[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] web-webkit: enable https web page accessing

2011-06-29 Thread edwin . zhai
From: Zhai Edwin edwin.z...@intel.com Let web-webkit RRECOMMENDS glib-networing for TLS support. The following changes since commit a4f3e006e1f2fd93f156012af2a05adccf41d065: u-boot-mkimage: bump version to 2011.03 (2011-06-28 17:13:19 +0100) are available in the git repository at:

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] web-webkit: recommends glib-networking to access https web page

2011-06-29 Thread edwin . zhai
From: Zhai Edwin edwin.z...@intel.com It is required by libsoup for TLS support. [YOCTO #1037] got fixed Signed-off-by: Zhai Edwin edwin.z...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-sato/web/web-webkit_svn.bb |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [OE-core] Conflicting providers for ssh/sshd (dropbear and openssh)

2011-06-29 Thread Anders Darander
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 00:51, Scott Garman scott.a.gar...@intel.com wrote: On 06/28/2011 03:41 PM, Khem Raj wrote: reason is that dropbear only provides ssh and sshd packages openssh provides a few more e.g. openssh-sftp-server which is demanded by some images and at same time wants dropbear

Re: [OE-core] Conflicting providers for ssh/sshd (dropbear and openssh)

2011-06-29 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 29 jun 2011, om 00:41 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: If they are independent then may be the openssh recipe should be divided into openssh-ssh and openssh-rest so one can use openssh provided daemon or dropbear provided as they wish Dividing the openssl recipe would gain us little

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] Upstream-Status: update the status for some patches

2011-06-29 Thread Dongxiao Xu
gypsy: fix-unused-but-set-variable-warning.patch telepathy-python: parallel_make.patch opkg-utils: mtime-int.patch opkg: headerfix.patch flac: flac-gcc43-fixes.patch libsamplerate0: libsamplerate-0.1.7-macro-quoting.patch Signed-off-by: Dongxiao Xu dongxiao...@intel.com ---

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1][PULL] Upstream-Status update

2011-06-29 Thread Dongxiao Xu
Hi Saul, This pull request update some patch's Upstream-Status, please help to review and pull. Thanks, Dongxiao The following changes since commit a4f3e006e1f2fd93f156012af2a05adccf41d065: u-boot-mkimage: bump version to 2011.03 (2011-06-28 17:13:19 +0100) are available in the git

Re: [OE-core] Conflicting providers for ssh/sshd (dropbear and openssh)

2011-06-29 Thread Anders Darander
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:24, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote: Op 29 jun 2011, om 00:41 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: If they are independent then may be the openssh recipe should be divided into openssh-ssh and openssh-rest so one can use openssh provided daemon or

Re: [OE-core] Conflicting providers for ssh/sshd (dropbear and openssh)

2011-06-29 Thread Graeme Gregory
On 06/29/2011 09:50 AM, Anders Darander wrote: On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:24, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote: Op 29 jun 2011, om 00:41 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: If they are independent then may be the openssh recipe should be divided into openssh-ssh and openssh-rest

Re: [OE-core] Conflicting providers for ssh/sshd (dropbear and openssh)

2011-06-29 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 29 jun 2011, om 10:50 heeft Anders Darander het volgende geschreven: On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:24, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote: Op 29 jun 2011, om 00:41 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: If they are independent then may be the openssh recipe should be divided into

[OE-core] Gstreamer packaging

2011-06-29 Thread Koen Kooi
Saul said I broke gst-meta with my patch, so let's view the gstreamer situation: given: 1) plugins move between -good, -bad and -ugly 2) libraries move between -good, -bad and -ugly 3) applications require specific plugins 4) upgrade paths must work When combining 1 and 4 the current

Re: [OE-core] Conflicting providers for ssh/sshd (dropbear and openssh)

2011-06-29 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 10:08 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 10:56 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: That's already the case now. The problem is the PROVIDES overlap since the Poky people decided a distro could only have one true ssh implementation instead of choosing it per image.

