Re: [Open64-devel] followup patch for statically linked target scheduling info

2011-02-17 Thread Sun Chan
please go ahead Sun On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:14 AM, David Coakley wrote: > Hi Gang, > > Thank you for testing and correcting the patch.  I have revised my > original patch to include your change to isa_subset_gen.cxx below. > This patch does not include any target-specific code and should not >

Re: [Open64-devel] followup patch for statically linked target scheduling info

2011-02-17 Thread David Coakley
Hi Gang, Thank you for testing and correcting the patch. I have revised my original patch to include your change to isa_subset_gen.cxx below. This patch does not include any target-specific code and should not affect the existing targets -- it just clears the way for future use of ISA subsets. C

Re: [Open64-devel] followup patch for statically linked target scheduling info

2011-01-24 Thread Gang Yu
David, Thanks for your patch and we're just waiting for it. Thank you for your patient and continuously improvement. Maybe isa-subset is not that useful for the x86 target, but it's meaningful to the SL processors since they are quite changed from each other and only share a common risc cor

[Open64-devel] followup patch for statically linked target scheduling info

2011-01-24 Thread David Coakley
The attached patch si_subset.diff enables the target SI generator to work with ISA subsets. Previously I had not tested this case as no one was using it, but it looks like it is useful as a way to avoid having to explicitly list unsupported instructions in the set of dummy instructions. There are