Re: OpenJFX status update

3. JavaFX has been removed from JDK 11 as of this week. Starting with jdk-11+14, early access builds of JDK 11 will not include JavaFX. 4. After jdk-11+14 is posted on java.net, and FX is no longer included in JDK 11, we will start using openjfx-11 as the fix version in JBS to distinguish

Re: OpenJFX status update

On 5/15/2018 11:57 PM, Ty Young wrote: 3. JavaFX has been removed from JDK 11 as of this week. Starting with jdk-11+14, early access builds of JDK 11 will not include JavaFX. I'm not sure if it's intentional or perhaps a bug on my end, but I cannot compile JavaFX without Oracle JDK(9 or

Re: OpenJFX status update

The javapackager was removed from the Oracle JDK along with JavaFX (and has never been part of OpenJDK). It isn't included with the standalone JavaFX bundles, and doesn't really fit in a standalone FX release. We are looking at the possibility of providing a replacement packaging tool in

Re: OpenJFX status update

That sounds like a good idea. Alan > On May 16, 2018, at 10:08 AM, Kevin Rushforth > wrote: > > The javapackager was removed from the Oracle JDK along with JavaFX (and has > never been part of OpenJDK). It isn't included with the standalone JavaFX > bundles,

Re: OpenJFX status update

What will happen to the JavaDocs? Will they be removed from the EA docs and upon release from the release docs? - Nir On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:59 AM, Kevin Rushforth < kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> wrote: > I wanted to update you on the progress of the last couple weeks on the > OpenJFX

Re: OpenJFX status update

On 05/16/2018 10:42 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote: On 5/15/2018 11:57 PM, Ty Young wrote: 3. JavaFX has been removed from JDK 11 as of this week. Starting with jdk-11+14, early access builds of JDK 11 will not include JavaFX. I'm not sure if it's intentional or perhaps a bug on my end, but

Re: OpenJFX status update

On 5/16/2018 10:49 AM, Ty Young wrote: That one, as mentioned in the wiki build guide. I get an immediate build fail(see: https://pastebin.com/geR4LLMm). The JDK works just fine: I can set it as the default JDK, run Netbeans, set the project source to 11, and my application builds just

Re: OpenJFX status update

Alright great, no complaints from me then :). On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 1:08 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote: > Yes, the source code for javapackager is fully open source. > > -- Kevin > > > > On 5/16/2018 1:05 PM, Michael Ennen wrote: > > Is the source code for

Re: OpenJFX status update

It needs a lot of work. I’m reminded as a see all the issues I’ve reported against it are being reassigned today. Despite the issues, Javapackager was one of the best things to happen for Java deployment in many years. I’m kinda bummed that it didn’t make it to OpenJDK. jlink isn’t really

Re: OpenJFX status update

On 5/16/2018 11:54 AM, Nir Lisker wrote: What will happen to the JavaDocs? Will they be removed from the EA docs and upon release from the release docs? Correct. The JDK 11 docs will no longer include JavaFX modules and classes. We will need to host separate docs for JavaFX. -- Kevin

Re: OpenJFX status update

Yes, the source code for javapackager is fully open source. -- Kevin On 5/16/2018 1:05 PM, Michael Ennen wrote: Is the source code for javapackager fully open source? Thanks. On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Kevin Rushforth >

Re: OpenJFX status update

Is the source code for javapackager fully open source? Thanks. On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Kevin Rushforth < kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> wrote: > The javapackager was removed from the Oracle JDK along with JavaFX (and > has never been part of OpenJDK). It isn't included with the