WTC?? Is this spam? Are these Spanish Marketing Materials?
I don't see how this pertains to OpenSim development.
If you are a new user looking for help, I would love to try and help you,
but can you try to *speak English* please...
Mark
2013/5/14 JHON FELIPE URREGO
Dan/Stanley,
Has any work been done on this to make DSG part of OpenSim Core, or part of
a possible module that can be added to OpenSim Core?
* There is a branch from master from about a year ago that *
* has the initial release of the DSG code integrated into core. *
Was this branch (from a
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Mark Malewski mark.malew...@gmail.comwrote:
Dan/Stanley,
Has any work been done on this to make DSG part of OpenSim Core, or part
of a possible module that can be added to OpenSim Core?
* There is a branch from master from about a year ago that *
* has
* You mean you want to know which ports have to be open *
* to connect with OpenSimulator through a firewall? *
START SHORT RESPONSE HERE
I am guessing, that what Stanley is asking/suggesting is that the viewer
has the ability to automatically check to see what ports are
open/accessible (this
Dan,
Any idea as to when an updated TestClient from libomv (with your modified
changes) might become available? Is there any chance that you could
possibly post the source for your modified TestClient?
Mark
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Lake, Dan dan.l...@intel.com wrote:
Umar,
What exactly is it that they are trying to file a PATENT on?
They're hardly the first company to use Windows 2008 Server, and Hyper-V
(and SQL 2008) for deploying OpenSim.
Seems a bit absurd, and the silly hogwash press release is nothing but
marketing hype from Microsoft (who probably never
* This article seems to make no mention of a Patent filing. *
* The word Patent is not mentioned even once.*
Yeah, I didn't see any mention of any patent either.
Do you have a patent number?
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Michael Cerquoni nebadon2...@gmail.comwrote:
This article seems to
Now that's TRULY absurd...
They're claiming to be the FIRST to use virtualization to host OpenSim?
That's absurd. Every single instance of OpenSim that I have running is
hosted in either VMWare, VirtualBox, or Hyper-V. (Depending on the type of
server, and whether it's Linux or Windows based).
Regardless, it's just another false claim. Just like the silly IBM patent
claim about using LDAP with OpenSim.
This is just another false patent claim, attempting to make a false claim
that they invented using virtualization with OpenSim.
Completely absurd...
Mark
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011
Does anyone actually have the Patent number?
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Mark Malewski mark.malew...@gmail.comwrote:
Regardless, it's just another false claim. Just like the silly IBM patent
claim about using LDAP with OpenSim.
This is just another false patent claim, attempting
they're too stupid to setup their own Microsoft
2008 Server, or use Hyper-V.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Jor3l Boa jo...@foravatars.com wrote:
Seems like Mark is upset lol
2011/2/2 Mark Malewski mark.malew...@gmail.com
Does anyone actually have the Patent number?
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011
://homepages.uc.edu/secondlife
OLN Second Life: http://www.oln.org/emerging_technologies/emtech.php
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Mark Malewski mark.malew...@gmail.comwrote:
Regardless, it's just another false claim. Just like the silly IBM
patent claim about using LDAP with OpenSim
:41 PM, Mark Malewski mark.malew...@gmail.com wrote:
* Seems like Mark is upset lol*
Just sick and tired of people trying to make FALSE patent claims on
OpenSource software, and attempting to claim inventions based on
OpenSource software.
Just so they can begin suing others that use
know I would not stop nor would I pay
royalties.
There must be more to this than it seems on the face of it, that we just
haven't seen yet, is my guess.
-ste
On Feb 2, 2011, at 4:32 PM, Mark Malewski mark.malew...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that's TRULY absurd...
They're claiming
Forming a legal entity (an LLC) creates LIABILITY. You are giving LL a
legal entity to sue.
At this point, LL has no one to sue/fight/shut down. By creating a legal
entity, you are giving LL (or whoever buys out LL in the future) a target
to fight/sue (and an opportunity to shut down OpenSim).
