Re: Infortrend + iSCSI: detected conn error (1011) + TCP Dup ACK

2009-11-19 Thread Matthew Dickinson
On 11/10/09 11:39 AM, Mike Christie micha...@cs.wisc.edu wrote: What version of open-iscsi were you using and what kernel, and were you using the iscsi kernel modules with open-iscsi.org tarball or from the kernel? iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.0.871-0.10.el5 kernel-2.6.18-164.2.1.el5 RedHat

Re: Infortrend + iSCSI: detected conn error (1011) + TCP Dup ACK

2009-11-19 Thread Mike Christie
Matthew Dickinson wrote: On 11/10/09 11:39 AM, Mike Christie micha...@cs.wisc.edu wrote: What version of open-iscsi were you using and what kernel, and were you using the iscsi kernel modules with open-iscsi.org tarball or from the kernel? iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.0.871-0.10.el5

Re: Infortrend + iSCSI: detected conn error (1011) + TCP Dup ACK

2009-11-12 Thread Hoot, Joseph
sorry... wrong information. Here is the correct information. I was doing some testing in VMWare Fusion VM's for a presentation that I'm giving. The storage server is CentOS 5.3, which dishes out IETD targets for my OVM servers. The OVM 2.2 environment is as follows: [r...@ovm1 ~]# uname

Re: Infortrend + iSCSI: detected conn error (1011) + TCP Dup ACK

2009-11-10 Thread Mike Christie
Hoot, Joseph wrote: I've had about 3 threads of dt (kicking off a bit randomly) on (3) separate volumes for over a week and haven't had a single disconnect yet. I am currently using whatever rpm is distributed with Oracle VM v2.2. I know for sure that they have included the 871 base,

Re: Infortrend + iSCSI: detected conn error (1011) + TCP Dup ACK

2009-11-10 Thread Hoot, Joseph
[r...@storage ~]# uname -r 2.6.18-164.el5 [r...@storage ~]# rpm -qa | grep iscsi iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.0.868-0.18.el5_3.1 [r...@storage ~]# On Nov 10, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Mike Christie wrote: Hoot, Joseph wrote: I've had about 3 threads of dt (kicking off a bit randomly) on (3) separate

Re: Infortrend + iSCSI: detected conn error (1011) + TCP Dup ACK

2009-11-10 Thread Mike Christie
Matthew Dickinson wrote: On 11/6/09 3:39 PM, Matthew Dickinson matt-openis...@alpha345.com wrote: Try disabling nops by setting node.conn[0].timeo.noop_out_interval = 0 node.conn[0].timeo.noop_out_timeout = 0 I'm still getting errors: Nov 10 09:08:04 backup kernel: connection12:0:

Re: Infortrend + iSCSI: detected conn error (1011) + TCP Dup ACK

2009-11-10 Thread Mike Christie
Hoot, Joseph wrote: [r...@storage ~]# uname -r 2.6.18-164.el5 [r...@storage ~]# rpm -qa | grep iscsi iscsi-initiator-utils-6.2.0.868-0.18.el5_3.1 [r...@storage ~]# Weird. Is 2.6.18-164.el5 the kernel being used in the virtual machine/DonU? Is that where you are using iscsi? It looks

Re: Infortrend + iSCSI: detected conn error (1011) + TCP Dup ACK

2009-11-09 Thread Santi Saez
El 06/11/09 14:10, mdaitc escribió: Hi mdaitc, I’m seeing similar TCP “weirdness” as the other posts mention as well as the below errors. (..) Nov 2 08:15:14 backup kernel: connection33:0: detected conn error The performance isn’t what I’d expect: (..) What happens if you disable TCP

Re: Infortrend + iSCSI: detected conn error (1011) + TCP Dup ACK

2009-11-09 Thread Hoot, Joseph
What version of OiS are you using? I had lots of weirdness and the same types of disconnects to our Dell EqualLogic when we were (actually still are in production) using 868 code. I'm now using open- iscsi-871 code plus a sendwait patch and haven' had the issue. I've now been slamming

Re: Infortrend + iSCSI: detected conn error (1011) + TCP Dup ACK

2009-11-09 Thread Gopu Krishnan
Hi all, I am working on iSCSI En. Tar. Could you please someone explain about the performance of the IET. If so how the performance was calculated and what was the througput for the same. Thanks Gopala krishnan Varatharajan On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:09 AM, Matthew Dickinson

Re: Infortrend + iSCSI: detected conn error (1011) + TCP Dup ACK

2009-11-09 Thread Mike Christie
Hoot, Joseph wrote: What version of OiS are you using? I had lots of weirdness and the same types of disconnects to our Dell EqualLogic when we were (actually still are in production) using 868 code. I'm now using open- iscsi-871 code plus a sendwait patch and haven' had the issue.

Re: Infortrend + iSCSI: detected conn error (1011) + TCP Dup ACK

2009-11-09 Thread Hoot, Joseph
it was for OiS 871 code prior to RHEL 5.4 release (not sure if the release include it or not). I'm not sure who came up with it. I was working with Don Williams from Dell EqualLogic. He got ahold of it somehow. I applied it and it seemed to improve things. On Nov 9, 2009, at 2:31 PM,

Re: Infortrend + iSCSI: detected conn error (1011) + TCP Dup ACK

2009-11-09 Thread Mike Christie
Hoot, Joseph wrote: it was for OiS 871 code prior to RHEL 5.4 release (not sure if the release include it or not). I'm not sure who came up with it. I was working with Don Williams from Dell EqualLogic. He got ahold of it somehow. I applied it and it seemed to improve things. Ah

Re: Infortrend + iSCSI: detected conn error (1011) + TCP Dup ACK

2009-11-09 Thread Hoot, Joseph
I've had about 3 threads of dt (kicking off a bit randomly) on (3) separate volumes for over a week and haven't had a single disconnect yet. I am currently using whatever rpm is distributed with Oracle VM v2.2. I know for sure that they have included the 871 base, plus I believe at least a

Re: Infortrend + iSCSI: detected conn error (1011) + TCP Dup ACK

2009-11-04 Thread Santi Saez
El 03/11/09 0:52, Mike Christie escribió: Dear Mike, You can turn off ping/nops by setting node.conn[0].timeo.noop_out_interval = 0 node.conn[0].timeo.noop_out_timeout = 0 (set that in iscsid.conf then rediscovery the target or run iscsiadm -m node -T your_target -o update -n

Re: Infortrend + iSCSI: detected conn error (1011) + TCP Dup ACK

2009-11-02 Thread Mike Christie
Santi Saez wrote: Hi, Randomly we get Open-iSCSI conn errors when connecting to an Infortrend A16E-G2130-4 storage array. We had discussed about this earlier in the list, see: http://tr.im/DVQm http://tr.im/DVQp Open-iSCSI logs this:

Re: Infortrend + iSCSI: detected conn error (1011) + TCP Dup ACK

2009-11-02 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi! I would guess that your network/storage system is overloaded occasionally, and then network packets are significantly (5s) delayed. It sounds unlikely, but that would explain a duplicate ACK IMHO. Here with SLES10 SP2 on x86_64 with a HP EVA 6000 + iSCSI connectivity option (MPX100)