The thing I can confirm is that the Text is inside a TextFlow but I'm
fairly unable to provide a test-case because it happens at random times
- I'll try to update to the latest u40 build to see if the fix from Jim
helps me.
For the time being I was able to work around the problem by adjusting
the
I am surprised more people have not expressed an opinion on this. To me,
it seems absolutely *vital* to the long term (or any term) success of
JavaFX.
Haven't any of you ever programmed in Flash? Can you imagine trying to
create any of those complex (or even the simple) animations and
I do not think that JavaFX is aiming at replacing flash, HTML and javascript
are doing a great job there, hence animations are not equally important as they
were for flash.
Tom
On 24-11-2014 10:46, Felix Bembrick wrote:
I am surprised more people have not expressed an opinion on this. To
Really? My point is, why have such good built-on classes to support the
building of everything from simple animations to complex visualisations if
it is practically impossible to do so?
On 24 November 2014 at 21:02, Tom Eugelink t...@tbee.org wrote:
I do not think that JavaFX is aiming at
thats funny -Scene! boy I can't spell
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Mike mikeg...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually Felix Everybody is waiting for you to write such a tool. I don't
think anybody has scene your Disney Animation Movie Credits but me.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Felix Bembrick
I have no problems using JavaFX's animations for my purposes, which are
decorative effects. I do not need an editor for that, forced me to use it and
it probably will even get in my way. Which BTW was the case with the Flash
coding that I have done; I hated that Flash EDI, it was way too much
JavaFX should not be seen as a replacement for anything or an
alternative. It has characteristics of both Flash and Flex along with
Silverlight and especially Qt, (not to mention even HTML5/CSS/JS), but is a
separate and distinct product in its own class.
Just because the Flash visual editor may
Hi,
Are there any plans to improve the portability of Scene Builder's
configuration? To give a specific example of what I mean, I asked a
question related to previewed style sheets on the forum:
https://community.oracle.com/message/12734301#12734301
For me, any features that store config info
Oh, you are right, if the JavaFX team does not need to make choices on where to invest their
precious time, then all possible usages could be implemented immediately. Unfortunately they too
have to place priorities and then the most likely usage will get implemented first (since most
usages
Can we build 64 bit libraries on 32 bit systems ? If so then modify
this patch accordingly.
No, this will not work and is not something we would ever intend to do
even if it were possible.
Btw, please add review comments to JIRA. Thanks.
-- Kevin
Kirill Kirichenko wrote:
Can we build
Hi Anton,
This is new to me, I think OpenJDK 8 does *not* contain OpenJFX (or JavaFX).
You are probably referring to the Oracle closed JDK.
Cheers,
Mario
Il 24/nov/2014 08:49 Anton V. Tarasov anton.tara...@oracle.com ha
scritto:
Hello Alexander,
On 22.11.2014 17:42, Александр Свиридов
I have a longtime backgroud in Flash and Flex development and a bit if iOS, so
I would like to add here my 5 cents.
My first impression and experience with Scene Builder was kind of: Is this
meant serious? It cannot be that Oracle release such a product in year 2014
when other platform had
In light of the reflection performance hit, the approach dagger 2 has taken
with DI may be pretty interesting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oK_XtfXPkqw
On 24-11-2014 16:19, Manfred Karrer wrote:
I have a longtime backgroud in Flash and Flex development and a bit if iOS, so
I would like to
FWIW I've found Scene Builder to work pretty well and haven't missed
animation support. Doing it at the code level was good enough. And yes I
have built things in Flash, a long time ago. Perhaps my standards are
lower, as mostly in the last few years when doing UI work I've been stuck
with HTML
+1
On Nov 22, 2014, at 5:29 PM, Kevin Rushforth kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com wrote:
Dave, Kirill, Anton, Chris,
Please review the following build changes to enable building 32-bit graphics,
media, webkit, and packager binaries on a 64-bit Linux system.
Kevin, Kirill, please review the following fix for 8u40:
JIRA:
https://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-38973
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ddehaven/RT-38973/rt.0/
I added an additional (annoying) compiler warning fix.
-DrD-
You are completely right, except in the now that this part has been done.
SceneBuilder is no where near to being done yet, that is, assuming SB should work on the
level of XCode or the Flash editor. And then the question is, should it be working good
in one area or only half in two?
Tom
On
On 25 November 2014 at 17:24, Tom Eugelink t...@tbee.org wrote:
the question is, should it be working good in one area or only half in two?
That's an age-old problem I guess Tom. Personally I feel that traditional
forms/dialogs based applications have enough support in Scene Builder as it
is
19 matches
Mail list logo
