the existing code. They are
totally different. The 4 modules is maintained by nobody and can be
removed in future, I said it in
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Test_Refactor
I see. The goal is to remove the modules test, testautomation,
testgraphical, testtools? Then it is OK to ignore them for now.
But then my question is: why not one new module and place testcommon
and
testoo as subdirectories into it?
Do you mean the code structure like the following?
test/testcommon
test/testoo
Jürgen suggested the same code layout. Actually I also prefer to it. I
have one question. test/testoo depends on test/testcommon.
cd test/testoo
build
Is testcommon built automatically? If yes, it's ok.
We have main/test/prj/build.lst for that. There is one line for each
directory that is to be build, together with dependencies on other
modules
(in the first line) and on other directories in the same module (on each
line after the '-')
You would probably add two lines similar to these:
te test\source\testcommon nmake - all te_testcommon NULL
te test\source\testoo nmake - all te_testoo te_testcommon NULL
Which state that te_testoo depends on te_testcommon.
Then build the module with
cd main/test
build
(please note that you build in main/test/, not in main/test/testoo or
main/test/testcommon)
-Andre
OK. I accept. Thanks for your advice, Andre.
De Bin, what's your opinion?
Both are ok for me.
Besides, has the naming scheme (test{common/oo}) anything to do with
the
now
obsolete distinction between oo and so (the Sun only code parts)?
No! Do you have better name?
-Andre
--
Best Regards
From aliu...@gmail.com
--
Best regards
Lei De Bin
Re: [DISCUSS] Participate in another GSoC like programme
Just a caveat...There was an issue with the now-attic-ed project Bluesky, which, as I understand it, was operated with teacher committers and student contributors. The whole IP/licensing issue looked ugly toward the end because none of the students had signed ICLAs and hadn't contributed the code directly with license acknowledgement checkboxes selected. GSoC is a volunteer thing. Schoolwork typically isn't. A school isn't an employer of students, and therefore I assume can't do a CCLA that would cover students. Can students be compelled through schoolwork assignments to do work that would then be treated as contributions? Or would this be like an internship or a dedicated class, such that signing up for it at all is contingent on signing an ICLA? Don On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: My apologies, I sent this to the wrong list (damned autocomplete) please ignore (or pick it up on d...@community.apache.org if you are interested) On 25 June 2012 13:15, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: Some may recall that I kept promising the arrival of students from an EU Commission project on a GSoC style pilot in formal education. This was a very long way from successful but there was zero impact on our projects since we asked PMCs to mark GSoC level projects as mentor. This enabled us to provide a list of suitable projects for the students without PMCs needing to do additional work. I've now been approached by another EU Commission project proposal team that wants to do something similar, but this time with students doing the work as part of their assessed coursework (i.e. they have a strong motivation for doing the work). Another, big difference this time is that one of the partner organisations has ASF committers (2 of) and there are three open source savvy commercial organisations on the bid (DISCLOSURE: one of them is my little consultancy company). Given the way these proposals get written, there is a very tight deadline on this (2 days). I got a first draft of the proposal this weekend and I am now satisfied that what is being asked of associate partners is acceptable (i.e we won't be responsible for students education). However, there isn't enough time for a proper discuss then vote process. I'm therefore running these in parallel. If anyone has *any* serious concerns about rushing like this please vote -1 and I'll go back to plan B which is simply to highlight my engagement with the ASF as an individual. Note that I will not be voting given the obvious conflict of interest. However, if the funding is approved I will be taking full responsibility for all aspects of administration within the ASF (and other associate partners). Note I have also notified board@ and will cancel the vote if the board raises a concern. In terms of deliverables from the project think of GSoC where the students get credits towards their degree rather than cash (Semester of Code rather than Summer of Code). If successful the project will provide a manual for other universities wishing to offer such real world experience to their students. Our PMCs will choose to offer mentors based on the quality of student applications - if there are no students that look interesting we have no further commitments. Here is the text of the letter of intent I propose to sign if the ComDev PMC approves: start copied text --- The Apache Software Foundation (ASF) provides support for the Apache community of open-source software projects. That community provide software products for the public good. The ASF is made up of over 100 top level projects that cover a wide range of technologies. Chances are that if anyone is looking for a rewarding experience in Open Source, you are going to find it here. The Apache projects are defined by collaborative consensus based processes, an open, pragmatic software license and a desire to create high quality software that leads the way in its field. We are recognized as one of the most influential software organisations of our time and are often seen as the gold standard of open source software development. We have participated in the Google Summer of Code programme since its inception and continue to mentor around 40 students per year. We have had great success with this programme with some of our earliest students still working with us. The OSKA project has the potential to extend the benefits of the Google Summer of Code programme into formal education whilst still allowing our communities to work alongside students in real world open source projects. As a voluntary organisation we cannot guarantee that students will succeed, but we can provide an environment in which any sufficiently able student will find our projects supportive and educational. We look forward to extending our Google Summer of Code efforts to support the OSKA trial. -- Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: proposing Bug 118057 [filter] word 2003 XML (wordml) filters broken as release blocker
--- Lun 25/6/12, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com ha scritto: ... Most fixes are probably fixed on trunk first and merged after some discussion on the branch. But do we need a fix direction here? I think no because it really depends on the issue. Keep in mind that we have some general tasks to do for each release that are not necessary on trunk. We should use svn merge to integrate a fix from one code base into another one. I am not a svn:mergeinfo expert but I recommend doing svn merge in one direction only. In trunk we want to keep record of the merges from the development branches (Armin has already done it) and in the stable branch (AOO34) we want to track only things from trunk. If we start merging from everywhere we will get a rather messy spaghetti structure but, worse than that, the mergeinfo in trunk will be unnecessarily big and will be inherited into all the branches. Just my $0.002, Pedro.
Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: proposing Bug 118057 [filter] word 2003 XML (wordml) filters broken as release blocker
Answering to myself, --- Lun 25/6/12, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org ha scritto: ... --- Lun 25/6/12, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com ha scritto: ... We should use svn merge to integrate a fix from one code base into another one. I am not a svn:mergeinfo expert but I recommend doing svn merge in one direction only. In trunk we want to keep record of the merges from the development branches (Armin has already done it) and in the stable branch (AOO34) we want to track only things from trunk. If we start merging from everywhere we will get a rather messy spaghetti structure but, worse than that, the mergeinfo in trunk will be unnecessarily big and will be inherited into all the branches. Actually ... This is not a big issue. Tracking merges from different branches is much better than not tracking at all. Pedro. Just my $0.002, Pedro.
Re: [VOTE] Participate in another GSoC like project
Hi. 2012/6/25 Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com: This is an unusual vote in that it is running in parallel to the DISCUSS thread as a result of external time restraints. It is also unusual in that I am not likely to be able to leave it running for a full 72 hours for the same reason (minimum 36 hours, will push as late as I can). For this reason please feel free to vote -1 if you feel this is insufficient time to properly evaluate (I've even provided this as a vote option) Please see the parallel DISCUSS thread before voting (in particular note the DISCLOSURE there which means I have a conflict of interest in this vote and thus will not be voting). [ ] +1 Agree to sign a non-binding letter of intent to participate in a GSoC like pilot project as described in this votes DISCUSS thread [ ] -1 Do not participate in the OSKA pilot project due to limited time for appropriate consensus building [ ] -1 Do not sign because ... +1 Albino
Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: Include only one en-US dictionary extension
On 19.06.2012 09:17, Andre Fischer wrote: On 19.06.2012 05:07, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Hi there, there have been some reports of users complaining that the Thesaurus does not work. [...] As this bug has its root in the dictionary extensions, the only thing we can do to fix it is just provide only one extension, in this case dict-en.oxt. Dropping the other english dictionaries is a good idea for other reasons, too. Issue 119272 (https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119272) describes the problem of all dictionaries using more than 160MB, most of this are the large thesaurus files. Including only one english dictionary would reduce this number considerably. Besides, it contains support for most variants of English anyway. I would like to go forward on this but am not sure that we reached consensus. Are there still concerns about this? If nobody complains in the next 72 hours then I will remove all English extensions except dict-en.oxt for both the standard English version and the British English version. See also issue 120033 (https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120033) for details. -Andre
Re: Question about text clipping mechanism in word processor
Hi, The idea sounds good to me. The task needs to accomplish piece by piece from my point of view. I'm look into text repaint process in word processor and trying to fix the character painting error in issue.119476 when inserting and deleting the text in first line of paragraph. Seems adding additional spacing before paragraph case to enlarge the repaint rectangle of paragraph line in SwTxtFrm::FormatLine(..) may be able to partially fix the problem. and the problem disturbs me is also how to store additional information :( 2012/6/25 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com Hi, On 22.06.2012 18:18, Fan Zheng wrote: Hi, Oliver: In some degree, I changed my mind following your answer that, we should not change the definition of SvxLineSpacingItem. So based on the discussion we already have, we can do some summary. Now we know, Under the following situations: a. Value of above-paragraph-spacing greater than 0; b. The type of line-spacing is Exactly; c. The value of line-spacing is less than the font height; MS Word will consider the above-paragraph-spacing as the additional line-spacing for the first line. Also, MS Word doing funny stuff commonly because the in-consistent process mechanism, such as the background height and flying object positing stuff. In a further step, we considered that AOO has fidelity issues on representing such kind of MS Word document with the properties settings we talked about, and we want to fix it. So far so good. But what should be the range of the fix? In my opinion, we should consider following candidates: a. Preventing the text presentation clipping in first line in above condition, as ZJ already done perfectly; b. Consistency behavior of paint refresh and cursor selection; The hard point of this one is that, when refreshing a line portion painting (including the selection range stuff), the paint range is clipped already to fit the size of line portion. We may need some kind of breaking method on working with big line spacing. Such method may need to change the VisArea of a SwTxtFrm; c. Following the in-consistent process mechanism that MS Word has; I really do not want it, but without it, the fidelity issues still there. d. Making the documents loaded from ODF files also work like this; So for me, ZuoJun's work maybe acceptable, but it is only a very beginning of big works. I agree to ZhengFan's analysis. Now, we need to discuss how we address these issues. My view one this is the following (propsal for discussion): - Let us separate the stuff regarding the character painting and the object positioning stuff in two issue. 