Look for dtrace sched provider or check dtracetoolkit - there might be
something there already.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
-Original Message-
From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
[mailto:opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Kishore
haven't seen a solaris 10
system for a couple of years.
--
Robert Hartzell
b...@rwhartzell.net
RwHartzell.Net, Inc.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
and I haven't
had the time to revisit that issue.
http://www.isc.org/software/dhcp
--
Robert Hartzell
b...@rwhartzell.net
RwHartzell.Net, Inc.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Seems to be working properly now! Please keep us posted on further progress.
Season's greetings,
Robert
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
hello Guenther
have you done the update via online-installer?
Yes
have you modified something about permissions?
No
you should also at least logout and re-login within
napp-it
I have
(should be happen automatically after updates)
I have alos rebooted
please retry update and look if all
-it/sunos/edit admin.pl and setup os
back/ zurück
---
More work for Xmas 8-)
Cheers, Robert
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
about what has happened, and could still...
That is a very good thing.
Respectfully,
Robert Hanke
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
smb groupnames have to be lowercase.
Crrect: I use lowercase, except in the message 8-)
i auto-translate them now to lowercase
and allow uppercase in description.
Oh I see, this is why the firts letter disappeared...
available now with another bugfix (moveable
popup-windows in
i have fixed the problem in 0.407
please update and report if its working now.
I confirm; however there seem to be some functions that need syntax updates:
If I create smb user jules, it is created all right. Now if I try to delete
it, the function fails.
However, userdel jules from a
Please report, if you find more things not working on
Solaris Express.
Will do.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
When creating a smb group, first letter of the comments gets truncated. Ex:
creating Marie with comment Groupe de Marie, what is displayed is (roupe de
Marie).
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
hello all
i have done a clean reinstall of solaris express 11
and encountered the same path problem with
folder-create
Good! I knew something had to be wrong.
i must have modified settings on my first install.
i have fixed the problem in 0.407
please update and report if its working
by default).
# Defaults targetpw # Ask for the password of the target user
# ALL ALL=(ALL) ALL # WARNING: only use this together with 'Defaults targetpw'
## Read drop-in files from /etc/sudoers.d
## (the '#' here does not indicate a comment)
#includedir /etc/sudoers.d
robert ALL=(ALL) ALL
napp
-it
with identical symptoms), except for the fact that in SEx 11 you can't login as
root, only get root privileges from your $USER account. The installation took
place in /home/robert (remember that in 0.402c there was a directory problem
that you fixed in 0.405?)
Still stuck... Did anyone
Probably directory containing `zfs` not in PATH.
Hi Franck,
How could I check that?
Robert
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
hello frank
normally napp-it + online installer should care
about settings.
if there are problems, i need to understand the
reason
and what you do another way than me.
Hi Guenther, are you talking to Franck, or to me, Robert?
about your problem:
did you have a current napp-it (0.406
worked
for me so far - e.g. how to install SEx 11 on a mirrored pool (not for the
faints of heart, and Oracle's documentation does not help - it is even
misleading).
I'll publish those notes (in French and English) in order to somewhat relieve
others' pains.
Amitiés,
Robert
--
This message
A good example of the above:
I have created a pool, as follows hereunder:
pool: portlune_ZFS
state: ONLINE
scan: none requested
config:
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
portlune_ZFS ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
Hi Gunther!
1.
please login as admin, do a su to get root permission
and try again
thats the way i have it done.
On Solaris Express, you create a username (for me robert) and get a password.
You get root privileges by using sudo. There is no admin account.
2.
nappit creates a be named
-it
-
unzip: cannot find or open /home/robert/napp-it-0.402c.zip,
/home/robert/napp-it-0.402c.zip.zip or /home/robert/napp-it-0.402c.zip.ZIP.
###
something went wrong, needed Folder /home/robert/web
of
support. And unfortunately they will chose Linux more often.
I don't know - perhaps Oracle should consider a special license for
up-to 2-socekt x86 servers which would allow production deployments for
free with no support?
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
On 29/08/2010 23:34, usafverteran wrote:
Does Solaris 10 have Active Memory Expansion? Does Solaris 10 have Workload
Manager?
yes, and yes.
Both were available even before Solaris 10.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
= arg0;
}
syscall::uname:return
/self-addr/
{
copyoutstr(5.10, self-addr+(257*2), 257);
self-addr = 0;
}
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
and ultimately with Oracle's
Solaris. A disparate packaging scheme shows a fractured community.
