Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-29 Thread Andre Fischer
We are down to 277 files without or with a wrong license header. -Andre

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-28 Thread Andre Fischer
Tada! Today there are no files left in the rat output that are not in the SGA. But there are still 1403 files marked as "Unknown Licenses - or files without a license" -Andre

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-27 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: > The numbers of the day: > > A total of 1408files is marked as "Unknown Licenses - or files without a > license" > > Of these: > 1403 files in SGA > > 5 files not in SGA > > The 5 files not in SGA are: > > > reportbuilder/java/com/sun/**star/

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-27 Thread Andre Fischer
The numbers of the day: A total of 1408files is marked as "Unknown Licenses - or files without a license" Of these: 1403 files in SGA 5 files not in SGA The 5 files not in SGA are: reportbuilder/java/com/sun/star/report/pentaho/parser/style-mapping.txt reportbuilder/license/THIRDPARTYREADMEL

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-26 Thread Andre Fischer
The numbers of the day: A total of 1437 files is marked as "Unknown Licenses - or files without a license" Of these: 1413 files in SGA 24 files not in SGA The 24 files not in SGA are: mythes/mythes-1.2.0-makefile-mk.diff np_sdk/mozsrc/LEGAL np_sdk/mozsrc/jri.h np_sdk/mozsrc/jri_md.h np_sdk/m

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-23 Thread Andre Fischer
Here are the 26 files not in the SGA: libtextcat/data/new_fingerprints/fpdb.conf mythes/mythes-1.2.0-makefile-mk.diff np_sdk/mozsrc/LEGAL np_sdk/mozsrc/jri.h np_sdk/mozsrc/jri_md.h np_sdk/mozsrc/jritypes.h np_sdk/mozsrc/npapi.h np_sdk/mozsrc/npunix.c np_sdk/mozsrc/npupp.h np_sdk/mozsrc/npwin.cpp

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-23 Thread Andre Fischer
The new numbers are: 2188 files marked as "Unknown Licenses - or files without a license" Of these 2162 files are in the SGA, and 26 files are not in the SGA -Andre

Re: Rat scan vs SGA Files with BSD/MIT similar license

2012-03-22 Thread Armin Le Grand
Hi all, these are the files (25) which are not covered by the RAT output but have a BSD or MIT equal or similar license included. // GPL, but special entry there (see af's mail or in the files) : //# As a special exception t

Re: Rat scan vs SGA files which should be in SGA grant

2012-03-22 Thread Armin Le Grand
Hi all, these are the files (63) which are not covered by the RAT output but should be part of a third SGA from Oracle: connectivity\com\sun\star\sdbcx\comp\hsqldb\StorageNativeOutputStream.java mysqlc\source\mysqlc_connecti

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-22 Thread Andre Fischer
On 22.03.2012 10:12, Armin Le Grand wrote: >[...] // mixed file, (C) SUN/Oracle and Copyright (C) 2002 William Lachance // May be GPL prtially ?? writerperfect\source\wpdimp\wpft_genericfilter.cxx >[...] This file contains only generic code for registering a UNO service that can be found alm

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-22 Thread Andre Fischer
On 22.03.2012 10:12, Armin Le Grand wrote: [...] // No information, originally from http://odur.let.rug.nl/~vannoord/TextCat/, adapted by Jocelyn MERAND // delivered in libtextcat\prj\d.lst // used in instsetoo_native, lingucomponent, scp2 (DEFAULT_CONF_FILE_NAME) ?? libtextcat\data\new_fingerpr

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-22 Thread Andre Fischer
The rat scan still notes 4395 files in SGA and 100 not in SGA.

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-22 Thread Armin Le Grand
Hi all, Statusupdate for the 103 files still not in the SGA: Agenda: // : Comments as usual 1st column: OK Can be added to the rat excludes ?? Not cleared GR Should be added to the grant (SGA)

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-21 Thread Rob Weir
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: > >> * binary files such as .jpeg, .png, .odX that should have a header >> inside, but are more complex in terms of adding a header (more >> difficult than my current perl script) > > > Is a license header in image files really necessary?  Can

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-21 Thread Armin Le Grand
Hi all, Statusupdate for the 103 files still not in the SGA: Agenda: // : Comments as usual 1st column: OK Can be added to the rat excludes ?? Not cleared GR Should be added to the grant (SGA)

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-21 Thread Herbert Duerr
The only file that looks like a potential legal problem is acinclude.m4. It contains some OpenOffice specific macros (and thus can not be re-created on the fly) and contains [...] It contains the check whether getspnam_r used in sal/osl/unx/security requires five parameters. Since we are not in