119476 for the character painting, new issue for the object positioning stuff. - Character painting stuff: -- I am in favor of a solution which does not change our intrinsic text formatting and line portion creation algorithm. Thus, to solve the repaint and selection problem we can store additional information - the additional space taken by the character painting - at the SwTxtFrm instance in order to access it during painting and selection actions. The additional space taken for the character painting is already part of the frame area (member SwTxtFrm::aFrm), but not part of the frame printing area (member SwTxtFrm::aPrt). What do other think about it? Best regards, Oliver.
Re: [RELEASE][3.4.1]: Include only one en-US dictionary extension
On Jun 25, 2012, at 7:54 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: On 19.06.2012 09:17, Andre Fischer wrote: On 19.06.2012 05:07, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: Hi there, there have been some reports of users complaining that the Thesaurus does not work. [...] As this bug has its root in the dictionary extensions, the only thing we can do to fix it is just provide only one extension, in this case dict-en.oxt. Dropping the other english dictionaries is a good idea for other reasons, too. Issue 119272 (https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119272) describes the problem of all dictionaries using more than 160MB, most of this are the large thesaurus files. Including only one english dictionary would reduce this number considerably. Besides, it contains support for most variants of English anyway. I would like to go forward on this but am not sure that we reached consensus. Are there still concerns about this? If nobody complains in the next 72 hours then I will remove all English extensions except dict-en.oxt for both the standard English version and the British English version. See also issue 120033 (https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120033) for details. My concerns are answered. Users of the released versions will suffer no ill effects. Please include detail about this change in the release notes for version 3.4.1. Thanks Regards, Dave -Andre
Help please - working on an AOO34 CD
Howdy, Have been working on an AOO 3.4 CD image - suitable for boosters to use as swag, part of individual supports toolbox, etc. The work is down to the final stages now and I could use some help in the way of input with some of the details. THIS IS NOT FINISHED - but in wanted folks to see exactly what I have this morning so made use of the sf.net resources to do so. Two files added here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/lorepo/files/AOO34/ cd-aoo34-bin.iso and cd-aoo-34-src.iso (again these are NOT intended for distribution yet..) What's in them currently? cd-aoo34-bin.iso AOO 3.4 Binaries - Windows English(us) full install package - All Windows language packs released with 3.4 - Windows SDK Documents, all as PDF - Installation Guide - Getting Started Guide - Administration Guide - Basic Programmers Guide - Developers Guide HTML files - Index [home] (started as webstie page - done) - Files (started from website page - done) - Instructions (not close to done) - Conatct [support] (could be done maybe) - Release Notes [notes] (copy of webstie page, added one graphic - done) - License (not done) - java (copy of website page - done) - sys_reqs_aoo34 (copy of webstie page) - ooo.css and style.css from webstie, 1 changes in each file Print ready artwork for packaging - Thin / Tall DVD case cover - Cut/Fold CD envelope template - Pre-fab sleeve cover - disk label cd-aoo-34-src.iso All the files in the cd-aoo-34-bin.iso and the source files tar ball, along with changes to a couple of html files. --- So - there are things I see to do on each piece here still. I do not expect to add any other artifacts at this point. For today I want to finish up an the install help page(s). Right now though any general feedback on _any_ of it is welcomed. Thanks //drew
Re: Help please - working on an AOO34 CD
On Jun 25, 2012, at 8:34 AM, drew jensen wrote: Howdy, Have been working on an AOO 3.4 CD image - suitable for boosters to use as swag, part of individual supports toolbox, etc. The work is down to the final stages now and I could use some help in the way of input with some of the details. THIS IS NOT FINISHED - but in wanted folks to see exactly what I have this morning so made use of the sf.net resources to do so. Two files added here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/lorepo/files/AOO34/ cd-aoo34-bin.iso and cd-aoo-34-src.iso (again these are NOT intended for distribution yet..) What's in them currently? cd-aoo34-bin.iso AOO 3.4 Binaries - Windows English(us) full install package - All Windows language packs released with 3.4 - Windows SDK Documents, all as PDF - Installation Guide - Getting Started Guide - Administration Guide - Basic Programmers Guide - Developers Guide HTML files - Index [home] (started as webstie page - done) - Files (started from website page - done) - Instructions (not close to done) - Conatct [support] (could be done maybe) - Release Notes [notes] (copy of webstie page, added one graphic - done) - License (not done) - java (copy of website page - done) - sys_reqs_aoo34 (copy of webstie page) - ooo.css and style.css from webstie, 1 changes in each file Print ready artwork for packaging - Thin / Tall DVD case cover - Cut/Fold CD envelope template - Pre-fab sleeve cover - disk label cd-aoo-34-src.iso All the files in the cd-aoo-34-bin.iso and the source files tar ball, along with changes to a couple of html files. --- So - there are things I see to do on each piece here still. I do not expect to add any other artifacts at this point. For today I want to finish up an the install help page(s). Right now though any general feedback on _any_ of it is welcomed. EIther the naming should indicate that this is a Windows iso, or - IMO you ought to include MacOSX and Linux installers! Regards, Dave Thanks //drew