Phil,
Would it make more sense to possibly add/work on adding PAL support?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics_Abstraction_Layer
PAL supports multiple physics engines including:
Box2D http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Box2D
Bullet http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullet_(software)
Havok
Please let me clarify, because this whole discussion is being taken out of
context.
At no point did I EVER call anyone on this thread, or that is a part of the
OpenSim Community stupid.
My exact words were:
* Seems pretty foolish. Stupid people do stupid things.*
I was referring to NYC
* is the use of the name Open Simulator.*
Don't use the name Open Simulator. We have no clue what direction you are
trying to head, or even what you are raising this money for, or even what
your intentions to do with this money are.
Have you considered tax liabilities? Who's going to pay the
* if your paying people to create patches that wont *
* be accepted into core this could create problems *
* for the fund raisers in the end.*
I completely agree. If you're going to beat your drum, and try to conjur up
money, then at least screw your head on straight and try to get a grasp on
thrown in for those things to be prototyped and experimented with --
research money, for starters; that's the kind of thing that will keep a lot
of graduate students busy for the next few years.
On 7/6/2010 6:54 PM, Mark Malewski wrote:
OpenSim/RealXtend,
Another thought is the issue
Austin,
* I have been tensing the setup process for a brand new 00.7 standalone...*
Since you're starting off with a fresh 0.7 install, could you please take
the time to write up an updated step-by-step tutorial on the WIKI pages?
* **the current StandaloneCommon.ini.example sets up for one
OpenSim/RealXtend,
Another thought is the issue of scalability with the current OpenSim
and/or realXtend Architecture.
Running hundreds (or thousands) of IDLE regions require too many system
resources (RAM, CPU cycles, etc.)
I believe that the basic server core (OpenSim) should eventually be
OpenSim/RealXtend,
Another thought is the issue of scalability with the current OpenSim
and/or realXtend Architecture.
Running hundreds (or thousands) of IDLE regions require too many system
resources (RAM, CPU cycles, etc.)
I believe that the basic server core (OpenSim) should
Mike,
* Diva, your message as worded sounds to me like you *
* would accept contributions so long as there were no *
* GPL licensed code in the submission. *
Not sure what you read (or misunderstood), or where you would have derived
that conclusion from, but from what I just read from Diva's
* This is probably worth an entry on the OpenSimulator Wiki*
It's already on the wiki and has already been there as far as I can
remember.
http://opensimulator.org/wiki/Contributions_Policy
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Dirk Krause dirk.kra...@pixelpark.comwrote:
This is probably worth
Neil,
It's not rocket science. Try to work with one, or the other, but not both.
* **OpenSIM core can't include GPL'd code into the *
* BSD licensed core*
That's the gist of it all.
If you're going to do any viewer work, then maybe look at Naali. It's a
BSD-licensed viewer, and you can work
* First stage of the new interactive region creation.*
This sounds extremely interesting. Interactive region creation sounds like
an excellent idea.
Will this by any chance allow interactive on-demand region loading?
If you calculate just the total LAND area of Earth is 148,940,000 km², or
Interactive Region Creation sounds like a great concept. Is there any
possibility of allowing inactive (or idle) regions to shut down and not
consume any resources as well?
* Melanie, could you explain in greater detail what you're doing here? *
* How is region creation going to change?*
Yes,
I agree with Ted, it's just another useless TLD, and just another waste.
There are plenty of TLD's, and another stupid TLD is meaningless.
Nobody will use it, and it's just a waste. I see no real benefit as well.
Users could simply keep their current domain name, and just use a
,
Mark
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Kyle cre...@reactiongrid.com wrote:
How nice of you Mark!
*From:* opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:
opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de] *On Behalf Of *Mark Malewski
*Sent:* Monday, February 22, 2010 4:01 PM
*To:* opensim
* we're all still fairly ignorant when it comes to using git, and *
* we've all had close encounters with git disasters.*
Why are we using GIT? I understand that it's supposed to be better than
CVS/SVN, but it's still a dinosaur compared to Mercurial or Bazaar. Why
aren't we using Mercurial?
