On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Andre McCurdy wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Sujith H wrote:
> > From: Christopher Larson
> >
> > When built on an i686 host for qemux86-64 without the
> > fix to obey LD and it fails:
Hi,
Please find my comments below:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:39:50PM +0800, Lei Maohui wrote:
> More:
> - change spdx tool from fossology to dosocs2
It would be nice to include the reason for change from fossology to dosocs2
in the commit message too (from cover letter)
> Signed-off-by: Lei
The current file structure felt slightly unsuitable for adding
MIPS64r2. So I restructured it slightly and added MIPS64r2
support
Signed-off-by: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel
---
meta/conf/machine/include/mips/arch-mips.inc | 60
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
> zhe...@windriver.com
> Sent: den 18 september 2016 04:52
> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject: [OE-core] [PATCH]
On 19 September 2016 at 12:57, Peter Kjellerstedt <
peter.kjellerst...@axis.com> wrote:
> > ++mem_exists="`grep "^$groupname:[!:]*:[!:]*:\([!,
> ]*,\)*$username\(,[!,]*\)*"$rootdir/etc/group || true`"
> > if test "x$mem_exists" = "x"; then
> >
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Ulf Magnusson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 5:42 AM, Robert Yang
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/19/2016 11:32 AM, Randy MacLeod wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2016-09-18 10:37 PM, Christopher Larson wrote:
On Sun,
The open(self.lock, 'w') may fail when the lock is created by other
users, return false for this case to let it try other devices.
Fixed:
runqemu - INFO - Running /sbin/ip link...
runqemu - INFO - Acquiring lockfile /tmp/qemu-tap-locks/tap0.lock...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
The following changes since commit d77fe838ab7631a19e90ff4226f0712e54aa4e22:
scripts: add tool to scan for bashisms recipe shell scripts (2016-09-16
15:19:31 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib rbt/rq_lock
1) Upgrade ltp from 20160126 to 20160510.
2) Modify some patches, since the data has been changed.
0011-Rename-sigset-variable-to-sigset1.patch
0030-lib-Use-PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE-in-place-of-PTHREAD_.patch
3) Delete some patches, since they are no use.
Fixed kernel trace when booting:
[ 12.825809] random: crng init done
[ 13.918323] irq 36: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
[ 13.924821] CPU: 0 PID: 335 Comm: getty Not tainted 4.8.0-rc5-yocto-standard
#1
[ 13.930492] Call Trace:
[ 13.936214] [cff73f20] [c00790f0]
The following changes since commit d77fe838ab7631a19e90ff4226f0712e54aa4e22:
scripts: add tool to scan for bashisms recipe shell scripts (2016-09-16
15:19:31 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib rbt/qemuppc
On 09/19/2016 05:12 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
On Sun, 2016-09-18 at 00:39 -0700, Robert Yang wrote:
* Search rootfs in the following order:
- IMAGE_NAME*.FSTYPE
- IMAGE_LINK_NAME*.FSTYPE
* Search kernel in the following order:
- QB_DEFAULT_KERNEL
- KERNEL_IMAGETYPE
- KERNEL_IMAGETYPE*
On 19 September 2016 at 16:09, Burton, Ross wrote:
> This is being fired on the AB:
>
> ERROR: linux-yocto-4.1.32+gitAUTOINC+b30b6b9ef2_d6237b3b24-r0
> do_kernel_version_sanity_check: Package Version
> (4.1.32+gitAUTOINC+b30b6b9ef2_d6237b3b24) does not match of kernel
On 2016-09-16 07:48 PM, California Sullivan wrote:
The kernel being built should match what the recipe claims it is
building. This function ensures that happens by comparing the version
information in the kernel's Makefile to the PV the recipe is using.
v2 changes:
* Match against PV instead of
On 19 September 2016 at 16:04, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
> Otherwise, I don't see anything obviously wrong (I looked at the regexs
> but didn't study them in detail) .. and it looks sane to me. A good
> balance between checking and not needing the entire kernel to be
This adds the correct support for initfini-array which replaces .init
and .fini with .init-array and .fini-array. There is no appreciable
size difference with this change.
The change is needed since configure will not correctly detect support
when building cross-compilers.
This only affect
On 09/26/2014 05:59 PM, Fathi Boudra wrote:
* pass --enable-debug-frame on aarch64 architecture
Hi Fathi,
I'm now dealing with a problem related to libunwind support on aarch64.
Could you please tell me why '--enable-debug-frame' is needed for aarch64?