Re: Help please - working on an AOO34 CD
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 08:44 -0700, Dave Fisher wrote: On Jun 25, 2012, at 8:34 AM, drew jensen wrote: Howdy, Have been working on an AOO 3.4 CD image - suitable for boosters to use as swag, part of individual supports toolbox, etc. The work is down to the final stages now and I could use some help in the way of input with some of the details. THIS IS NOT FINISHED - but in wanted folks to see exactly what I have this morning so made use of the sf.net resources to do so. Two files added here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/lorepo/files/AOO34/ cd-aoo34-bin.iso and cd-aoo-34-src.iso (again these are NOT intended for distribution yet..) What's in them currently? cd-aoo34-bin.iso AOO 3.4 Binaries - Windows English(us) full install package - All Windows language packs released with 3.4 - Windows SDK Documents, all as PDF - Installation Guide - Getting Started Guide - Administration Guide - Basic Programmers Guide - Developers Guide HTML files - Index [home] (started as webstie page - done) - Files (started from website page - done) - Instructions (not close to done) - Conatct [support] (could be done maybe) - Release Notes [notes] (copy of webstie page, added one graphic - done) - License (not done) - java (copy of website page - done) - sys_reqs_aoo34 (copy of webstie page) - ooo.css and style.css from webstie, 1 changes in each file Print ready artwork for packaging - Thin / Tall DVD case cover - Cut/Fold CD envelope template - Pre-fab sleeve cover - disk label cd-aoo-34-src.iso All the files in the cd-aoo-34-bin.iso and the source files tar ball, along with changes to a couple of html files. --- So - there are things I see to do on each piece here still. I do not expect to add any other artifacts at this point. For today I want to finish up an the install help page(s). Right now though any general feedback on _any_ of it is welcomed. EIther the naming should indicate that this is a Windows iso, or - Howdy Dave, yes, your right - will fix that. IMO you ought to include MacOSX and Linux installers! I've been, in truth, hemming and hawing about actually doing this as it means a lengthy commitment once it's 'out in the wild' - so keeping the scope of the work product limited. Juergen, Ma and the gang will have the image obsolete in here in just a few weeks with 3.4.1 - for example. For the moment I would like to finish the windows only CD first. I have a MAC version in mind, and files mostly laid out, next. After all the details come together on this one it should be just a quick step to merge that to the MAC. Linux is interesting in that one could, and some do, construct it so that the media is also a proper, mountable, package repository. Anyway - it's a place to start from is all. Thanks //drew Regards, Dave Thanks //drew
Re: Help please - working on an AOO34 CD
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:34 AM, drew jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.com wrote: Howdy, Have been working on an AOO 3.4 CD image - suitable for boosters to use as swag, part of individual supports toolbox, etc. The work is down to the final stages now and I could use some help in the way of input with some of the details. THIS IS NOT FINISHED - but in wanted folks to see exactly what I have this morning so made use of the sf.net resources to do so. Two files added here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/lorepo/files/AOO34/ cd-aoo34-bin.iso and cd-aoo-34-src.iso (again these are NOT intended for distribution yet..) I just downloaded and burned the BIN image. Overall this is totally awesome, a truly righteous and outstanding accomplishment. But a few quick observations: 1) Is the audience for this end-users? Conference organizers? As it is now it is not clear where to start. I insert CD and just get the directory listing. This is on Windows 7. Maybe other OS's know to automatically load index.html from a CD? Or is there something else that would trigger this? 2) On index.html, you have under quick install, links with the text, I know how. Maybe just me, but I was looking for a parallel one saying I don't know how 3) Contact.html. Typos on 2nd header Questions regardig the Apache OpenOfice project 4) You are including all the language installs, but only art work in English. It it in your longer term plans to get translations added? -Rob What's in them currently? cd-aoo34-bin.iso AOO 3.4 Binaries - Windows English(us) full install package - All Windows language packs released with 3.4 - Windows SDK Documents, all as PDF - Installation Guide - Getting Started Guide - Administration Guide - Basic Programmers Guide - Developers Guide HTML files - Index [home] (started as webstie page - done) - Files (started from website page - done) - Instructions (not close to done) - Conatct [support] (could be done maybe) - Release Notes [notes] (copy of webstie page, added one graphic - done) - License (not done) - java (copy of website page - done) - sys_reqs_aoo34 (copy of webstie page) - ooo.css and style.css from webstie, 1 changes in each file Print ready artwork for packaging - Thin / Tall DVD case cover - Cut/Fold CD envelope template - Pre-fab sleeve cover - disk label cd-aoo-34-src.iso All the files in the cd-aoo-34-bin.iso and the source files tar ball, along with changes to a couple of html files. --- So - there are things I see to do on each piece here still. I do not expect to add any other artifacts at this point. For today I want to finish up an the install help page(s). Right now though any general feedback on _any_ of it is welcomed. Thanks //drew
