I would like propose a new project SCSI SAM Pseudo
File system in OpenSolaris. This file system will be
somewhat similar to Linux’s /proc/scsi file system,
with several extensions.
While I think there are times where a pseudo file system is
a good answer to a problem, and I don't know whether
http://docs.sun.com/ Voluminous - yes
Detailed - yes Usability - I have mixed feelings. Often it has been notes
put up on the blogs, mailing list archives or queries on newsgroups that
seem to give me the right answers. (I can count myself among those
One of the things we as a community have often communicated is that we
abhore the Linux fragmentation and that we want a unified *platform*, in
stark contrast with the Linux mentality. Really? I don't abhore the
Linux fragmentation, and I don't recall a consensus-community message
Really? I don't abhore the Linux fragmentation, and
I don't recall a
consensus-community message where we communicated
that at all.
I already covered the blanket statement part, but while
on the subject, this just in:
Too Many Linux Distros Make For Open Source Mess:
I find the professional documentation for Solaris
fairly typical of
professional documentation these days, and not
terribly useful. It is,
as you say, detailed and step-by-step. What it
*doesn't* do is give me
any traction in really understanding how the system
works;
The question
On 7/19/07, a b [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Voluminous - yes
Detailed - yes
Usability - I have mixed feelings. Often it has been notes put up on
the blogs, mailing list archives or queries on newsgroups that seem to
give me the right answers.
(I can count myself among those who has
On 7/19/07, UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question to you is, how is the documentation supposed
to answer a question as undefined as yours?
First you need to communicate what it is that you'd like to
know, in more precise terms, then I can point you to the
corresponding document.
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 01:38 -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
I find the professional documentation for Solaris
fairly typical of
professional documentation these days, and not
terribly useful. It is,
as you say, detailed and step-by-step. What it
*doesn't* do is give me
any traction in
This is a modified JumpStart environment question for a standalone SPARC system
using a bootable DVD and a USB Thumb-Drive.
In its simplest form the JumpStart DVD installs a baseline configuration...but
it cannot be modified. Is it possible to override the default DVD information
with
Hi,
I couldn't able to understand the difference between milestones and
runlevels. As far as I understand they are somehow related
What I understand is for example svc:/milestone/multi-user:default is
runlevel 2. And if I want to see what is run in runlevel2 I can see that
with:
bash-3.00#
UNIX admin wrote:
Really? I don't abhore the Linux fragmentation, and
I don't recall a
consensus-community message where we communicated
that at all.
I already covered the blanket statement part, but while
on the subject, this just in:
Too Many Linux Distros Make For Open Source Mess:
Toying around with using a minimal RAM-resident version of OpenSolaris
(currently 80MB) as an appliance platform. The idea here would be that the OS
would be real small, would boot real fast (from flash), would have no disk
footprint, and most importantly -- be stateless. The stateless part
Is the only way to get updates for OpenSolaris to buy a annual contract from
Sun?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Aaron Epps wrote:
Is the only way to get updates for OpenSolaris to buy a annual contract from
Sun?
No - there is no contract from Sun you can buy that will give
you anything more than you can get from the free downloads on
OpenSolaris.org.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL
Perhaps I wasn't clear. Once I've installed Solaris, surely there are
pathces/etc that are released, currently it looks as if I need to register my
installation of Solaris in order to get access to these patches and that
appears to require some kind of support contract with Sun. Is there any
Jim Connors wrote:
Toying around with using a minimal RAM-resident version of OpenSolaris
(currently 80MB) as an appliance platform. The idea here would be that the
OS would be real small, would boot real fast (from flash), would have no disk
footprint, and most importantly -- be
Aaron Epps wrote:
Perhaps I wasn't clear. Once I've installed Solaris, surely there are
pathces/etc that are released, currently it looks as if I need to register
my installation of Solaris in order to get access to these patches and that
appears to require some kind of support contract
Solaris and OpenSolaris are not the same thing.
As this is an OpenSolaris forum, it's not the best place to discuss topics that
are specific to Solaris (like support contracts and patch availability).
--
Darren
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Aaron Epps writes:
Perhaps I wasn't clear. Once I've installed Solaris, surely there are
pathces/etc that are released, currently it looks as if I need to register
my installation of Solaris in order to get access to these patches and that
appears to require some kind of support contract
I'm just attempting to familiarize myself with how OpenSolaris differs from
Fedora. For example, eventhought Fedora is a development project, they still
release and make patches freely available without having to buy a support
contract; of course if you buy RHEL then you do need to purchase a
Epps, Aaron writes:
I'm talking about Solaris Express...
