On 18-02-18 23:09, GF wrote:
Is it an idea to annotate nodes with instructions for display.
Personally I think having special templates/archetypes for display is
better. Templates are create per purpose, and mixing purposes in a
single template does seem good idea to me
Personally I would prefer if no visualization attributes ended up in the
EHR RM, but I'm fine if we want to create an additional RM to handle
visualization (and we create templates of that model that point to the EHR
model)
2018-02-19 10:15 GMT+01:00 Bert Verhees :
> On
On 19-02-18 10:21, Diego Boscá wrote:
Personally I would prefer if no visualization attributes ended up in
the EHR RM, but I'm fine if we want to create an additional RM to
handle visualization (and we create templates of that model that point
to the EHR model)
I agree on this!
(again
It can be that Compositions appear in a single GUI-form (in GP
applications this happens regularly), but there is still no need to to
show them from a single template. That can be up to the GUI-designer, he
can use HTML-features to handle one or more entries in a single
GUI-view. Having the
Is there a terminology with concepts we can use to annotate?
Probably there is and there are more.
Which one, will be the question.
Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl
Kattensingel 20
2801 CA Gouda
the Netherlands
> On 19 Feb 2018, at 07:00, Erik Sundvall
Hi!
I agree that in many use-cases it is better to have a separate template
intended for GUI/application hints overlayed on a "normal" data content
definition template. (Quick experimentation may be an exception.)
That is why I added "layers of templates" in my previous comment - sorry
for not
note that a key problem I want to address is that templates based on
COMPOSITIONs don't really make sense as models of data retrieval/display
forms - they are really only useful for data capture forms (or messages,
or documents), because COMPOSITION is a container for committing data to
the
IMO annotating templates with UI info is not a good idea. A layered
approach is much cleaner and scalable, i.e. to define a new artifact on top
of current templates / archetypes / RM (these are also examples of layered
design).
Under this approach, if we have UITemplates on top of openEHR
Yes, this is about two different problems
1. having extra RM structures tree be used to group RM data in different
ways than the one defined for a composition, in order to use y as a data
retrieval for APIs and GUI.
2. another level of definition, above OPTs, to specify GUI structures and
Often Spanish is not always a big problem, let us try drag through
Google translate to make it al readable
Bert
On 19-02-18 17:37, David Moner wrote:
We also have a Final Degree Project where a student made a proposal
for a Visual Template Model. It's from 2012, for ISO 13606, and also
in
We also have a Final Degree Project where a student made a proposal for a
Visual Template Model. It's from 2012, for ISO 13606, and also in Spanish,
but the main idea probably remains the same :-)
I've been always in favor of having a third layer for visualization
purposes that defines some of
I was reviewing that work, and I found it cited this reference. This is an
old topic...
H. van der Linden, T. Austin, J. Talmon, Generic screen representations for
future-proof systems, is it possible? There is more to a GUI than meets the
eye, Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 95 (2009) 213–226.
In fact David, the work is about how an interface should look like, that is
interesting for GUI designers. But the discussion here is not about GUI
design but about offering a technical environment to GUI designers.
Bert
Op 19 feb. 2018 17:57 schreef "David Moner" :
I was
13 matches
Mail list logo