Re: Help please - working on an AOO34 CD
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:34 AM, drew jensen drewjensen.in...@gmail.com wrote: Howdy, Have been working on an AOO 3.4 CD image - suitable for boosters to use as swag, part of individual supports toolbox, etc. The work is down to the final stages now and I could use some help in the way of input with some of the details. THIS IS NOT FINISHED - but in wanted folks to see exactly what I have this morning so made use of the sf.net resources to do so. Two files added here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/lorepo/files/AOO34/ cd-aoo34-bin.iso and cd-aoo-34-src.iso (again these are NOT intended for distribution yet..) I just downloaded and burned the BIN image. Overall this is totally awesome, a truly righteous and outstanding accomplishment. Sorry, just to be clear. I was praising Drew's work producing the image, not my CD burning. -Rob But a few quick observations: 1) Is the audience for this end-users? Conference organizers? As it is now it is not clear where to start. I insert CD and just get the directory listing. This is on Windows 7. Maybe other OS's know to automatically load index.html from a CD? Or is there something else that would trigger this? 2) On index.html, you have under quick install, links with the text, I know how. Maybe just me, but I was looking for a parallel one saying I don't know how 3) Contact.html. Typos on 2nd header Questions regardig the Apache OpenOfice project 4) You are including all the language installs, but only art work in English. It it in your longer term plans to get translations added? -Rob What's in them currently? cd-aoo34-bin.iso AOO 3.4 Binaries - Windows English(us) full install package - All Windows language packs released with 3.4 - Windows SDK Documents, all as PDF - Installation Guide - Getting Started Guide - Administration Guide - Basic Programmers Guide - Developers Guide HTML files - Index [home] (started as webstie page - done) - Files (started from website page - done) - Instructions (not close to done) - Conatct [support] (could be done maybe) - Release Notes [notes] (copy of webstie page, added one graphic - done) - License (not done) - java (copy of website page - done) - sys_reqs_aoo34 (copy of webstie page) - ooo.css and style.css from webstie, 1 changes in each file Print ready artwork for packaging - Thin / Tall DVD case cover - Cut/Fold CD envelope template - Pre-fab sleeve cover - disk label cd-aoo-34-src.iso All the files in the cd-aoo-34-bin.iso and the source files tar ball, along with changes to a couple of html files. --- So - there are things I see to do on each piece here still. I do not expect to add any other artifacts at this point. For today I want to finish up an the install help page(s). Right now though any general feedback on _any_ of it is welcomed. Thanks //drew
Language moduls
Dear Madame, dear Sir, I am working with OpenOffice since years. I use version 3.4 at the time. Every now and then I loose contact to the language modules for no obvious reason. They don't show up under linguistics then. That means that neither the thesaurus nor the spell check work. I have tried everything from repairing the program to deleting and reinstalling it. Sometimes that helped, but this time there is no success what so ever . I didn't find an answer to my problem in the OpenOffice forum. So could you please advise me what to do or where the problem lies. I use the German version and technically I am more or less an idiot. With kind regards Thomas Rothschild
Pootle projects
I understand that we have Pootle projects for in-product strings, as well as a separate project for help files. But I don't understand why we have 3 different flavors of each. For example: Apache OpenOffice 3.4.x Apache OpenOffice 4.x Apache OpenOffice (Incubating) Is one trunk and one for the 3.4.1 branch? But which is the trunk? And why the 3rd project? -Rob
Re: Language moduls
Hi, There is a problem with one of the dictionaries bundled with AOO. You have to disable or remove the New Zealand flavor in the extension manager (then restart AOO). See http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7t=54595 Hagar Le lun. 25 juin 2012 21:58:54 CEST, Thomas Rothschild thomas.rothsch...@ilw.uni-stuttgart.de a écrit : Dear Madame, dear Sir, I am working with OpenOffice since years. I use version 3.4 at the time. Every now and then I loose contact to the language modules for no obvious reason. They don't show up under linguistics then. That means that neither the thesaurus nor the spell check work. I have tried everything from repairing the program to deleting and reinstalling it. Sometimes that helped, but this time there is no success what so ever . I didn't find an answer to my problem in the OpenOffice forum. So could you please advise me what to do or where the problem lies. I use the German version and technically I am more or less an idiot. With kind regards Thomas Rothschild
Re: [Call-for-Review] Issue 119922:[From Symphony]Graphic in header and footer can not be displayed correctly.
