Hi Jan,
On 12-10-16, at 12:22 , jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally I have finished describing the current process, and also combining
all the notes on open issues I could find.
Thanks. A lot of work. Last it was dealt with was probably (prior to Apache's
advent) back in…. I
Thanks for your kind words.
see below please:
On 24 October 2012 19:49, Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 12-10-16, at 12:22 , jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally I have finished describing the current process, and also
combining
all the notes on
May I politely ask if there are other comments or more importantly
objections ?
If not I will continue with the process and keep you posted, please
remember comments are also welcome as the new workflow takes shape.
Jan I.
On 24 October 2012 20:18, jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12-10-24, at 14:35 , jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com wrote:
May I politely ask if there are other comments or more importantly
objections ?
Press on. And expect to be patient: this is a volunteer effort. I'd also, if I
were you, see about highlighting this effort at ApacheCon EU or NA
Where can I read more about ApacheCon EU or NA ? I cannot quite follow you
here (mainly due to terms), is this about getting sponsor money to AOO ?
It should be easy to get somebody from EU and others, I could call on the
NLC to help QA and general testing.
jan.
On 24 October 2012 21:53,
Hi Jan,
more information about ApacheCon can be found here:
http://www.apachecon.eu/
Am 24.10.2012 22:03, schrieb jan iversen:
Where can I read more about ApacheCon EU or NA ? I cannot quite follow you
here (mainly due to terms), is this about getting sponsor money to AOO ?
It should be easy
On 12-10-24, at 16:03 , jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com wrote:
Where can I read more about ApacheCon EU or NA ? I cannot quite follow you
here (mainly due to terms), is this about getting sponsor money to AOO ?
http://www.apachecon.com/
No. That may be too late. It's about asking via the
Got it, I did not think of the upcoming meeting.
I think it is too early for that (maybe somebody has opinions??) I would
like to present it, when it is ready to be launched...I dont like to
present hot air :-)
But as I understood it there is another conference early next year, that
would be
On 17/10/2012 jan iversen wrote:
Would it be an idea to have 1 UI file pr directory in main (that would be
so easy to implement) and 1 Help file pr directory in helpContent2 ?
Yes, this might work. Sure the current 276 files are too many, while
consolidating too much on the other hand is very
of splitting the discussion of a
new l10n workflow from the discussion of file formats. That is I have
succeed (I think) in making a workflow that does not rely on the fileformat.
Jan.
On 16.10.2012 18:22, jan iversen wrote:
Finally I have finished describing the current process, and also combining
all the notes on open issues I could find.
Please have a look at:
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/File:L10proc.pdf
and
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_AOO
I hope we
Thanks for your support.
a documentation question: do you find it a good idea to have (as in the
document) a non-technical round-trip intended for translators etc. and then
the deep technical round trip, or should I reduce it to just the technical
part ?
Sorry for not having formulated 9.7 very
On 16/10/2012 jan iversen wrote:
Finally I have finished describing the current process, and also combining
all the notes on open issues I could find.
Please have a look at:
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/File:L10proc.pdf
and
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_AOO
Thanks, this is a
Thanks.
The biggest problem with .po is that it does not contain a file reference
(the directory structure is a copy of the source structure), I can put the
path in the po file as a comment, but that is not very robust.
The translators will see no difference (apart from changing poEdit for
On 17.10.2012 10:05, jan iversen wrote:
Thanks for your support.
a documentation question: do you find it a good idea to have (as in the
document) a non-technical round-trip intended for translators etc. and then
the deep technical round trip, or should I reduce it to just the technical
part ?
Andrea:
I just got an idea on how to split the files and keep the number low.
Would it be an idea to have 1 UI file pr directory in main (that would be
so easy to implement) and 1 Help file pr directory in helpContent2 ?
I could in addition have a build instruction in a new l10n directory,
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:22 PM, jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally I have finished describing the current process, and also combining
all the notes on open issues I could find.
Please have a look at:
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/File:L10proc.pdf
and
Thanks
I did not see that file, that is what I want to make available for each
language and in .po (or .xliff) format so it can be used in the editors.
Talking about en-US I have a couple of questions (which you may have
discussed in the past)
1) there are no translation to US, meaning that
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:36 AM, jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks
I did not see that file, that is what I want to make available for each
language and in .po (or .xliff) format so it can be used in the editors.
Talking about en-US I have a couple of questions (which you may
An internal audit sound like the best (and easiest) way.
It should of course be done by a native speaking person (which rules me
out), should I make a bugzilla issue or is there another task list you
could put it on ?
This person should also check the letter accellerators (Ca~ncel) I have a
very
Finally I have finished describing the current process, and also combining
all the notes on open issues I could find.
Please have a look at:
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/File:L10proc.pdf
and
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_AOO
I hope we can have a discussion on the open issues,
On 10/16/12, jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally I have finished describing the current process, and also combining
all the notes on open issues I could find.
Please have a look at:
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/File:L10proc.pdf
and
Sorry for asking but what is ML discussions ?
I will happely update information, but I would prefer to delay it until we
have decided which way to go, once that is decided I will make a wiki page
with the new workflow.
jan.
On 16 October 2012 20:36, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
On
On 10/16/12, jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for asking but what is ML discussions ?
Mailing list archives. This emails are publicly available on the web.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-l10n/
I will happely update information, but I would prefer to
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
On 10/16/12, jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for asking but what is ML discussions ?
Mailing list archives. This emails are publicly available on the web.
I have in the meantime understood the request.
Now the document is available under wiki as:
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_AOO
and also as pdf.
best of two worlds.
jan
On 16 October 2012 22:53, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Alexandro
26 matches
Mail list logo
