On 07/12/10 01:17 PM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
Those popped up as unresolved trying to build the latest netatalk (2.1.2).
I see them in rpcsvc/rquota.h, but not in any library or anything else
that I've been able to find. I see references to them in the source of
rquotad and the quota command,
On 07/ 1/10 10:44 AM, Peter Taps wrote:
Folks,
My package authority is set to http://pkg.opensolaris.org/release
When I try to install package sunstudioexpress, I can an error:
sunstudioexpress matches multiple packages
pkg:/developers/sunstudioexpress
pkg:/sunstudioexpress
Can someone
On 05/27/10 12:18 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Can someone else confirm this happens on SNV_138 ?
I have this bash binary :
$ which bash
/usr/bin/bash
$ /opt/schily/bin/mdigest -a sha256 /usr/bin/bash
0e0754eeb655c4ff6b85841b627179d81208c5fe93b89dd065faba3788665c9a
/usr/bin/bash
Then do the foll
ill
effectively set nscount to 0 because it sets maxns = 0. [1]
--
Shawn Walker
[1]
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/lib/libresolv2/common/resolv/res_init.c
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@
mation here :)
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Main/participate
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
Liane Praza wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
Well then, a couple of scripts that would run all needed commands
to get everything ready (one to be run with privileges appropriate to
installing additional software like the compiler, one to be run as
whatever account was
developer/opensolaris/osnet (just 'osnet' works as well).
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
The proposed project's work overlaps with much of what the ON CG does.
CGs are currently a higher-level community governance structure, so I
don't believe that this sort of project fits its current definition.
No, its disjoint. Sure,
produce them.
The format is simple enough that others can transform the packages if
needed, and I believe Moinak, et al. can do so now.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Why do you need CCs to make decisions? Even then, you don't need your
own CG to have CCs if you align with the correct CG :)
We at least need a committee of folks who can make decisions about the
code that goes into the tree, because
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
I don't agree with that. The OpenSolaris constitution structure
doesn't mean that an ON-sponsored project is subservient to the ON
Community Group. If you're really that worried about that sort of
influence, then you
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
This is the sort of project that needs to stay in sync with whatever
the ON community is doing so they can be aware of big gate or process
changes, and so that they can work together.
I don't like the idea of making this project formally s
doing, it would seem logical to me to expand
the scope of this proposal to be a bit more generic in purpose.
I'm not offended if you think this is way out of scope :)
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
, Links, References,
Advices and help to get solaris kernel compile for x86 machine!!
Thanks in advance
Follow the developer's guide here:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/on/devref_toc/
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-code mailing
re is it supposed to come from?
Did you install the SUNWtss package?
There was a recent flag day about this ...
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/openso
ndeed looks like the problem.
From my 111b OpenSolaris system:
$ pkg contents SUNWperl584core | grep Scalar
usr/perl5/5.8.4/lib/Scalar
usr/perl5/5.8.4/lib/Scalar/Util.pm
usr/perl5/5.8.4/lib/Tie/Scalar.pm
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-code mailing
James Carlson wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Have you tried "pkg verify SUNWperl584core" to see if everything is ok?
Yep. And "pkg fix SUNWperl584core". It's fine. It just doesn't work.
The web seems to suggest that this means that this module was compiled
with
7 on my 64-bit x86 systems and neither of
them seem to have this issue.
Have you tried "pkg verify SUNWperl584core" to see if everything is ok?
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http
On Jun 25, 2009, at 1:52 PM, Dean Anderson wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Shawn Walker wrote:
And that article is two years out of date. There's an LGPL version
of
Qt now that you can use for commercial software.
You seem to be ignorant of a lot of history. There has been an LGPL
ve
On Jun 24, 2009, at 11:42 PM, Dean Anderson wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Shawn Walker wrote:
I will let the numbers of users of Gtk, Qt, etc. products speak for
themselves. They paint the facts in hard, cold numbers.
Sure. Except that you have no numbers. I've tried to avoid
engagi
On Jun 23, 2009, at 11:40 PM, Dean Anderson wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Shawn Walker wrote:
While there are accessibility solutions for Motif, they were
commercial at last check, and keyboard-centric in nature.
??? Keyboards are handled by the X Server.
In other words, hooks for voice
On Jun 23, 2009, at 11:25 PM, Dean Anderson wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Shawn Walker wrote:
Anyway, here's an example of what to do in any Motif-based
application:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-customlaf/
That says nothing about motif and accessibility. About the
On Jun 23, 2009, at 10:55 PM, Dean Anderson wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Shawn Walker wrote:
Other X toolkits, in my (biased :-) opinion, are just reinventing
the
wheel (and many subtle bugs) with no real benefit to application
developers or end users.