*
Bazaar) and has a nice P2P
architecture which is great for mobile (and laptop) users, or people that
are not connected to the internet 24/7.
Mark
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Mark Malewski mark.malew...@gmail.comwrote:
* we're all still fairly ignorant when it comes
Mic,
It seems like a good request. I like the idea of a tag, but maybe we should
create two tags? Use a 0.6.8.x tag prior to the merge, and a 0.6.9.x tag
after the merge? Then save the 0.7 tag for the stable RC?
* Can I make one request... Can we tag the current master as *
* 0.6.9 (or
, and also give the bug testers the ability to move
between boxes for documenting/mantis bug reporting/bug testing, and test
everything thoroughly prior to the formal 0.7 RC release.
Mark
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Mark Malewski mark.malew...@gmail.comwrote:
Mic
want to develop.
-1
Melanie
Mark Malewski wrote:
* we're all still fairly ignorant when it comes to using git, and *
* we've all had close encounters with git disasters.*
Why are we using GIT? I understand that it's supposed to be better than
CVS/SVN, but it's still a dinosaur
* Your offer is quite generous, however most of us already have test
regions set *
* up to facilitate development.*
Ok, I was just offering. So at least we'd have various platforms that the
dev's (and alpha testing community) could use for sandboxing and bug
reporting platforms.
* On the
I supposed all you can do is file a bug report, and make the core dev's
aware of it, and hope that it possibly gets fixed in a future release.
Whether you want to view OpenSim as an application or a Platform or
middleware or whatever word you want to describe it, the point is that I
believe Len
.
Br,
Tedd
*From:* opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:
opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de] *On Behalf Of *Mark Malewski
*Sent:* 12. februar 2010 06:01
*To:* opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
*Subject:* Re: [Opensim-dev] How Was OpenSim Born?
* I honestly believe
:* opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:
opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de] *On Behalf Of *Mark Malewski
*Sent:* 12. februar 2010 06:01
*To:* opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
*Subject:* Re: [Opensim-dev] How Was OpenSim Born?
* I honestly believe that the patent system, by its very nature
, Feb 15, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Domain Admin ad...@glscripting.org wrote:
That is true there should be no reason to have patents for stuff that
shouldnt be there but if you dont you got pigs stealing everyones food.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Mark Malewski mark.malew...@gmail.comwrote:
Doing
* That used to work, but was broken some months ago.*
Are there any plans to fix this bug? (or fix whatever has been broken?)
It's extremely hard to update documentation, or write tutorials when things
are constantly breaking or not working.
Len, maybe wait for the latest OpenSim 0.7 RC to get
be turned on or off, and also turned on (but hidden), so that way
users can use BOTH, or one or the other, or even have the menu toolbar at
the top enabled (but hidden) and that way users can use whichever they
choose.
Mark
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Mark Malewski wrote
I really do love the idea of having a nice navigation UI that can either be
used with a touchscreen computer, and/or a wireless XBOX 360 remote. Apple
has always done a great job with UI's, and it looks like Naali is doing an
excellent job of bringing a great new UI to OpenSim/RealXtend.
Could
Sounds like the patent trolls are digging for more information.
* I know that the various versions of the viewer are derived from
Linden Lab releasing the viewer source code as open source, but what
about the server side of things?*
Does anyone ask the Keebler elves how they make their
* I honestly believe that the patent system, by its very nature, *
* is the worst thing ever when it comes to stifling innovation*
* and technological advancement.*
Agreed.
___
Opensim-dev mailing list
Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
become enemy #1 of any patent application
that vaguely tries to grab OpenSim infrastructure -- it will be crushed or
made irrelevant.
Diva / Crista
On Feb 4, 2010, at 1:06 PM, dz wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Mark Malewski mark.malew...@gmail.comwrote:
What exactly is going
Diva,
Excellent blog post!! Investors/business managers are always looking to
stop innovation by attempting to file patents, and bring the open-source
community to an end. Thank-you for the wonderful post.
