> I've got a bit of an odd bug with my OS NAS, every monday morning I come into
> work
> and I have to reboot it. SSH doesn't respond and nor does the CIFS shares.
> And the
> ping response times are very high!
Snowpooch,
Have you checked if suspend / resume (i.e. suspend to RAM) is enabled o
We need to protest this loudly as a community because Opera is the only web
browser that makes it easy to browse the web from inside a Solaris zone (for
more secure web browsing). If you don't believe me just create a zone, download
the Opera SVR4 package, "pkgadd -d" it inside the zone, then ss
You're wrong.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>Friends, i am on job trials.
>I have learned solaris 10 and done certification part-1 and part-2.
>I am not able to answer the below questions as i do not have work >experience
>on solaris. please help me with your answers.
>Q.1) What is the project you are presently working on?
>Q.2) What is y
This bug with ZFS deduplication is another one that needs to be fixed correctly
before the next "long term support" stable release of OpenSolaris comes out:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6924824
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
I think the engineers at Sun should take their time with this release and
release it whenever it's ready and bug free and not let peer pressure from the
community or from management force them to make a final 2010.04 release that
has critical bugs in it. I want to use this next release on produc
Maybe this one is Oracle playing an April Fools joke on us as well?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Is this an April fools joke? Alexander Eremin got me pretty good last year with
the "Opensolaris successfully booting up on an iphone" port.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris
@bsdfan- I do agree with you that snv_129 is the best build of OpenSolaris
Indiana that I have tried so far, because it was almost like a more polished,
perfected version of everything that was in 2009.06 (i.e. the best of 2009.06
plus ZFS deduplication, good bug fixes, lots of minor improvement
> Since a copyright protection does not extend to functionality--I am sure we
> all know this,
> writing a software implementing the QQ client protocol is not a copyright
> violation. Actually,
> there is even a QQ client written in java. :-)
If there is a QQ client written in Java, then the J
> Since I've been at Sun, "Solaris Next" has been used for Solaris 8, 9, and 10
> at various phases.
Maybe Oracle could rename it from "Solaris Next" to "Solaris (N + 1)" or if
we could just get IPS to be as fast as blastwave's pkgutil or Nexenta's
apt-get, we could call it "(Solaris)^2" (a.
Ok, install OpenSolaris on a server, create a zone, and then in your first zone
just running this very basic IPS command:
pkg install SUNWman
takes forever because it downloads each man page file individually. Downloading
a large number of small files via FTP or whatever will always be slowe
The missing driver in OpenSolaris that ticks me off the most (as a sysadmin) is
the missing baseboard management controller (bmc) driver. This bug here really
rained on my parade:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6799081
Do you think that if I just copy these three fil
Also note, while OpenSolaris x86 might not have failsafe boot, it does have
"single user mode" which can be pretty useful (see link below):
http://blogs.sun.com/observatory/entry/boot_into_single_user_mode
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
Hugh my friend, the "happy face boot" is the most retarded thing I have ever
seen in the history of UNIX server operating systems. Because you're a sysadmin
who only uses SSH to connect to remote servers and administer them from the
command line, of course you are going to want to disable tha pe
> And since the source is open for almost all of it, anyone in the community who
> chose to do so could backport security updates to a stable branch in their
> copy
> of the source gate and offer binaries built from that to other community
> members
> - but in the almost two years since 2008.05 r
If Oracle charges for security patches on Solaris then we won't be able to have
massive success stories like this one in Serbia:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=123103&tstart=0
Giving the O.S. and the patches for free or maybe giving the O.S. for free and
the security patch
And yes there is a GUI, there is even a graphical interface for ZFS called time
slider that allows you to use ZFS snapshots to rewind your computer's file
system back in time:
http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/entry/zfs_on_the_desktop_zfs
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
Hi Mukesh, if you click on this URL link that I have copied and pasted below:
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=%22installing+opensolaris+2009.06+from+the+live+cd%22
you will find a special video that I have created just for you that points you
to the appropriate instructions (click on the first link that ap
> My basic concern is that I really like Solaris and OpenSolaris and what Sun
> has brought to the table.