Re: [OE-core] [Multilib] a problem of SHLIBSDIR

2011-06-29 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 17:10 +0800, Lu, Lianhao wrote: Hi, SHLIBSDIR is a central place where to store the pkg information about the shared libraries which the package would provide. In the do_package task, the function package_do_shlibs() will use this kind of information to automatically

Re: [OE-core] Conflicting providers for ssh/sshd (dropbear and openssh)

2011-06-29 Thread Phil Blundell
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 10:42 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: Speaking as the person who likely added this code in the first place, its not quite this simple. There are two problem cases: a) When we have several recipes like external-toolchain, glibc, eglibc and uclibc all of which provide

Re: [OE-core] Gstreamer packaging

2011-06-29 Thread Phil Blundell
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:33 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: So the new systems does the following: * split out each plugin as gst-plugin-foo * split out each lib as libfoo So both plugins and libraries have a stable package name (barring plugin renames, e.g. flvdemux - flv). Package feeds and

Re: [OE-core] Conflicting providers for ssh/sshd (dropbear and openssh)

2011-06-29 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 10:51 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 10:42 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: Speaking as the person who likely added this code in the first place, its not quite this simple. There are two problem cases: a) When we have several recipes like

Re: [OE-core] Gstreamer packaging

2011-06-29 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 10:55 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:33 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: So the new systems does the following: * split out each plugin as gst-plugin-foo * split out each lib as libfoo So both plugins and libraries have a stable package name

Re: [OE-core] Gstreamer packaging

2011-06-29 Thread Phil Blundell
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:53 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: Obviously you can make the recipe depend on good+bad+ugly but its less than ideal for build time reasons (esp. when considering dependencies) but also the reason that good/bad/ugly exist in the first place which is licensing. It's only

Re: [OE-core] Gstreamer packaging

2011-06-29 Thread Phil Blundell
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:53 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: Obviously you can make the recipe depend on good+bad+ugly but its less than ideal for build time reasons (esp. when considering dependencies) but also the reason that good/bad/ugly exist in the first place which is licensing. If the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] prelink_git.bb: Only block the postinst script when no image-prelink

2011-06-29 Thread Phil Blundell
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 12:20 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 20:42 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: +# If we're using mklibs-prelink, we want to skip this on the host side Is it really mklibs-prelink? I thought those were two different things. Ah, nevermind, I see you changed

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] multiple recipes converted to -staticdev packages

2011-06-29 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 17:07 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: +staticdev_libs = ${libdir}/*.a ${base_libdir}/*.a +FILES_${PN}-staticdev = ${@oe_filter_out('lib.*_nonshared.a', '${staticdev_libs}', d)} Does that actually work? I wouldn't have expected the pattern to get globbed early enough for the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] fontconfig: specify font directory in EXTRA_OECONF

2011-06-29 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 17:27 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: On 06/27/2011 08:24 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: -PR = r1 +PR = r3 a nitpick though not wrong but should be r2 Is it official policy that PRs need to be sequential? There seem to be various precedents for incrementing it by more than one in

[OE-core] [PATCH] libc locale split: fix some remaining problems

2011-06-29 Thread Koen Kooi
* libc-{common,package}.bbclass: fix shlib renaming for the C library Without this you'd end up with eglibc_2.12.ipk instead of libc6_2.12.ipk as before * eglibc-locale: don't make versions go backwards after split from eglibc eglibc was way beyond PR = r1 at the time of the

[OE-core] [PATCH v2] libc locale split: fix some remaining problems

2011-06-29 Thread Koen Kooi
* libc-{common,package}.bbclass: fix shlib renaming for the C library Without this you'd end up with eglibc_2.12.ipk instead of libc6_2.12.ipk as before * eglibc-locale: don't make versions go backwards after split from eglibc eglibc was way beyond PR = r1 at the time of the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] bump PR to fix the perl-native issue

2011-06-29 Thread Cui, Dexuan
Cui, Dexuan wrote: I did a core-image-sato-sdk and meta-toolchain-gmae building using a commit of May 12 between 605141a9(the perl-native workaround patch) and 3ba6d018(populate perl-native into its own dir), and grepped ${STAGING_BINDIR_NATIVE}/perl in ${STAGING_BINDIR_NATIVE} to find out

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] bump PR to fix the perl-native issue

2011-06-29 Thread Cui, Dexuan
Cui, Dexuan wrote: Cui, Dexuan wrote: I did a core-image-sato-sdk and meta-toolchain-gmae building using a commit of May 12 between 605141a9(the perl-native workaround patch) and 3ba6d018(populate perl-native into its own dir), and grepped ${STAGING_BINDIR_NATIVE}/perl in

