To: Evergreen Discussion Group open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 4:02:23 PM
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Motion to deactivate the evergreen-admin
mailing list
Hi all,
I administer or co-administer all of the open-ils/evergreen mailing lists
] On Behalf Of
Galen Charlton
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 12:43 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Motion to deactivate the evergreen-admin
mailing list
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Chris Sharp csh...@georgialibraries.org
wrote:
In my view, the Evergreen
...@list.georgialibraries.org
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of
Galen Charlton
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 12:43 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Motion to deactivate the
evergreen-admin
mailing list
Hi,
On Tue, Jan
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Motion to deactivate the
evergreen-admin
mailing list
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Chris Sharp
csh...@georgialibraries.org
wrote:
In my view, the Evergreen-Admin list duplicates the purpose of this,
the General list
...@list.georgialibraries.org
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf
Of
Galen Charlton
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 12:43 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Motion to deactivate the
evergreen-admin
mailing list
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:02 PM
-
From: open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On
Behalf Of
Galen Charlton
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 12:43 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Motion to deactivate the
evergreen-admin
I like idea of making the dev list as an explicitly advertised place
where sysadmins should go for advice. Alternatively I still like the
idea of making it explicitly clear that the general list is where
sysadmins questions can be sent (if the sender prefers to use email).
I am completely opposed
, January 14, 2015 12:43 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Motion to deactivate the
evergreen-admin
mailing list
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Chris Sharp
csh...@georgialibraries.org
wrote:
In my view, the Evergreen-Admin list duplicates
On 01/16/2015 12:44 PM, Lazar, Alexey Vladimirovich wrote:
A potential time-saving benefit of implementing such a structure or some
variant of it (and finishing migrating to the new list server) could be that
for the foreseeable future this would remain the last discussion thread on the
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Motion to deactivate the evergreen-admin
mailing list
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Chris Sharp csh...@georgialibraries.org
wrote:
In my view, the Evergreen-Admin list duplicates the purpose of this,
the General list, in that the General list serves
-
From: open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org
[mailto:open-ils-general-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of
Galen Charlton
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 12:43 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Motion to deactivate the evergreen-admin
: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Motion to deactivate the
evergreen-admin
mailing list
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Chris Sharp
csh...@georgialibraries.org
wrote:
In my view, the Evergreen-Admin list duplicates the purpose of this,
the General list, in that the General list
Charlton
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 12:43 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Motion to deactivate the evergreen-admin
mailing list
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Chris Sharp csh...@georgialibraries.org
wrote:
In my view, the Evergreen-Admin list
, January 14, 2015 12:43 PM
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Motion to deactivate the
evergreen-admin
mailing list
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Chris Sharp
csh...@georgialibraries.org javascript:;
wrote:
In my view, the Evergreen-Admin list
To: Evergreen Discussion Group
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Motion to deactivate the
evergreen-admin
mailing list
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Chris Sharp
csh...@georgialibraries.org
wrote:
In my view, the Evergreen-Admin list duplicates the purpose
- Original Message -
From: Chris Sharp csh...@georgialibraries.org
To: Evergreen Discussion Group open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 4:02:23 PM
Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Motion to deactivate the evergreen-admin
mailing list
Hi all,
I
-1.
Using similar logic, the cataloguers, web team, reports, DIG and even the dev
list should also be eliminated. They are all low-traffic and the general list
serves as the all-purpose venue for any of the content there, because “general
means anything and everything.
I suspect that low list
/me pretty much agrees with Alexey.
Quoting Lazar, Alexey Vladimirovich alexey.la...@mnsu.edu:
-1.
Using similar logic, the cataloguers, web team, reports, DIG and
even the dev list should also be eliminated. They are all
low-traffic and the general list serves as the all-purpose venue
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Chris Sharp
csh...@georgialibraries.org wrote:
In my view, the Evergreen-Admin list duplicates the purpose of this, the
General list, in that the General list serves as an all-purpose venue for
(non-development related) technical help in running Evergreen.
Hi all,
When the initial discussion arose about the creation of the sys admin
list, I sat on the sidelines and watched the discussion, but I didn't
offer an opinion because I'm not a sys admin, and I think the sys admins
should make the decision. However, I do subscribe to all the lists, and
+1, deactivate.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Chris Sharp
csh...@georgialibraries.org wrote:
Hi all,
I administer or co-administer all of the open-ils/evergreen mailing lists,
and I would like to make a motion that we deactivate the Evergreen-Admin
mailing list. It is a very
+1 to killing with fire
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Ben Shum bs...@biblio.org wrote:
+1, deactivate.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Chris Sharp
csh...@georgialibraries.org wrote:
Hi all,
I administer or co-administer all of the open-ils/evergreen mailing
lists, and I would like
Hi all,
I administer or co-administer all of the open-ils/evergreen mailing lists, and
I would like to make a motion that we deactivate the Evergreen-Admin mailing
list. It is a very low-traffic list (maybe a dozen monthly posts at its
busiest) with low membership (75 members), and most of
23 matches
Mail list logo
