Never mind. I got the images at
http://developers.sun.com/solaris/downloads/solaris_apps/index.jsp
I wonder what are 3 VMs doing there on the webpage?
-Atul
On 4/10/07, Atul Vidwansa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a vmware image available for latest on builds? I intend to
run it under vmwar
> > 3) Unlike Linux, Solaris is a complete operating
> system. This means
> > that, yes, you can easily upgrade Linux because it
> is just a kernel,
> > fairly frequently without changing anything in
> userland except
> > drivers. Solaris, unlike Linux, is a complete
> operating system and
> > bri
Is there a vmware image available for latest on builds? I intend to
run it under vmware player or vmware server.
_Atul
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Shawn Walker wrote:
...
3) Unlike Linux, Solaris is a complete operating system. This means
that, yes, you can easily upgrade Linux because it is just a kernel,
fairly frequently without changing anything in userland except
drivers. Solaris, unlike Linux, is a complete operating system and
bring
> While it is only my first day in the new job, I can
> already tell you
> there is a tremendous amount of executive attention
> at Sun focused on
> ensuring the OpenSolaris community is successful.
> Among many other
> things, one of my priorities is to ensure we bring
> our own Solaris 10
>
Hey,
More activity - thanks to Tim for sending me some content for this week.
Glynn
==
Derek Cicero announced [1] that Solaris Express Community Edition build 61 was
now available.
1.http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-announce/2007-April/000958.html
Steve Lau announced [2] tha
--- Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 09/04/07, Chung Hang Christopher Chan
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Most of your confusion seems to stem around not
> > > understanding the
> > > updates are handled differently for the
> Community
> > > and Developer
> > > releases of Sol
On 09/04/07, Chung Hang Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Most of your confusion seems to stem around not
> understanding the
> updates are handled differently for the Community
> and Developer
> releases of Solaris than the "official" release.
Thanks Shawn. I was trying to point th
On 09/04/07, Chung Hang Christopher Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So if you tell me that things between b59 and b61 will
get broken then I really need that network enabled
dist-upgrade. Fedora is bad enough at 6 months for a
dist-upgrade, Solaris Express is like once a month or
at least once a
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 8 Apr 2007, Chung Hang Christopher Chan
> wrote:
>
> > Yes, I know this. You still have not however
> answered
> > my question about where do I find a binary package
> or
> > a source tarball for the si3124 driver.
>
> It's included in the latest stu
Marc Hamilton wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to introduce myself to the OpenSolaris community. Some of you
might know me from my previous roles at Sun, or from my blog, but
starting today I'll be leading up Sun's Solaris marketing efforts,
including OpenSolaris marketing. The first thing I want to do is
On 09/04/07, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You could even use OpenPKG to build your own entire
> software stack or
> use the one they provide:
> http://www.openpkg.org/
>
> The nice thing about OpenPKG is that it works on more
> operating
> systems than just Solaris.
You could, and it
On 09/04/07, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, James Carlson wrote:
>
> > Not all things in Solaris are under the CDDL. Only the things that
> > Sun has licensed under CDDL are marked that way. Some things have
> > different owners who've g
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Re: How To Install Solaris 10 : A Step by Step
Guide
From:"John Plocher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:Mon, April 9, 2007 17:17
To: "Dennis Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi,
> I wanted to introduce myself to the OpenSolaris community. Some of you
> might know me from my previous roles at Sun, or from my blog, but
> starting today I'll be leading up Sun's Solaris marketing efforts,
> including OpenSolaris marketing. The first thing I want to do is listen
> to the
Hi,
I wanted to introduce myself to the OpenSolaris community. Some of you
might know me from my previous roles at Sun, or from my blog, but
starting today I'll be leading up Sun's Solaris marketing efforts,
including OpenSolaris marketing. The first thing I want to do is listen
to the OpenSol
>Was that intended as a joke?
I'm sure it was.
>Static linking introduces horrors that are far harder to solve than
>any of the issues I mentioned with dynamic linking. You can't patch,
>for one thing.
For one, you could not have pluggable modules.
But yes, having no shared libraries means yo
>>
>> This is for review.
>> goto : http://www.blastwave.org/docs/index.html
>> select doc BLS-0061
>> A lot of the pages were written when I was getting
>> tired and there will
>> be errors. At the very least some dry humour and
>> possibly rambling.
>> The topic or index page is still being
UNIX admin writes:
> > They shouldn't be "allowed" to explode, but if
> > someone has a good way
> > to prevent it (and a cure that isn't just worse than
> > the disease),
> > it'd be good to see some work done on it.
> >
> > --
> > James Carlson, Solaris Networking
>
> Isn't it great that today
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, James Carlson wrote:
>
> > Not all things in Solaris are under the CDDL. Only the things that
> > Sun has licensed under CDDL are marked that way. Some things have
> > different owners who've given different licenses.
>
> Seems that having the lic
> You could even use OpenPKG to build your own entire
> software stack or
> use the one they provide:
> http://www.openpkg.org/
>
> The nice thing about OpenPKG is that it works on more
> operating
> systems than just Solaris.