If you like Solaris and OpenSolaris so much, then how come you only have two
posts in this forum?
Some of the other people here have hundreds if not thousands of posts and that
comes usu
> Thanks to all developers for good dev release :) If it contained rlwrap,
> it would be priceless...
I'm still holding my breath for a 100% functional version of the lsof utility:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lsof
to be integrated in to OpenSolaris. Trying to use pfiles shell scripts to grep
> After reverting to 111b, all the additions I had to root's crontab where
> gone.
> I had added jobs to do periodic backups, intrusion tests, email graylist
> cleanup, spam rule updates, wiki cleanup and zfs scrubs. I brought the
> crontab back from the archives and all is well, but I don't un
Having a "reboot loop" is also a pretty good sign that one of your sticks of
RAM is bad. Go to the command line and type in this command:
gnome-system-monitor
and you'll notice that it is probably rebooting whenever it hits that same
exact certain bad spot in the RAM.
--
This message posted
> Since it happens randomly on on any disk, I would doubt that all 5 disks
> suddenly failed.
When checksum errors happen randomly on any disk it usually either means that
your server has bad RAM or a bad powersupply. Check out this link below:
http://blogs.sun.com/elowe/entry/zfs_saves_the_d
Since Asterisk is such a heavily multi-threaded application, I have a client
who is actually interested in trying it out on UltraSPARC Niagara to see if
open source Asterisk running on Solaris on Sun's Niagara hardware can get
better performance than the very costly proprietary solutions that he
Hi Bruno,
What is your output for these commands?
cat /etc/release
pfexec scanpci
?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> I just tested SeaMonkey 2.0.2 on Linux with Bordeaux 2.0.0 and it runs fine..
> I'll test it on OS in a couple days.
Awesome! Thanks for testing this.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discus
Erik Trimble said:
> From my standpoint as a current Sun employee, my biggest problem with
> Sun has been it's lack of focus. We've spent way to much time, effort,
> and money doing a variety of neat things, all which /might/ be really
> sweet. However, as a consequence, all of them tend to be lat
> So show me win 2003/2008 for sparc...
I think there is a version of Windows Server 2003 for those big HP-UX Itanium
boxes:
http://www.microsoft.com/servers/64bit/itanium/overview.mspx
I think it's called "Windows Server 2003 Datacenter Edition" and Microsoft
claims that it scales to 512 pr
SMF is already filled up with so much stuff that at a certain point, it starts
to become overwhelming from a sysadmin persective just to parse through the
output of svcs -a and now the goal is to add even more stuff to it by getting
rid of scripting during package installation and offloading all
I just had to play some more whack-a-mole and kill yet another one of these
unnecessary services:
# svcadm disable avahi-bridge-dsd:default
and what does:
svc:/application/desktop-cache/mime-types-cache:default
do? And why is it running right now on my minimalized headless server that has
X-w
> (3) After the installation process is done, only SSH and mail should be
> running.
alanc:
> Done since the Secure by Default project integrated a few years ago.
Yes, but I just had to do the following two commands on an OpenSolaris Indiana
snv_129 server that a client was evaluating:
#svcadm
> With the OpenSolaris distribution, you install a relatively small core
> (that is supported), and then you add pieces to that.
U, OpenSolaris might be an improvement over Solaris 10 in some ways (i.e.
pkg image-update being better than live upgrade) but any OS that forces you to
install a
> Why do you think we're designing OpenSolaris as a desktop first?
OpenSolaris is designed as a destkop first because the GUI installer doesn't
even let you assign a static IP address the way that Red Hat Enterprise Linux /
Oracle Unbreakable Linux / CentOS installer does and it forces you to h
This is actually a good sign:
Oracle puts the spark back in SPARC!!!
h, maybe I should give up on this whole sysadmin gig and become a marketing
droid?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-di
> I hope Oracle will not rebrand OpenSolaris / Solaris look and feel, which
> tends to be > blue/silver to something bright red. It would be just too
> annoying.
I always thought we should just stick with the gorgeous and elegant 2008.05
branding for all of the OpenSolaris releases. The dark bl
> Links to another server. Not a good sign that they plan on keeping it.