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-21 Thread Andre Fischer
Update regarding the autoconf files in main/: If you are interested in a list of the files in main/ then please have a look at [1]. In main/ you will find the files acinclude.m4 aclocal.m4 config.guess config.sub install-sh which are used in the autoconf process. The fi

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-21 Thread Andre Fischer
Here is an update, 103 files still not in the SGA. I am currently looking at the files in the main/ directory in the hope to find a way to remove the autoconf files from the repository (acinclude.m4, config.guess, config.sub) And now the 103 files (all below main/): acinclude.m4 config.guess

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-21 Thread Armin Le Grand
On 20.03.2012 22:11, Andrew Rist wrote: I'll update the rat excludes with this info. (skipping over all of the ?? - adding all of the OKs) A. Thanks Andrew. Please also add ?? mysqlc\source\mysqlc_propertyids.hxx "No info, but should be same as mysqlc_propertyids.cxx" ?? mysqlc\source\mysqlc_

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-21 Thread Andre Fischer
On 20.03.2012 21:44, Andrew Rist wrote: On 3/20/2012 8:18 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: Hi all, I compared the output of the Rat scan (section "Unapproved Licenses:") with the SGA and here is the result: http://people.apache.org/~af/ratscan-sga.zip There are 4575 files in the Rat scan that have

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-20 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
hello; --- Mar 20/3/12, Dave Fisher ha scritto: ... > Hi, > > Just investigating and not acting: > > libtextcat/data/new_fingerprints/fpdb.conf > > This is based on this http://odur.let.rug.nl/~vannoord/TextCat/ > which is LGPL, not maintained.  We are in luck since > Apache Spamassassin has a

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-20 Thread Andrew Rist
On 3/20/2012 8:18 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: Hi all, I compared the output of the Rat scan (section "Unapproved Licenses:") with the SGA and here is the result: http://people.apache.org/~af/ratscan-sga.zip There are 4575 files in the Rat scan that have unapproved licenses and which need

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-20 Thread Andrew Rist
I'll update the rat excludes with this info. (skipping over all of the ?? - adding all of the OKs) A. On 3/20/2012 9:42 AM, Armin Le Grand wrote: On 20.03.2012 16:18, Andre Fischer wrote: Hi all, I compared the output of the Rat scan (section "Unapproved Licenses:") with the SGA and here is th

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Andrew; --- Mar 20/3/12, Andrew Rist ha scritto: ... > > > > hwpfilter/source/ksc5601.h is funny because it has FSF > > notice so Rat probably thought it was GPLd but it is > > MIT licensed. > I'll look - if it's ok I'll add to the excludes list. Trust me, it's OK .. Ollivier and I brought t

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-20 Thread Andrew Rist
On 3/20/2012 9:22 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Hi; On 03/20/12 10:18, Andre Fischer wrote: Hi all, I compared the output of the Rat scan (section "Unapproved Licenses:") with the SGA and here is the result: http://people.apache.org/~af/ratscan-sga.zip There are 4575 files in the Rat scan

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-20 Thread Armin Le Grand
On 20.03.2012 16:18, Andre Fischer wrote: Hi all, I compared the output of the Rat scan (section "Unapproved Licenses:") with the SGA and here is the result: http://people.apache.org/~af/ratscan-sga.zip There are 4575 files in the Rat scan that have unapproved licenses and which need our atten

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-20 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi, Just investigating and not acting: libtextcat/data/new_fingerprints/fpdb.conf This is based on this http://odur.let.rug.nl/~vannoord/TextCat/ which is LGPL, not maintained. We are in luck since Apache Spamassassin has a version of TextCat. Regards, Dave On Mar 20, 2012, at 9:26 AM, Pedr

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi Yuri; Can you look at these two please? vcl/inc/os2/wingdi.h vcl/inc/os2/xwphook.h cheers, Pedro. On 03/20/12 10:18, Andre Fischer wrote: Hi all, I compared the output of the Rat scan (section "Unapproved Licenses:") with the SGA and here is the result: http://people.apache.org/~a

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-20 Thread Rob Weir
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: > Hi all, > > I compared the output of the Rat scan (section "Unapproved Licenses:") with > the SGA and here is the result: > >    http://people.apache.org/~af/ratscan-sga.zip > > There are 4575 files in the Rat scan that have unapproved licen

Re: Rat scan vs SGA

2012-03-20 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hi; On 03/20/12 10:18, Andre Fischer wrote: Hi all, I compared the output of the Rat scan (section "Unapproved Licenses:") with the SGA and here is the result: http://people.apache.org/~af/ratscan-sga.zip There are 4575 files in the Rat scan that have unapproved licenses and which need