> Look forward to hearing your testing results on
> SuperMicro/AHCI!
Hi Ying,
Thank you for your posting . SuperMicro 7045 is not my concern.
(just ASUS P5B Deluxe)
Please, view :-
http://jp.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=25795&tstart=0
regarding SuperMicro 7045.
Boris
>
> Thanks,
>
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 07:43 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Are you sure you have an nVidia graphics card? Did you look through the
> other devices reported by scanpci?
I'm sure. It should be GeForce 6100. Attached the log file. You can find
the keyword 6100 in it. But I can't configure it with
On 09/03/07, Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Even though I'm a candidate, there's one overriding question that a lot of
candidates haven't answered since they've produced absolutely no content other
than accepting their nomination.
Why should I spend one of my 7 votes on you?
I answere
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 18:32 -0400, John Martin wrote:
> Calvin Liu wrote:
> >
> > I got no clue from the output below.
> > -bash-3.00# /usr/X11/bin/scanpci|grep nVidia
> >
> Can you provide the output of scanpci without any filtering?
The attached log file was created by
"/usr/X11/bin/scanpci >
...and b59 is now working.
If this helps someone;
1. Express (not development)
2. Solaris Interactive Text
and no stops...
In the end if you want install Developer Tools (README first).
Martti
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolar
Here's the thing. It looks already like there could be functionality or
performance tradeoffs against getting more drivers available relatively
quickly. Personally, I tend to favor having everything that's there,
really good, and while I naturally want as many drivers as possible,
put that a dist
Wolfgang Stief wrote On 03/14/07 06:22,:
Hello community!
Some more words on the first OpenSolaris Developer Conference which took
place end of February / beginning of March in Berlin, Germany.
For those interested in official numbers: we counted 60 people
registered for the first OpenSola
Martin Bochnig wrote On 03/14/07 14:28,:
Ben Rockwood wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
Glynn Foster wrote On 03/09/07 10:58,:
Hi,
Even though I'm a candidate, there's one overriding question that a
lot of
candidates haven't answered since they've produced absolutely
Hi Boris,
Yesterday I got an ASUS P5B-E Plus mother board which has the ICH8R
southbridge, and the ahci driver works fine for AHCI mode after
running some tests.
Look forward to hearing your testing results on SuperMicro/AHCI!
Thanks,
- ying -
Boris Derzhavets wrote:
Hi Ying,
As soon as I'l
Ben Rockwood wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
Glynn Foster wrote On 03/09/07 10:58,:
Hi,
Even though I'm a candidate, there's one overriding question that a
lot of
candidates haven't answered since they've produced absolutely no
content other
than accepting their nom
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
Glynn Foster wrote On 03/09/07 10:58,:
Hi,
Even though I'm a candidate, there's one overriding question that a
lot of
candidates haven't answered since they've produced absolutely no
content other
than accepting their nomination.
Why should I
In fedora or RHEK, you can you yum -y install XYZ_software or yum update
install XYZ_software or use up2date.
is there something similar with above in solaris?
In most cases, do I must install apps etc from source?
Tnx in advanced
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
Glynn Foster wrote On 03/09/07 10:58,:
Hi,
Even though I'm a candidate, there's one overriding question that a
lot of
candidates haven't answered since they've produced absolutely no
content other
than accepting their nomination.
Why should I spend one of my 7 votes
Glynn Foster wrote On 03/09/07 10:58,:
Hi,
Even though I'm a candidate, there's one overriding question that a lot of
candidates haven't answered since they've produced absolutely no content other
than accepting their nomination.
Why should I spend one of my 7 votes on you?
Here's my why:
Tnx.
I learned nuch from you.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Thanks, Anders. You have seconds. I'll contact you offline to
get you set up.
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Anders Persson wrote:
Everyone,
There is currently no interface for using sockets within the kernel. However,
there is a need for kernel sockets and the currently solution used by
developers is
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 04:21 pm, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Mar 7, 2007, at 2:54 PM, John Rice wrote:
> > We discussed this with Alfred and whilst he had thought of your
> > suggestion, wanted to opt for a mozilla dtrace project hosted on
> > OpenSolaris and a general Opensolaris one hosted on
You are the real expert here, who provides the Solaris porting of Xserver!
I just boldly provide some thoughts. I just ignored the suspend issue. I
thought we
could solve it in kernel driver without giving up the 2d part user space
driver,
like what is done for 3d. I think we are trying to rep
The 2D part does need a kernel mode driver though, for features such as
suspend-and-resume, and for getting rid of the security issues associated
with /dev/xsvc & allowing user space processes to have ring-0 access so
that the Xserver can access the hardware from user space.
Solaris & Linux are b
Hi, Douglas,
Glad to hear from you.