You could, and it sounds nice, but it's a trap. Sooner or later whoeve
>>
>> This is for review.
>> goto : http://www.blastwave.org/docs/index.html
>> select doc BLS-0061
>> A lot of the pages were written when I was getting
>> tired and there will
>> be errors. At the very least some dry humour and
>> possibly rambling.
>> The topic or index page is still being
> Consider an application that is linked with a
> versioned library.
> We'll call it "libresolv.so.1" to make a concrete
> example. That
> application also pulls in (say) "libldap.so.1". This
> library, though,
> has been relinked with the new "libresolv.so.2".
>
> The result is that the applica
>
> This is for review.
> goto : http://www.blastwave.org/docs/index.html
> select doc BLS-0061
> A lot of the pages were written when I was getting
> tired and there will
> be errors. At the very least some dry humour and
> possibly rambling.
> The topic or index page is still being written.
Jerry Sutton wrote:
Is adoption of the Xorg server considered a technical advance -
generally a good thing?
Yes.
Will Xsun remain for sparc?
Only for a while - the announcement of it's end of life should be in the
next Solaris 10 update release notes. SPARC graphics & Sun Ray are working
Is adoption of the Xorg server considered a technical advance -
generally a good thing? Will Xsun remain for sparc?
Yes I understand I have a far better chance of timely Xorg support for
arbitrary commodity hardware. I've read some negative press about the
Xorg server as compared to Xsun for
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Shawn Walker wrote:
Yes, I know this. You still have not however answered
my question about where do I find a binary package or
a source tarball for the si3124 driver. Maybe this is
an edge case but I would not rule out a dist-upgrade
for a driver especially one that comes
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007, Chung Hang Christopher Chan wrote:
Yes, I know this. You still have not however answered
my question about where do I find a binary package or
a source tarball for the si3124 driver.
It's included in the latest stuff, grab Solaris Express and it's in there,
AFAIK.
Not
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Chung Hang Christopher Chan wrote:
Haha, well that was what I could come up with because
that is how I got the si3124 driver on Nexenta.
Ok, but all those drivers are delivered in the base OpenSolaris system.
So, what's the point?
Of course, a dist upgrade would be ove
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Eric Saxe wrote:
I'd like to propose a project to provide an enhanced platform independent
power
management architecture...to be known as "Project Tesla".
That sounds good, +1 or whatever is required if it's not been done
already...
From a high level, this project w
Is there a schedule for when KDE 3.5.x might be available with Solaris 10 mods?
I have 3.4.3, but if a newer version is coming "soon" I'll hold off on
building it . . . .
Thanks!
Dan
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discus
On 09/04/07, Manoj Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
> Teamware is Sun's internal code management tool. wx, wx, workspace,
> bringover are all internal Sun tools. You don't need them to build
> OpenSolaris.
wx and ws are no longer internal only. It is part of SUNWonbld and i
"Peter C. Norton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 11:14:14PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > The problem is that the creators of the Linux distributions
> > keep their users uninformed.
> >
> > They don't know that the command line features they see are features
> > from ba
Chung Hang Christopher Chan wrote:
So Open Solaris/Solaris 10 is not quite ready for
production then?
Solaris 10 and OpenSolaris are very different beasts.
Solaris 10 is ready for production and in production
at many sites - what you see in OpenSolaris is still
in development for the next relea
* Chung Hang Christopher Chan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
SNIP
> >
> > The official release has an update manager that
> > provides new driver,
> > fixes, patches, etc. The Community and Developer
> > releases do not; if
> > you want to upgrade with those, you use the upgrade
> > functionality
>
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>> As it stands .. I have to rewrite it now. The contents looks like it
>> was
>> written by me. That may not fly too well with some readers and it gives
>> the whole document a "community" feel to it. Not very professional if you
>> know what I mea
Alan Coopersmith writes:
> Jason King wrote:
> > Perhaps it might be worthwhile to add the ability to specify the default
> > encryption algorithm or encryption policy as part of the install or
> > sysidcfg?
>
> Except that marketing is convinced every question you ask during install
> chases aw
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Except that marketing is convinced every question you ask during install
> chases away thousands of users who are too confused to answer, and is
> removing as many questions as possible.
Oh, and renaming products every five minutes DOESN'T confuse cus
> Most of your confusion seems to stem around not
> understanding the
> updates are handled differently for the Community
> and Developer
> releases of Solaris than the "official" release.
Thanks Shawn. I was trying to point that the current
methods available do not fly against what is available
Jason King wrote:
Perhaps it might be worthwhile to add the ability to specify the default
encryption algorithm or encryption policy as part of the install or
sysidcfg?
Except that marketing is convinced every question you ask during install
chases away thousands of users who are too confused
Manoj Joseph wrote:
Suraj Verma wrote:
I am not sure of the legal nuiances, but the license in SUNWonbld
package available at "http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/ ",
says that you can use it only for building opensolaris.
That should be ok. I am planning to make changes to opensolar
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> As it stands .. I have to rewrite it now. The contents looks like it was
> written by me. That may not fly too well with some readers and it gives
> the whole document a "community" feel to it. Not very professional if you
> know what I mean.