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] fix to bug #1099, updates to Upstream-Status and distro_tracking_fields.inc

2011-06-29 Thread Dexuan Cui
The following changes since commit a4f3e006e1f2fd93f156012af2a05adccf41d065: u-boot-mkimage: bump version to 2011.03 (2011-06-28 17:13:19 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib dcui/master

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] grub: add -fno-reorder-functions into STAGE2_COMPILE

2011-06-29 Thread Dexuan Cui
This is used to work around a gcc-4.6's bug about the option. [YOCTO #1099] Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui dexuan@intel.com --- .../grub/grub-0.97/no-reorder-functions.patch | 31 meta/recipes-bsp/grub/grub_0.97.bb |5 ++- 2 files changed, 34

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] distro_tracking_fields.inc: update RECIPE_MANUAL_CHECK_DATE for screen and tcf-agent

2011-06-29 Thread Dexuan Cui
Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui dexuan@intel.com --- .../conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc index

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] grub: add -fno-reorder-functions into STAGE2_COMPILE

2011-06-29 Thread Cui, Dexuan
Cui, Dexuan wrote: This is used to work around a gcc-4.6's bug about the option. [YOCTO #1099] diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/grub/grub_0.97.bb b/meta/recipes-bsp/grub/grub_0.97.bb index 131d942..ffacb61 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/grub/grub_0.97.bb +++

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] lttng-ust: change the patch's Upstream-Status to Accepted.

2011-06-29 Thread Dexuan Cui
Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui dexuan@intel.com --- .../lttng/lttng-ust/uclibc-sched_getcpu.patch |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-ust/uclibc-sched_getcpu.patch

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] grub: add -fno-reorder-functions into STAGE2_COMPILE

2011-06-29 Thread Phil Blundell
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 21:09 +0800, Dexuan Cui wrote: +This turned out to be a gcc's bug. See +https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360513 +http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39333 + +Upstream gcc seems uninterested in the bug, so at present we can disable the +option as a

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] eglibc-locale: fix localedef packaging

2011-06-29 Thread Phil Blundell
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 22:32 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: From http://git.angstrom-distribution.org/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/testlab/commit/?h=yoctoid=0d0e14cda2ddd881d09798b0e6edd8086aa9b6d9 +libc6 - libc6_dev; So libc6 now depends on libc6-dev :( I guess it would be straightforward to patch

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Fix prelink to avoid first boot script

2011-06-29 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 20:42 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: In most cases the user will have the image-prelink enabled, which will prelink the target image at image creation time. If this is enabled we want to avoid prelinking at first boot. We do this by setting the script exit status to '0' if we

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1][PULL] Upstream-Status update

2011-06-29 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 16:47 +0800, Dongxiao Xu wrote: Hi Saul, This pull request update some patch's Upstream-Status, please help to review and pull. Thanks, Dongxiao The following changes since commit a4f3e006e1f2fd93f156012af2a05adccf41d065: u-boot-mkimage: bump version to

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] web-webkit: enable https web page accessing

2011-06-29 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 14:39 +0800, edwin.z...@intel.com wrote: From: Zhai Edwin edwin.z...@intel.com Let web-webkit RRECOMMENDS glib-networing for TLS support. The following changes since commit a4f3e006e1f2fd93f156012af2a05adccf41d065: u-boot-mkimage: bump version to 2011.03

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1][PULL] Update manual check info in distro_checking_fields.inc

2011-06-29 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 14:09 +0800, Dongxiao Xu wrote: Hi Saul, This pull request update the manual check fields in distro_checking_fields.inc, Please help to review and pull. Thanks, Dongxiao The following changes since commit a4f3e006e1f2fd93f156012af2a05adccf41d065:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/6 v4][PULL] 3G network support

2011-06-29 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 10:59 +0800, Dongxiao Xu wrote: Hi, This is the 4th version of 3G patches, please help to review and pull. Changes from v3: 1) Use DISTRO_FEATURE to handle the dependency of ofono. 2) Adopt ofono 0.50 version which could work with Ericsson modem. (ofono's commit

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] eglibc-locale: fix localedef packaging

2011-06-29 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 14:36 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 22:32 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: From http://git.angstrom-distribution.org/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/testlab/commit/?h=yoctoid=0d0e14cda2ddd881d09798b0e6edd8086aa9b6d9 +libc6 - libc6_dev; So libc6 now depends on

