Re: RFC: do we need a new list for kernel patches

2009-06-26 Thread Ulrich Windl
On 11 Jun 2009 at 12:41, Mike Christie wrote: Hey, It seems like we have a lot of members on the list that are not kernel developers, but we now have 5 iscsi drivers (qla4xxx, bnx2i, cxgb3i, iscsi_tcp and ib_iser) with another being written. So it seems like we are going to have lots

Re: RFC: do we need a new list for kernel patches

2009-06-15 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek
I agree that having just one mailing list is the most convenient for kernel developers. But not everyone who is subscribed to open-iscsi is a kernel developer. Wouldn't it be more convenient for iSCSI users to have two lists -- one intended for iSCSI users, and one for iSCSI developers,

Re: RFC: do we need a new list for kernel patches

2009-06-14 Thread Erez Zilber
Having everything in a single list sounds like a better idea to me. If we have 2 lists, many people will have to monitor both. Erez --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups open-iscsi group. To post to this

Re: RFC: do we need a new list for kernel patches

2009-06-14 Thread Or Gerlitz
Mike Christie wrote: So it seems like we are going to have lots of patches. I would also like to start sending my kernel patches out in a way that everyone can see them. Previously to avoid noise on this list, I have been pinging you guys privately which just does not work so well now

Re: RFC: do we need a new list for kernel patches

2009-06-14 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/11/2009 08:41 PM, Mike Christie wrote: Hey, It seems like we have a lot of members on the list that are not kernel developers, but we now have 5 iscsi drivers (qla4xxx, bnx2i, cxgb3i, iscsi_tcp and ib_iser) with another being written. So it seems like we are going to have lots of

Re: RFC: do we need a new list for kernel patches

2009-06-14 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Boaz Harroshbharr...@panasas.com wrote: On 06/11/2009 08:41 PM, Mike Christie wrote: It seems like we have a lot of members on the list that are not kernel developers, but we now have 5 iscsi drivers (qla4xxx, bnx2i, cxgb3i, iscsi_tcp and ib_iser) with

Re: RFC: do we need a new list for kernel patches

2009-06-14 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 06/14/2009 12:52 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Boaz Harroshbharr...@panasas.com wrote: On 06/11/2009 08:41 PM, Mike Christie wrote: It seems like we have a lot of members on the list that are not kernel developers, but we now have 5 iscsi drivers (qla4xxx,

Re: RFC: do we need a new list for kernel patches

2009-06-12 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:41:17PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote: Hey, It seems like we have a lot of members on the list that are not kernel developers, but we now have 5 iscsi drivers (qla4xxx, bnx2i, cxgb3i, iscsi_tcp and ib_iser) with another being written. So it seems like we are

RFC: do we need a new list for kernel patches

2009-06-11 Thread Mike Christie
Hey, It seems like we have a lot of members on the list that are not kernel developers, but we now have 5 iscsi drivers (qla4xxx, bnx2i, cxgb3i, iscsi_tcp and ib_iser) with another being written. So it seems like we are going to have lots of patches. I would also like to start sending my

Re: RFC: do we need a new list for kernel patches

2009-06-11 Thread Hans de Goede
On 06/11/2009 07:41 PM, Mike Christie wrote: Hey, It seems like we have a lot of members on the list that are not kernel developers, but we now have 5 iscsi drivers (qla4xxx, bnx2i, cxgb3i, iscsi_tcp and ib_iser) with another being written. So it seems like we are going to have lots of

Re: RFC: do we need a new list for kernel patches

2009-06-11 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:41:17PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote: Hey, It seems like we have a lot of members on the list that are not kernel developers, but we now have 5 iscsi drivers (qla4xxx, bnx2i, cxgb3i, iscsi_tcp and ib_iser) with another being written. So it seems like we are

Re: RFC: do we need a new list for kernel patches

2009-06-11 Thread Chandra Seetharaman
Creating a new list would be a better idea. On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 12:41 -0500, Mike Christie wrote: Hey, It seems like we have a lot of members on the list that are not kernel developers, but we now have 5 iscsi drivers (qla4xxx, bnx2i, cxgb3i, iscsi_tcp and ib_iser) with another being