> They will retire the Sun server infrastructure and cut over to their own
> eventually.
> Integration would be a better sign!
If Oracle retires Sun's infrastructure but still keeps the Solaris /
OpenSolaris projects going
Since we're on the subject of commands that we like or dislike, for me as a
sysadmin, the much bigger issue is that it takes me like 20 to 40 lines of
shell script to do with pfiles what this simple command:
lsof -ni
does on FreeBSD and Linux. And pfiles pretty much takes forever to grep th
> Unfortunately, there's not enough here for me to debug. I can only
> guess that there is a routing issue of some sort between your system and
> pkg.opensolaris.org.
I had a similar problem that I think might be caused by a routing issue with
newer versions of OpenSolaris inside older versions o
For me, snv_129 was the last version of OpenSolaris that I was able to install
into a usable system from the live CD. I'm starting to really like the
stability of 129 so far and I think I'm going to freeze there and wait until
newer OpenSolaris has the ability to actually install from the LiveCD
You should post the problem here:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=83
in Linux BrandZ discuss, since that's where the people who work on BrandZ zones
hang out.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mai
> If anyone wants to point me to bugs, and if I can add myself I will.
How about this one where the scroll bars get corrupted in 2009.06 when you open
up an Adobe Acrobat file with a lot of pages in it:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=121969&tstart=0
Anybody know if a bug h
Oh, and checking if Google Chrome and Seamonkey:
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/
work in Bordeaux would be interesting as well.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hey twicklin,
I just wanted to let you know how much I appreciate you guys supporting FreeBSD
and Solaris. A few quick questions:
Has the Bordeaux team ever tried running VLC media player under their version
of Wine with OpenSolaris 2009.06, and if so, is it known to work?
http://www.videol
> [*] I do see a S/R problem if virtualization hardware support
> is enabled in the SBIOS, but this is not the default setting.
Yes, but I would think that one of the main reasons for buying a Toshiba laptop
with OpenSolaris pre-installed is to run a software stack that draws heavily
from Sun's
> It looks like ILOM is the way to go, but I'll probably use serial consoles on
> the existing servers.
Wmeister, it might be helpful to check out this link to Dennis Clarke's blog
where he explains how he got OpenSolaris 2008.05 to boot up to a serial console:
http://www.blastwave.org/dclark
kgardas, check out this blog entry that's called "Finding memory leaks on
Solaris systems":
http://prefetch.net/blog/index.php/2006/02/19/finding-memory-leaks-on-solaris-systems/
Basically, there's live kernel debugging tool in Solaris called "mdb" that will
let you debug a live kernel with the
> It looks like I will have to use OpenBSD. Thanks for the link!
OpenBSD can be an intimidating operating system to install and configure if you
have never used it before. A good web link for a complete newbie to learn how
to install and configure it might be this one:
http://www.openbsd10
Just go to www.opensolaris.com and download OpenSolaris 2009.06 and the ath
driver should work fine. It works fine for me!
Solaris 10 is a completely different matter though
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailin
Check this out wmeister, it might be what you're looking for:
http://blogs.sun.com/bigadmin/entry/server_administration_from_the_beach
http://www.sun.com/systemmanagement/ilom.jsp
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mai
Are you hitting this problem:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=6837
Or
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6820826
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6820576
?
I think Jurgen Keil posted a workaround here:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?thre
Now, just to keep the record straight. I'm not in 100% agreement with Ben
Rockwood (maybe only 96% agreement).
I actually love Indiana and run it as my main day-to-day desktop OS. The
problem is that you can't use Indiana as a minimal server OS in production
because the Caiman installer does n
> It already *has* market share. Think of all the Solaris 10 deployments
> (from which OpenSolaris was initially started from). Not to mention the
> people
> (like Joyent) who are running OpenSolaris *today* in *production*.
No, this is very much incorrect. Joyent does not run "OpenSolaris Indi
> I saw the bottom of the post below about OpenSolaris 2010.03, but can't find
> any
> other mention of 2010.02 becoming a March release.
