Thanks Robert - much appreciated.

Just be careful, you may soon be labelled a spammer, get threatened with being 
banned from this list and also expect random creeps to send you private 
(cowardly) "offline" insults.

But, don't worry, I am well aware of the *massive* number of poor believers in 
JavaFX out there who can get nothing but intimidation out of Oracle.

I am just the one who put my hand up to say what everyone else is thinking 
simply because their lame efforts to "dispose" of me just make me chuckle...

P.S. I am willing to bet this post will "magically" not make it into the list 
somehow...

But you will at least get it.

So much for "open" JFX!

Blessings,

Felix

> On 14 Jun 2016, at 20:25, Robert Krüger <krueger@lesspain.software> wrote:
> 
> Only regarding the net loss for the community: There are not many places 
> where people trying to defend (and make a living off) Java as a viable 
> desktop technology can try to get information from Oracle and the questions 
> he asks are also the ones we (as an ISV with a Java-based product) would ask, 
> so I do regard them as valuable.
> 
> Having said that, I understand, however that those things will never get an 
> answer here (never have in the past, having asked such questions myself).
> 
> Just writing that so Felix does not feel that he's alone with his concerns 
> and to add another data point on the Oracle radar that Houston, we do have a 
> real problem here and quite a few frustrated Java advocates.
> 
> Over and out.
> 
> Robert
> 
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:26 PM, dalibor topic <dalibor.to...@oracle.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> On 13.06.2016 15:02, Felix Bembrick wrote:
>>> I am one of the most vocal, passionate and positive advocates for OpenJFX 
>>> and JavaFX.
>> 
>> Felix,
>> 
>> That may very well be the case, in your opinion, but this mailing list is 
>> not a forum for advocacy. It is for technical discussions.
>> 
>> Whether you are or you are not an advocate for something or other is not 
>> relevant on this mailing list. Maybe there is some other forum where people 
>> who are advocates for things meet and have vocal and passionate discussions 
>> with each other. In any case, this mailing list is not it, because what you 
>> are or what you aren't is not a technical subject to begin with.
>> 
>> Unless you are a robot, of course. But in that case, this mailing list would 
>> still be the wrong forum ...
>> 
>> Please, hold off on posting off-topic posts to this list for a week or two.
>> 
>> If for some reason you feel the need to continue to spam this mailing list 
>> with off-topic posts, as you have done so far, despite being asked to stop 
>> both on and off-list, then I trust that the mailing list administrator could 
>> take care of this problem for all of us.
>> 
>> cheers,
>> dalibor topic
>> 
>> 
>>>> On 13 Jun 2016, at 22:45, dalibor topic <dalibor.to...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Felix,
>>>> 
>>>> This is an open source Project's mailing list, specifically for technical 
>>>> discussions of that Project's development. It's not an 'open' forum 
>>>> suitable for discussion of other issues.
>>>> 
>>>> Removing participants that continue to abuse the privilege of being on an 
>>>> open source project's mailing list is a useful tool to deal with 
>>>> individuals which contribute negatively to a project, if they don't seem 
>>>> to be able to change their act.
>>>> 
>>>> cheers,
>>>> dalibor topic
>>>> 
>>>>> On 13.06.2016 14:11, Felix Bembrick wrote:
>>>>> Dear Dalibor,
>>>>> 
>>>>> "This mailing list is the not the right forum for discussions of
>>>>> Oracle's products. This mailing list is for OpenJFX development,
>>>>> specifically."
>>>>> 
>>>>> Read that again. Thank you for giving me the clear answer you promised!
>>>>> 
>>>>> And thanks for the warning in case I accidentally start "spamming". But
>>>>> surely you wouldn't remove anyone from an "open" forum would you?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Blessings,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Felix
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 13 Jun 2016, at 21:17, dalibor topic <dalibor.to...@oracle.com
>>>>> <mailto:dalibor.to...@oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Felix,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> if you'd like to ask questions about Oracle's products, please do so
>>>>>> at https://community.oracle.com/welcome .
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This mailing list is the not the right forum for discussions of
>>>>>> Oracle's products. This mailing list is for OpenJFX development,
>>>>>> specifically.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On a side note, spamming this list with off-topic posts could result
>>>>>> in removal from it without further warning.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> cheers,
>>>>>> dalibor topic
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 13.06.2016 12:37, Felix Bembrick wrote:
>>>>>>> Thanks you most sincerely Dalibor for that very direct response.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Only... it wasn't really, was it?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You "believe I am entitled to a clear answer to my question".
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Great! */So why have you still not answered it?/*
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Let me put it another way */so as there can be no possible room for any
>>>>>>> further confusion (hopefully)/*.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> */COULD YOU PLEASE DETAIL EXACTLY WHERE JAVAFX IS USED IN EITHER
>>>>>>> PRODUCTS USED INTERNALLY BY ORACLE OR IN COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS WHICH
>>>>>>> ORACLE MARKETS?/*
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Now, please give me the "clear answer" that I "am entitled to" (Your
>>>>>>> words, not mine).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> (Given that we now know that usage of JavaFX within JMX is about to be
>>>>>>> abandoned, and there may be a tiny fraction of JMC that is still gasping
>>>>>>> for air written using JavaFX, but knowing how */incredibly
>>>>>>> enthusiastically Oracle is advancing JavaFX/*, I *know* there must be
>>>>>>> hundreds more examples and I am sure we would all love to hear about
>>>>>>> them).  That would give us all a lot more faith in JavaFX. I am sure you
>>>>>>> want that don't you?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> See - no mention of age of participants, telephony equipment or career
>>>>>>> plans! Just JMX and a lot about OpenJFX!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Am I *still* in the wrong forum?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> All my blessings,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> P.S. What is this "bitterness" that you speak of?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 13 June 2016 at 19:55, dalibor topic <dalibor.to...@oracle.com
>>>>>>> <mailto:dalibor.to...@oracle.com>
>>>>>>> <mailto:dalibor.to...@oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   Felix, I believe that you are entitled to a clear answer to your
