hakan wrote:
>No offense, but...
and none taken.
> Isn't it great that someone take their time to implement the interface to
> SQLite when oneself is not talent/or lack the knowledge how to do it !.
Yes, absolutely.
> If SQLite will evolve and that is delayed/not implemented in ooSQLite,
> we
No offense, but...
Isn't it great that someone take their time to implement the interface to
SQLite when oneself is not talent/or lack the knowledge how to do it !. If
SQLite will evolve and that is delayed/not implemented in ooSQLite, well you
can always do the implementation yourself, but as
as usual I was wrong and too short
It should have gone under DOC
and Reference was meant to be the ooRexx Language reference Doc
correct is, however, the name of the bif and the section number :-)
Walter
Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge schrieb:
> "Rony G. Flatscher" wrote:
>
> > Having subs
"Rony G. Flatscher" wrote:
> Having subscribed the bug-tracking-list I wonder, why this post was not
> sent by Sourceforge, hence the question, whether anyone has received that
> mail? (Subject: "Algorithm for changestr does not mention the optional
> count", author: "walterpachl")
I got it, but
Mark Miesfeld wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge
> wrote:
> > Do you have a mechanism in mind to allow future versions of ooSQLLite to
> > use V4/5/6... structs and APIs? How would a programmer dictate which
> > set were to be used for a particular db? Woul
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge
wrote:
> Mark Miesfeld wrote:
>
>> If the ooSQLite package gets included in the ooRexx distribution then an
>> application written that uses ooSQLite will run on any system where the
>> user of the application has ooRexx installed.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge
wrote:
> Mark Miesfeld wrote:
>
>> Here is an outline of the classes:
>> ...
>
> Something that catches my eye here isn't really a SQLite issue as such, but
> it seems to me that the implication of SQLite C structs having names which
Mark Miesfeld wrote:
> If the ooSQLite package gets included in the ooRexx distribution then an
> application written that uses ooSQLite will run on any system where the
> user of the application has ooRexx installed. And the user will not have
> to install anything else.
But hopefully there's
Mark Miesfeld wrote:
> Here is an outline of the classes:
>
> * In SQLite, 95% of what any one would use are is done though APIs that
> either require a database connection or require a prepared statement. So
> the 2 main objects in ooSQLite are:
>
> Database connection:
>
>::class 'ooSQLiteDB'
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:56 PM, hakan wrote:
> False alarm,
> After rereading my program code I found out that I had a "return" statement
> missing.
> After writing the array of commands to a file, there was an item, which was
> an empty SQL INSERT statement, added to the array of commands.
W
As you may know, one part of the BSF4ooRexx support is making ooRexx available
as a macro language
for OpenOffice/LibreOffice. Also there is special OpenOffice programming
support in form of a Rexx
package named "UNO.CLS", which makes it relatively easy for Rexx programmers to
use the
OpenOffice
Hello,
Yes, the problem was the disk size...
Thanks for the heads up.
Bye
Rainer Tammer
On 14.06.2012 18:42, Jean-Louis Faucher wrote:
> About the three failures TEST_MANY_CHARS.
> I have them under windows, when running the test from an USB drive.
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.p
12 matches
Mail list logo
