Hi All,
Just wondering what typical activity is like on OpenNMS Bugzilla.
I logged a bug over a month ago, and it's not been assigned even:
http://bugzilla.opennms.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3996
Is this normal? Is there someone I should be giving a prod?
Hope no one minds my asking :)
Cheers,
J
Thanks for the info Benjamin.
Cheers,
Just
On 9/3/10 4:04 PM, jcat wrote:
> Just wondering what typical activity is like on OpenNMS Bugzilla.
>
> I logged a bug over a month ago, and it's not been assigned even:
> http://bugzilla.opennms.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3996
>
> Is
Hi All,
Why so many of the file permissions in a freshly compiled installation so
crazy?
Brief example from lib/ :
-rwsrwsrwt 1 2372 2200 62983 2010-06-11 11:37 activation-1.1.jar
-rwsrwsrwt 1 2372 2200 1514270 2011-02-02 12:37 ant-1.8.1.jar
-rwsrwsrwt 1 2372 2200 12312 2011-02-02 12:37
Cheers,
Just
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 06:44 +1200, Craig Miskell wrote:
> On 9/06/11 1:30 AM, jcat wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> >
> >
> > Why so many of the file permissions in a freshly compiled installation so
> > crazy?
> >
> > Brief example
Well, I can confirm that the perms are set like that in the assembled tar.
I'm compiling from 1.8.12-1 release downloaded from SF.
I'm doing:
./compile.pl && ./assemble.pl -Dopennms.home=/opennms/current
Ben: Can you tell me what you mean by hah?
Any idea how I can sort this out?
Cheers,
Hi,
Is this still supported?
I've just been trying to run using tomcat 5.5 and onms 1.8.12, some stuff
doesn't seem to work very well.
All Alams Summary for instance errors, and Quick Search on front page is
missing.
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Just
--
View this message in context:
http://op
Hi all,
Quick question:
Do the metric aliases defined in the datacolection.xml file need to be
unique?
I was under the impression that that did, but by datacollection.xml file is
now very large and duplicates are getting harder to avoid (if by accident).
Can you confirm if this will impact the
Hi All,
Does anyone have any inside info on when this bug might be fixed?
http://issues.opennms.org/browse/NMS-5233
It's pretty nasty for us - and is preventing an upgrade from 1.6 to 1.10
series.
The new provisioning is great BTW - I'm looking forward to using it going
forward, but I need to b
The reason it's holding up my upgrade, is because I want to move to
provisioning everything using directed discovery - and if that's going to
work the way we require it in our environment, we need to be able to use
some policy rules in the foreign source definitions to not persist
interfaces with h
Hi,
So, as I'm pretty desperate for a fix for this, I've had a little look into
it myself - and I've added a patch to the issue.
Please be warned, as I point out in my comment, I'm not a java or onms dev
:)
..so my patch may be bad, but it does at least compile and fix the issue for
me.
Even i
Hi All,
Apologies if I'm asking something obvious - but is there are way of
including protocol plugins like dhcp in the main assembly tar.gz when
compiling from source?
If I can't including it in the main tarball, is installing it as simple as
un-taring the built org.opennms.protocols.dhcp-${ver
Does no one know the answer? :)
cheers,
Just
--
View this message in context:
http://opennms.530661.n2.nabble.com/Protocol-Plugins-tp7582547p7583031.html
Sent from the OpenNMS - devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
Excellent - that does it :)
It would be good to see a mention of that on the Wiki page devoted to
building the source.
Thanks again.
Cheers,
Just
--
View this message in context:
http://opennms.530661.n2.nabble.com/Protocol-Plugins-tp7582547p7583082.html
Sent from the OpenNMS - devel maili
Chaps,
Just wanted to give you a quick poke here to make you aware of this bug.
It's posted against dev version 1.11.3, but I have found a thread in current
prod release 1.10.9.
If you don't catch it, it kills the server as it exhausts the hard thread
limit eventually. I've had it happen 3 times
Hi,
I recently upgraded production to 1.12.3 (on linux using jrobin), as testing
of the upgrade seemed to go well.
However, after the upgrade, when I ran the online update tools to merge the
rrd files, I found many of the file merges were aborted by the tool, due to
errors like these:
Merging
I've created a Jira issue accordingly:
http://issues.opennms.org/browse/NMS-6369
..seems like the issue arrises when a DS has only ever stored an NaN.
Cheers,
Just
--
View this message in context:
http://opennms.530661.n2.nabble.com/1-12-Upgrade-tools-failure-for-many-rrd-files-tp758568
Issue updated :)
--
View this message in context:
http://opennms.530661.n2.nabble.com/1-12-Upgrade-tools-failure-for-many-rrd-files-tp7585683p7585694.html
Sent from the OpenNMS - devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Issue updated - works for me :)
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://opennms.530661.n2.nabble.com/1-12-Upgrade-tools-failure-for-many-rrd-files-tp7585683p7585706.html
Sent from the OpenNMS - devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
odes?
Is it possible to run the process manually egains a single node?
I also see this message at the start of the merge, is it related?