[OE-core] OE Changelog for 2011-06-20 to 2011-06-27

2011-06-29 Thread cliff . brake
Changelog for 2011-06-20 to 2011-06-27. Projects included in this report: bitbake: git://git.openembedded.org/bitbake openembedded-core: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core meta-openembedded: git://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded meta-angstrom:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] fix to bug #1099, updates to Upstream-Status and distro_tracking_fields.inc

2011-06-29 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 21:09 +0800, Dexuan Cui wrote: The following changes since commit a4f3e006e1f2fd93f156012af2a05adccf41d065: u-boot-mkimage: bump version to 2011.03 (2011-06-28 17:13:19 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib dcui/master

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] bump PR to fix the perl-native issue

2011-06-29 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 20:49 +0800, Cui, Dexuan wrote: Cui, Dexuan wrote: Cui, Dexuan wrote: I did a core-image-sato-sdk and meta-toolchain-gmae building using a commit of May 12 between 605141a9(the perl-native workaround patch) and 3ba6d018(populate perl-native into its own dir), and

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] linux-libc-headers: add 2.6.39

2011-06-29 Thread Koen Kooi
ping Op 21 jun 2011, om 15:59 heeft Koen Kooi het volgende geschreven: The 2.6.37.2 version is kept to allow the qemu kernels and libc headers version to match --- .../linux-libc-headers_2.6.39.bb | 49 1 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 0

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] grub: add -fno-reorder-functions into STAGE2_COMPILE

2011-06-29 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 14:20 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 21:09 +0800, Dexuan Cui wrote: +This turned out to be a gcc's bug. See +https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=360513 +http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39333 + +Upstream gcc seems uninterested in

Re: [OE-core] Gstreamer packaging

2011-06-29 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 12:08 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:53 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: Obviously you can make the recipe depend on good+bad+ugly but its less than ideal for build time reasons (esp. when considering dependencies) but also the reason that

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] multiple recipes converted to -staticdev packages

2011-06-29 Thread Richard Purdie
Hi Saul, I'm still not 100% sure this patch is the right way to go or not. Let me ask some specific questions below. On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 17:07 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: This commit adds a new base package ${PN}-staticdev to bitbake.conf which pulls in the static *.a libraries as a seperate

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] multiple recipes converted to -staticdev packages

2011-06-29 Thread Saul Wold
On 06/29/2011 04:25 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 17:07 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: +staticdev_libs = ${libdir}/*.a ${base_libdir}/*.a +FILES_${PN}-staticdev = ${@oe_filter_out('lib.*_nonshared.a', '${staticdev_libs}', d)} Does that actually work? I wouldn't have expected the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/7] useradd.bbclass: new class for managing user/group permissions

2011-06-29 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 09:42 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: On 6/28/11 8:04 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: Hi Scott, Sorry its taken me a while to get to this. Some comments below. I think I know the answer to a few of the issues mentioned below. Scott can correct me if I'm wrong. On Thu,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] prelink_git.bb: Only block the postinst script when no image-prelink (v2)

2011-06-29 Thread Cui, Dexuan
Mark Hatle wrote: [V2 - fix a small typo in the comment] If image-prelink is being used, the system will automatically prelink the target image. This avoids the need to run the postinst prelink script at first boot. However, if the user has not enabled image prelinking -- then we do

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] prelink_git.bb: Only block the postinst script when no image-prelink (v2)

2011-06-29 Thread Mark Hatle
On 6/29/11 9:42 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 22:39 +0800, Cui, Dexuan wrote: Even if without the patch, we still skip this on the host side -- previously we skipped with exit 1, and with the patch now we skip with exit 1 or exit 0. So IMHO looks the patch doesn't actually

[OE-core] bitbake -b busted again?

2011-06-29 Thread Phil Blundell
Using bitbake master from today, I'm now getting this error whenever I try to do bitbake -b anything.bb: ERROR: Command execution failed: Traceback (most recent call last): File /home/pb/oe/bitbake/lib/bb/command.py, line 102, in runAsyncCommand commandmethod(self.cmds_async, self, options)

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] prelink_git.bb: Only block the postinst script when no image-prelink (v2)

2011-06-29 Thread Cui, Dexuan
Mark Hatle wrote: On 6/29/11 9:42 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 22:39 +0800, Cui, Dexuan wrote: Even if without the patch, we still skip this on the host side -- previously we skipped with exit 1, and with the patch now we skip with exit 1 or exit 0. So IMHO looks the patch

Re: [OE-core] bitbake -b busted again?