I think it's actually a good sign that the developers are taking their time and
are not forcing a new major release of OpenSolaris Indiana every six months.
> For my it works on "Asus M2N32 WS PRO"
I also wonder if the fact that it works for you on snv_130 has anything to do
with this work that Eric Schrock did for integrating SMART into Solaris FMA as
part of Fishworks:
http://blogs.sun.com/eschrock/entry/solaris_platform_integration_generic_d
> For my it works on "Asus M2N32 WS PRO"
> After install "SUNWhd-1.07.pkg" i can read SMART from disks connected to MCP
> sata controller (non > Marvell)!!!
> snv_130
Hey slaver_2, now you've got me curious, what is your output for this command:
pfexec scanpci -v
?
Maybe SUNWhd is a lot
> except with tongue firmly in čík
I don't know about you but my tongue is always firmly in čík.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> do you know if MAC is also available in the OpenSolaris 2009.06? I.e. I
> assume
> this is mandatory access control implementation from trusted solaris edition,
> right?
> Thanks,
> Karel
@kgardas, if you look at the "What's New in OpenSolaris 2008.11" page here:
http://www.opensolaris.com/
> I presume that Solaris simply doesn't implement the right functions.
> I'd love to be corrected.
Ok zetetic, so I'll love to correct you then. I think Solaris actually does
implement the right functions for S.M.A.R.T., and you actually can get
S.M.A.R.T. data (and much more) on Solaris 10 us
> It's three years old!
Touche! I didn't even look at the date. Still the article was lame. I was
hoping for more outrage. Currently very disappointed with the lack of outrage
and snide remarks from the OpenSolaris community about this ;-)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
I think that this is a problem with VMware and not a problem with OpenSolaris,
and since VMware is a closed-source proprietary architecture, there is nothing
we can do to help since only VMware has the source code for their software. If
you purchased a support contract from VMware then you can c
Do any of you here think that this Oracle related article has any truth to it:
http://kevinclosson.wordpress.com/2006/12/10/no-more-oracle-ports-to-solarisaixhp-ux-after-oracle11g/
or do you think it's just more anti-Solaris F.U.D. ?
To me this article doesn't make any sense at all: the Applicat
I personally would not use OpenSolaris for a minimal firewall appliance because
the OpenSolaris 2009.06 "Caimain" installer is very inflexible: It forces you
to use DHCP (there's no way to set a static IP address set during the
installation process- and you obviously don't want "network auto-mag
> I wonder why and how nfo is loaded without instaling the nfo driver for my
> weak chipset.
I think it's a bug in the Live CD and the Caiman installer that it mistakenly
thinks that your Nvidia "nfo" network card is an Nvidia "nge" network card and
it installs the wrong device driver for it. O
> Thanks for the info. However, I am still surprised that there is no ability
> to install from local files
> as we approach for 4th release. On the face of it, it would seem an easy
> thing to add. I guess
> if I really needed it I could add it myself.
Yes! Look at people who are coming over
There are two recommended books that should be useful:
Pro OpenSolaris by Harry Foxwell and Christine Tran:
http://www.amazon.com/Pro-OpenSolaris-Harry-Foxwell/dp/1430218916/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1262651509&sr=8-1
and "OpenSolaris Bible" by Solter, Jelinek and Miner:
http://www
>Hi there
> I'm running smartmontools-5.38 on OpenSolaris 2009.06 (snv_111b) without any
> problems.
> You can download the source from http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/
There are no tricks or work arounds required to compile smartmontools and get
SMART data from SATA disks other than the
Hey tiptop, what do you get as your output for this command:
modinfo
or for this command:
modinfo | grep nge
and this command:
modinfo | grep ngo
?