Best Regards,
Chen Qi
* include
Hi,
It seems that this one causes build failures on qemumips64 + multilib:
config:
http://autobuilder.yocto.io:8010/builders/nightly-multilib/builds/64/steps/CreateAutoConf_5/logs/stdio
error:
http://autobuilder.yocto.io:8010/builders/nightly-multilib/builds/64/steps/BuildImages_5/logs/stdio
Fixed when building on Debian-testing:
| Can't locate find.pl in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl
/usr/local/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.22.2 /usr/local/share/perl/5.22.2
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl5/5.22 /usr/share/perl5
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.22 /usr/share/perl/5.22
The following changes since commit 5ac0604fdc7d5b783011c43d476210b427b5dae0:
build-appliance-image: Create image in correct location (2016-09-19 08:58:04
+0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib rbt/openssl
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Bruce Ashfield
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Cal Sullivan <
> california.l.sulli...@intel.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 09/19/2016 03:55 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Cal Sullivan <
>>
On 2016-09-19 02:35 AM, Wang Xin wrote:
1) Upgrade ltp from 20160126 to 20160510.
2) Modify some patches, since the data has been changed.
0011-Rename-sigset-variable-to-sigset1.patch
0030-lib-Use-PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE-in-place-of-PTHREAD_.patch
3) Delete some patches, since they are
* use PACKAGECONFIG for various *spell implementations
* keep aspell enabled by default
* prevent hunspell/myspell being autodetected as reported in "bitbake world
status" e-mails:
WARN: enchant: enchant rdepends on hunspell, but it isn't a build dependency?
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa
== Number of issues - stats ==
{| class='wikitable'
!|Date !!colspan='3'|Failed tasks
!!colspan='6'|Failed depencencies!!|Signatures
!!colspan='12'|QA !!Comment
|-
|| ||qemuarm ||qemux86 ||qemux86_64
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:10 AM, sujith h wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Andre McCurdy
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Sujith H wrote:
>> > From: Christopher Larson
>> >
>> >
It looks like the function is doing as its supposed to, and we need to
update some PVs or SRCREVs to match PVs.
E.g., on the error below, SRCREV d6237b3b24 is indeed 4.1.31.
---
Cal
On 09/19/2016 09:22 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 19 September 2016 at 16:09, Burton, Ross
This adds the correct support for initfini-array which replaces .init
and .fini with .init-array and .fini-array. There is no appreciable
size difference with this change.
The change is needed since configure will not correctly detect support
when building cross-compilers.
Signed-off-by: Haitao
We are experimenting failures to calibrate CPU's using TSC in x86
VM's due to usage of nested KVM [1], this is a known issue [2][3]
in virtualization environments, for detail explnation see [4].
Also we already have an ignore for 'TSC Fast calibration fail'.
[1]
On 19 September 2016 at 18:05, Cal Sullivan wrote:
> It looks like the function is doing as its supposed to, and we need to
> update some PVs or SRCREVs to match PVs.
>
> E.g., on the error below, SRCREV d6237b3b24 is indeed 4.1.31.
>
And some more builders
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> == Number of issues - stats ==
> {| class='wikitable'
> !|Date !!colspan='3'|Failed tasks
> !!colspan='6'|Failed depencencies!!|Signatures
>
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Andreas Müller
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
>> == Number of issues - stats ==
>> {| class='wikitable'
>> !|Date !!colspan='3'|Failed tasks
>>
Yep, these all have incorrect PVs.
628bf62756 Merge tag 'v4.4.11' into standard/base
The problem seems fairly wide spread.
Bruce, do you suggest updating PVs or updating the SRCREVs (is there a
good reason to keep using old SRCREVs?)?
---
Cal
On 09/19/2016 11:54 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On
Depend on zeroconf distro feature whether to install avahi packages
as it is done in packagegroup-base.
While at it also get rid of some comment cruft.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner
---
meta-oe/recipes-core/packagegroups/packagegroup-basic.bb | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1
I don't have time to smoke test a SRCREV update for so many machines
right now, so I think for now I will just set the correct PV in the
various linux-yocto recipes so we don't block master-next builds.
Is this acceptable?
Thanks,
Cal
On 09/19/2016 01:49 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
On Mon,
More:
- change spdx tool from fossology to dosocs2
Signed-off-by: Lei Maohui
---
meta/classes/spdx.bbclass | 505 ++
meta/conf/licenses.conf | 67 +-
2 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 374 deletions(-)
diff --git
There are some problems in spdx module(spdx.bbclass).
1. The newest version of spdxi specification is 2.0. But even spdx 1.1,
yocto+SPDX can't support well.
2. It is complex to build a Yocto+SPDX environment.
3. Creating a spdx file spends too much time, especially for large software.
To improve
On Sun, 2016-09-18 at 00:39 -0700, Robert Yang wrote:
> * Search rootfs in the following order:
> - IMAGE_NAME*.FSTYPE
> - IMAGE_LINK_NAME*.FSTYPE
>
> * Search kernel in the following order:
> - QB_DEFAULT_KERNEL
> - KERNEL_IMAGETYPE
> - KERNEL_IMAGETYPE*
>
> * Search dtb in the
Hi all
I have updated my patch for newest poky, can someone give me some comments?