2011-06-29 Thread Phil Blundell
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 15:48 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: Using bitbake master from today, I'm now getting this error whenever I try to do bitbake -b anything.bb: Actually, it looks like I was just unlucky/unskilled in my choice of recipes when I tested. It does in fact work for at least some

Re: [OE-core] bitbake -b busted again?

2011-06-29 Thread Phil Blundell
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 16:55 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 29 jun 2011, om 16:54 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven: On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 15:48 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: Using bitbake master from today, I'm now getting this error whenever I try to do bitbake -b anything.bb:

Re: [OE-core] bitbake -b busted again?

2011-06-29 Thread Phil Blundell
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 16:07 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: It seems that the main problem I was having was that (coincidentally in light of the earlier gst discussion) the recipe I was trying to build was unluckily named and being skipped because base.bbclass thought I wasn't licensed to use it.

[OE-core] In which meta/layer is a home for not yet supported machines

2011-06-29 Thread Andreas Mueller
Hi, just started to collect first oe-core experiences and would like to get the hardware on my (or friend's) desk supported. To check already available I did find -name *.conf | grep machine and miss o gumstix overo ( http://www.gumstix.com/store/index.php?cPath=33 ) o tx28 (

Re: [OE-core] [oe] In which meta/layer is a home for not yet supported machines

2011-06-29 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Andreas Mueller schnitzelt...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, just started to collect first oe-core experiences and would like to get the hardware on my (or friend's) desk supported. To check already available I did find -name *.conf | grep machine and miss o gumstix

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] base.bbclass: show layer's branches/revisions in the banner info

2011-06-29 Thread Cui, Dexuan
Khem Raj wrote: On 06/28/2011 04:07 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Tuesday 28 June 2011 07:45:09 Koen Kooi wrote: So it works as expected, but the output is a bit confusing. I have a few (conflicting) suggestions: 1) replace _BRANCH and _REVISION with ' branch' and ' revision', e.g.:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] base.bbclass: show layer's branches/revisions in the banner info

2011-06-29 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 29 jun 2011, om 18:14 heeft Cui, Dexuan het volgende geschreven: Khem Raj wrote: On 06/28/2011 04:07 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Tuesday 28 June 2011 07:45:09 Koen Kooi wrote: So it works as expected, but the output is a bit confusing. I have a few (conflicting) suggestions: 1)

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] multiple recipes converted to -staticdev packages

2011-06-29 Thread Saul Wold
On 06/29/2011 07:18 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: Hi Saul, I'm still not 100% sure this patch is the right way to go or not. Let me ask some specific questions below. On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 17:07 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: This commit adds a new base package ${PN}-staticdev to bitbake.conf which

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] multiple recipes converted to -staticdev packages

2011-06-29 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 29 jun 2011, om 18:23 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: On 06/29/2011 07:18 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: Hi Saul, I'm still not 100% sure this patch is the right way to go or not. Let me ask some specific questions below. On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 17:07 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: This

[OE-core] meta-toolchain issues. Unsatisfied dependencies, eglic, eglibc-dev

2011-06-29 Thread Jonathan Cameron
Prior to Koen's patch libc locale split: fix some remaining problems I was getting the same issue but with libc6 and particular versions. I'm guessing this is more fallout from the same issue Koen found? Relevant chunk of log is (during populate_sdk) is: | Downloading

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] multiple recipes converted to -staticdev packages

2011-06-29 Thread Phil Blundell
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 07:22 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: On 06/29/2011 04:25 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 17:07 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: +staticdev_libs = ${libdir}/*.a ${base_libdir}/*.a +FILES_${PN}-staticdev = ${@oe_filter_out('lib.*_nonshared.a', '${staticdev_libs}', d)}

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] base.bbclass: show layer's branches/revisions in the banner info