Accessibility and modernisation
bel for Motif.
Regardless of how you want to label it, Motif is legacy, and is
effectively dead.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
accessibility solutions for Motif, they were
commercial at last check, and keyboard-centric in nature.
Also consider that the last time OpenMotif was updated was in 2000.
Such a stagnant project speaks volumes about its future viability.
So, respectfully, I must disagree.
Cheers,
--
Shawn
James C. McPherson wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:22:40 -0600
> Shawn Walker wrote:
>
>> James C. McPherson wrote:
>>> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:48:58 -0800 (PST)
>>> wan_jm wrote:
>>>
>>>> I want to find the source code of pkgadd, but I do
that code has not been Opened.
>
> I don't expect it to ever be made Open, either.
No, it was released. However, I believe it's in the process of being
moved into ON. If someone needs a copy, they should email
install-discuss [1].
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
[1] http:/
wan_jm wrote:
> I want to find the source code of pkgadd, but I don't know which project it
> belong to.
> so could you please me! thanks.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/svr4_packaging/
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-cod
business. The fact that mail
> notification strips the real names and only divulge things like " 1-5BMAI7>" also adds to frustration. It feels like talking to a wall.
>
> So how can I find out what happened and whom to talk ?
I've responded to Cyrl off-list with more info
Nick Kew wrote:
> Shawn Walker wrote:
>> Nick Kew wrote:
>>>> Don't do that. Use solaris ld on solaris; do not use
>>>> GNU ld.
>>>
>>> Scroll up to the top of the thread at
>>> http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=
related CC, etc. variables, I'm certain
that something amiss will become obvious.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
Nick Kew wrote:
> The hack of substituting GNU ld for /usr/bin/ld works with gcc. I have yet
> to try it with sunstudio.
Don't do that. Use solaris ld on solaris; do not use GNU ld.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opens
I don't, you should email the testing-discuss list.
Palle Lyckegaard wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
>
> thank you for the link - it says that the Test Farm will be officially
> launched soon... do you (or anyone) known when ?
>
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Shawn Walker wrote:
>
>&
not employed by Sun.
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
This is already in the works. See here:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/testing/testfarm/
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@op
There are a few long-term projects and some more immediate ones that are
being worked on to help speed up the build process.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
hereafter know (based on user-serviceable parts) where to get
> the rest of its tools.
It does cause problems when building other components though that don't
have a "bldenv" script or the like. Namely pkg :-)
--
Shawn Walker
___
>
>>> SUNWhea
>>> SUNWsfwhea
>>> SUNWarc
>>> SUNWperl-xml-parser
>>> SUNWtlsd
>>> SUNWprd
>>> SUNWj6dev
>>> SUNWj6rt
>>> SUNWflexlex
>>>
>>> SUNWwb* (WBEM stuf
gt; OpenSolaris 2008.05 snv_86_rc3 X86
>
pkg install SUNWmercurial
The current search / list mechanisms don't do partial matching.
In general, I suggest visiting http://pkg.opensolaris.org/status and
just using your web browser's find to find things easily
2008/7/9 Piotr Jasiukajtis / estibi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Shawn Walker pisze:
>> 2008/7/9 Piotr Jasiukajtis / estibi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is it supported to compile ONNV-GATE within non global zone?
>>
>> Compile? Yes,
2008/7/9 Piotr Jasiukajtis / estibi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Is it supported to compile ONNV-GATE within non global zone?
Compile? Yes, that should work just fine.
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
o
me "for loops"
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~swalker/4754400/usr/src/tools/scripts/cstyle.pl.wdiff.html
It's still on the "awaiting sponsor" list :-)
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
plications expect mmap access to /dev/dsp if they use OSS.
I know that Dev (at 4Front) and the others don't think it is right or
necessary, but on certain audio hardware, it works great. Especially
older Creative Labs hardware (Live, Audigy, etc.).
--
Shawn Walker
the code now.
The short answer?
You really don't.
You'll have to retrieve the whole tarball.
As for buildling individual components, look at the developer's reference.
--
Shawn Walker
"To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." -
Robert Orben
___
ok sane to me, and the comments are quite enlightening.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker
"To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." -
Robert Orben
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
ing is fine, I just wanted to reference how
another variant of ps handles syntax.
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
"To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." -
Robert Orben
SunOS 4 ps
sunos like SunOS 4 ps
sysv standard
unix standard
unix95 standard
unix98 standard
...
Just thought I'd note this,
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blo
as passed down.
> >
> > This is called *AFTER* the device has been opened in pcfs_mount,
> > however. So the device would get opened R/W even if you passed down
> > readonly.