Connecting to jdbc:postgresql://localhost:5432/opennms
Error: can't retrieve data from the OpenNMS Database because null
Cheers,
jcat
--
View
They all match.
Cheers,
jcat
--
View this message in context:
http://opennms.530661.n2.nabble.com/1-12-Upgrade-tools-failure-for-many-rrd-files-tp7585683p7585710.html
Sent from the OpenNMS - devel mailing list archiv
2_0-001f12af5802
ge_0_0_3_0
ge_0_0_3_0-001f12af5803
ge_1_3_0_0
ge_1_3_0_0-001f12af58db
>
>Have you tried executing the upgrade tools again (i.e. execute
/opt/opennms/bin/upgrade with OpenNMS running) after removing the reference
to SnmpInterfaceRrdMigratorOnline in opennms-upgrade-status.prop
nd at ease - due to the time based nature of RRD files,
is there any penalty for waiting a "long time" between the data merges?
Cheers,
jcat
--
View this message in context:
http://opennms.530661.n2.nabble.com/1-12-Upgrade-tools-failure-for-many-rrd-files-tp7585683p7585717.html
Sent f
s/etc and /var/opennms/rrd,
I can invest time trying to reproduce the problem locally
Unfortunately our IT policy probably doesn't allow this :( ..but I will
look into it.
Cheers,
jcat
--
View this message in context:
http://opennms.530661.n2.nabble.com/1-12-Upgrade-tools-fa
hysaddr is not null and snmpifname is
null;
~~~8<~~~
(456 rows)
If these unexpected results are the issue, I guess you could either update
the query or add some more handling in your parsing logic.
What do you think?
Cheers,
jcat
--
View this message in context:
http://opennms.530661.n2
Hi Alejandro,
Do you want me to create a jira ticket?
Cheers,
jcat
--
View this message in context:
http://opennms.530661.n2.nabble.com/1-12-Upgrade-tools-failure-for-many-rrd-files-tp7585683p7585763.html
Sent from the OpenNMS - devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com
>Thanks a lot for your help here :)
No worries!
On Feb 6, 2014, at 4:40 AM, jcat <jcat@.co> wrote:
>> Do you want me to create a jira ticket?
>
>I don't think so, unless you've found new issues ;)
W, I'm turning into your worst nightmare, but I'
Sorry, is it from yesterday? it's probably this right?
commit e943740f524a67ffb9be5f685f1c69a1c277f019
Author: Alejandro Galue
Date: Wed Feb 5 16:56:01 2014 -0500
Cheers,
jcat
--
View this message in context:
http://opennms.530661.n2.nabble.com/1-12-Upgrade-tools-failure-for-man
Think we crossed emails :)
I'll let you know when I've tested..
Cheers,
jcat
--
View this message in context:
http://opennms.530661.n2.nabble.com/1-12-Upgrade-tools-failure-for-many-rrd-files-tp7585683p7585777.html
Sent from the OpenNMS - devel mailing list archive at
trieve the required data from the OpenNMS Database or there
were problems while processing them.
Reason(java.lang.NullPointerException): Unknown
..it then carries on and does a few interfaces only.
Damn - I thought we were on to something their..
Cheers,
jcat
--
View this message in cont
l
If I delete those from the test DB I've got running, the error goes away :)
I guess in a ideal world the parser would simply "pass" or "skip on
combination like this. Is that possible?
Cheers,
jcat
--
View this message in context:
http://opennms.530661.n2.nabble.com
| dd_infrastructure_power | oobman-peddup06.ocado.com |
|| 00029906ced7
share/rrd/snmp/329# ls -la |grep 00029906ced7
drwxrwxr-x2 root root 4096 Jan 29 15:11 null-00029906ced7
:)
Cheers,
jcat
--
View this message in context:
http://opennms.530661.n2
:744)
- Running execution phase
Don't forget that the snmpifdescr was not actually null in this case, but
"blank" or "empty" - ""
Not sure if that will be the difference?
Cheers,
jcat
--
View this message in context:
http://opennms.530661.n2.nabble
ting the sting "null" as an actual null ?
Cheers,
jcat
--
View this message in context:
http://opennms.530661.n2.nabble.com/1-12-Upgrade-tools-failure-for-many-rrd-files-tp7585683p7585796.html
Sent from the OpenNMS - devel mail
I can't seem to build from git directly - I get lots of dependency errors
regarding -SNAPSHOT versions.
Sorry - I'm not really a java dev by any means!
Cheers,
jcat
--
View this message in context:
http://opennms.530661.n2.nabble.com/1-12-Upgrade-tools-failure-for-many
Excellent stuff - that works! :)
Thanks again for your quick patches - I'm off to finish upgrading
production.
There is still a potential issue with the KSC report update, but I can start
a separate thread or issue for that on Monday maybe :)
Cheers,
jcat
--
View this message in co
nt blog post about grafana support. But support for nodes
from multiple requisitions would be a great stop-gap measure if it's not too
hard to do.
Cheers,
jcat
--
View this message in context:
http://opennms.530661.n2.nabble.com/Introducing-Grafana-support-tp7592211p7593021.html
Sent fro
36 matches
Mail list logo