We should at least strive to appear united!
100% agree
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
to complain that it is slow (which is still the
case sometimes) or that it consumes too much memory which is especially
visible on notebooks, etc. But generally they do like it and one can see
how it has been improving over time.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
or so automatically more or less. But all of that has been frozen
for now.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
10 branded zone do?
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
without spreading FUD and being offensive to others who put lots of
their energy into Open Solaris and might see things differently than you.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
not yet been resolved.
Because it didn't really matter that much from the practical point of view.
It may or may not matter more now depending on what exactly Oracle will
do in regards to Open Solaris.
btw: code contributions are welcome as usual :)
--
Robert Milkowski
http
On 20/07/2010 20:56, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Robert Milkowskimi...@task.gda.pl wrote:
I must admit that I actually like IPS. Of course it is work-in-progress
but for most of the part it already works better than the old packaging
tools.
IPS is not yet inside OpenSolaris and I am
On 21/07/2010 11:01, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Robert Milkowskimi...@task.gda.pl wrote:
Of course IPS is included in the OSOL distribution for a long time now.
One might argue that the OSOL is a community distribution as apart from
Sun many community members contributed to it in one way
via SourceJuicer
and get it published in /contrib repository.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
a new
project. Shouting at Sun (Oracle) that you don't like it won't really
change anything.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
really compare load and/or CPU usage values across
different operating systems.
Did you actually test application performance inside guests? Was there
any difference?
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
On 02/07/2010 12:19, Matthias Pfützner wrote:
You (Robert Milkowski) wrote:
I understand that but all I'm saying is that it is simply wrong when
applied to something like Open Solaris development. There are certainly
technical people here involved with OSOL 2010.06 and with /dev builds
On 02/07/2010 14:51, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
While I can understand it when it applies to commercial only products it
doesn't make much sense
when applied to open source products being in development.
This is a new aspect of the long standing tension
Oracle will realize it rather sooner than later.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
organize some kind of a petition and open letter
signed by community (both Sun and non-Sun people) which would state what
issues there are and it could be presented to senior management? Perhaps
if we organize a little bit it would make some difference.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
own hardware.
What was the cost? And was it based on a purchase cost of the dell
server (12%) or not?
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
support will still be there as it was removed past
snv_134.
Nevertheless I wouldn't deploy brandz/linux as it is a dead end.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
systems isn't one of
them.
100% agree.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
to.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi list,
I bought a Sun system from Ebay and they have zfs as root file system, I don't
have much knowledge in zfs. Is there a way to completely get rid of zfs and
boot as a regular UFS?
Please let me know.
Thanks
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Problem is when I do boot cdrom -s with solaris 10 cd it is taking me to zfs
menu. I may need to cleanup zfs before booting installing using regular ufs.
Raj
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
-Sun hardware).
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 26/04/2010 21:30, Charles Hedrick wrote:
This is getting absurd. Our local HP people checked back and still agree with
the statement that
wrigtim got about Oracle cancelling the HP contract. It's pretty clear that
there are two different stories out there, both among people who should know.
to Studio still seem to be free.
A+
Paul
Why not use Open Solaris on your desktop?
That's what I do...
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Solaris when bough along with
HW support (Premium Systems Support) it is not obvious if Premium
Opearting Systems support cover Open Solaris - at least it is not
explicitly listed there.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris
On 25/04/2010 14:43, Robert Milkowski wrote:
On 24/04/2010 16:25, Matthias Pfützner wrote:
Rule: You need an entitlement to run Solaris/openSolaris in a PRODUCTION
I think/hope you are wrong here and you can run Open Solaris in
production on any hardware you want without paying anything
On 23/04/2010 16:31, Justin Lee Ewing wrote:
On 04/23/10 04:23 AM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
On 22/04/2010 22:14, Charles Hedrick wrote:
For a transition period:
Oracle has exercised its right to terminate HP’s Solaris
Agreement. HP clients that have purchased Solaris Subscriptions10
for HP
and updates directly to HP's customers through Oracle SunSolve.
As part of this expanded relationship HP and Oracle will work together
to enhance the customer experience for Oracle Solaris on ProLiant
servers and *HP increase its participation in the OpenSolaris community*.
--
Robert
.
Where did you get this information from?
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
sessions after all.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
, your thought on the subject do not make sense and I tend to
agree with Eric that you seem to be trolling.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
- it doesn't.
Also I'm not saying that there aren't any concerns - there are and we
have to wait and see and complain so maybe Oracle will notice.