As for moving X drivers to kernel, I have investigated on it. We must be
aware that nowadays the display card include two functions, 2d and 3d,
the first part does not need dma, thus can be implemented in user space
conveniently, as the 3d part, it relies
Multimedia screencasts featuring some rather familiar names: Brendan Gregg,
Tom Erickson, Ginnie Wray, Bill Rushmore...
DTrace for JavaScript Debugging
http://frsun.downloads.edgesuite.net/sun/07C00953/
Chime Visualization Tool for DTrace
http://frsun.downloads.edgesuite.net/sun/07C00941/
Dual
Calvin Liu wrote:
I got no clue from the output below.
-bash-3.00# /usr/X11/bin/scanpci|grep nVidia
Can you provide the output of scanpci without any filtering?
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
tnx for quick response :)
-Original Message-
From: Martin Bochnig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 12:50 PM
To: Vu The Cuong
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] newbe: which solaris 10 iso file should be
downloaded?
Welcome!
vuthe
On 14/03/07, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
> On 13/03/07, vuthecuong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Solaris have many editions:
>> - Solaris Express, Community Edition
>> - Solaris Express, Developer Edition
>> - etc
>> -etc
>>
>> So wich version is mainly for crit
Hello community!
Some more words on the first OpenSolaris Developer Conference which took
place end of February / beginning of March in Berlin, Germany.
For those interested in official numbers: we counted 60 people
registered for the first OpenSolaris Developer Conference plus another
130 r
Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Shawn Walker wrote:
>
>> On 13/03/07, vuthecuong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Solaris have many editions:
>>> - Solaris Express, Community Edition
>>> - Solaris Express, Developer Edition
>>> - etc
>>> -etc
>>>
>>> So wich version is mainly for critical mission server
Hi
On my laptop (amd turion, atiixp chipset) the keyboard doesn't work with
build 55 (SXCE).
I have tried to:
- install b54 (works)
- b54 -> BFU to b55 (doensn't work)
- install b57 (doesn't work)
- install b59 (doesn't work)
- b59 -> BFU to b60 (doesn't work)
When I connect usb keyboard, then
* David Edmondson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-13 11:45]:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:30:20AM -0700, Stephen Hahn wrote:
> > Although I agree that there are problems with a "give Sun hardware"
> > policy, I am less convinced that there shouldn't be some contributor,
> > not employed by the d
Stephen Hahn wrote:
* Richard Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-13 11:11]:
Paul Durrant wrote:
On 3/13/07, John Plocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paul Durrant writes:
The current ON processes are just wrong for open source.
The ON development process forces developers to look beyond
the cur
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 11:30:20AM -0700, Stephen Hahn wrote:
> Although I agree that there are problems with a "give Sun hardware"
> policy, I am less convinced that there shouldn't be some contributor,
> not employed by the device manufacturer, able to test that, with the
> device install
* Richard Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-13 11:11]:
> Paul Durrant wrote:
> >On 3/13/07, John Plocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Paul Durrant writes:
> The current ON processes are just wrong for open source.
> >>
> >>The ON development process forces developers to look beyond
> >>the
James Mansion wrote:
And they start to find it hard to make time to spend time on
anything that isn't work - ie open source projects. I've seen
That *was* my point.
this happen on a number of occasions. And contrary to what
you're suggesting, they don't turn up an opensolaris, som
Paul Durrant wrote:
On 3/13/07, John Plocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Durrant writes:
>>The current ON processes are just wrong for open source.
The ON development process forces developers to look beyond
the current confines of their project and understand/manage
the impact that their
On 3/13/07, John Plocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Durrant writes:
>>The current ON processes are just wrong for open source.
The ON development process forces developers to look beyond
the current confines of their project and understand/manage
the impact that their development choices
> I have noticed that (at least with 10u3) there seems
> to be a font page switching problem when switching to
> a different locale.
>
> For example, when I created a "StarOffice 8" launcher
> in simplified Chinese locale, the label "StarOffice
> 8" disappeared when I logged into the en_US.UTF-8
>
Shawn Walker wrote:
On 13/03/07, vuthecuong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Solaris have many editions:
- Solaris Express, Community Edition
- Solaris Express, Developer Edition
- etc
-etc
So wich version is mainly for critical mission server?
Neither. The version you want for that is here:
http:
Your configuration is illegal. If the votes needed were one, then each of the
nodes could form a cluster independently, and corrupt any storage shared
between them.
You need a SCSI device which is connected to both nodes, and does reservations,
to be the quorum device. Then you will have thre
Has Sun Cluster been open-sourced? I want to look at the source-code for
HAStoragePlus, with a view to creating something that does the same thing, but
across a pair of Oracle RAC instances, for the benefit of a client that needs
to:
- start if at least one of them is up
- restart if the Or
Hi Freeman,
I have seen blogs talking about the opposite direction (I recall having read
some blog entry about moving X drivers into the kernel). However, with every
new build of Solaris Express, I get some good or bad surprise. The bad ones
usually have to do with new kernel modules that don't
Bob Palowoda wrote:
I was reading Moinak Ghosh's blog about Belenix 0.6 improvements:
http://blogs.sun.com/moinakg/entry/belenix_dvd_with_netbeans_openoffice#comments
and I'm a bit interested in the application development futures in OpenSolaris.
