In the last 4 years of using SAM-FS/QFS I have fallen in love with this
product. I have tried earlier to ask Sun to incorporate features into this
product but in vain.
Do you think the following is worth exploring and in-corporating:
1. Unlike ZFS SAM-FS/QFS File system need compression
Mohan Chandrashekar wrote:
Please let me know how I can contribute to this project.
Have you tried joining the mailing list shown on their project
page at http://opensolaris.org/os/project/samqfs/ and asking
there?
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems,
Alan,
I can't find this list here: http://opensolaris.org/os/discussions/
Is this because it isn't integrated with the website?
Thanks,
Brian
On Jan 26, 2008 1:36 PM, Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mohan Chandrashekar wrote:
Please let me know how I can contribute to this
Brian Gupta wrote:
Alan,
I can't find this list here: http://opensolaris.org/os/discussions/
Is this because it isn't integrated with the website?
Looks like they have a mailing list, but not a web (jive) forum.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun
Tom Haynes wrote:
Holger Berger wrote:
Ted, when will this project go public?
Holger
It just did this week, no?
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/samqfs/
Hmm... The link on the storage community page says
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/sam-qfs/
This is wrong. Could it be
On 4/24/07, Ted Pogue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Project Overview:
I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to the
community Solaris host-based data services; namely the Storage Archive
Manager or SAM and the Solaris shared file system QFS. These data
services
Holger Berger wrote:
Ted, when will this project go public?
Holger
It just did this week, no?
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/samqfs/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:25:54PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or move your star tool, which is frankly not nearly as important and
useful a tool, perhaps.
I would encourage you to inform yourself about star. It will be your favorite
tar program
Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would encourage you to inform yourself about star. It will be your
favorite
tar program after you discovered all the features ;-)
Oh, it's a good tar, don't get me wrong :)
However, the measure of its successful integration into {Open,}Solaris
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 03:22:27PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would encourage you to inform yourself about star. It will be your
favorite
tar program after you discovered all the features ;-)
Oh, it's a good tar, don't get me wrong :)
Joerg,
The SAM commands came out of former LSC, inc. I can't comment on
what was considered
in the naming of them. I have been with the product in one form or
another since 1998 and these SAM
commands existed then, probably since 94 or 95. They are included in
/opt/SUNWsamfs/sbin and bin.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:01:08PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Tom Haynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While doing this is a really good idea, I see potential name conflicts
with older softare.
Since 20..25 years, I create and publish programs like:
smake, star, sformat,
Joerg Schilling writes:
- Which programs from SAM FS have name clashes?
- What do you intend to do in order to solve the problem
I'm confused. Are we discussing whether the proposal to create a
project for SAM-QFS is an appropriate and well-defined OpenSolaris
project, or are we
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 02:57:09PM -0500, Ted Pogue wrote:
Project Overview:
I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to the
community Solaris host-based data services; namely the Storage Archive
Manager or SAM and the Solaris shared file system QFS.
I did research about 5 years ago regarding HSM file systems. QFS/SAMFS was a
leading contender in that space. It also had the added benefit of having a
truly massive ability to scale. (We ended up going with another product,
because our first choice of optical jukeboxes was not supported.)
This
Ted Pogue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg,
The SAM commands came out of former LSC, inc. I can't comment on
what was considered
in the naming of them. I have been with the product in one form or
another since 1998 and these SAM
commands existed then, probably since 94 or 95. They are
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ted Pogue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg,
The SAM commands came out of former LSC, inc. I can't comment on
what was considered
in the naming of them. I have been with the product in one form or
another since 1998 and these SAM
commands existed
Frank Hofmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
commands existed then, probably since 94 or 95. They are included in
/opt/SUNWsamfs/sbin and bin.
Ted
Thank you for the information!
This means that a normal Solaris user will not be confused but a user that
did install /opt/SUNWsamfs may be
Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or move your star tool, which is frankly not nearly as important and
useful a tool, perhaps.
I would encourage you to inform yourself about star. It will be your favorite
tar program after you discovered all the features ;-)
James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling writes:
- Which programs from SAM FS have name clashes?
- What do you intend to do in order to solve the problem
I'm confused. Are we discussing whether the proposal to create a
project for SAM-QFS is an appropriate and
Joerg Schilling writes:
James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling writes:
- Which programs from SAM FS have name clashes?