2011-06-29 Thread Cui, Dexuan
Koen Kooi wrote: Op 29 jun 2011, om 18:14 heeft Cui, Dexuan het volgende geschreven: Khem Raj wrote: On 06/28/2011 04:07 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Tuesday 28 June 2011 07:45:09 Koen Kooi wrote: BTW: meta and mete-yocto belong to the same git repo actually, so do you think showing them in

Re: [OE-core] Conflicting providers for ssh/sshd (dropbear and openssh)

2011-06-29 Thread Scott Garman
On 06/29/2011 01:56 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 29 jun 2011, om 10:50 heeft Anders Darander het volgende geschreven: On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:24, Koen Kooik...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote: Op 29 jun 2011, om 00:41 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: If they are independent then may be

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] multiple recipes converted to -staticdev packages

2011-06-29 Thread Saul Wold
On 06/29/2011 09:26 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 29 jun 2011, om 18:23 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: On 06/29/2011 07:18 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: Hi Saul, I'm still not 100% sure this patch is the right way to go or not. Let me ask some specific questions below. On Tue, 2011-06-28

[OE-core] [RFC v3 PATCH 0/9] Linux 3.0 build support

2011-06-29 Thread Anders Darander
v3: - task-base.bb: fix a problem that *pcmia26 couldn't be found. v2: Probably some more patches could be squashed together. There might also be more places that should be addressed in these patches. - Whitespace fixes - Updated module-init-tools to 3.16. I'm not applying the

[OE-core] [RFC v3 PATCH 6/9] modutils-initscripts: move recipe prior to modutils removal

2011-06-29 Thread Anders Darander
Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- .../{modutils = module-init-tools}/files/PD.patch |0 .../files/modutils.sh |0 .../modutils-initscripts.bb|0 3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) rename

[OE-core] [RFC v3 PATCH 1/9] Remove support for building 2.4 kernels

2011-06-29 Thread Anders Darander
Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 12 ++-- meta/classes/module-base.bbclass |2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass index

[OE-core] [RFC v3 PATCH 5/9] kernel.bblass: remove get_kernelmajorversion

2011-06-29 Thread Anders Darander
It is now unused. Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- meta/classes/linux-kernel-base.bbclass |8 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/linux-kernel-base.bbclass b/meta/classes/linux-kernel-base.bbclass index

[OE-core] [RFC v3 PATCH 9/9] distro_tracking_fields: remove modutils.

2011-06-29 Thread Anders Darander
Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- .../conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc |8 +--- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc b/meta/conf/distro/include/distro_tracking_fields.inc

[OE-core] [RFC v3 PATCH 3/9] modules-init-tools(-cross): update to 3.16

2011-06-29 Thread Anders Darander
Update to get support for Linux 3.0. Remove the application of ignore_arch_directory.patch, as this one do not apply. (A comment in the patch states not sure the reason yet. Keep for a while and verify later.). Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- ...oss_3.12.bb =

[OE-core] [RFC v3 PATCH 7/9] modutils: remove modutils

2011-06-29 Thread Anders Darander
As 2.4 support is being phased out, remove modutils. Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/files/armeb.patch | 16 meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/files/configure.patch | 34 --- meta/recipes-kernel/modutils/files/gcc4.patch |

[OE-core] [RFC v3 PATCH 8/9] task-base: remove modutils reference.

2011-06-29 Thread Anders Darander
Also remove the other kernel24 references. Make everything dependent on kernel26 default. Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-base.bb | 24 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git

[OE-core] [RFC v3 PATCH 4/9] module-init-tools-cross: do not install depmod as depmod-2.6

2011-06-29 Thread Anders Darander
Signed-off-by: Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se --- .../module-init-tools-cross_3.16.bb|4 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/module-init-tools/module-init-tools-cross_3.16.bb

Re: [OE-core] [RFC v3 PATCH 0/9] Linux 3.0 build support

2011-06-29 Thread Anders Darander
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 19:54, Anders Darander and...@chargestorm.se wrote: v3: - task-base.bb: fix a problem that *pcmia26 couldn't be found. This third version fixes a bug introduced in v2. (task-base-pcmcia26 weren't found). The fix is incorporated in patch 0008 (task-base). Sofar, I've

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] kernel: move menuconfig task after configure

2011-06-29 Thread Darren Hart
The following changes since commit e0fc42b51a8209dac1163ae8126f8c687b6bfddf: distro_tracking_fields.inc: update RECIPE_MANUAL_CHECK_DATE for screen and tcf-agent (2011-06-29 15:04:59 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib dvhart/kernel