>>>>>>>   question:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   Yes, I have considered a career in politics.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   That being said, I would kindly suggest that you stop trying to
>>>>>>>   divert[0] technical discussions in this community with off-topic
>>>>>>>   posts, such as your contributions to this thread so far, where you
>>>>>>>   attempted to discuss :
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>    * the age of discussion participants,
>>>>>>>    * their telephony equipment and
>>>>>>>    * career plans,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   none of which have anything to do with JMX or OpenJFX.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   Instead, you should consider unsubscribing from this mailing list
>>>>>>>   for a week or two, in order to get clarity in what capacity, if any,
>>>>>>>   you'd like to positively contribute to ongoing OpenJFX development.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   As it stands, your current mode of participation on this mailing
>>>>>>>   list is a net loss for this community, and apparently, for yourself
>>>>>>>   as well, judging by what seems to be an increasing amount of
>>>>>>>   bitterness in your posts.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   You can change that.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   All the best,
>>>>>>>   Dalibor Topic
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   [0] https://joeyh.name/blog/entry/thread_patterns/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   On 10.06.2016 15:29, Felix Bembrick wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>       Dalibor, please forgive me for assuming that Oracle had access
>>>>>>>       to an English language parser. I could translate my original
>>>>>>>       question into Klingon and resubmit if that would help.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>       And thanks so much for pointing out to me that this forum is
>>>>>>>       devoted to "ongoing OpenJFX development".  Clearly I was under
>>>>>>>       the misapprehension that it was about unicorns, angels and aliens.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>       However, the word "ongoing" probably could do with some
>>>>>>>       clarification.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>       Oh, and I don't actually *need* to find a forum to discuss
>>>>>>>       telephony equipment used by other organisations because such
>>>>>>>       information is transparent and clearly indicates belief and
>>>>>>>       commitment to their own technologies.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>       Just out of interest, have you ever considered a career in
>>>>>>> politics?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>       And thanks for finally answering my question (even if it was
>>>>>>>       accidental)...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>           On 10 Jun 2016, at 22:59, Dalibor Topic
>>>>>>>           <dalibor.to...@oracle.com
>>>>>>> <mailto:dalibor.to...@oracle.com> <mailto:dalibor.to...@oracle.com>>
>>>>>>>           wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>           Felix, unfortunately your original question was not
>>>>>>> parse-able.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>           Before you go on prolonging this thread with more of that,
>>>>>>>           please consider that this mailing list is for discussion of
>>>>>>>           ongoing OpenJFX development.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>           If instead you would prefer to discuss something else,
>>>>>>>           please do try to find a more suitable venue for discussion
>>>>>>>           of such interests. While I can't help you find an adequate
>>>>>>>           forum to discuss telephony equipment used by employees of
>>>>>>>           other organizations, I hope that you will be able to find a
>>>>>>>           better place to do so in the future.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>           Cheers,
>>>>>>>           Dalibor Topic
>>>>>>>           --
>>>>>>>           <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product
>>>>>>>           Manager
>>>>>>>           Phone: +494089091214 <tel:%2B494089091214><tel:+494089091214
>>>>>>>           <tel:%2B494089091214>> | Mobile: +491737185961
>>>>>>>           <tel:%2B491737185961>
>>>>>>>           <tel:+491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>           ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>           ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>>>>>>>           Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>>>>>>>           Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>           Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
>>>>>>>           Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
>>>>>>>           Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr.
>>>>>>>           30143697
>>>>>>>           Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val
>>>>>>>           Maher
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>           <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to
>>>>>>>           developing
>>>>>>>           practices and products that help protect the environment
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>               On 10.06.2016, at 12:46, Felix Bembrick
>>>>>>>               <felix.bembr...@gmail.com
>>>>>>> <mailto:felix.bembr...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>               <mailto:felix.bembr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>               I am taking that as a "yes" answer to my original
>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>               On a completely unrelated topic, do Microsoft employees
>>>>>>>               all have Macs on their desktops and carry iPhones and
>>>>>>>               iPads around?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>               No?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>               Well I bet Apple employees do!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                   On 10 Jun 2016, at 20:01, dalibor topic
>>>>>>>                   <dalibor.to...@oracle.com
>>>>>>> <mailto:dalibor.to...@oracle.com>
>>>>>>>                   <mailto:dalibor.to...@oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                   I suspect that particular plugin is extremely rarely
>>>>>>>                   used, judging by
>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>> https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=%22javafx-mx.jar%22&type=Code&ref=searchresults
>>>>>>>                   showing 0 results.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                   cheers,
>>>>>>>                   dalibor topic
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                       On 09.06.2016 00:31, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>>>>>>>                       As some of you may be aware, JavaFX has shipped
>>>>>>>                       a JMX plugin as a
>>>>>>>                       separate jar file along with the JDK (not part
>>>>>>>                       of the JRE) in
>>>>>>>                       <JDK>/lib/javafx-mx.jar. Development on this
>>>>>>>                       plugin stopped prior to JDK