Mark
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:15 AM, d...@metaverseink.com wrote:
What exactly is going on?
Did someone apply for a patent? Are ANY patents pending? If so, please let
us know what patents are currently pending, so we can at least look them
over and contest them.
I've had virtual worlds running since 1991, with 3D shopping malls, online
e-commerce, etc.
I'd
Patents are just used by patent troll lawyers, that spend their time just
screwing with people (and corporations) by threatening with expensive
litigation/law suits.
These companies/managers just apply for patents on just about anything, and
after looking at this past patent application, I'm
else can just come
along and file a patent for what you're working on? So much for Open Source
communities and open standards.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Robert Martin robertl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Mark Malewski mark.malew...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
I'm
globally. Patents are bad for America.
Mark
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Mark Malewski mark.malew...@gmail.comwrote:
The best thing that IBM can do is donate the patents they hold to
the Community to that those patents off the table unless somebody
decides to get
, we’d have somewhat
of a standard on our hands.
Adam
*From:* opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:
opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de] *On Behalf Of *Mark Malewski
*Sent:* Wednesday, 30 September 2009 9:02 AM
*To:* realxt...@googlegroups.com; Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
,
we might be able to find funding for it.
Cheers,
From: opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de
[mailto:opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Mark Malewski
Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 9:02 AM
To: realxt...@googlegroups.com; Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
Subject: Re
[mailto:
opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de] *On Behalf Of *Mark Malewski
*Sent:* Wednesday, 30 September 2009 11:05 AM
*To:* d...@metaverseink.com; Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
*Subject:* Re: [Opensim-dev] [realXtend] Re: 3Di Viewer Rei goes open
source (BSD licensed in-browser viewer)
Diva
to help with documentation, and testing, but I just want to see
an actual release candidate (with working modules) come out.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 2:03 PM, d...@metaverseink.com wrote:
Mark Malewski wrote:
It would just be nice to get everything integrated back into core (or as
OpenSim
- Fluids
- Particle Fluids (SPH)
- Grid-Based Fluids (Dampened Shallow Wave)
- Buoyancy Force
- Drag Lift Forces
- Vehicles
Physics Abstraction Layer:
http://www.adrianboeing.com/pal/index.html
Mark
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Mark Malewski
Jason,
Still not working. Please don't be offended, but it really might be best to
stop beating up the Open-Sim Dev list with your attempts at trying to set up
your own personal blog.
It might be best to spend a few weeks (or a few months) working out all the
bugs, and getting things up and
Stefan,
I'm truly sorry to hear about Tribal Media's demise.
http://lbsa71.net/2009/05/18/tribes-and-tribulations/#comments
I've always disliked the do it yourself, or pay someone to do it comments,
simply because it seems to go directly against what I truly believe the Open
Source Community is
Jason/Colin/Rock/Aldon,
I completely agree with your stance on having a virtual currency
system/Karma system (whether it is or is not based on actual real-world
currency).
Companies like Zynga that do online gaming, have virtual currencies and
things such as virtual money and Godfather points in
I agree, if core dev doesn't want it a part of core... that's their choice,
but as long as we can create a separate OpenCurrency module and add
whatever hooks are necessary to core, that should suffice.
This way we can always improve upon the OpenCurrency module (add PayPal
API gateway, etc.).
documentation. The recent proposal pages from
Diva/Melanie looked great! So thank-you ALL for your hard work.
Thanks,
Mark
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:27 AM, Justin Clark-Casey
jjusti...@googlemail.com wrote:
Mark Malewski wrote:
Dev-Group,
First, I'll join
Dev-Group,
Ok, I've been working (as much as I possibly can) on creating pages,
improving navigation links, and improving the current WIKI documentation,
but there are quite a few pages that still need updating (and I'm clueless
as to what information should go on a few of these pages). I've
Dev-Group / Core Developers,
Another question that I have: Is a 4 color code Table Key scheme on the
LSL_Status/Types page (listed below) sufficient? Not Implemented [image:
↓] http://opensimulator.org/wiki/LSL_Status/Types# Partially
ImplementedFully Implemented
Depreciated
The page that
Diva,
Comments, feedback -- welcome and needed.
