On 12/ 8/11 04:45 AM, Rob McMahon wrote:
I know this isn't really OpenSolaris related, but I don't know of a
better list.
I've just done the pkg image-update to take me from express 151.0.1.12.
I tried a couple of weeks ago, and was left with an unusable boot
environment. I was left without a g
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Do you know if that forum is available by NNTP?
I don't think any of the Oracle fora have NNTP gateways. If they're
using Jive Software's forum software there as well then I know it's
capable but I don't think Oracle has ever hosted a public NNTP server
Gary writes:
> I don't know if gmane archives it but comp.unix.solaris is still
> somewhat active. However, most discussion exclusive to Solaris 11 may
> be found on the sysadmin and dev fora here;
> http://forums.oracle.com/forums/category.jspa?categoryID=303
Thanks for the link. I just posted
I don't know if gmane archives it but comp.unix.solaris is still
somewhat active. However, most discussion exclusive to Solaris 11 may
be found on the sysadmin and dev fora here;
http://forums.oracle.com/forums/category.jspa?categoryID=303
-Gary
___
open
Chavdar, apologies for this inconvenience. We are aware of the problem
with the zip contents and are working to fix it. Thanks.
-alan
Subject: [osol-discuss] Solaris 11 Express Documentation Bundle
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 01:50:57 PST
From: Chavdar Ivanov
To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.or
We're not dead yet. :-)
We're looking into this problem and hope to republish this collection
soon to solve these issues.
Thanks for reporting this problem.
Cindy
On 02/11/11 02:50, Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
Hi,
I see the documentation forum is all but dead; as we have no current Oracle support
* Ghee Teo [2011-02-07 15:53]:
> On 02/ 7/11 02:11 PM, Mike Suchodolski wrote:
> >The Oracle distros are worthless to me if there's no security patches
> >available. I'm trying openIndiana now.. thanks for the advice Alex!
> Does OpenIndiana provides also security patches?
> I will be amazed if
On 02/ 7/11 06:11 AM, Mike Suchodolski wrote:
> The Oracle distros are worthless to me if there's no security patches
> available.
There are security patches available - just like for OpenSolaris 2008.05,
2008.11, and 2009.06, you can get security patches for 2010.11 by buying
a support contract.
Mike Suchodolski wrote:
> The Oracle distros are worthless to me if there's no security patches
> available. I'm trying openIndiana now.. thanks for the advice Alex! so far
> only one issue .. the system lost display when the machine was unattended for
> some time.. seme to remember that hap
On 02/ 7/11 02:11 PM, Mike Suchodolski wrote:
The Oracle distros are worthless to me if there's no security patches
available. I'm trying openIndiana now.. thanks for the advice Alex!
Does OpenIndiana provides also security patches?
I will be amazed if it does :)
-Ghee
so far only one issue
The Oracle distros are worthless to me if there's no security patches
available. I'm trying openIndiana now.. thanks for the advice Alex! so far
only one issue .. the system lost display when the machine was unattended for
some time.. seme to remember that happening with early version of Solar
; E-Mail: unixcons...@yahoo.com
> *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
>
>
> From: Uros Nedic
> To: unixcons...@yahoo.com; msuchodol...@msn.com; OpenSolarisDiscuss
>
> Sent: Sun, February 6, 2011 12:52:49 PM
> Subject: RE: [osol-discuss] Solaris 11 Express is out
>
> Solaris 11 Express is free for pe
o.com
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
From: Uros Nedic
To: unixcons...@yahoo.com; msuchodol...@msn.com; OpenSolarisDiscuss
Sent: Sun, February 6, 2011 12:52:49 PM
Subject: RE: [osol-discuss] Solaris 11 Express is out
Solaris 11 Expre
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message
>> From: Mike Suchodolski
>> To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>> Sent: Sat, February 5, 2011 10:41:51 PM
>> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 11 Express is out
>>
>> I just found my way to th
ate: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 09:59:12 -0800
> From: unixcons...@yahoo.com
> To: msuchodol...@msn.com; opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 11 Express is out
>
> Solaris 11 Express is free for personal use. You only need to pay for it when
> you
com
E-Mail: unixcons...@yahoo.com
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
- Original Message
From: Mike Suchodolski
To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Sat, February 5, 2011 10:41:51 PM
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 11 Express is out
I
You may want to look into Illumos and OpenIndiana. They are
continuances of the OpenSolaris project and are actively maintained.