[OE-core] Consistent MAC on Beagleboard xM

2011-06-29 Thread Darren Hart
We have an open bug for a consistent MAC on the Beagleboard xM on the yocto project bugzilla. I want to track whatever solution you have or plan to take. I didn't see a fix in linux-omap_2.6.39 at a quick scan through the patches. There are two approaches suggested in Comment 3 of the bug:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] glib-networking: Add 2.28.7 as new recipe

2011-06-29 Thread Saul Wold
On 06/28/2011 06:54 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 15:42 +0800, edwin.z...@intel.com wrote: From: Zhai Edwinedwin.z...@intel.com glib-networking contains the implementations of certain GLib networking features that cannot be implemented directly in GLib itself because of their

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] multiple recipes converted to -staticdev packages

2011-06-29 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 29 jun 2011, om 19:27 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: On 06/29/2011 09:26 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 29 jun 2011, om 18:23 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: On 06/29/2011 07:18 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: Hi Saul, I'm still not 100% sure this patch is the right way to go

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] base.bbclass: show layer's branches/revisions in the banner info

2011-06-29 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 29 jun 2011, om 18:44 heeft Cui, Dexuan het volgende geschreven: Koen Kooi wrote: Op 29 jun 2011, om 18:14 heeft Cui, Dexuan het volgende geschreven: Khem Raj wrote: On 06/28/2011 04:07 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Tuesday 28 June 2011 07:45:09 Koen Kooi wrote: BTW: meta and mete-yocto

Re: [OE-core] Consistent MAC on Beagleboard xM

2011-06-29 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 29 jun 2011, om 23:00 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven: We have an open bug for a consistent MAC on the Beagleboard xM on the yocto project bugzilla. I want to track whatever solution you have or plan to take. I didn't see a fix in linux-omap_2.6.39 at a quick scan through the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] glib-networking: Add 2.28.7 as new recipe

2011-06-29 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 29 jun 2011, om 23:13 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: On 06/28/2011 06:54 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 15:42 +0800, edwin.z...@intel.com wrote: From: Zhai Edwinedwin.z...@intel.com glib-networking contains the implementations of certain GLib networking

[OE-core] [RFC 0/2] Sanity check network connectivity

2011-06-29 Thread Joshua Lock
v3 of this change set based on extra feedback from Khem Raj. Changes since v2: * Remove references to Yocto, don't offer default uri's to check * Make the error message configurable through a variable, CONNECTIVITY_CHECK_MSG, whilst providing a reasonable default. In response to a Yocto Bugzilla

[OE-core] [RFC 1/2] sanity.bbclass: pass the data object to the less frequent test harnesses

2011-06-29 Thread Joshua Lock
By passing the data object to the less frequently run test harnesses (check_sanity_tmpdir_change(), check_sanity_sstate_dir_change() and check_sanity_version_change()) we can run tests against BitBake data here too. Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com --- meta/classes/sanity.bbclass

[OE-core] [RFC 2/2] sanity: implement network connectivity test

2011-06-29 Thread Joshua Lock
Sanity test to verify files can be fetched from the network using git, http and https fetchers point users at a page to help get set up in the case of a failure. Requires a variable CONNECTIVITY_CHECK_URIS to be set, using the same pattern as SRC_URI, of URI's to test against. The variable

Re: [OE-core] [RFC 0/2] Sanity check network connectivity

2011-06-29 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 29 jun 2011, om 23:55 heeft Joshua Lock het volgende geschreven: v3 of this change set based on extra feedback from Khem Raj. Changes since v2: * Remove references to Yocto, don't offer default uri's to check Can't you offer an oe.org url to check instead?

