I think we figured out what was going on. The "Staff" group permissions
folder had it's parent record changed to itself. We changed the parent back
to what it was, based on our backup, and the permissions groups came back.
Patrick+
Asbury Seminary
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Jason Etheridge
> Probably caused an infinite loop and exhausted memory.
Worth noting this was a single server test system running everything
including the database. The kernel force killed apache and postgres
because it was out of memory and those were juicy targets; on a more
robust setup, the database would
> On a test system, I made Staff a child of itself, and that prevented
> new logins for normal staff accounts, and made only patron groups
> visible in the patron editor for the admin account.
Oh, apparently, it also crashed PostgreSQL. :-)
Probably caused an infinite loop and exhausted memory.
There aren't visibility flags for hiding permission groups in the staff
client, no.
I can imagine something like a major hardware failure corrupting data and
perhaps doing this though it's unlikely. With that said unlikely things
happen routinely somewhere with all the servers running in the
All,
Yes. Something very badly and horrible has gone wrong.Right now in our
staff client, the Staff group is gone. To top that off, now the system is
down and no one can get in. People with more knowledge than I have
are working on it and we are hopeful it will be back to normal
Hi Jennifer,
With the caveat of anything is theoretically possible if an admin has done
bizarre thing x, y and z
Generally Patrons will be a child of Users and it would be impossible to
delete Users and Patrons still exist. It's kind of like yanking the
foundation out from under a building
Thomas,
Very interesting! And completely confusing. What I think you are
saying is that it is possible to delete the GROUP, but meanwhile all the actual
permissions are still in the system?
When evergreen was started, it has two main permission groups.Patrons and
Users.Our
Absolutely. Just point the staff client to the localhost. I do this with
debian images regularly in virtual box if I'm running the staff client in
my host os doing something else.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Jim Lynch wrote:
> We're just getting started and I
We're just getting started and I want to let some of the folks become
familiar with things. Our network isn't yet functional so I have a
Ubuntu laptop I was thinking about putting both the server and a client
on to let them test.
Is that a reasonable thing to do?
Thanks,
Jim.
I think I'd want to try it on this guy:
https://getchip.com/pages/chip
$9 + $10 VGA adapter
Justin
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Joe Knueven wrote:
> Also, because Evergreen’s implementation is so lightweight, you require
> only the most rudimentary of hardware to
Also, because Evergreen’s implementation is so lightweight, you require only
the most rudimentary of hardware to get started.
For instance, our current selfcheck machine is an old thin client device with a
usb stick plugged in for a hard drive, running Debian, LXDE and iceweasel for
the
All the permission assignments are in the database, not the file system.
Taking a very quick look it appears that deleting a group assigned directly to
a user should fail due to key constraints, but deleting a group only assigned
to users as a secondary mapping (permission.usr_grp_map table)
All –
So, what happens when all the staff permission groups are deleted?How is it
that people can still login to the system? Staff with “cataloger” permissions
and “circ” permissions and so forth? What happens when they try to login with
that account? Does evergreen ‘assign’ them
This is a reminder that the taskforce of the Oversight Board will be
meeting in IRC on Thursday at 3PM to discuss updating the conflict of
interest policy and review the rules of governance for Evergreen.
The taskforce consists of myself, Ruth Frasur, Garry Collum, Terran
McCanna, Mike Rylander,
one
> using it and how?
>
> Thanks
> Stuart
>
>
>
> Stuart Forrest PhD
> Library Systems Specialist
> Beaufort County Library
> 843 255 6450
> sforr...@bcgov.net<mailto:sforr...@
There is! One of the branches in PINES has been using it for about a year,
and several others are currently considering switching to it. I believe
they are setting it up in kiosk mode on a desktop (with keyboard, mouse,
barcode scanner, receipt printer) on or near the circ desk so that it can
be
Hi Stuart,
Evergreen does include a basic self-check component:
http://docs.evergreen-ils.org/2.10/_self_checkout.html
It can also talk to more sophisticated self-check products via SIP2.
For example, some members of our consortium use Bibliotheca/3M's
products.
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:30 AM,
Hi All
Is there are a Self-Check component in Evergreen and if so is there anyone
using it and how?
Thanks
Stuart
Stuart Forrest PhD
Library Systems Specialist
Beaufort County Library
843 255 6450
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 1:11 AM, Jayaraj JR wrote:
> 1. What setting is to be done for blocking the renewal of overdue items
> through TPAC
You can configure a standing penalty to block renewal of overdue items
-- in the staff client, go to Admin | Local
19 matches
Mail list logo