Ken Smith wrote:
> Thanks for all the responses and links! Peter, the separate SRAM's I'm
> talking about are the separate memories for instruction and code that
> pertain, I think, to the Harvard architecture of the chip. I read
> somewhere that the memories can only be used for certain purposes.
Thanks for all the responses and links! Peter, the separate SRAM's I'm
talking about are the separate memories for instruction and code that
pertain, I think, to the Harvard architecture of the chip. I read
somewhere that the memories can only be used for certain purposes.
I'm also intrigued by th
Flemming Frandsen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
> > Which Cortex-M3 works best with OpenOCD? I'm considering one of these
> > based on LPC1768.
>
> I'm just starting out with LPC1769 (same as the '68, but 120 MHz),
> I've cobbled a toolchain (including gcc, newlib and
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Ken Smith wrote:
> Which Cortex-M3 works best with OpenOCD? I'm considering one of these
> based on LPC1768.
I'm just starting out with LPC1769 (same as the '68, but 120 MHz),
I've cobbled a toolchain (including gcc, newlib and openocd) and I'm
starting to build m
Ken Smith wrote:
> Which Cortex-M3 works best with OpenOCD? I'm considering one of these
> based on LPC1768.
>
> http://www.sparkfun.com/products/9931
SparkFun as always overpriced, but the board does work with OpenOCD.
It hasn't been perfect for me, but it does work. LPC17 has the
advantage that
Which Cortex-M3 works best with OpenOCD? I'm considering one of these
based on LPC1768.
http://www.sparkfun.com/products/9931
Any experience with it using OpenOCD? Do you recommend another? Is it
difficult to deal with the two separate SRAM's? The recent
conversation on the list makes me think th