http://www.illumos.org/
http://www.openindiana.org/
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 23:41, Mike Suchodolski wrote:
> I just found my way to this post.. I've been scratching my
I just found my way to this post.. I've been scratching my head as to why
update manager has been failing to find any updates and I downloaded the latest
"Oracle Solaris" to see if that would fix things.. only to find I can't even
register my solaris machine anymore.. :-(
I'm a manager now.. be
On 12/23/10 10:37 AM, Claus Assmann wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010, Claus Assmann wrote:
Oh well, maybe I put an nVidia graphics card into the box again and
see how that works (it caused some problems with X and the selection
It actually works ok. However, it would be nice to have the builtin
gr
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010, Claus Assmann wrote:
> Oh well, maybe I put an nVidia graphics card into the box again and
> see how that works (it caused some problems with X and the selection
It actually works ok. However, it would be nice to have the builtin
graphics working properly too -- AFAICT the p
On 12/15/10 09:38 AM, Claus Assmann wrote:
Oh well, maybe I put an nVidia graphics card into the box again and
see how that works (it caused some problems with X and the selection
of a graphics card before).
Details?
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing l
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010, Claus Assmann wrote:
> 0.0001 stat64("/usr/lib/X11/locale/common/ximlocal.so.2", 0x08045C70) Err#2
> ENOENT
> 0.0001 fstat64(2, 0x08045E70) = 0
> Failed to open input method
> 0. write(2, " F a i l e d t o o p".., 28) = 28
> nanoslee
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010, Loren Davis wrote:
> I'd take a closer look at the following lines in your Xorg log. Is your
> configuration correct? Do you have the right drivers installed?
It's a basic installation and I have not (yet) created an xorg.conf
file, i.e., X uses the builtin configuration:
On 12/14/2010 07:19 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>
> xterm doesn't use glx - you shouldn't get messages like that, but GLX
> acceleration isn't available for ATI graphics right now so it won't buy you
> much.
>
>
Thanks for the information.
>
> This message could be simply replaced by "Hey! Y
Loren Davis wrote:
> On 12/14/2010 06:22 PM, Claus Assmann wrote:
>
> I'd take a closer look at the following lines in your Xorg log. Is your
> configuration correct? Do you have the right drivers installed?
>
>> Xorg log follows:
>>
>
>> (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/amd64/
On 12/14/2010 06:22 PM, Claus Assmann wrote:
I'd take a closer look at the following lines in your Xorg log. Is your
configuration correct? Do you have the right drivers installed?
> Xorg log follows:
>
> (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/amd64/libglx.so
> dlopen: ld.so.1: Xorg:
On 12/15/10 03:22 PM, Claus Assmann wrote:
[Is it ok to ask questions about Solaris 11 Express here?]
I bought a new machine (with AMD 880G graphics chip) and while it
seems to run Solaris 11 Express (snv_151a) fine, it is very slow
under X. I ran some x11perf test which show good numbers, but
Pardon me for asking what might be obvious to others but is not to me;
why are folks upgrading production systems to Solaris Express
regardless of version? If you plan to use Xvm until Solaris 11 ships
with or without a replacement for it, why are you "upgrading" these
systems in the first place? I
Upgraded to solaris 11 express.