He is including Netbeans 5.5 and Java EE Applicati
Bob Palowoda wrote:
I would have commented directly in the blog but there seems to be some sort of 2 blog
comment limit and comments are closed on the Sun blogs page.
blogs.sun.com has a limit on how long you can add comments to posts, since
it was found most comments to old posts were by li
Calvin Liu wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 22:22 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Calvin Liu wrote:
So far I know there's some commands available to detect the system
configuration like prtconf, sysdef, dmesg, etc. But seems none of them
can tell me which model of the graphics card that I'm using. I
Hi all,
I have had a few problems with b59 in my Toshiba (x86-32) notebook. The DVD
boots cleanly and the installation process goes also fine. After installation,
however, the first boot starts loading the kernel, shows "Configuring devices"
message on the console, blanks the screen and never co
Paul Durrant writes:
> On 3/13/07, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But the underlying point here is that you don't have to go through ON
> > (there are other supported ways to integrate drivers) and you don't
> > need to create (and can't actually use) yet another consolidation to
> >
On 3/13/07, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think even that policy is being actively debated.
Good.
But the underlying point here is that you don't have to go through ON
(there are other supported ways to integrate drivers) and you don't
need to create (and can't actually use) ye
Paul Durrant writes:
> On 3/13/07, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Really?
> >
> > Which processes are wrong? Should some code not have design reviews
> > and code reviews because the author makes it "open?"
> >
>
> Not at all. I'm all for design and code reviews, but submitting
On 3/13/07, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Really?
Which processes are wrong? Should some code not have design reviews
and code reviews because the author makes it "open?"
Not at all. I'm all for design and code reviews, but submitting h/w to
ON PIT as a gating factor for source i
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Calvin Liu wrote:
So far I know there's some commands available to detect the system
configuration like prtconf, sysdef, dmesg, etc. But seems none of them
can tell me which model of the graphics card that I'm using. In another
word, in my case, I just know the system loa
Paul Durrant writes:
> While I was at Sun I wondered whether there should be a consolidation
> for open source drivers (a good while before Solaris itself was open
> source). The consolidation would have very lightweight integration
> rules (since the driver source would already be freely available
Solaris U3
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I was reading Moinak Ghosh's blog about Belenix 0.6 improvements:
http://blogs.sun.com/moinakg/entry/belenix_dvd_with_netbeans_openoffice#comments
and I'm a bit interested in the application development futures in OpenSolaris.
He is including Netbeans 5.5 and Java EE Application Server 9.0 U1 which
girish writes:
> I was thinking that maybe SUN wanted to keep the official releases
> binary-only and only make the intermediate builds publicly available via
> opensolaris. So thats what's there in OpenSolaris may not exactly match with
> what was used to build the official release. But I am gl
On 13/03/07, vuthecuong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Solaris have many editions:
- Solaris Express, Community Edition
- Solaris Express, Developer Edition
- etc
-etc
So wich version is mainly for critical mission server?
Neither. The version you want for that is here:
http://www.sun.com/softwar
On 13/03/07, vuthecuong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a single hard disk with following OS and partitions:
partition1: NTFS, primary, windowsXP installed.
parttition2: primary, Freebsd 6.2 installed.
partition3: primary, Sunsolaris 10 will be installed here.
Could anyone quicly confirm me is
On 3/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 3/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Correct; I think that Sun will need to change that attitude and define
>> a process for itself in which it limits the bits of OpenSolaris it
>> ships as part of its distributi
How about running Sun Grid Engine: http://gridengine.sunsource.net/
It has qrsh, qsh, and qtcsh...
You can get further help from the mailing lists:
http://gridengine.sunsource.net/project/gridengine/maillist.html
Rayson
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
for Alan,Community and Readers
Sorry for these repetitions.It wasn't my intention.I had problems about thread
java exception for many hours ( I don''t know why...) without a clear
response,if my message was or not saved.Now I can see that it is always saved
although many errors.
Giacomo
__
Solaris have many editions:
- Solaris Express, Community Edition
- Solaris Express, Developer Edition
- etc
-etc
So wich version is mainly for critical mission server?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
open
James C. McPherson wrote:
Rao Shoaib wrote:
James C. McPherson wrote:
Anders Persson wrote:
Everyone,
There is currently no interface for using sockets within the
kernel. However, there is a need for kernel sockets and the
currently solution used by developers is to use private interfaces.
59 matches
Mail list logo
