On 26/08/2015 13:08, Bert Verhees wrote:
On 26-08-15 14:03, Diego Boscá wrote:
I agree with most of the points, but I'm curious why you say that 13606
does not support AQL (and in any case wouldn't be AQL does not support
13606?)
Yes, that is a good question, I did not know that AQL was
On 27/08/2015 10:18, Bakke, Silje Ljosland wrote:
So it’s possible to specify the role of each participant?
yep - the PARTICIPATION type has 'function' i.e. 'role' (this name was
adopted from 13606 a long time ago - probably too late to change).
- thomas
On 26/08/2015 16:46, Erik Sundvall wrote:
Hi!
Where can one find proposals/diagrams describing the refreshed RM
(reference model) in the new 13606 revision? Will 13606 keep using the
old data types or harmonize more with CIMI or OpenEHR?
Is there now consensus/majority regarding using
openEHR has an EHR Extract specification
http://www.openehr.org/releases/RM/latest/ehr_extract.htmlas well,
which is more flexible than the 13606 one e.g. it can include
information from more than one patient, and accommodates both openEHR
and non-openEHR content.
- thomas
On 26/08/2015
Sorry, but I have to ask: are you doing a homework?
On Friday, 28 August 2015, 王海生 edwin_ue...@163.com wrote:
could we just add a page on openEHR website to illustrate these points
thx
--
王海生
15901958021
在 2015-08-28 01:54:58，Thomas Beale thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com
On 28/08/2015 10:03, 王海生 wrote:
could we just add a page on openEHR website to illustrate these points
thx
if you search on the wiki
https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/dosearchsite.action?queryString=13606,
with either '13606' or 'CIMI' you will find a lot of material.
- thomas
could we just add a page on openEHR website to illustrate these points
thx
--
王海生
15901958021
在 2015-08-28 01:54:58，Thomas Beale thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com 写道：
On 26/08/2015 16:46, Erik Sundvall wrote:
Hi!
Where can one find proposals/diagrams describing the refreshed RM
Hi Silje,
I agree that ACTION.performer would be a useful addition (optional) to the
RM. For now, I model performer as a participation.
ACTION.other_participations inherits ENTRY.other_participations
http://www.openehr.org/releases/trunk/UML/#Diagrams___18_1_83e026d_1433173757197_893618_10673
Normally you would use participations.
Sent from my HTC
- Reply message -
From: Bakke, Silje Ljosland silje.ljosland.ba...@nasjonalikt.no
To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org
Subject: ACTION performer?
Date: Thu, Aug 27, 2015 10:00
Hi all,
So it’s possible to specify the role of each participant?
Regards,
Silje
From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On
Behalf Of thomas.be...@oceaninformatics.com
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 11:09 AM
To: Openehr-Technical
Subject: Re: ACTION performer?
Hi all,
According to Norwegian law, the performer or main performer of a procedure has
to be explicitly recorded. The main performer is not necessarily the same
person who records the action, so the COMPOSITION.composer RM object may not be
used for this. We can't seem to find any complete
Like the Ocean Archetype editor. It only supports the OpenEhr RM only. That
is understandable and no problem. The market will fill in that gap.
Op 27 aug. 2015 01:49 schreef Heath Frankel
heath.fran...@oceaninformatics.com:
Technical, the original grammar for AQL was bound to openEHR RM
Presumably the outline syntax, SELECT, CONTAINS etc is generalisable?
Ian
Dr Ian McNicoll
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
office +44 (0)1536 414994
skype: ianmcnicoll
email: i...@freshehr.com
twitter: @ianmcnicoll
Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation ian.mcnic...@openehr.org
Director, freshEHR Clinical
All of it is very, very generalizable :)
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Ian McNicoll i...@freshehr.com wrote:
Presumably the outline syntax, SELECT, CONTAINS etc is generalisable?
Ian
Dr Ian McNicoll
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
office +44 (0)1536 414994
skype: ianmcnicoll
email:
14 matches
Mail list logo