OK.
So, if there are never going to be
any patches issued for Solaris Express, then why have the Update-Manager
applet loaded on the default gnome panel? For that matter, why not just
remove or hide it all together if it's not going
Aaron Epps wrote:
I'm just attempting to familiarize myself with how OpenSolaris differs from
Fedora. For example, eventhought Fedora is a development project, they still
release and make patches freely available without having to buy a support
contract; of course if you buy RHEL then you
* Aaron Epps ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'm just attempting to familiarize myself with how OpenSolaris differs
from Fedora. For example, eventhought Fedora is a development project,
they still release and make patches freely available without having to
buy a support contract; of course if you
James Carlson wrote:
Epps, Aaron writes:
I'm talking about Solaris Express...
OK.
So, if there are never going to be
any patches issued for Solaris Express, then why have the Update-Manager
applet loaded on the default gnome panel? For that matter, why not just
remove or hide it all
Hey,
Anyone any ideas if Solaris can see this device: Maxtor 1TB OneTouch III Turbo
Edition USB or firewire ? Connecting this to my Solaris Express build 64a, USB:
Jul 19 21:16:27 earth usba: [ID 349649 kern.info] Maxtor OneTouch III
2CAD0L5P
Jul 19 21:16:27 earth genunix: [ID
Apologies. Moving over to smf-discuss ...
-- Jim C
Jim Connors wrote:
Toying around with using a minimal RAM-resident version of
OpenSolaris (currently 80MB) as an appliance platform. The idea
here would be that the OS would be real small, would boot real fast
(from flash), would have
Hi
Write here when you success , i'm more than happy to do some testing :-)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
couple of more info:
- I was able to fdisk it in Redhat AS. In Solaris it was not possible.
- The device ships as MacOSX device so I needed to repartion it
- Even if I have defined in Redhat AS 2 partitions Im not able to use fdisk
nor format, rmformat in S11. Not sure whats going on.
Jul 19 21:16:27 earth usba: [ID 349649 kern.info] Maxtor OneTouch III
2CAD0L5P
Jul 19 21:16:27 earth genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] scsa2usb0 is /[EMAIL
PROTECTED],0/pci1043,[EMAIL PROTECTED],1/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jul 19 21:16:27 earth genunix: [ID 408114 kern.info] /[EMAIL
Hi Artem,
Thanks for comments.
- USB: I will try to add reduced-cmd-support=true, reboot my system and see
whats going on.
- FireWire: I was not able at all to access the disk, the storage is not
detected.
Stefan
This message posted from opensolaris.org
- FireWire: I was not able at all to access the disk, the storage is not
detected.
That's peculiar. Nothing at all in /var/adm/messages?
-Artem.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
- USB: I will try to add reduced-cmd-support=true, reboot my system and see
whats going on.
Don't forget the semicolon at the end, or it won't take effect.
-Artem.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
For FireWire: nope. Nothing reported from scsa1394 driver.
However after your suggestion Im able to see now: c4t0d0p0.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]rmformat -l
Looking for devices...
1. Logical Node: /dev/rdsk/c4t0d0p0
Physical Node: /[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/pci1043,[EMAIL PROTECTED],1/[EMAIL
Hey,
Stephen Hahn blogged awesomely about his thoughts on packaging - if you're
interested in the discussion, you should probably subscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and comment on things.
[this mail is just a heads up, so that people don't feel like they're missing
something - it's purposely not
Hey,
Stephen Hahn blogged awesomely about his thoughts on
packaging - if you're
interested in the discussion, you should probably
subscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and comment on
things.
[this mail is just a heads up, so that people don't
feel like they're missing
something - it's
The USB FAQ storage section might help you.
http://www.sun.com/io_technologies/usb/USB-Faq.html#Storage
The scsa2usb.conf property is mentioned in question 20.
- Colin
Stefan Parvu wrote:
For FireWire: nope. Nothing reported from scsa1394 driver.
However after your suggestion Im able to see
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 08:50 -0700, Aaron Epps wrote:
Perhaps I wasn't clear. Once I've installed Solaris, surely there are
pathces/etc that are released, currently it looks as if I need to register
my installation of Solaris in order to get access to these patches and that
appears to
Bump ???
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
38 matches
Mail list logo