I think the problem might be that the old nge device driver is still
incorrectly attached to that device and that's why the new nf
@Bodie, if you follow what tiptop is doing, he is basically following Masayuki
Murayama's instructions for how to install the nfo device driver, which I will
copy and paste verbatim for you:
1. Introduction
This is the nForce ethernet NIC driver for Solaris. It is distributed
under the BSD lic
> You say that you use 2009.06 so I suppose that you have really 2009.06 which
> is
> from June and not something really actual. Download latest build of
> OpenSolaris from
> www.genunix.org (as you have this unbelievable bad piece of HW from Nvidia)
> and
> try if it's supported with nge dri
Hey Carlos,
Do you ever use usenet newsgroups?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newsgroups
if you're dealing with some obscure problem with ancient SPARC hardware, you
might want to try asking in a new topic at the following newsgroup:
comp.sys.sun.hardware
see link below:
http://groups.g
> Happy New Year all. Will there be a OpenSolaris Nevada sxce snv_130 or is it
> dead?
> --ron
I hope not. They should probably just skip snv_130 and go straight to snv_131
if the Solaris Express version is going to be anywhere near as buggy as the
bleeding edge Indiana version was.
If they
> We have been researching this for 2 days, and the frustration
> is setting in - we would like to know WHAT drives the backup retention ?
I'm sorry but I don't understand your question? Have you tried using a label
maker to make labels for your backup tapes?
You also never even made clear wha
> I have a Sun Sparc T5240 server. I want to open the cover to hook my test
> instruments. But,
> if the cover is open, then the server won't boot up.
Dude, a SPARC Enterprise T5240 is like a $40,000 to $50,000 server, why do you
want to break it so badly? Running it with the cover off will cau
Does anybody have any idea when an OpenSolaris Indiana version based on snv_131
will be put on genunix.org and in the /dev repository so we can either install
or pkg image-update to it?
I guess until OpenSolaris snv_131 comes out, the only workaround will be to use
ZFS's beadm ZFS snapshot and
> There's a known problem in snv_130, fixed in snv_131:
Any idea when an OpenSolaris Indiana version based on snv_131 will be put on
genunix.org and in the /dev repository so we can either install or pkg
image-update to it?
I've been having a really rough time with updates from snv_111b to the
This is another link that might help:
http://www.linuxdynasty.org/opensolaris-serial-console-howto.html
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Has anyone figured out a way to fix this?
Hey, if it's a server, you don't need a KVM. Just turn off x-windows and GNOME
with this commmand:
pfexec svcadm disable gdm
then set it up so that you can get a command line on the server using a DB-9
serial console cable (i.e. similar to the kind o
> Ask Sun why they decided to write IPS and not implement pkgsrc or similar.
> At least you can do something here to change at least number of available
> packages http://pkgfactory.opensolaris.org/ or you may use this
> http://www.nexenta.org/ .
NetBSD's Pkgsrc is an awesome package managemen
Also, if you can't find the AdbeRdr9.2-1_i486solaris_enu.bin file in your
/export/home/username/Desktop
directory using the "ls" command. Then try typing in this series of commands to
find it and execute it:
pfexec su
updatedb -v
(wait 10 or 20 seconds for updatedb to finish running an
Oh, yeah, and I forgot to give you a heads up. There's some kind of a weird bug
right now in the scroll bars in the GNOME desktop on OpenSolaris- when you try
to view a really long document (like a 300 page book) in Adobe Acrobat reader,
the scroll bar becomes smaller than it is supposed to be a
> 2. I downloaded AdbeRdr9.2-1_i486solaris_enu.bin file. When executing
> through CUI/GUI, it is saying "can not execute binary file"/"no app for this
> file type"
Unfortunately I think you need to run the installer from the command line with
root or administrator level permissions for Adobe Ac
> waynel - I think you should lay off the man you are talking to. He is not the
> original post creator, I am so if you have a beef then bring it to me and if
> you have a problem with the word *** then you need to get some help from
> someplace other than here.
@bsdnix
Since we have your atten
> Failure on newer CentOS versions might have to do with the lack of lx brand
> *at() syscall emulation.