Reviewed and Committed with Revision:1353791..Thanks for the patch. On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 5:57 PM, jane kang kangjane2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jian hong, This issue wouldn't happen on frame or OLE in header/footer, since Follow text flow property is unchecked for these two objects when open an odt previous version in Ooo latest version.Thanks. On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:55 PM, chengjh chen...@apache.org wrote: Hi Jane, If the graphic within the header/footer is replaced with frame or OLE,how about the result of the code fix? They have also the new attributes of Follow text flow..thanks. On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:56 PM, chengjh chen...@apache.org wrote: I will take care of this issue.. On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:30 PM, jane kang kangjane2...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have fixed issue *119922.* Detail info of issue pls refer to https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119922. Patch infor pls refer to https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=78224. Pls review it. Thanks. -- Best Regards,Jianhong Cheng -- Best Regards,Jianhong Cheng -- Best Regards,Jianhong Cheng
Re: Question about text clipping mechanism in word processor
Seeing my reply in following blue lines please: 2012/6/25 ZuoJun Chen zjchen...@gmail.com Hi, The idea sounds good to me. The task needs to accomplish piece by piece from my point of view. I'm look into text repaint process in word processor and trying to fix the character painting error in issue.119476 when inserting and deleting the text in first line of paragraph. Seems adding additional spacing before paragraph case to enlarge the repaint rectangle of paragraph line in SwTxtFrm::FormatLine(..) may be able to partially fix the problem. and the problem disturbs me is also how to store additional information :( 2012/6/25 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com Hi, On 22.06.2012 18:18, Fan Zheng wrote: Hi, Oliver: In some degree, I changed my mind following your answer that, we should not change the definition of SvxLineSpacingItem. So based on the discussion we already have, we can do some summary. Now we know, Under the following situations: a. Value of above-paragraph-spacing greater than 0; b. The type of line-spacing is Exactly; c. The value of line-spacing is less than the font height; MS Word will consider the above-paragraph-spacing as the additional line-spacing for the first line. Also, MS Word doing funny stuff commonly because the in-consistent process mechanism, such as the background height and flying object positing stuff. In a further step, we considered that AOO has fidelity issues on representing such kind of MS Word document with the properties settings we talked about, and we want to fix it. So far so good. But what should be the range of the fix? In my opinion, we should consider following candidates: a. Preventing the text presentation clipping in first line in above condition, as ZJ already done perfectly; b. Consistency behavior of paint refresh and cursor selection; The hard point of this one is that, when refreshing a line portion painting (including the selection range stuff), the paint range is clipped already to fit the size of line portion. We may need some kind of breaking method on working with big line spacing. Such method may need to change the VisArea of a SwTxtFrm; c. Following the in-consistent process mechanism that MS Word has; I really do not want it, but without it, the fidelity issues still there. d. Making the documents loaded from ODF files also work like this; So for me, ZuoJun's work maybe acceptable, but it is only a very beginning of big works. I agree to ZhengFan's analysis. Now, we need to discuss how we address these issues. My view one this is the following (propsal for discussion): - Let us separate the stuff regarding the character painting and the object positioning stuff in two issue. 119476 for the character painting, new issue for the object positioning stuff. - Character painting stuff: -- I am in favor of a solution which does not change our intrinsic text formatting and line portion creation algorithm. Thus, to solve the repaint and selection problem we can store additional information - the additional space taken by the character painting - at the SwTxtFrm instance in order to access it during painting and selection actions. The additional space taken for the character painting is already part of the frame area (member SwTxtFrm::aFrm), but not part of the frame printing area (member SwTxtFrm::aPrt). 1 Concern: Could such additional information to be available in ODF Standard? If not, whether it means that, the conversion from MS-Word Doc to ODT lead different representation result? What do other think about it? Best regards, Oliver.
