+1
> On Aug 10, 2018, at 11:32 AM, Mike Jones wrote:
>
> Welcome (back), Dale! Thanks again, Ashish!
>
>-- Mike
>
> From: board On Behalf Of Don Thibeau
> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 7:50 AM
> To: OIDF Board
> Subject: [OpenID
Yes, welcome.
On Aug 17, 2015, at 7:06 PM, Pamela Dingle pdin...@pingidentity.com wrote:
Welcome Lydia!
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Adam Dawes ada...@google.com
mailto:ada...@google.com wrote:
+1
Great to have you on Board; look forward to meeting you at our next meeting.
+1
On Aug 21, 2014, at 2:51 PM, Nat Sakimura sakim...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
2014-08-22 1:15 GMT+09:00 Mike Jones michael.jo...@microsoft.com:
Congratulations on the ONC joining!
From: oidf-marketing-commit...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:oidf-marketing-commit...@googlegroups.com] On
For 1 that is fine on Oct 30. (There is an extra 19 in the date that I am
ignoring)
2 is fine.
2a I note that MWC is March 2-5 in Barcelona and we may want to plan something
around that, though probably not a board meeting.
2b IETF 92 Dallas March 22-27 (probably WG meeting)
3 Hotels are not
I am in Paris as well that week. If it is possible I will try to get over.
John
On 2012-02-06, at 11:18 PM, Nat Sakimura wrote:
Thank you Eric.
I will be in Paris during that time and I will see if I can sneak out
of IETF meeting so that I can join the meeting.
It all depends on when the
to contribute to it should
join the Artifact Binding working group, where the work is actually
proceeding. Formally, there have been 7 contributors on the Connect working
group list in the last 6 months: Breno de Medeiros, Chris Messina, Chuck
Mortimore, David Recordon, John Bradley, Joseph
Chris,
Are you referring to the libraries themselves or the WIKI pages we host
pointing to those distributions?
I know Libraries like openID4java are still actively maintained and in that
case officially part of a number of Eclipse projects.
John B.
On 2011-01-20, at 12:39 PM, Dick Hardt
Chris,
I was under the impression that the PHP library was a JainRain project. Is it
a fork that the foundation has taken responsibility for at some point?
I don't know that it is the foundations code. It may be but then who is
maintaining the agreements for contributors?
John B.
On
how nominate myself?
Thanks, js
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Chris Messina chris.mess...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:10 PM, John Bradley ve7...@ve7jtb.com wrote:
I seem to recall that the web site is using UTC for running ballots etc. I
suppose that we had
I am attending.
John B.
On 2010-07-12, at 1:16 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
I'll be there.
-Original Message-
From: openid-board-boun...@lists.openid.net
[mailto:openid-board-boun...@lists.openid.net] On Behalf Of Nat Sakimura
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 11:58 PM
To: openid-board
[mailto:openid-board-boun...@lists.openid.net] On Behalf Of John Bradley
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 5:45 PM
To: openid-board@lists.openid.net
Cc: bo...@lists.openid.net
Subject: Re: [OpenID board] Congratulations to Google on NCBI deployment
An update on users associating openID's
it this is the home page.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
John B.
On 2010-06-22, at 2:58 PM, John Bradley wrote:
They could accept them all now. They want to revise the interface before
adding more.
This is a link to some of the UX mock-ups under consideration.
http://kantarainitiative.org
Dick,
You know that XRI is used by multiple OP. It is not something a RP site
demands.
In discovery going forward we need to look at how and if XRI identifiers are
supported.
Because LRDD and XRI are so close you can normalize a XRI by adding @xri.net to
the end and doing webfinger/LRDD
David,
Thanks for informing the Tech Committee.
Regards
John B.
On 2010-05-19, at 11:23 PM, David Recordon wrote:
The committee elects its own chairs. A few months ago we elected Dick as
chair and me as co-chair. Joseph was really close to being co-chair.
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:22
Nat,
I think camps may be a bit strong.
Unless some people are only willing to accept exactly the openID connect
proposal.
We will have a WG shortly to work on the next version of the core protocol.
Some of what we have done for AB may or may not get reused as part of that.
I am willing to
David,
My recollection is that Dick said that being part of a decision to direct funds
to himself would be a conflict, so he recused himself from the vote.
I understood Scot's reply to be that resigning from the board/committee was not
required. That the bylaws contained other mechanisms to
On consideration of the events.
Nat, Dick and myself may have a different underlying expectations of process
than our American friends.
We come from Constitutional Monarchies vs Republics. The only place there is
fundamental difference between the systems is in cases like this.
That may be
, David Recordon record...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems that it was completely a misunderstanding. Given that the Board
wanted us to move forward quickly, I was just trying to help make that happen.
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:58 AM, John Bradley jbrad...@mac.com wrote:
David,
My recollection
on the 8th and use this opportunity to extend the
adoption and technology committee discussions to this venue. To propose
presentations and for further information please contact John Bradley or
myself:
Don Thibeau
d...@oidf.org
Executive Director
The OpenID Foundation
http
:
That's with EEMA. There is a European ID conference on May 3- and wiki says
there is a summit in conjunction with it. I. suppose that one is cancelled.
=nat @ Tokyo via iPhone
On 2010/04/19, at 23:45, John Bradley jbrad...@mac.com wrote:
June 8.
On 2010-04-19, at 10:37 AM, Nat wrote
I am moderating a pannel for OASIS at EEMA.
Your participation will certainly help rase the profile of openID at the event.
John B.
On 2010-04-14, at 11:30 AM, Don Thibeau (OIDF ED) wrote:
Before accepting the invitation below I wanted to see if there were any OIDF
Board members planning on
I think it is a good idea.
Good work Bill.
John Bradley
On 2010-03-17, at 6:48 PM, Allen Tom wrote:
Hi All -
Digg announced today that they’ll be accepting OpenID, and they’re doing a
lot of really positive things for Open Standards:
http://about.digg.com/node/575
This is a great
policy as a stating point if we want to
improve or broaden it within the legal or privacy committee.
From: openid-board-boun...@lists.openid.net
[mailto:openid-board-boun...@lists.openid.net] On Behalf Of John Bradley
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 10:00 AM
To: openid-board
Of John Bradley
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 9:40 AM
To: openid-board@lists.openid.net
Cc: bo...@openid.net
Subject: [OpenID board] Commitees
I was talking to Pam about the committee structure.
Should we have a committee on interoperability and testing separate from the
Technical
. Suite 600 Portland, OR 97204
Increase registrations, engage users, and grow your brand with RPX. Learn
more at www.rpxnow.com
-Original Message-
From: openid-board-boun...@lists.openid.net
[mailto:openid-board-boun...@lists.openid.net] On Behalf Of John Bradley
Sent: Wednesday
The 6 committees on the wiki look like a good start.
I know that there are a bunch of other new people on the board.
It might be useful if we all indicate what committees we intend to participate
in.
We can't all be chairs of every committee.I have a large ego but that would
be too much
26 matches
Mail list logo