Did you try applying jbit's 2.6 kernel LX brand patches before installing the
branded zone? You can find more information about them at these links:
http://blog.jbit.net/2009/08/debian-squee
Ok, I really need to apologize for this quadruple post, I'm trying to type in
"greater than" and "less than" signs to symbolize input and output redirection
in BASH and KSH and for some reason the OpenSolaris forums interpret greater
than and less than signs as HTML tags or something similar and
If all you want is basic hardware info (like what stick of RAM is in what slot
on the motherboard and what device is in what slot) OpenSolaris has these three
commands which I really love:
pfexec prtdiag -v
pfexec psrinfo -pv
pfexec scanpci
However, I always thought it was kind of re
If all you want is basic hardware info (like what stick of RAM is in what slot
on the motherboard and what device is in what slot) OpenSolaris has these three
commands which I really love:
pfexec prtdiag -v
pfexec psrinfo -pv
pfexec scanpci
However, I always thought it was kind of re
If all you want is basic hardware info (like what stick of RAM is in what slot
on the motherboard and what device is in what slot) OpenSolaris has these three
commands which I really love:
pfexec prtdiag -v
pfexec psrinfo -pv
pfexec scanpci
However, I always thought it was kind of re
If all you want is basic hardware info (like what stick of RAM is in what slot
on the motherboard and what device is in what slot) OpenSolaris has these three
commands which I really love:
pfexec prtdiag -v
pfexec psrinfo -pv
pfexec scanpci
However, I always thought it was kind of re
> If I may suggest, use # sys-unconfig, you will need to reboot (it'll take
> you), but this process will
> ensure you change every part correctly.
I thought sys-unconfig doesn't work properly on OpenSolaris Indiana. Can anyone
confirm or deny this?
I know when I got one of those Toshiba OpenS
Actually ejannett, I kind of messed up, a better way to get interrupt
statistics might be to put a time interval after the intrstat command like this:
pfexec intrstat 30
for 30 second intervals or
pfexec intrstat 60
for 60 second intervals. There's also an "intrtime" command as well. These
> BTW he use wifi for this problem : "I am updating over a wireless 11b network"
That's what I get for skimming through this thread in less then 3 seconds and
firing off a reply without reading everything. I only check this forum in a few
spare minutes between doing other work that I actually ge
Hi ejannet,
Can you try running these commands:
pfexec scanpci
prtdiag -v
and copy and paste the output here?
Also try running this command:
pfexec intrstat
and then hit control C after the first couple of pages of output and then copy
and paste that output here as well. The "intrsta
If you're using Solaris 10 or Solaris Express, the older "SysV" packages do let
you download a package from a remote FTP server and then install it using the
"pkgadd -d" command.
OpenSolaris still supports legacy SysV packages and the "pkgadd -d" command for
backwards compatibility with Solaris
Is anybody interested in tacking a crack at re-writing IPS in the C programming
language if that would make it run faster?
Maybe it might be useful add an optional choice where local OpenSolaris user's
groups could use an algorithm similar to bit-torrent to accelerate the
downloading of packag
Hey Leoric, have you read the OpenSolaris Bible yet:
http://www.amazon.com/OpenSolaris-Bible-Wiley-Nicholas-Solter/dp/0470385480/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1259649986&sr=8-1
One of the authors of the OpenSolaris Bible is Nicholas A. Solter, who is one
of the core contributors to the OpenSola
Is there any word on when this improved device driver will be incorporated into
an "official" build of OpenSolaris Indiana or Solaris Express distributed by
Sun? The URL for the bug id is here:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6807184
The reason I'm asking is because I have a
This is the official "yge" Marvell Yukon driver that is going to be
incorporated into future builds of OpenSolaris:
http://gdamore.blogspot.com/2009/08/test-marvell-yukon-2-ethernet-driver.html
It should already be in there by default if you're running one of the newer,
more bleeding edge dev
Hi Ted,
I recommend that you post on the device driver discuss forum and/or get in
contact with Garret D'Amore (see URL link below):
http://gdamore.blogspot.com/2009/08/test-marvell-yukon-2-ethernet-driver.html
He is a device driver engineer / UNIX jedi master that works on Solaris and
NetBS
> so is there a reason that you have to use this line? should this not be
> something simple to have
> already programmed into the package manager? The install really pauses and
> then ramps up and
> then pauses again and over and over until it finishes or stalls and fails to
> download.
Hey
1 - 100 of 303 matches
Mail list logo