>
> sure sounds like a bug to me. I'm certain I've opened pcfs readonly in the
&g
.
I know many folks turn off atime completely anyway because of the
performance degradation (many GNU/Linux distributions certainly do).
I do wonder how this will affect POSIX compliance. At last check,
atime was required for POSIX compliance. So does this mean that
applications using the proposed f
f those things I think I'd like to see a general solution
> for,
> whether following that model, or an entirely new one.
I would certainly like to see this supported. Encouraging the
development of good backup software or making it easier for existing
software to perform such a valuabl
urrently.
Other consolidations such as JDS or SFE, however, can have individual
packages rebuilt.
In general, consulting the project/community that is responsible for
the consolidation that delivers the package is the best way to find
out.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://b
ld area before a build.
However, if you have added the "-i" option (incremental build) it will
not perform "make clobber" before building.
You can always try to run "make clobber" manually from the top of the
source tree.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http:
se where you may have to create your own
abstraction for platform differences.
You will likely have major changes to your source code.
However, I am somewhat surprised you are having these issues as, in my
experience, as long as developers stick to the basic APIs that gnu
libc pr
stigate further into the problem but if you think you have any
> pointers to resolve this issue please do let me know.
You may be able to get more information by using the tips in this blog entry:
http://blogs.sun.com/dmick/date/20050615
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
ht
I will
> find people who are _porting_ the jvm, rather than writing applications.
>
I'm not from "Sun", but I can answer your question:
http://openjdk.java.net/
I also can suggest the Iced Tea project:
http://iced-tea.org/wiki/Main_Page
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems
10, etc.
As such, you will find more suitable assistance at Sun's bigadmin.com forums:
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/home/index.html
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
"We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all us
On 05/11/2007, Mike Gerdts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/5/07, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "man" on GNU/Linux tends to be worthless. "info" is usually the place
> > to find things in my experience.
>
> True enough. But if I
ifferent or
> incomplete...
>
> We've had this man command conversation before at least once in the past
> several years; I'll try to find it and post a pointer (I think BartS was
> involved...)
"man" on GNU/Linux tends to be worthless. "info" is usually the
; 1) it doesn't fix the algorithm by which exrecover determines which
> > lucky 50 preserve files are shown (broken imo)
> >
> > 2) It doesn't fix any lint errors that were already there
> >
> > 3) It doesn't fix any cstyle errors
> >
> > At this poi
step up from 'stick with 11'.
>
> I tried it but didn't work on my laptop.
It is still unsupported at this time. Some folks have gotten it to
work, but there's no guarantees.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot
On 18/09/2007, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-09-18 13:46, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > After a half day's worth of effort, I manage to align the sun, moon,
> > and stars and generated my first webrev:
> > http://cr.open
oking for reviewers to comment on the proposed fix.
Thanks,
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
tried it. " --Donald Knuth
_
> "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This seems rather tedious to do for every change.
> What do you folks do
> > when making changes to ONNV? Do you work / build
> nightlies out of your
> > mercurial directory? Do you commit them to
g under /usr/include/librpcsvc?
Is it only the header files listed on the man page?
Thanks,
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
tried it.
up you have?
I haven't found the "sweet spot" yet to make this process easier. When
I was originally making contributions, the mercurial gate wasn't even
up yet, so I just worked with an original extracted copy of the source
tree and a working copy of the source tree from tarballs.
ttext("fclose failed: %s: %s\n")
What is the "preferred" solution?
Cheers,
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have
vided
by/for librpcsvc.
As a result, lint complains that:
warning: name used but not defined: __clnt_bindresvport in
umount.c(318) (E_NAME_USED_NOT_DEF2)
Thoughts?
Thanks,
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
"Beware of bugs in
/* LINTLIBRARY */
>/* PROTOLIB1 */
>
>#include
>#include ...
Okay, dumb question of the day:
What criteria is used to determine which files comprise a library's
public interface?
These are the only two files listed in the man page:
I was expecting a llib-lrpcsvc file for librpcsvc, but didn't find one.
Is it just missing or has it not yet been created?
If it hasn't been created, what's involved in creating one?
Thanks,
-Shawn
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opens
I installed b70 choosing the SXDE option (which in retrospect wasn't the best
idea).
What I couldn't figure out initially was how to remove Studio 12, etc. since
you must still use Studio 11 for building ON.
It would appear that Studio 12 is not installed by packages, but rather just
extracted
, it only makes since to
stay consistent.
Even if Sun weren't involved, changing formatting rules because you
don't like them is silly whenever the majority of the codebase already
has a particular style.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL P
the sensitivity label associated with each archived file
> and directory is stored in the tarfile.
