Looks like you are right, some quick tests made on a iscsitarget linux
server
using nullio and fileio on a sata drive give much better results than the
netapp
file server with it's 12 disks (and while the netapp is directly connected
to the client
and on a jumbo frame network, the linux initiator i
2009/6/5 Pasi Kärkkäinen
>
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:57:11AM +0200, benoit plessis wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Well the target are NetApp Filers, one FAS2020 and the other a FAS3020.
> >
> > The test system is directly attached to the filer, using either a bnx2
> card
> > or an intel
> >
> > The la
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 12:57:11AM +0200, benoit plessis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well the target are NetApp Filers, one FAS2020 and the other a FAS3020.
>
> The test system is directly attached to the filer, using either a bnx2 card
> or an intel
>
> The latency is calculated by bonnie++ 1.95 on a ext
Hi,
Well the target are NetApp Filers, one FAS2020 and the other a FAS3020.
The test system is directly attached to the filer, using either a bnx2 card
or an intel
The latency is calculated by bonnie++ 1.95 on a ext2 file system, the
bandwith came from interface monitoring using cacti or bmon an
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 04:03:28PM +0200, benoit plessis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What do you think of (real) iSCSI HBA like Qlogic cards under linux ?
> We are using open-iscsi now with bnx2 cards and the perfs are far from
> decent (top 50/100Mbps),
> some comparative tests on an intel e1000 card show
Hi,
What do you think of (real) iSCSI HBA like Qlogic cards under linux ?
We are using open-iscsi now with bnx2 cards and the perfs are far from
decent (top 50/100Mbps),
some comparative tests on an intel e1000 card show betters results
(500/600Mbps) but
far from gigabit saturation, and still high
