Hello Marek,
I think, we have to stop the discussion now, because it is not leading
into any conclusion. Anyway, both of us have a different opinion.
Maybe rewriting into python will solve it, I won't do that.
Cheers,
Andrej
On Wed, 2022-02-02 at 09:17 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 2/2/22
On 2/2/22 07:51, Valek, Andrej wrote:
Marek,
Hello Andrej,
Sorry, but these are still not an arguments, why to do that.
I'm sorry, I am lost and confused ... what part of the email are you
referring to ?
On Mon, 2022-01-31 at 10:39 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 1/31/22 08:01, Valek,
Marek,
Sorry, but these are still not an arguments, why to do that.
On Mon, 2022-01-31 at 10:39 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 1/31/22 08:01, Valek, Andrej wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hello Andrej,
>
> (please avoid top-posting)
>
> > Sorry, but personally I don't like your idea. What's the benefit of
On 1/31/22 08:01, Valek, Andrej wrote:
Hi,
Hello Andrej,
(please avoid top-posting)
Sorry, but personally I don't like your idea. What's the benefit of
reverting this? I would keep the ${} for bitbake and $ for shell. The
{} has to be placed only for variables like $a${b}c.
That's exactly
Hi,
Sorry, but personally I don't like your idea. What's the benefit of
reverting this? I would keep the ${} for bitbake and $ for shell. The
{} has to be placed only for variables like $a${b}c.
We should respect the workflow on all recipes otherwise we're braking
the "unwritten" rules.
Regards,
On 1/29/22 03:01, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Personally I do not see it as inconsistent, it is just the way
shell handles variables. It is just something to get used to (I
also had a colleague who would review any shell code changes we
made and comment on every single unnecessary
> -Original Message-
> From: Marek Vasut
> Sent: den 29 januari 2022 02:39
> To: Peter Kjellerstedt ; openembedded-
> c...@lists.openembedded.org
> Cc: Andrej Valek ; Richard Purdie
>
> Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Revert "featimage: refactor style&
] Revert "featimage: refactor style"
This reverts commit f44bb458884da64356ee188917094b5515d3b159.
The reverted patch attempted to perform some sort of clean up, however
it only brought in style inconsistencies like this:
```
conf_desc="$conf_desc${sep}setup"
```
The c
ubject: [OE-core] [PATCH] Revert "featimage: refactor style"
>
> This reverts commit f44bb458884da64356ee188917094b5515d3b159.
>
> The reverted patch attempted to perform some sort of clean up, however
> it only brought in style inconsistencies like this:
>
> ```
&
This reverts commit f44bb458884da64356ee188917094b5515d3b159.
The reverted patch attempted to perform some sort of clean up, however
it only brought in style inconsistencies like this:
```
conf_desc="$conf_desc${sep}setup"
```
The curly brackets around variables were placed in the
10 matches
Mail list logo
