Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

Thank you René On 2022-06-22 03:55, René Jansen wrote: I think so too. This is why I built the following pipeline to make sure this page is updated daily: ➜  test git:(master) cat oorexx_downloads.nrx out ='' address pipe with output stem out 'pipe (pipnm) literal curl

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

I agree it should work. RC(30) means the command environment is unknown.  I see that you have "address pipe ..." so that may be the problem.  You might try "address path pipe..." or "address '' pipe..." and see if that works any better. Gil On 6/22/2022 10:19 AM, René Jansen wrote: I think

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

I think it *should* work on ooRexx, but after changing ‘out' to ‘out.' and changing the line continuations from ‘-‘ to ‘,’ (and commenting out the output loop) I only get an RC(30). ‘Pipe’ is just an executable known to PATH (actually a zsh alias, but I also tried with Marc’s ‘pipe’ shell

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

Ok, did not realize when asking that you were running this on NetRexx The pipe seems neat as well, never used it though. Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse, P.O. Jonsson oor...@jonases.se > Am 22.06.2022 um 15:58 schrieb René Jansen : > > Hi P.O., > > It is embedded in a NetRexx program. As it

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

Hi P.O., It is embedded in a NetRexx program. As it does not have stems (but indexed strings with [ ] I cannot specify a dot (but need not specify it either). I am tempted to try if Gil’s example works! René. > On 22 Jun 2022, at 14:24, P.O. Jonsson wrote: > > Off Topic: You have the stem

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

I checked the documentation and it isn't really clear (to me). So I ran rexxtry and got: address cmd with output stem d   Oooops ! ... try again. Symbol expected.   Stem symbol expected after STEM keyword.   rc = 20.932 ... rexxtry.rex

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

Wow! Shows the versatility of address … with and incredible improvement that on its own motivate making ooRexx 5 available to a larger audience, I.e. an official release or GA. Off Topic: You have the stem name without the dot (.) whereas I have always used it dotted. This is what I did in a

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

I think so too. This is why I built the following pipeline to make sure this page is updated daily: ➜ test git:(master) cat oorexx_downloads.nrx out ='' address pipe with output stem out 'pipe (pipnm) literal curl https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/5.0.0beta/ '- '| command

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

I think the documentation pointers should point to Sourceforge https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx-docs/ with the appropriate subfolder renamed (currently 5.0.0beta) The documentation can be built automatically

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

Ok all, I'm going to start triage on the bugs, documentation and task tickets on SourceForge, I'm going to ask for a freeze sometime in the near future.  I'd like to ask all creators of tickets to examine them and mark any in milestone 5.0.0 that are not showstoppers to change the milestone

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

On the topic of documentation... I don't want to connect the website issues as showstoppers for a 5.0 GA release, but... All of the documentation pointers in oorexx.org/doc result in 404 errors.  If memory serves (and sometimes it doesn't, corrections gratefully received) we now have

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

Dear René > Am 21.06.2022 um 13:57 schrieb René Jansen : > > 2) Mac installer missing (now a dmg installer is there) The reason we cannot build a pkg installer is because Apple decided to remove the command-line support for it. In my eyes the .dmg installer is NOT a showstopper. What would be

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

This from 2019. I will finish the website shortly. (This week). I am against a freeze, as I've got some changes in the works that I'd really like to get into the 5.0 release. Rick On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:46 AM René Jansen wrote: > I am for it, but I think it is up to Erich and Rick. > > To

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

This from 2018: On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 8:21 AM Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > Almost a month has passed since my last posting, so assuming that everyone > is just in "wait and see" > mode. Therefore throwing another stone into the water: how about releasing > the current 5.0 Beta this > coming

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

Another thing was documentation. There has been a lot of work done by Gil (and Jon and P.O. - afraid I am forgetting someone). > On 21 Jun 2022, at 13:57, René Jansen wrote: > > Hi Terry, > > I am happy that you are taking this up. Yes, there was a list some time ago; > Jon and P.O. might

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

Hi Terry, I am happy that you are taking this up. Yes, there was a list some time ago; Jon and P.O. might have done better bookkeeping - I cannot find it now. From memory: 1) Website very outdated 2) Mac installer missing (now a dmg installer is there) 3) Some showstoppers yet (cannot

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

Greetings again ooRexx'ers, Also on the topic of reminding what needs completing to release ooRexx v5.0... Terry Fuller wrote: Is there a list somewhere of showstoppers which are preventing 5.0 from going GA? If so, can someone point me to it? If not, can I serve as a clearinghouse for

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

Greetings ooRexx'ers, On the topic of reminding what needs completing to release ooRexx v5.0... Terry Fuller wrote: Is there a list somewhere of showstoppers which are preventing 5.0 from going GA? If so, can someone point me to it? If not, can I serve as a clearinghouse for reports of

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

Sanford, On 17.06.2022 22:53, Sanford Geiger wrote: I agree that 5.0 is way overdue for GA. The only possible holdup that I can think of is full support for all of OLE. Do we have such support? AFAIK the OLE support is complete since 4.0. The OLE support has been a little bit enhanced and

Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA Is there a list somewhere of showstoppers which are preventing 5.0 from going GA? If so, can someone point me to it? If not, can I serve as a clearinghouse for reports of showstoppers? -- taf ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx

[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 5.0 GA

Is there a list somewhere of showstoppers which are preventing 5.0 from going GA? If so, can someone point me to it? If not, can I serve as a clearinghouse for reports of showstoppers? -- taf ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list