Hi Kevin,
> Am 14.06.2016 um 23:00 schrieb Kevin Rushforth :
>
> Hi,
>
> As far as we know, FXCanvas is now usable in an OSGi context with JDK 9 +
> Jigsaw, so you should be able to test this with the latest JDK 9 early access
> build.
I will contact Tom Schindl w.r.t. this as he maintains t
For what it is worth, a little known but on-topic community about the use of
JavaFX in games can be found at java-gaming.org. Most of the members are
involved with LWJGL and Libgdx (including founding coders for each), but there
is an area for those interested in using JavaFX in games. I'd like
Guru & Chien,
Please review the following fix to the HelloWebView toy:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8159474
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kcr/8159474/webrev.00/
-- Kevin
I think you mean "scene builder", not "stage builder". It was made
available under a BSD license for tools vendors that may want to
incorporate. Gluon is providing binaries as you noted.
- Don
On 14/06/2016 4:06 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
JavaFX is delivered as part of the JDK, so yes, Ora
Hi,
As far as we know, FXCanvas is now usable in an OSGi context with JDK 9
+ Jigsaw, so you should be able to test this with the latest JDK 9 early
access build.
You mentioned that the following bugs are critical for you:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8159227 (properly forward
c
The Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework (GEF) project as well as other Eclipse
project rely on the JavaFX-SWT-integration that is realized through FXCanvas.
We at GEF, however, do not use it out-of-the-box but have created a subclass
(http://git.eclipse.org/c/gef/org.eclipse.gef4.git/tree/org.ec
JavaFX is delivered as part of the JDK, so yes, Oracle does support it.
-- Kevin
Kevin Loverde wrote:
Does Oracle support JFX at all anymore? The only place I could find the
stage builder was through Gluon.
Does Oracle support JFX at all anymore? The only place I could find the
stage builder was through Gluon.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Tomas Mikula
wrote:
> Felix,
>
> I'm sure the JavaFX engineers are the first ones who wish that Oracle
> invested more resources in JavaFX. Therefore I'm af
Felix,
I'm sure the JavaFX engineers are the first ones who wish that Oracle
invested more resources in JavaFX. Therefore I'm afraid that the anger is
targeted at the wrong crowd here.
Tomas
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Felix Bembrick
wrote:
> OK, I have learned my lesson - I will be caref
Please find something else to spent your time on.
Tom
On 14-6-2016 14:52, Felix Bembrick wrote:
OK, I have learned my lesson - I will be careful to be strictly on-topic and
very well behaved in this post.
So, I would simply request if someone could please provide a complete list of
all the
OK, I have learned my lesson - I will be careful to be strictly on-topic and
very well behaved in this post.
So, I would simply request if someone could please provide a complete list of
all the NEW features that are either planned or possibly going to be included
in JavaFX 9.
Being totally co
On 14.06.2016 12:25, Robert Krüger wrote:
Only regarding the net loss for the community: There are not many places
where people trying to defend (and make a living off) Java as a viable
desktop technology can try to get information from Oracle
This particular mailing list is not one of those pl
Mario, I would really love to agree with you but then sadly we'd both be wrong.
But thanks for not sending this email just to me "offline" for a change (and
for being far more polite)...
> On 14 Jun 2016, at 21:05, Mario Torre wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Robert Krüger
> wrote
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Robert Krüger
wrote:
> Only regarding the net loss for the community: There are not many places
> where people trying to defend (and make a living off) Java as a viable
> desktop technology can try to get information from Oracle and the questions
> he asks are als
Thanks Robert - much appreciated.
Just be careful, you may soon be labelled a spammer, get threatened with being
banned from this list and also expect random creeps to send you private
(cowardly) "offline" insults.
But, don't worry, I am well aware of the *massive* number of poor believers in
Hi Murali, Arun & Kevin,
Please review the fix:
JBS:https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8087763
Webrev:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asrivastava/8087763/webrev.00/
Solution updated in JBS.
Regards,
Ankit
Only regarding the net loss for the community: There are not many places
where people trying to defend (and make a living off) Java as a viable
desktop technology can try to get information from Oracle and the questions
he asks are also the ones we (as an ISV with a Java-based product) would
ask, s
17 matches
Mail list logo
