It needs a lot of work. I’m reminded as a see all the issues I’ve reported
against it are being reassigned today.
Despite the issues, Javapackager was one of the best things to happen for Java
deployment in many years. I’m kinda bummed that it didn’t make it to OpenJDK.
jlink isn’t really usa
Alright great, no complaints from me then :).
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 1:08 PM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Yes, the source code for javapackager is fully open source.
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
>
> On 5/16/2018 1:05 PM, Michael Ennen wrote:
>
> Is the source code for javapackager fully open source?
>
> Thank
Yes, the source code for javapackager is fully open source.
-- Kevin
On 5/16/2018 1:05 PM, Michael Ennen wrote:
Is the source code for javapackager fully open source?
Thanks.
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Kevin Rushforth
mailto:kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>> wrote:
The javapackager
Is the source code for javapackager fully open source?
Thanks.
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Kevin Rushforth <
kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> wrote:
> The javapackager was removed from the Oracle JDK along with JavaFX (and
> has never been part of OpenJDK). It isn't included with the standalone
On 5/16/2018 11:54 AM, Nir Lisker wrote:
What will happen to the JavaDocs? Will they be removed from the EA
docs and upon release from the release docs?
Correct. The JDK 11 docs will no longer include JavaFX modules and
classes. We will need to host separate docs for JavaFX.
-- Kevin
On 5/16/2018 10:49 AM, Ty Young wrote:
That one, as mentioned in the wiki build guide. I get an immediate
build fail(see: https://pastebin.com/geR4LLMm). The JDK works just
fine: I can set it as the default JDK, run Netbeans, set the project
source to 11, and my application builds just fine.
What will happen to the JavaDocs? Will they be removed from the EA docs and
upon release from the release docs?
- Nir
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:59 AM, Kevin Rushforth <
kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com> wrote:
> I wanted to update you on the progress of the last couple weeks on the
> OpenJFX project:
That sounds like a good idea.
Alan
> On May 16, 2018, at 10:08 AM, Kevin Rushforth
> wrote:
>
> The javapackager was removed from the Oracle JDK along with JavaFX (and has
> never been part of OpenJDK). It isn't included with the standalone JavaFX
> bundles, and doesn't really fit in a st
On 05/16/2018 10:42 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
On 5/15/2018 11:57 PM, Ty Young wrote:
3. JavaFX has been removed from JDK 11 as of this week. Starting
with jdk-11+14, early access builds of JDK 11 will not include JavaFX.
I'm not sure if it's intentional or perhaps a bug on my end, but I
The javapackager was removed from the Oracle JDK along with JavaFX (and
has never been part of OpenJDK). It isn't included with the standalone
JavaFX bundles, and doesn't really fit in a standalone FX release.
We are looking at the possibility of providing a replacement packaging
tool in OpenJ
On 5/15/2018 11:57 PM, Ty Young wrote:
3. JavaFX has been removed from JDK 11 as of this week. Starting with
jdk-11+14, early access builds of JDK 11 will not include JavaFX.
I'm not sure if it's intentional or perhaps a bug on my end, but I
cannot compile JavaFX without Oracle JDK(9 or 10
11 matches
Mail list logo