I've joined this group - thanks for accepting. But, I'd like to join using a
non-yahoo account. Did I miss some instruction on a web page somewhere that
tells me how to do that?
Thanks.
Richard Schilling
-
New Yahoo! Messenger
The evolving work-social phenomena are sure interesting. Toyota, and
agriculture research adopting the approach is pretty cool.
I believe there are a LOT of companies incorporating open source work
into RFPs and proposals to get a contract without even talking to the
original developers - this
Can anyone post the link again to the files section? Thanks!
Richard
Will Ross wrote:
oops. now i posted the document in the openhealth files section.
[wr]
- - - - - - - -
On Mar 23, 2006, at 8:01 PM, David Forslund wrote:
As you probably noticed, images (and attachments) are
I'd prefer to assume that the CCHIT pricing model is simply biased
toward software companies that can produce a viable product. And by
that I mean a software product that stimulates revenue for a company at
some point - which in our case is not through the sale of software licenses.
Nothing
Rod Roark wrote:
This is equivalent to ignoring the practical issues that Fred raised.
I disagree. The practical issues Fred raised are real concerns, but the
software companies we're competing against throw a *lot* of money into
validation and certification - especially HIPAA compliance (in
Nice work flow diagram.
One of the more difficult things I've encountered in 10+ years of health
care software development is documenting the work flow.
The hallmark of a good clinic hospital seems to be the ability to adjust
the work flow to meet the need. There's the work flow the system
I understand Rod's point, and I believe that if you choose to restrict
your activities to a purely altruistic ideal, then what Rod talks about
and what Eric Rayomond talks about is just fine. But, I argue that at
any point you invest time into open source (as a user,developer, etc.)
it is
offered a U.S. corporation might be much greater
than in Malaysia.
Richard Schilling
Molly Cheah wrote:
Dear all,
I am happy to annouce that the transfer of the domain name oshca.org
from Brian had been completed. Brian is in the process of creating and
signing a document disclaiming rights
Molly, I think you should incorporate in Malaysia eventually. As a
Malaysian you'll have a very easy time doing it and know what it means.
The members of the protem committee have been discussing OSCHA
incorporation since 2002 or perhaps earlier if memory serves. Why it
didn't happen in
Thank you Dr. Molly. What you wrote is very helpful and answers my
concerns about intellectual property protections afforded to Malaysian
incorporation. But, I'm still not convinced I know enough to say it's a
great idea to start there. You're right - I need to spend some time
there, and
'. Being registered as an organization/corporation is VERY
important.
Regards,
Tim Cook
Richard Schilling wrote:
As soon as I have those four things, I'll get the paperwork drafted.
Looks like OSCHA would be technically classified in the U.S. as an
international trade association. Non
MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Schilling wrote:
Molly deserves extra credit for hanging in there.
I'm anxious to see things progress. It doesn't sound like, though, you
or anyone is interested in seeing a U.S. component. Is that true?
Richard
Hi Richard,
Let me be quite clear
Since OSCHA is an internationl body we can register siultaneously, and
choose the base to be anywhere.
Is the incorporation in Malaysia going to be doing business or just
representing FOSS industry interests? Depending on the answer to that
here are our choices here in the U.S. that I can
to update the community with
information would lead to a kind of upstaging the protem committee's
efforts. If you proceed to register OSHCA it will be tantamount to
acting in bad faith, as I had been negotiating with Brian on behalf of
the community.
Molly
Richard Schilling wrote:
Since
14 matches
Mail list logo