Re: [HELP REQUIRED]: edit reference version on the website
On Jun 25, 2012, at 2:29 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 6/22/12 4:45 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi Jürgen, My memory was not correct the string to change is in templates/api/ssi.mdtext. I've made this change: @@ -3,5 +3,5 @@ footer: /footer.html topnav: /topnav.html leftnav: /api/leftnav.html -legacy: Content for OpenOffice.org version 3.3. +legacy: Content for Apache OpenOffice version 3.4. home:home thanks for changing the version string. But I can't see the whole string anymore. Should be all good. Let me know if you'd like to discuss a redesign. Regards, Dave Juergen You may need to make a trivial change to trigger the rebuild of the api content. Regards, Dave On Jun 20, 2012, at 5:10 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: Look in api/brand.mdtext I'm on board a flight home and will help later. We can totally discuss the CSS. What don't you like? Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone On Jun 20, 2012, at 4:04 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, I need some help. I have updated the generated reference documentation on api.openoffice.org. where I have not changed the related css files. Ok I have checked in the files but they are not yet published. On top of the page is a string Content for OpenOffice.org version 3.3.. I haven't found the string and would like to know where I can find and edit it for now. I don't really like the current layout anymore and would like to rework the whole page in the future. But that is a different topic ;-) Thanks Juergen
Re: References to Apache OpenOffice
Hi - On Jun 23, 2012, at 8:31 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: Hi Nick, I'm top posting because it is clear to me what is happening here: (1) The Title of the AOO blog is Apache OpenOffice (Incubating) (2) The Title of various blog entries includes the phrase Apache OpenOffice, but not the phrase Apache OpenOffice (incubating). I have the karma and will fix these blog entry titles except for the Japanese one, but I'm going to wait 24 hours. Wearing my IPMC and PPMC hats. I've changed blog entry titles. Sorry for our oversight (or lack). Thanks for yours. Regards, Dave Regards, Dave On Jun 23, 2012, at 12:03 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: @Nick, Ross offered to come to the AOOi PPMC to fix it. I'm not clear what the PPMC has to do with it. Specifically, @TheASF is not of AOOi PPMC origin. The question is, who is expected to do something about that and how is it to be communicated to them? Someone else is responsible for those tweets and their aggregation on the ASF home page. Also, you refer to a blog post by Rob Weir on his own site. It is true that Rob Weir is a member of the AOOi PPMC, but that blog site is not a product of the AOOi PPMC and its aggregation into Roller is no different than the aggregation of any Apache committer posts that a committer arranges to include in the feed picked-up by Roller. (I believe the PPMC did authorize that Get it Here image and link to be used by sites that wanted to promote the availability of the software. If there should have been greater formality before doing that, there are places to raise that specific problem.) My concern is how to determine what the infractions are that someone can do something about and also being clear who that someone is expected to be. The general claim just has us running around like headless chickens over on ooo-dev. - Dennis PS: I'm now in time-penalty and will check back anon. -Original Message- From: Nick Kew [mailto:n...@apache.org] Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2012 11:38 To: gene...@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: References to Apache OpenOffice On 23 Jun 2012, at 18:48, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Nick, the AOOi project does not write those tweets from @TheASF and they are not under AOOi control. Are these and blog text occurrences the ones that attracted your attention or are there others? If you follow the links to the referenced blog posts you will see that the full term is used in the blog title. E.g., https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/5_million_downloads_of_apache. So what appears on www.apache.org doesn't matter? Nor what appears on planet.apache.org, featuring the article that first struck me as using the name in a way I wouldn't expect when I read it in my feed reader: http://www.robweir.com/blog/2012/06/pache-openoffice-34-downloads.html Would it have been sufficient to add it in the title of the individual post, and in the first mention in the opening paragraph? I should think so, but that's just me! How many times do you require that the qualifier be used to satisfy the requirement for identifying incubation as the origin of a release, an announcement, etc? If the guidelines are unclear then maybe they need reviewing? I was just pointing out usage that seems at odds with my understanding of the incubator rules. If a blog gets aggregated, then readers will see what appears in their aggregator, as I did. That's without the context of the page title in your link! -- Nick Kew - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Re: Propose Khmer language in download page
On 25-Jun-12 7:01 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Rob Weir wrote: On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Khoem Sokhem wrote: Could you please provide Khmer language pack in the official download page of Open Office? You mentioned on the ooo-users list that you had sent a Khmer translation in April. Where did you send that? To this list? As a Bugzilla attachment? Khoem was speaking about April 2011 (OpenOffice.org 3.4-beta); so it's this issue, from the pre-Apache era: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=117933 But some strings will have to be updated for OpenOffice 3.4. That's correct for Khmer translations. And Could you please add Khmer in https://translate.apache.org/projects/OOo_34/? If Khmer language available in Pootle, If it is available soon in Pootle my team can start updating for the release of 3.4.1. Thanks, Sokhem Regards, Andrea.
