://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120113/487e0f28/attachment.html
was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120113/9fc924c8/attachment.html
://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120113/29cece22/attachment.html
://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120113/f5601aba/attachment.html
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: face-sad.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1057 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman
mailing list
openEHR-technical at openehr.org
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120113/59e8c0f0
Certification?).
Please check out the ISHEP web site for further information, and let
me know your initial thoughts.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120113
Hi Diego
On 11/01/2012 03:12, Diego Bosc? wrote:
If it is really needed for the moment for representing templates then
it's OK with me (as long as we agree that this is a temporal thing),
but I still feel that having two separated places to rule UI
generation is a bad idea.
I think that
I do like the idea but I would prefer that each conference has its own
very clear identity, albeit that some sessions could be shared, along
with venue etc. A couple of the MIE conferences have operated this way
with local informatics conferences being co-hosted/located with the
European event,
On 13/01/2012 08:14, Ian McNicoll wrote:
I do like the idea but I would prefer that each conference has its own
very clear identity, albeit that some sessions could be shared, along
with venue etc. A couple of the MIE conferences have operated this way
with local informatics conferences being
On 13/01/2012 08:46, Diego Bosc? wrote:
visible, allowed types, icon...
ok - I understood those were settings relating to the display of that
kind of node within the modelling tool, not of the data in a deployed
system so its about data? What does icon mean then?
- thomas
No, but they can be used for different things, from creating specific
editors, to mindmaps or sample GUI generation
2012/1/13 Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com:
On 13/01/2012 08:46, Diego Bosc? wrote:
visible, allowed types, icon...
ok - I understood those were settings
On 11/01/2012 08:15, Heath Frankel wrote:
Further to my previous email, I believe the original intent of the
name attribute is a form caption of an element value, the approach of
adding a numeric suffix to provide a unique key is contrary to this
original intent.
this is correct. The
12 matches
Mail list logo