It would be fine to post digital images with the signatures and address
information redacted - possibly by overlaying them with Information on file
with OIDF or something of that sort. (Sort of how elevators often contain
messages about the elevator license being on file at such-and-such
John,
The policy itself looks good. Making it public is a good first step.
It states that the OIDF regularly reviews it's compliance with our privacy
policy.
I think posting member PII to the public website is not in keeping with the
policy.
We should review the IPR process and any other
They look good.
In addition, I feel that it is a good practice to put privacy policy
link as a footer item in every page as well.
In our case, right next to Contact Us in the footer.
=nat
(2010/01/28 10:00), John Ehrig wrote:
Darin at Refresh mocked up a couple of options for the higher
Please no. There are very few parts of the site which people are actually
interacting with and where we accept data. I'm fine with this on pages for
things like the membership tool and wiki.
--David
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Nat Sakimura n-sakim...@nri.co.jp wrote:
They look good.
Did you know that privacy is the one link that appears on every page
hosted by google?
(Okay, not really, but it's pretty darn close.)
There's a good reason for this, and it sets a very good example. So +1 to
putting the link in the footer on openid.net. And on every site.
-DeWitt
On Wed,
Yes, but people give Google data, often personal data, with every
interaction. That's very different than the OpenID site.
I don't care enough to argue, so go for it if you feel strongly.
--David
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:40 PM, DeWitt Clinton dew...@google.com wrote:
Did you know that
Maybe I'm missing something. What is there to disagree with?
Serious question, I can't even guess at the objection.
-DeWitt
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:43 PM, David Recordon record...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes, but people give Google data, often personal data, with every
interaction. That's very
Just adding yet another link to every page. The homepage already has thirty
four different things you can click on.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:46 PM, DeWitt Clinton dew...@google.com wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something. What is there to disagree with?
Serious question, I can't even guess at
Starting the new year off right and moving this to the public list... :)
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Brian Kissel bkis...@janrain.com wrote:
Hello All,
Following up on our meeting last week, I’ve updated the OIDF Committee Wiki
at https://openid.pbworks.com/Committees I’ve also
There are a few legitimate use cases of the private list, but I generally
agree with you. It seems like the main uses for the private list should be:
- draft meeting notes for review
- sensitive legal / PR issues
- HR (though this mainly happens via a small CC list of the exec committee)
-
Sure, I have absolutely no objection to private lists for sensitive affairs,
which definitely do come up from time to time. But I'm equally conscious of
the power of autocomplete in the To box, or just simple muscle memory.
BTW, the draft notes should probably be public. All but the executive
11 matches
Mail list logo