Re: [OE-core] Building behind a firewall/proxy

2011-06-29 Thread Joshua Lock
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 22:20 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 28 jun 2011, om 22:14 heeft Joshua Lock het volgende geschreven: All, For the Yocto 1.1 release we want to ease the pain of getting set up to build behind a firewall. I have a series of patches under development to run a one

Re: [OE-core] Building behind a firewall/proxy

2011-06-29 Thread Joshua Lock
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 14:46 -0700, Tom Rini wrote: On 06/28/2011 01:14 PM, Joshua Lock wrote: All, For the Yocto 1.1 release we want to ease the pain of getting set up to build behind a firewall. I have a series of patches under development to run a one hit sanity test which tries

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] eglibc-locale: fix localedef packaging

2011-06-29 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 28 jun 2011, om 18:11 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 17:30 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: the ${PN} still needs some checking, since it will now inheriting the default FILES_${PN} Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net I merged a different

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] Add env setting to support libtool2.4 m4 macro

2011-06-29 Thread Jessica Zhang
Add OECORE_ACLOCAL_OPTS to env setup scripts for options running aclocal to generate correct libtool 2.4 m4 macro, the autogen.sh should be changed as aclocal ${OECORE_ACLOCAL_OPTS} The following changes since commit c412674cf818e77e35857fb93353e392e7ac9e53: Khem Raj (1):

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] Add OECORE_ACLOCAL_OPTS to env setup scripts for autotool project using correct libtool 2.4

2011-06-29 Thread Jessica Zhang
Signed-off-by: Jessica Zhang jessica.zh...@intel.com --- meta/classes/toolchain-scripts.bbclass |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/toolchain-scripts.bbclass b/meta/classes/toolchain-scripts.bbclass index 09ecd7c..3301319 100644 ---

[OE-core] How to reuse code in oe-core environment

2011-06-29 Thread Andreas Mueller
Hi, I am playing around with oe-core try to find a way of reusing code for multiple recipes. In oe I did create foo.inc with foo() { # code to reuse } and called foo from several recipes. In oe-core the run.* scripts are much more stripped of unnecessary. All the code included by

Re: [OE-core] Consistent MAC on Beagleboard xM

2011-06-29 Thread Darren Hart
On 06/29/2011 02:19 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 29 jun 2011, om 23:00 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven: We have an open bug for a consistent MAC on the Beagleboard xM on the yocto project bugzilla. I want to track whatever solution you have or plan to take. I didn't see a fix in

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] eglibc-locale: add missing 2.12 version

2011-06-29 Thread Saul Wold
On 06/28/2011 05:21 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: Signed-off-by: Koen Kooik...@dominion.thruhere.net --- meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-locale_2.12.bb | 58 1 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 meta/recipes-core/eglibc/eglibc-locale_2.12.bb

Re: [OE-core] How to reuse code in oe-core environment

2011-06-29 Thread Khem Raj
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Andreas Mueller schnitzelt...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, I am playing around with oe-core try to find a way of reusing code for multiple recipes. In oe I did create foo.inc with foo() {        # code to reuse } and called foo from several recipes. In oe-core the

Re: [OE-core] How to reuse code in oe-core environment

2011-06-29 Thread Chris Larson
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Andreas Mueller schnitzelt...@gmx.de wrote: foo() {        # code to reuse } and called foo from several recipes. In oe-core the run.* scripts are much more stripped of unnecessary.  All the code included by 'require' seems to miss, so the function foo()

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] util-linux: Rebase remove-lscpu patch for non-gplv3

2011-06-29 Thread Saul Wold
This patch rebases the remove-lscpu patch for util-linux so that it can build a non-gplv3 compliant image. Sau! The following changes since commit ff014d9634638457622f6019b163e75bafcefada: task-base: add 3G into DISTRO_FEATURE (2011-06-29 14:46:46 +0100) are available in the git repository

Re: [OE-core] How to reuse code in oe-core environment

2011-06-29 Thread Andreas Mueller
On Thursday, June 30, 2011 02:32:56 AM Mark Hatle wrote: On 6/29/11 6:59 PM, Chris Larson wrote: On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Andreas Mueller schnitzelt...@gmx.de wrote: foo() { # code to reuse } and called foo from several recipes. In oe-core the run.* scripts are

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] util-linux: Rebase remove-lscpu patch from non-gplv3

2011-06-29 Thread Saul Wold
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com --- .../util-linux-2.19.1/remove-lscpu.patch | 120 ++- meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux_2.19.1.bb |2 +- 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 9/9] cmake: add nativesdk and target versions

2011-06-29 Thread Saul Wold
On 06/17/2011 07:51 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: Adds a recipe that provides the nativesdk and target versions of CMake. This recipe is based on code from OpenEmbeeded (rev b1f2e1501c19540617a829b37415c0616101c7ad). Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvadorota...@ossystems.com.br ---

  1   2   >