But the conclusions you presented here seem to have little if anything
to do with reality.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
Ok, I was patient enough and enough is enough.
No point arguing with you about basic facts Mr Anonymous Coward.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi,
Has anyone managed to get coherence, which is distributed with OSOL,
working with xbox360?
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Man pages created via ksh93 getopts --nroff' option should include a date
(mtime)
as the third argument to the .TH macro. The argument isn't output causing
Last
change: output field to be empty.
% echo ${.sh.version}
Version JMP 93t+ 2009-10-12
% getopts --nroff 21 | grep '.TH\'
.TH getopts
On 02/04/2010 20:48, Brent Jones wrote:
We're about ready to wipe the machines, and switch to RHEL or FreeBSD.
At least those operating systems support -DELETING FILES-!
No, they don't - at least not with dedup.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
it is not an open source product. We should
except more products/appliances like this in the future I think. I would
be very surprised (and disappointed) if Oracle would start closing main
components of the OS. I doubt they will.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
On 31/03/2010 14:55, Robert Milkowski wrote:
Oracle is doing Welcome Sessions and when I attended the London one
couple of weeks ago they mentioned that not everything will be open
source in Open Solaris.
That's always been the case. Everything in the OpenSolaris distro is
freely re
is corruped).
However what's good about the document is that putting memory issue
aside ZFS is actually shining there and passed 5/5 :)
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Harry Putnam wrote:
Man, I'm really sorry to the list for all my huffing and puffing when
I'm pretty sure I had been claiming I had the right settings in
/etc/default/nfs (but didn't).
This makes a lot more sense. NFSv4 should have worked for
you if you had the client and server both set to
Harry Putnam wrote:
Robert Thurlow robert.thur...@sun.com writes:
This makes a lot more sense. NFSv4 should have worked for
you if you had the client and server both set to the same
NFSv4 domain - if you care to work on this, we can.
Thanks for the offer. Is there something NFSv4 offers
Agree.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I get this error msg.
A local copy of CSWggettext-0.17,REV=2009.05.27 exists and is of matching size.
MD5 for CSWggettext-0.17,REV=2009.05.27 doesn't match catalog! at
/opt/csw/bin/pkgutil line 696, STDIN line 1.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Thanks it works. I cleared the cache in /var/opt/csw/pkgutil/packages
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 11:16 -0800, Svein Skogen wrote:
Is getting bacula up and running a non-trivial task on Opensolaris, and how
would I go about disaster-recovery and getting the zvol's down to tape? (So I
don't have to recreate the vmware solution that handles my mail and
webservers
something... :P
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
the filesystem again: zfs mount pool/fs1
do your testing
to enable zil again, unmount the filesystem then: echo 'zil_disable/W0 |
mdb -kw' and mount the fs again.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris
On 22/02/2010 18:02, N wrote:
no problem, I figured it out .. file format is not the issue any more.
Although, zfs-dupe at the block-level is not making any sense to me as my
testing shows that these image files contain similar data but do not dedup
unless they are the same exact match.
On 12/02/2010 16:00, Ken Gunderson wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 10:05 -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
OpenSolaris/Solaris friends :
This ( see below ) is from a thread on the PCA patch tool maillist this
morning. I made a few replies to Martin and there may be some upset by
Sun/Oracle
On 08/02/2010 14:07, Robert Milkowski wrote:
On 05/02/2010 15:25, Jürgen Keil wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
On 03/02/2010 12:25, Jürgen Keil wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Toshiba R600, up-to snv_129 X is working fine.
snv_131 and the moment Xorg starts the notebook does hard-reset
(quick
On 05/02/2010 15:25, Jürgen Keil wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
On 03/02/2010 12:25, Jürgen Keil wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Toshiba R600, up-to snv_129 X is working fine.
snv_131 and the moment Xorg starts the notebook does hard-reset (quick
power-off) - no crash dump
On 03/02/2010 12:25, Jürgen Keil wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Toshiba R600, up-to snv_129 X is working fine.
snv_131 and the moment Xorg starts the notebook does hard-reset (quick
power-off) - no crash dump, no nothing, When I booted under kernel
debugger the box just hangs and I can't
Orvar Korvar wrote:
So I have lots of files with weird characters in the name.
So I need to somehow, find all these files and rename them in an automatic way.
