On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:16:31 -0400
James Smart james.sm...@emulex.com wrote:
About the implementation, I think that it's better to have the common
library code rather than just copying the fs bsg code into iscsi.
Note: I tried to library-ize the transport implementation on the first pass
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
If vendors use the common data structures via bsg, it's totally fine
by me. I see why bsg is preferable. The only thing that I care about
is managing any iSCSI HBA with iscsiadm instead of various vendor
specific utilities.
agreed
About the implementation, I think
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:56:30 -0400
James Smart james.sm...@emulex.com wrote:
I still want to know why vendors can't do this via the existing
netlink interface. open-iscsi uses the netlink interface for some pdu
so I guess that having a different channel for management might be a
good
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:02:52 -0500
Mike Christie micha...@cs.wisc.edu wrote:
On 03/18/2010 08:58 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
- You invent your hardware specific data structure for the simplest
operation such as setting IP address.
I think this is what Jay is not
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:02:52 -0500
Mike Christie micha...@cs.wisc.edu wrote:
On 03/18/2010 08:58 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
- You invent your hardware specific data structure for the simplest
operation such as setting IP address.
I think this is what Jay is not trying to do. I think
On 03/18/2010 06:10 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:02:52 -0500
Mike Christiemicha...@cs.wisc.edu wrote:
On 03/18/2010 08:58 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
- You invent your hardware specific data structure for the simplest
operation such as setting IP address.
I think
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 23:37:07 +0530
Jayamohan Kallickal jayamoh...@serverengines.com wrote:
This patch contains the necessary changes to support
the bsg interface
Signed-off-by: Jayamohan Kallickal jayamoh...@serverengines.com
---
drivers/scsi/be2iscsi/be_cmds.h | 137
On 03/18/2010 08:58 AM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
- You invent your hardware specific data structure for the simplest
operation such as setting IP address.
I think this is what Jay is not trying to do. I think the patch has some
extra code like the ISCSI_BSG_HST_VENDOR parts that makes it
