Re: [Oorexx-devel] A proposal for tagging tickets needing some additional work.

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: > I've made a change to the Support Requests tracker item to add a new > selection field for marking pending work. I rather like this approach, since > it is possible to have that field show up in the search results. Take a > look at how it lo

Re: [Oorexx-devel] A proposal for tagging tickets needing some additional work.

I've made a change to the Support Requests tracker item to add a new selection field for marking pending work. I rather like this approach, since it is possible to have that field show up in the search results. Take a look at how it looks and let me know what you thing. Rick On Sun, Aug 19, 2012

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Oorexx Reference - the new format

Ok, I will create a publican directory under docs/trunk and put the finished docs there sometime today or tonight. David Ashley On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 08:05 -0700, Mark Miesfeld wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:36 AM, David Ashley > wrote: > > > I do not have strong feelings one way or the ot

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Oorexx Reference - the new format

You can check it out from SVN. It is in sandbox/david/publican/rxmath. David Ashley On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 17:32 +0200, Walter Pachl wrote: > David Ashley schrieb: > > Here is the status of all the documents. > can you send me rxmath source? > Walter --

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Oorexx Reference - the new format

David Ashley schrieb: > Here is the status of all the documents. can you send me rxmath source? Walter -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat lan

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Oorexx Reference - the new format

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:36 AM, David Ashley wrote: > I do not have strong feelings one way or the other about a rename. But > let me propose this: add a publican directory to the trunk directory and > store the finished (converted) docs there. That way a single checkout > can get both versions

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Oorexx Reference - the new format

I do not have strong feelings one way or the other about a rename. But let me propose this: add a publican directory to the trunk directory and store the finished (converted) docs there. That way a single checkout can get both versions from the trunk. And it will make it easier to keep both version

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Is there any way to turn off HTML in the emails SF sends out?

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge wrote: > The old emails I got when people updated bugs etc didn't have unnecessary > html parts in them, but I see the new ones do. Does anyone know if there's > a way to turn them off, either globally or at a user-level? I haven't

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Oorexx Reference - the new format

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: > What is the state of the conversion and going "live" with the new format? > I'm thinking I'm ready to take a break from the xml stuff I've been working > on and knock off a few RFEs. That, of course, also means updating the docs, > and I'd l

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Oorexx Reference - the new format

Here is the status of all the documents. buildmachine - not converted yet. oodguide - fully converted. oodialog - partially converted. Still working on link tags. oosqlite - not converted yet. ootest - not converted yet/ orxncurses - not converted yet. readme - not converted yet. rexxextens

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Oorexx Reference - the new format

What is the state of the conversion and going "live" with the new format? I'm thinking I'm ready to take a break from the xml stuff I've been working on and knock off a few RFEs. That, of course, also means updating the docs, and I'd like to only do this on the new versions. Rick On Mon, Aug 20,

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Oorexx Reference - the new format

I also find this not very user friendly. I know there are customizations that can be performed with Publican but I am not that far into it yet. Once I get the all the docs straightened out )converted) I will look into trying to fix these kinds of things. David Ashley On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 09:19 -

[Oorexx-devel] Is there any way to turn off HTML in the emails SF sends out?

The old emails I got when people updated bugs etc didn't have unnecessary html parts in them, but I see the new ones do. Does anyone know if there's a way to turn them off, either globally or at a user-level? -- Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own

Re: [Oorexx-devel] No email after a commit

The commit email setup was disabled for a few days after the project conversion, so nothing was getting sent out at that time. You should be receiving commit emails now, without needing to do anything special. Rick On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Oliver Sims < oliver.s...@simsassociates.co.uk> w

[Oorexx-devel] No email after a commit

I did a commit a couple of days ago but did not receive an email with the details. What should I do to ensure I get such an email after a commit? Thanks, -- Oliver Sims -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclus

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Howto get the name of the current .context~executable ?

On 20 August 2012 10:19, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > Hi Jon, > > thanks vor your vote too! > :) > > A question: how did you manage to add that link (was looking for this, but > did not find a way to do it in the hurry)? > > Hi Rony, There doesn't seem to be a provided mechanism for this, so I jus

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Howto get the name of the current .context~executable ?

Hi Jon, thanks vor your vote too! :) A question: how did you manage to add that link (was looking for this, but did not find a way to do it in the hurry)? ---rony On 20.08.2012 10:41, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers wrote: > Hi Rony, > > Thanks for your vote. I have linked the two RFE's in their com

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Howto get the name of the current .context~executable ?

Hi Rony, Thanks for your vote. I have linked the two RFE's in their comments as promised. Jon On 20 August 2012 09:27, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > > On 19.08.2012 15:58, Rick McGuire wrote: > > Or differently asked: is it possible for a running executable (method or > routine object) to get the

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Howto get the name of the current .context~executable ?

On 19.08.2012 15:58, Rick McGuire wrote: > Or differently asked: is it possible for a running executable (method or > routine object) to get the > >> name that was used to invoke it (very much like being able to get at >> the object's current >> arguments >> or current va

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Howto get the name of the current .context~executable ?

Jon, thank you for your hint and comment. Ad name of the executable: this needs to be researched, it may be the case that if there is a name known in the context that it is the name under which the routine got invoked (if currently executing a routine) or the message name if a method is current

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Howto get the name of the current .context~executable ?

On 19.08.2012 15:58, Rick McGuire wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Rony G. Flatscher > > wrote: > > On 19.08.2012 15:44, Rick McGuire wrote: >> >> Or differently asked: is it possible for a running executable >> (method or routine ob