I added the See Also heading, updating the navigation, added the category
tags, and also added the Proposal tag.
My Comments: Looks good... +1
Mark
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 2:23 PM, d...@metaverseink.com wrote:
Hi,
Here is the
Colin/Rock,
I am still working on adding 2 additional navigation links, and I'm still
working on updating navigation links on pages throughout the WIKI as well.
Please just be patient, and it's a constant work in progress. As
developers make changes, we just need to be made aware of those
The only obvious problem to voice for some of these conversations that if
you're not there at the time
it happens you lose out.
Yeah, I agree with Mike on that. With e-mails at least we can have an
interactive discussion without missing out on anything.
Listening to a recorded MP3 (after the
Again, I agree with Charles.
Would 8am PST work for everyone?
Name the time and the place. I still think the best thing to do is use the
message lists, to get the maximum amount of participation, but if we're
going to schedule a meeting please let the list know where and when (and
how).
So
Sean,
My wiki ID is: mark.malewski
Thanks,
Mark
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Sean Dague sda...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Malewski wrote:
Colin/Rock,
I am still working on adding 2 additional navigation links, and I'm still
working on updating navigation links on pages
to the next stage of documentation.
Charles
--
*From:* Mark Malewski mark.malew...@gmail.com
*To:* opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
*Sent:* Wednesday, May 20, 2009 9:52:52 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Opensim-dev] Navigating the Wiki
Charles,
Excellent questions. I'll work
...
Thanks,
Mark
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Mark Malewski mark.malew...@gmail.comwrote:
Charles,
Excellent questions. I'll work on the FAQ as well. I'm almost certain
that the FAQ needs updating. I'll put it on my To Do list, and slowly get
Charles,
Excellent questions. I'll work on the FAQ as well. I'm almost certain that
the FAQ needs updating. I'll put it on my To Do list, and slowly get to
it. Once I get closer to finishing, I'll post a list of pages open for
discussion and open for comment so that we can talk about what
Rob,
A) Yes, I'm working on a Site Map for the WIKI
B) Yes, I'm working on trying to make sure that everything links to
something, and yes I am working on Navigation and eventually some turtles,
or nests. But I'm just trying to get basic navigation done first.
C) I didn't do the long page names,
possible longterm solution to
this problem.
We would probably need to create some type of RADIUS module for OpenSim.
Mark
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Mark Malewski mark.malew...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Mark Malewski mark.malew...@gmail.comwrote
another grid, which will be useful for teleporting from UCI to ScienceSim.
John
-Original Message-
From: opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:opensim-dev-
boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Mark Malewski
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 3:04 PM
To: Opensim-dev
[mailto:opensim-dev-
boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Mark Malewski
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 3:04 PM
To: Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] [REX] [Fwd: User
Authentication]
Crista,
The bottom line question in my email, phrased in OpenID terminology
to be established between the various grids.
Mark
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Mark Malewski mark.malew...@gmail.comwrote:
A RADIUS server would make administration of user accounts, and also
group permissions much easier to administer. (Such as Grid
Administrators, and PeaceKeepers
, and uci.edu running? Are they using a
OpenID 2.0 compliant identity server? Are you using Prairie? NetMesh
InfoGrid LID PHP?
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Diva Canto d...@metaverseink.com wrote:
Mark Malewski wrote:
Just to clarify...
* Grids could provide openIDs in the form
-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:opensim-dev-
boun...@lists.berlios.de] On Behalf Of Diva Canto
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 5:06 PM
To: opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] User Authentication
Mark Malewski wrote:
Just to clarify...
Grids could
78 matches
Mail list logo
