Hi Diego On 11/01/2012 03:12, Diego Bosc? wrote: > If it is really needed for the moment for representing templates then > it's OK with me (as long as we agree that this is a temporal thing), > but I still feel that having two separated places to rule UI > generation is a bad idea. > I think that annotations could work for you (even creating a new > specific ADL section would).
technically, the annotations might work - it depends on how much needs to be said, because the annotations are not very powerful in terms of structure or semantic expressions - they are after all designed to be 'notes' of some kind. But the real problem is likely to be that for a given archetype (most likely national or local ones) or template (e.g. a national one for discharge summary), there are more than one UI template 'overlay' - e.g. let's say you have a Spanish template & some e-health groups in Andalusia & Galicia regions want different UIs. That means multiple UI-templates. > We currently have all the GUI directives for representation in a > documentation file for each reference model (as you can see in this > screen capture http://i.imgur.com/tQxRt.png). I don't understand which of these settings inn the right hand group is too do with UI rendering of the data...? - thomas