[UX][Volunteers Needed] - Harvesting Social Data
Hello All, As mentioned in an earlier post, collectively, our social assets present a huge opportunity to engage the AOO user community, capture insight, feedback and thoughts on the current health of our products, and our future product direction. Harvesting data from our social media assets, forums and mailing lists is an extremely challenging task. With s much content in disparate sources, it is likely that many threads will fade into the archives. However, we can attempt to harvest any insight that is considered relevant and actionable - so that the valueable data is not lost. Also, some AOO contributors cannot access some social media sites. Capturing social data in the AOO UX wiki also ensures the relevant and actionable social data is open, accessible and visible to all. To be clear, I understand that such effort is not going to capture everything, nor is it ever complete. Rather, this is a chance to capture any notable insight that could help drive informed design and development decisions in the future. Some data is better than none. Also, some international AOO contributors cannot access some social media sites. Capturing social data in the AOO UX wiki also ensures the relevant and actionable social data is open, accessible and visible to all. I have created a number of pages within the AOO UX wiki [1] for harvesting and capturing social data. [1] http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/AOO_Social_Data I invite everyone to harvest insight from our social media and post to the wiki. If you see something relevant, that could be actionable, please harvest this information and post to the wiki. Feel free to tweak the document table format to suite the content. Such raw data can help feed the development of informed UX work products moving forward. For example, such data can help us define our user roles, validate key usage scenarios and capture actionable product recommendations. Tracing our design and development work products to real data ensures that we will make informed decisions driven by end user insight. Do not hesitate to contact me for more information on this ongoing research activity. Regards, Kevin
Re: [Call-for-Review] one fix for odt saving performance improvement
hi, Juergen thanks you for your interest in this topic and really appreciate your help. On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@googlemail.comwrote: On 6/21/12 10:20 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 6/21/12 7:06 AM, li zhang wrote: for more information, you can refer to the below link: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/ODT_saving_performance_improvement On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:00 PM, li zhang lizh@gmail.com wrote: hi, all I'm zhang li from China. My main focus is performance(loading, saving, asynchronous loading, etc). I have one fix need for review. It is about odt saving. Please check the below for details, thanks! https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120030 root cause: Do profiling on a sample file, SfxObjectShell::GenerateAndStoreThumbnail is to be found occypy too much time, and it will call SwFlyFrm::Paint several times, but it's unnecessary to paint thumbnail so many times when saving. solution: When thumbnail is generated and stored, in SwFlyFrm::Paint, current visible rectangle will be compared with fly frame rectangle, if the two rectangles don't intersect, SwFlyFrm::Paint will return, need no repaint. I will take care of this I had some problems with building on trunk in general. Nothing that depends on your patch but it takes more time to built and test the patch. Juergen
Re: [Call-for-Review] one fix for odt saving performance improvement
hi Pitonyak Thank you for your attention to this topic. I will test the sample file mentioned in your mail and update the result. On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.org wrote: On 06/21/2012 01:00 AM, li zhang wrote: hi, all I'm zhang li from China. My main focus is performance(loading, saving, asynchronous loading, etc). I have one fix need for review. It is about odt saving. Please check the below for details, thanks! https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=120030https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120030 root cause: Do profiling on a sample file, SfxObjectShell::**GenerateAndStoreThumbnail is to be found occypy too much time, and it will call SwFlyFrm::Paint several times, but it's unnecessary to paint thumbnail so many times when saving. solution: When thumbnail is generated and stored, in SwFlyFrm::Paint, current visible rectangle will be compared with fly frame rectangle, if the two rectangles don't intersect, SwFlyFrm::Paint will return, need no repaint. Excellent I hope this speeds up the save time on http://www.pitonyak.org/OOME_**3_0.odthttp://www.pitonyak.org/OOME_3_0.odt Document loads pretty fast, but saving is horrid! Do you have a link for more information related to how to profile OOo? -- Andrew Pitonyak My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/**AndrewMacro.odthttp://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php
[UX][DISCUSSION] - Survey tools
Hello All, I'd like to move forward with the user research survey design and deployment, but do not know which survey tool we will use to deploy the surveys moving forward. As I'm new to the project, I'm not familiar with the AOO survey tooling of choice. Is there an open source survey tool of choice? What has been used in the past. Thoughts? Recommendations? Regards, Kevin