I ran into this trying to put Irish and Scottish Gaelic song
names on the FAT filesystem of my MP3 player. Here's what I
came up
On 01/28/10 06:53 AM, Thommy M. Malmström wrote:
I think I ran into this, had to remove and recreate
publisher to get the update.
Nope, still b130 after that...
Had the same problem...
pkg refresh --full
fixed it for me.
--
Robert W Hartzell
bear at rwhartzell.net
On 28/01/2010 14:05, Brian Ruthven - Sun UK wrote:
Bruce Porter wrote:
Hi,
While ago I tried to jump from 111b to something
around 129, but I run into:
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=12380
I can actually get as far as 129 (but slow boot and login puts me off), my
aspecially when it
comes to observability.
While there is still a long way to go with Open Solaris if you consider
*BSD or Linux in order to use Open Source software I would definitely
consider using Open Solaris as well.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
-2008 J�rg Schilling
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
mi...@r600:~#
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss
solarg wrote:
i've the same problem related in this thread:
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=99671tstart=60
i've set up the nfssec.conf and /etc/default/nfs, even auto_master. and
it doesn't work, the NFS client is sending my credentials
as nobody4
Looking at snoop, i got:
a working template - maybe developers building VB should make
creating and publishing VB IPS packages as part of their publishing
procedure being it beta or standard release?
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
Chris wrote:
I'm running OpenSolaris 2009.06.
I've twice tried updating to the development version, the latest being SVN_125.
I've only been able to get it to boot to console - which it does manage in
much less time than 35+ minutes.
I'm haven't figured out what I need to do to get it
Chris wrote:
Just in the last week, I've started to experience very slow boot times, upwards
of 35minutes. Looking in the log, I see the following message repeated for
around 30 minutes before the boot finally completes
Nov 30 09:29:14 supernova nwamd[23]: [ID 821790 daemon.warning]
Hi,
It would also be nice if you would provide your beta releases in IPS
packaging...
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Alan Steinberg wrote:
We hope to have the IPS version up in the next day or so. I don't think you
would want to manually download and install the tarballs from the
virtualbox.org
available with a full copy of the main repo which
you can download and start a depo server agains which will give you a
local access to all packages without a need to connect outside.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss
Although I respond to Alan appraently it didn't get posted here. I am comparing
a cluster of Sun Blade 2000's with a cluster of Ultra-24's Even though the
clock speed of the Ultra-24 is nearly 3 times that of the Blade 2000 the run
times for WRF-DA are nearly the same ( 5% difference). Since I
Found the bug report. Was searching for the wrong thing (of course). Your
observation pointed me in the right direction. Still not sure if this is an
OpenSolaris issue or a NetBeans issue.
http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=3239
Thanks
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Thanks, I am looking for the download. I added some echo statements:
rmoni...@dell690:~/Public/NetBeans$ /usr/netbeans/bin/nb2
progdir=/usr/netbeans/bin
progdir/../etc/netbeans.clusters= /usr/netbeans/bin/../etc/netbeans.clusters
X=
nbexec=
/bin/bash: : No such file or directory
So the problem is
Actually I think there are quite a few of us sparc users who would rather not
give up performance and reliability for the really lackluster performance and
problems associated with Solaris-X86 and intel in general
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
or
it re-occured again.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
,
before putting much more resources onto bluetooth project.
Does it mean the project is on-hold or are you still actively working on
it and would like to get extra resource?
I'm just curious...
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
and copy over everything for example).
I also think that you will have to upgrade your pool.
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi,
IIRC UFS will give you files in order they were created from readdir()
while ZFS will return basically in random order. Technically speaking
both approaches are ok (no specification broken such as POSIX) AFAIK.
Now tools like ls will sort output in alphabetical order by default and
it
this.
What if I want to have both /dev and /release publishers?
--
Robert Milkowski
http://milek.blogspot.com
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
/apache2/2.2/logs
--
Robert Hartzell b...@rwhartzell.net
RwHartzell.Net
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Roland Mainz wrote:
Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually
test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any
other options ?
By all means, test with ZFS. But it's easy to do that:
# mkfile 64m /zpool.file
# zpool create test
thanks.
It panics with:
NOTICE: Can not read the pool label from ' /p...@0,0/pci1458,b...@11/d...@2,0:a'
NOTICE: spa_import_rootpool: error 5
panic[cpu0]/thread=fbc2ef0: vfs_mountroot: cannot mount root
fbc50ce0 genunix:vfs_mountroot+350 ()
fbc50d10 genunix:main+e7 ()
1 - 100 of 365 matches
Mail list logo