- What do you intend to do in order to solve the problem
I'm confused. Are we discussing whether the proposal to create a
project for SAM-QFS
Alan DuBoff wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Except that the Device Driver community is defunct, having no
contributors
nor core contributors able to participate in community decision
making, and
as noted, it's really a better fit for Storage or the proposed File
Systems
James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, as there have been other things that have been forgotten
in this area, I now point people to potential conflicts as early as
possible ;-)
Once the methods for aproving projects and architectural reviews are known
to work without problems,
Joerg Schilling wrote:
James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, as there have been other things that have been forgotten
in this area, I now point people to potential conflicts as early as possible ;-)
Once the methods for aproving projects and architectural reviews are known
to work
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Stephen Hahn sent repeated mails to each community over a 6 month+ period.
Really, I don't remember seeing them, I wonder if they were sent to
device-driver-interest or where? I'll look back and see if I missed those,
but don't remember any, this
Project Overview:
I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to the
community Solaris host-based data services; namely the Storage Archive
Manager or SAM and the Solaris shared file system QFS. These data
services exist today and are distributed commercially by
Ted Pogue wrote:
Project Overview:
I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to the
community Solaris host-based data services; namely the Storage Archive
Manager or SAM and the Solaris shared file system QFS. These data
services exist today and are
Ted Pogue writes:
I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to the
community Solaris host-based data services; namely the Storage Archive
Manager or SAM and the Solaris shared file system QFS. These data
Wow! +1 from me.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking
EXCELLENT! +1!
-dt
Ted Pogue wrote On 04/24/07 13:57,:
Project Overview:
I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to
the community Solaris host-based data services; namely the Storage
Archive Manager or SAM and the Solaris shared file system QFS. These
data
Ted Pogue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Project Overview:
I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to the
community Solaris host-based data services; namely the Storage Archive
Manager or SAM and the Solaris shared file system QFS. These data
services exist
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ted Pogue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Project Overview:
I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to the
community Solaris host-based data services; namely the Storage Archive
Manager or SAM and the Solaris shared file system QFS. These
Tom Haynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Considering these are currently unbundled and shipping products, that
might be hard. I.e., would you want to tell
customers that they need to learn new commands, change all of their
scripts, etc?
Does this mean that my fears are correct?
Consdering the
On 4/24/07, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted Pogue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Project Overview:
I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to the
community Solaris host-based data services; namely the Storage Archive
Manager or SAM and the Solaris
On 4/24/07, Tom Haynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Ted Pogue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Project Overview:
I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to the
community Solaris host-based data services; namely the Storage Archive
Manager or
On 4/24/07, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Haynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Considering these are currently unbundled and shipping products, that
might be hard. I.e., would you want to tell
customers that they need to learn new commands, change all of their
scripts, etc?
Does
On 4/24/07, Ted Pogue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Project Overview:
I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to the
community Solaris host-based data services; namely the Storage Archive
Manager or SAM and the Solaris shared file system QFS. These data
services
Ted Pogue wrote:
I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to the
community Solaris host-based data services; namely the Storage Archive
Manager or SAM and the Solaris shared file system QFS.
The project proposal draft being considered by the OGB right now
would
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Ted Pogue wrote:
I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to
the community Solaris host-based data services; namely the Storage
Archive Manager or SAM and the Solaris shared file system QFS.
The project proposal draft being considered by the
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Ted Pogue wrote:
I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to the
community Solaris host-based data services; namely the Storage Archive
Manager or SAM and the Solaris shared file system QFS.
The project proposal draft
Alan DuBoff wrote:
What if you just make it a condition that Ted needs to get the
affiliation?
Tom Haynes said this has happened, so I'm satisfied.
If it's just a formality that Ted didn't get an affiliation
from an existing community, I would affiliate with the Device Driver
community,
All,
I can affiliate with the storage community until an FS community exists
if that works
for everyone. Oversight on my part not to have included this as part of
the proposal.
Thanks for the feedback,
Ted
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Alan DuBoff wrote:
What if you just make it a condition that
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Except that the Device Driver community is defunct, having no contributors
nor core contributors able to participate in community decision making, and
as noted, it's really a better fit for Storage or the proposed File Systems
community than Device
42 matches
Mail list logo