No problem at all during upgrade (postgresql service destroyed though, but that
was expected ;-))
keyboard english after upgrad, had to modify keymap:default service def
compiz doesn't start automatically (?) but works if selected from gui
Xend doesn't start after
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 06:18:13PM -0800, Muhammed Syyid wrote:
> Is there any specifics somewhere about what the known issues are? I'm
> currently on OSOL 126 (have been holding back primarily because of xvm)
>
> On a tangential note, what does OpenIndiana use for VM (I read that it
> doesn't s
On 11/23/10 05:08 PM, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
This thread started because I was unable to install OOo 3.3 RC5 in the just-released
S11e. The installation tarball came with a "setup" script (for installation)
which works in Ubuntu and S10u9 but not in S11e. I had so much expectation for S11e and
> "W. Wayne Liauh" wrote:
>
> > # For LibreOffice I don't see any builds for
> Solaris. So, when we #wouldn't care about "our"
> platform, what is then the foundation #doing? ;-)
> >
> >
> > I think your philosophy is fundamentally flawed.
> No one is expecting the TDF to port LibreOffice to
> S
"W. Wayne Liauh" wrote:
> # For LibreOffice I don't see any builds for Solaris. So, when we #wouldn't
> care about "our" platform, what is then the foundation #doing? ;-)
>
>
> I think your philosophy is fundamentally flawed. No one is expecting the TDF
> to port LibreOffice to Solaris.
OpenO
Is there any specifics somewhere about what the known issues are? I'm currently
on OSOL 126 (have been holding back primarily because of xvm)
On a tangential note, what does OpenIndiana use for VM (I read that it doesn't
support xvm but does it support kvm instead or something else?)
--
This me
# For LibreOffice I don't see any builds for Solaris. So, when we #wouldn't
care about "our" platform, what is then the foundation #doing? ;-)
I think your philosophy is fundamentally flawed. No one is expecting the TDF
to port LibreOffice to Solaris.
If Oracle is not stubborn/stupid enough a
Thank you for your response. I really don't want to get into any copyright
infringement stuff this is just a hobby/enthusiast type of thing for me.
First of all I would think Oracle has enough factory installed
hardware/software matched code to produce an extremely large product base. The
live C
john kroll wrote:
> but no one : Genunix offers it mirrored or something ?
Unlike OpenSolaris, Solaris 11 Express is not offered under a
license that allows free redistribution & mirroring.
--
-Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineer
Thanks for your reply. I did actually chat with two people during the process
the first was researching the problem but I ran short of time the second wanted
me to try with IE but I was booted into openindiana.Creating new account did
not work with windows/IE either. I think Sun Developer Netwo
I think there is a help button where you can submit issues with your login and
they can fix it. It happened to me when they started to transition things into
Oracle.
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Octave J. Orgeron
Solaris Virtualization Architect
IMHO this is glorious news! I plan to immediately contact my account manager,
retract the scathing words I had said, and find out the future and if the
future is bright we will resume testing to augment (maybe someday replace) ESX.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
> Hi Michael,
>
> Just noticed that you have changed your email address from Sun.com/Oracle.com
> to gmail.com, but we appreciate that you are still interested in
> OpenSolaris--whatever that meant.
it means that as of Nov 12 I no longer *have* an Oracle email address
(that I can access) - but n
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 18:33, W. Wayne Liauh
> wrote:
> > The following comment was cc'd from the GullFoss
> Forum, in case my posting was rejected:
> >
> > "
> >
> > I am unable to install OOo 3.3RC5 in the
> just-released Oracle Solaris 11 Express.
>
>
> it would really help to get some dat
> please disregard this method, openoffice did install
> but also broke my solaris 11 install, this method
> worked on previous opensolaris release but no
> longer.
>
> Regards
> Edward
You are right, trying to install OpenOffice.org the hard way (i.e., directly
using pkgadd) will hose your
>
>
> Hi,
>
> this method may also work for you; First i switch
> into root user, after I unpack the package, i went
> into OOO330_m15_native_packed-1_en-US.9546/packages
>
> ped: pkadd -d. (with a dot at the end)
>
> said "all" to install
>
> said 'yes' to all of the questions, then it
> The following comment was cc'd from the GullFoss
> Forum, in case my posting was rejected:
>
> "
>
> I am unable to install OOo 3.3RC5 in the
> just-released Oracle Solaris 11 Express. I have no
> problem installing it in Ubuntu. And I was able to
> install one of the previous RC's in Solaris
Greetings,
first sorry for my English.