>>>>>>>                       8 being shipped, although we continued to ship
>>>>>>>                       javafx-mx.jar in JDK 8.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                       Are there any developers that still use this? We
>>>>>>>                       haven't seen any bug
>>>>>>>                       reports or had questions on it for quite a
>>>>>>>                       while. I note that this jar
>>>>>>>                       file has been gone from JDK 9 ea since build 111
>>>>>>>                       and we are trying to
>>>>>>>                       determine how best to address this in JDK 9.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                       Our options are:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                       1) Remove it entirely and drop this tooling
>>>>>>> support
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                       2) Continue to ship it as a legacy jar file,
>>>>>>>                       meaning that any use would
>>>>>>>                       require command line qualified exports to be
>>>>>>>                       added since it uses
>>>>>>>                       internal packages
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                       3) Turn it into a proper JDK-only module,
>>>>>>>                       javafx.jmx; it would not be
>>>>>>>                       one of the default modules, so it would need to
>>>>>>>                       be added with -addmods.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                       Obviously #1 would be the least amount of work,
>>>>>>>                       and given that it isn't
>>>>>>>                       being actively maintained, might be a viable
>>>>>>>                       solution. If we do need to
>>>>>>>                       keep it, then #2 might be less effort than #3,
>>>>>>>                       while still preserving
>>>>>>>                       the ability for developers to use it. This is
>>>>>>>                       only used for tooling, so
>>>>>>>                       requiring qualified exports, as is done for
>>>>>>>                       Robot and
>>>>>>>                       PerformanceTracker, is not a problem.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                       Separately, if we don't remove it for JDK 9, we
>>>>>>>                       probably will deprecate
>>>>>>>                       it with the intention to remove it in a future
>>>>>>>                       release.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                       -- Kevin
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                   --
>>>>>>>                   <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal
>>>>>>>                   Product Manager
>>>>>>>                   Phone: +494089091214 <tel:%2B494089091214>
>>>>>>>                   <tel:+494089091214 <tel:%2B494089091214>> | Mobile:
>>>>>>>                   +491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>
>>>>>>>                   <tel:+491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                   ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 |
>>>>>>>                   22761 Hamburg
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                   ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>>>>>>>                   Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>>>>>>>                   Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                   Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
>>>>>>>                   Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
>>>>>>>                   Handelsregister der Handelskammer
>>>>>>>                   Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>>>>>>>                   Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan
>>>>>>>                   Schultheiss, Val Maher
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>                   <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is
>>>>>>>                   committed to developing
>>>>>>>                   practices and products that help protect the
>>>>>>> environment
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   --
>>>>>>>   <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
>>>>>>>   Phone: +494089091214 <tel:%2B494089091214> <tel:+494089091214
>>>>>>>   <tel:%2B494089091214>> | Mobile: +491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>
>>>>>>>   <tel:+491737185961 <tel:%2B491737185961>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>>>>>>>   Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>>>>>>>   Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
>>>>>>>   Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
>>>>>>>   Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>>>>>>>   Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>   <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
>>>>>>>   practices and products that help protect the environment
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
>>>>>> Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
>>>>>> <tel:+491737185961>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>>>>>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>>>>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
>>>>>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
>>>>>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>>>>>> Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
>>>>>> practices and products that help protect the environment
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
>>>> Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
>>>> <tel:+491737185961>
>>>> 
>>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
>>>> 
>>>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>>>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>>>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
>>>> 
>>>> Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
>>>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
>>>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>>>> Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher
>>>> 
>>>> <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
>>>> practices and products that help protect the environment
>> 
>> -- 
>> <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
>> Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961
>> <tel:+491737185961>
>> 
>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
>> 
>> ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
>> Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
>> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
>> 
>> Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
>> Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
>> Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
>> Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Jan Schultheiss, Val Maher
>> 
>> <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing
>> practices and products that help protect the environment
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Robert Krüger
> Managing Partner
> Lesspain GmbH & Co. KG
> 
> http://lesspain.software
> http://kyno.software

Reply via email to