>
> Specifying T implies the function modifier p.
> [...]
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
"
On 28/06/07, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 27/06/07, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In the special case of Sun's tar implementation, the biggest problem is that
> > th
able to read archives in the old format to be a
drop-in replacement.
As others said, the integration has already happened. Please stop
talking about the past. Do not mention the past any longer. It will
not help.
Determine how to move forward.
--
Shawn Walker, Software an
out what is missing from star,
work with people to add it (like me), and get star integrated.
If you continue communicating in this way, I don't see why anyone from
Sun would be interested in collaborating with you despite whatever
value you may bring.
Please, apologise, work out a plan, fi
On 27/06/07, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
let me remove ksk-93....
"Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg, you are a broken record.
>
> We know the cases weren't open, they will be going forward as much as
possible.
>
> Ins
On 27/06/07, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 27/06/07, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > It woul
rom talking about what has
happened and star talking about what to do now.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct,
S8 in 2000, and it was clearly designed well before
> that. POSIX.1-2001 is that old?
The related part of the standard did not change sicne 1998.
That doesn't matter. It wasn't a standard until 2001. As anybody
knows, treating a standard as one before it is a standard is fraug
ipping for a very long time
now.
The ship has sailed, the milk is spilled, the egg is cracked, the fat
lady has sung.
What do you plan to do now?
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
"Beware of b
On 27/06/07, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be possible to implement a Sun tar command-line mode would it not?
>
> Something like, if star is invoked as /usr/bin/tar, it would operate
> exactly li
ke, if star is invoked as /usr/bin/tar, it would operate
exactly like Sun tar used to?
Would that allow its replacement?
--
"Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot
hem. I know ATi
used them for a long time with their driver...
--
"Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensola
at all, IIRC,
> but "ash" or some other "limited" shell.
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
--
"Less is only more where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright
Shawn Wal
nly more where more is no good." --Frank Lloyd Wright
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
Sounds like a nice improvement to me! My x64 box will thank you later.
Integrate away!
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolari
>
> > > - The amount of change is huge and unwieldy; if
> you prepend each
> > > source file with the Changelog, there would be
> tons of stuff
> > > that over times becomes less and less
> relevant.
> >
> > Case in point: the SCCS history for
> $SRC/uts/common/inet/ip/ip.c
> > curre
I would suggest emailing Jonathan Adams who posted to that thread and asking if
you can receive that backported version from him.
Every bit of information I've seen seems to indicate that libumem was
introduced in Solaris 9, and you really should be using that to take advantage
of it.
Here is
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 12:14:59AM -0700, Padraig
> O'Briain wrote:
>
> > I have submitted patches to various projects to
> change references to string variables which could be
> NULL from
> >
> > s to
> >
> > s ? s : "NULL"
>
> Why? Other than debugging, what possible value does
> "NULL" ha
On 7/26/05, Rod Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shawn Walker wrote:
>
> > The question then is whether or not there is any continued point in
> > setting the executable bit? I mean, why bother setting it if it's
> > unnecessary? On the chance that som
On 7/23/05, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using this script along with a piece of software that uses the GNU
> auto* tools will make packaging pretty darn easy. The hard part is
> getting the project to compile usually.
I've since further enhanced it to ac
For those that couldn't see Rod's great explanation (I'm guessing his
CC to the list bounced):
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rod Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jul 24, 2005 9:45 PM
Subject: Re: [osol-code] Library Question
To: Peter Memishian <[EMAIL PROT
27;s
unnecessary? On the chance that some ancient ye olde customer software
will break?
Not that it really matters, just curious :)
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
https://opensolaris.org:444/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
m
to find why.
Responses appreciated,
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
https://opensolaris.org:444/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
Oh my, it might be helpful to say where I put it:
http://icculus.org/~eviltypeguy/pkg/gnutopkg
Doh.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris
usually.
Feeback is welcomed,
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
https://opensolaris.org:444/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
is the suggested fix in the bug report? bugs.opensolaris.org only
shows the first comment, so I didn't see anything else in there...
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-code m
her. While I can understand the other
viewpoint. Which is the "right" way?
Thoughts? Agree / Disagree?
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-code mailing
system-wide
things.
The shm tunable are a great example of things that I never want to deal with...
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@o
On 7/11/05, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As an exercise in learning a small part of the OpenSolaris codebase, I
> > decided to add the ability to export variables via the "commonly
> > accepted"
tonight, it makes
perfect sense that it would work ;}
Does the syntax itself makes sense? Eh...only from a very
"tokenizer"-istic view of things.
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
_
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