^_^
Best regards
Lei
> -Original Message-
> From: Lei, Maohui
> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 4:40 PM
> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Cc: jsmoel...@linuxfoundation.org; Lei, Maohui
The following changes since commit 5ac0604fdc7d5b783011c43d476210b427b5dae0:
build-appliance-image: Create image in correct location (2016-09-19 08:58:04
+0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib rbt/rq-gen-tap
It creats /etc/runqemu-nosudo when creats taps, so should remove it when
remove taps.
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang
---
scripts/runqemu-gen-tapdevs | 46 +
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git
ping
Thanks,
On 2016年08月26日 09:57, Yuanjie Huang wrote:
From: Yuanjie Huang
Pointer arithmatic results in implementation defined signed integer
type, so that 's - src' in strlcpy and others may trigger signed overflow.
In case of compilation by gcc or clang with
On 2 September 2016 at 22:59, Reinhard Tartler
wrote:
> According to the documentation, setting FEED_DEPLOYDIR_BASE_URI should
> be sufficient for setting up local feeds. This commit fixes the
> implementation to actually do that, even if BUILD_IMAGES_FROM_FEEDS is
>
Some machines move to new kernel versions slower, making the catch-all
LINUX_VERSION variable inaccurate. This mismatch is a security concern
and with 5df5974d53f88a85b2bb789708b86049b091e3aa becomes a build time
error.
Fix this by setting each MACHINE's LINUX_VERSION to the kernel version
each
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Cal Sullivan <
california.l.sulli...@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 09/19/2016 03:55 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Cal Sullivan <
> california.l.sulli...@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> I don't have time to smoke test a SRCREV update for so
On 2016-09-19 03:53 PM, Cal Sullivan wrote:
Yep, these all have incorrect PVs.
628bf62756 Merge tag 'v4.4.11' into standard/base
The problem seems fairly wide spread.
Bruce, do you suggest updating PVs or updating the SRCREVs (is there a
good reason to keep using old SRCREVs?)?
Updating the
On 09/19/2016 03:55 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Cal Sullivan
> wrote:
I don't have time to smoke test a SRCREV update for so many
machines right now, so I think for now I will
Without a packageconfig dependency for the file utility, there's
a rare compile faiure caused by a race where the magic.h
header file is not found:
../../../git/lib/support/plausible.c:33:19: fatal error: magic.h: No such file
or directory
This file, plausible.c, is part of libsupport.a which
On 19 September 2016 at 21:22, Randy MacLeod
wrote:
> +PACKAGECONFIG ??= "file"
> +PACKAGECONFIG[file] = ',,file'
>
This still has the non-determinism problem if file is disabled in
PACKAGECONFIG.
If the configure.ac doesn't have options but is doing standard
On Mon, 2016-09-19 at 15:55 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 2016-09-19 03:53 PM, Cal Sullivan wrote:
> >
> > Yep, these all have incorrect PVs.
> > 628bf62756 Merge tag 'v4.4.11' into standard/base
> > The problem seems fairly wide spread.
> >
> > Bruce, do you suggest updating PVs or updating
On 19 September 2016 at 10:38, André Draszik wrote:
> +++ b/meta/recipes-support/boost/boost/0004-Use-atomic-by-
> default-when-BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_ATOMIC.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
> +From c234cc557f60729e071d6da59747c1a9289555c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Peter Dimov
The alleviates the need to use and maintain hand-written
assembly, just relying on the compiler to do the right
thing.
Signed-off-by: André Draszik
---
...by-default-when-BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_ATOMIC.patch | 58 ++
meta/recipes-support/boost/boost_1.61.0.bb
The alleviates the need to use and maintain hand-written
assembly, just relying on the compiler to do the right
thing.
Signed-off-by: André Draszik
---
...by-default-when-BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_ATOMIC.patch | 59 ++
meta/recipes-support/boost/boost_1.61.0.bb
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Cal Sullivan <
california.l.sulli...@intel.com> wrote:
> I don't have time to smoke test a SRCREV update for so many machines right
> now, so I think for now I will just set the correct PV in the various
> linux-yocto recipes so we don't block master-next builds.
Ping.
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-
> boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of jackie.hu...@windriver.com
> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 10:48 AM
> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>
Ping.
> -Original Message-
> From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
> [mailto:openembedded-core-
> boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of jackie.hu...@windriver.com
> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 1:01 PM
> To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> Subject:
55 matches
Mail list logo