I would
On 4/7/07, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 07/04/07, Andrew Pattison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Passwords on Solaris are not limited to 8 characters, but the default
password hashing algorithm only looks at the first 8 characters, with the
result that passwords which have the same f
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 11:14:14PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> The problem is that the creators of the Linux distributions
> keep their users uninformed.
>
> They don't know that the command line features they see are features
> from bash.
>
> ... and they don't know that Linux does not come
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Abdul Halim A. Aziz wrote:
> I'm new in SunOS. i have an existing SunOS 5.8.
Welcome to our community, but please note in future that this
mailing list is for OpenSolaris discussion, not previous
release (alhtough S10 is tolerated).
That said:
> i've been searching for a way
Suraj Verma wrote:
I am not sure of the legal nuiances, but the license in SUNWonbld
package available at "http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/ ",
says that you can use it only for building opensolaris.
That should be ok. I am planning to make changes to opensolaris and
building it.
I am not sure of the legal nuiances, but the license in SUNWonbld
package available at "http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/ ",
says that you can use it only for building opensolaris.
Suraj
Manoj Joseph wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
Teamware is Sun's internal code management tool. wx,
I have seen a problem where a newer NVidia graphics card
would hard-hang with the nv driver (used during install
on older builds). This was with an 7900GT; the exact same
problem was also seen with Ubuntu. Works fine w/ the
Nvidia driver...
- Bart
--
Bart Smaalders Solaris
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Bob Palowoda wrote:
I like the comparison of Xsun to Windows 98.
Fortunately Xsun & kdmconfig will finally be gone from the x86
installer in S10U4, much as they already are on Nevada/Express.
when is U4 due out ?
Summertime.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [
Manoj Joseph writes:
> wx and ws are no longer internal only. It is part of SUNWonbld and is
> available for download and use.
>
> I am not trying to just build OpenSolaris and I could use workspace,
> bringover.
>
> So, is it available somewhere?
No. We're in the process of transitioning ove
> Bob Palowoda wrote:
>> I like the comparison of Xsun to Windows 98.
>
> Fortunately Xsun & kdmconfig will finally be gone from the x86
> installer in S10U4, much as they already are on Nevada/Express.
when is U4 due out ?
I'll have to rewrite this thing when it ships. :-\
As it stands
Shawn Walker wrote:
Teamware is Sun's internal code management tool. wx, wx, workspace,
bringover are all internal Sun tools. You don't need them to build
OpenSolaris.
wx and ws are no longer internal only. It is part of SUNWonbld and is
available for download and use.
I am not trying to ju
Bob Palowoda wrote:
I like the comparison of Xsun to Windows 98.
Fortunately Xsun & kdmconfig will finally be gone from the x86
installer in S10U4, much as they already are on Nevada/Express.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window
Thanks, Garrett. You have seconds. I'll contact you offline
to get you set up.
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
I would like to propose the creation of a project to incorporate various
platform specific support for Tadpole platforms into OpenSolaris. This
would include core platform
On 09/04/07, Abdul Halim A. Aziz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi.
I'm new in SunOS. i have an existing SunOS 5.8.
i've been searching for a way on how to install PHP on the meachine
and how can i know which webservice is running Apache / tomcat
These lists are for the discussion of OpenSolaris.
On 09/04/07, Manoj Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I just downloaded and installed the SUNWonbld package. It has tools like
ws, wx. But I don't see workspace, bringover etc.
man ws references these but I am unable to figure out where they are or
where to get them from.
Are these availa
>>
>> This is for review.
>> goto : http://www.blastwave.org/docs/index.html
>> select doc BLS-0061
>> A lot of the pages were written when I was getting
>> tired and there will
>> be errors. At the very least some dry humour and
>> possibly rambling.
>> The topic or index page is still being
>
> This is for review.
> goto : http://www.blastwave.org/docs/index.html
> select doc BLS-0061
> A lot of the pages were written when I was getting
> tired and there will
> be errors. At the very least some dry humour and
> possibly rambling.
> The topic or index page is still being written.
Dennis Clarke writes:
>
> Is this intended ?
Yes. Note carefully the BSD license notice.
> I note that dmesg has the CDDL as well as nearly everything else.
> I say "nearly" only because I am not certain.
Not all things in Solaris are under the CDDL. Only the things that
Sun has licensed unde
Hi,
I just downloaded and installed the SUNWonbld package. It has tools like
ws, wx. But I don't see workspace, bringover etc.
man ws references these but I am unable to figure out where they are or
where to get them from.
Are these available somewhere for download? Do I need Teamware? Goo
Hi.
I'm new in SunOS. i have an existing SunOS 5.8.
i've been searching for a way on how to install PHP on the meachine
and how can i know which webservice is running Apache / tomcat
thanks
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-di
This is for review.
goto : http://www.blastwave.org/docs/index.html select doc BLS-0061
A lot of the pages were written when I was getting tired and there will
be errors. At the very least some dry humour and possibly rambling.
The topic or index page is still being written. It needs to
62 matches
Mail list logo
