Hi All,
I found this link about the FX Experience Tools.
http://fxexperience.com/2012/03/announcing-fx-experience-tools/
It seems that this tool is no longer actively developed. Are there any
plans to continue to support it and also can I use use it in JavaFX 8?
BR,
Peter
+1. I ended up creating such property subclasses myself, too. And I don't
provide the static getClassCssMetaData() either.
Tomas
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Tom Eugelink t...@tbee.org wrote:
Yes, I had similar considerations. I was thinking about providing exactly
such extended Property
The reason things are as they are is because most properties in the core
classes are lazily created and I didn't want cause the property to be created
just to see if it was bound. But that is a particular concern for the core
classes and not so much for controls.
I'm not sure if you are aware
Based on the discussion I saw in the comments for RT-34236 I discovered
that using com.javafx.main.Main is not the way JavaFX 8 is supposed to
work. There are comments that read, ...making sure their Application class
has a main that calls launcher(String[] args).
This seems to imply that a main
Hi Scott,
The Java 8 launcher has been modified to recognize JavaFX applications
-- that is, classes that extend javafx.application.Application -- and
launch them directly by calling into the JavaFX launcher code. See
JDK-8001533 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8001533. This is
why
Changeset: 0d5bcb3c0951
Author:Daniel Blaukopf daniel.blauk...@oracle.com
Date: 2014-01-08 19:38 +0200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8u-dev/rt/rev/0d5bcb3c0951
RT-33250: Adding Monocle, a new embedded Glass port with minimal native code
Reviewed-by: ddhill
!
If the code sample is small, then it can be pasted into comments.
Otherwise, please contact the bug owner and he/she can attach the files.
This is not optimal. I'm looking into getting attachments re-enabled
for the JIRA.
Steve
On 2014-01-07 5:28 PM, Florian Brunner wrote:
Hi Steve,
Ok,
Changeset: 56e532279c86
Author:Daniel Blaukopf daniel.blauk...@oracle.com
Date: 2014-01-08 20:28 +0200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8u-dev/rt/rev/56e532279c86
RT-33250: Enable monocle in gradle
Reviewed-by: ddhill
! buildSrc/armv6hf.gradle
! buildSrc/armv6sf.gradle
!
Changeset: a1198d151646
Author:lisa.se...@oracle.com
Date: 2014-01-08 13:53 -0500
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8u-dev/rt/rev/a1198d151646
On case-sensitive systems (ie linux), need correct case for name of include
file.
!
On 8/01/2014 14:28, David Grieve wrote:
The reason things are as they are is because most properties in the core
classes are lazily created and I didn't want cause the property to be created
just to see if it was bound. But that is a particular concern for the core
classes and not so much for
That's basically how I've solved it so far (although I call the reusable
skins Layouts for lack of a more imaginitive name).
However, I'd like to support CSS properties as well for the delegates,
and I'm not sure how the CSS engine deals with Skins that can change
their properties when some
On 7/01/2014 18:11, Tomas Mikula wrote:
With a non-reusable skin, dispose is pretty much just removing the
listeners. With a reusable instance, I suspect there is more work to
reset the state of the instance (e.g. removing children, or, if you
were concerned about performance, returning them
I've written the Agenda control (Google Calendar alike) in JFXtras, which of
course also can have multiple skins although right now it only has one. So this
is an interesting discussion.
On 2014-1-8 22:31, John Hendrikx wrote:
That's basically how I've solved it so far (although I call the
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:56 PM, John Hendrikx hj...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 7/01/2014 18:11, Tomas Mikula wrote:
With a non-reusable skin, dispose is pretty much just removing the
listeners. With a reusable instance, I suspect there is more work to reset
the state of the instance (e.g.
Hi,
A few of us in the JavaFX team have been trying over the holidays to put
together an embedded implementation of Glass that has minimal native code. When
developing the existing embedded Glass implementation, Lens, we had noticed
that there were a few problems were were running into again
On the radar but not implemented yet.
On Jan 9, 2014, at 3:24 AM, Scott Palmer swpal...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the situation on Raspberry Pi? I got one for Christmas and made a
quick memory game for my daughter with JavaFX - works great.
Should I bother trying or do you already know it
Changeset: f175c22bbc78
Author:Daniel Blaukopf daniel.blauk...@oracle.com
Date: 2014-01-09 03:22 +0200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/openjfx/8u-dev/rt/rev/f175c22bbc78
RT-35231: [Monocle] Fix cursors on OMAP
!
The Java 8 java.exe launcher is now JavaFX aware in that it will launch
JavaFX Applications that don't have a main(String []) method.
The javafxpackager uses it's own launcher when creating a native package.
Are there plans to unify those launchers?
I noticed a comment under future work in
Very Cool!!!
Will it work also on the BeagleBone Black? Hardwarewise it seems to be very
close to the xM.
Also looking forward to test it on the cubox-i :)
Cheers,
Gerrit
Am 09.01.2014 um 01:00 schrieb Daniel Blaukopf daniel.blauk...@oracle.com:
Hi,
A few of us in the JavaFX team have
20 matches
Mail list logo