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:33:36 +0100, W. Wayne Liauh
wrote:
I am unable to install OOo 3.3RC5 in the just-released Oracle Solaris 11
Express.
What is Your installation procedure?
My is follow:
1. I download(ed) from http://download.openoffice.org/a
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 18:33, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
> The following comment was cc'd from the GullFoss Forum, in case my posting
> was rejected:
>
> "
>
> I am unable to install OOo 3.3RC5 in the just-released Oracle Solaris 11
> Express.
it would really help to get some data here - "unable t
> Hi,
>
> does anyone know if it is already possible to get
> access to the Solaris 11 Express "support" repository
> at https://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/support ? Where can
> I get the required certificate (given an Oracle
> Premier Support for Systems contract) to register it
> as a pkg publisher?
>
> Is there any information on how the Express train
> will be going forward? like planned release cycle and
> whether it will be continued after official S11
> launches?
>
> I still would like to stay with S11 express since I
> am not use it in any business or production. I didn't
> see release
laris specific examples of that in the
VirtualBox documentation, but it's not too hard to figure out.
Lastest stuff available at www.virtualbox.org
Joe
> Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 10:50:58 +0100 (CET)
> From: Bruno Damour
> To: david comay
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] solaris 11 express
l -
De: "david comay"
À: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Envoyé: Mercredi 17 Novembre 2010 07h41:21 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin /
Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [osol-discuss] solaris 11 express and xvm
> Does that mean that xvm is supported to use solaris 11 expr
Does that mean that xvm is supported to use solaris 11 express as Dom0 ?
Yes, the xVM packages are still present in 2010.11 although there are
known issues with them. And though the packages are there and I can't
speak to the dom0 roadmap, I should point out the following approved
ARC case from
On 11/17/10 05:23 PM, Erik Trimble wrote:
On 11/16/2010 8:16 PM, Erik Trimble wrote:
On 11/16/2010 7:39 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/17/10 04:29 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Kent Watsen wrote:
* if xvm Dom0 is in Solaris 11 Express, does that imply that it will
also be in Solaris 11?
No, we ar
On 11/16/2010 8:16 PM, Erik Trimble wrote:
On 11/16/2010 7:39 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/17/10 04:29 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Kent Watsen wrote:
* if xvm Dom0 is in Solaris 11 Express, does that imply that
it will
also be in Solaris 11?
No, we are still working through remova
On 11/16/2010 7:39 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/17/10 04:29 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Kent Watsen wrote:
* if xvm Dom0 is in Solaris 11 Express, does that imply that it
will
also be in Solaris 11?
No, we are still working through removal of EOF features. There are
some
major r
scuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Tue, November 16, 2010 9:39:37 PM
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] solaris 11 express and xvm
On 11/17/10 04:29 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Kent Watsen wrote:
>
>> * if xvm Dom0 is in Solaris 11 Express, does that imply that it will
>>also be in So
On 11/17/10 04:29 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Kent Watsen wrote:
* if xvm Dom0 is in Solaris 11 Express, does that imply that it will
also be in Solaris 11?
No, we are still working through removal of EOF features. There are some
major removals yet to come. (I don't know
Kent Watsen wrote:
> * if xvm Dom0 is in Solaris 11 Express, does that imply that it will
> also be in Solaris 11?
No, we are still working through removal of EOF features. There are some
major removals yet to come. (I don't know about Dom0 specifically, just
the case in general.)
--
On 11/17/10 03:17 PM, Kent Watsen wrote:
On 11/16/2010 3:24 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/17/10 08:11 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
The 32-bit dom0 hypervisor has been removed, per the release notes:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/821-1479/fbdtw?l=en&a=view
Other details regarding xvm usage can be
On 11/16/2010 3:24 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/17/10 08:11 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/16/10 01:04 AM, Bruno Damour wrote:
Hello,
In the repository (http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/release)
I see :
system/x...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20101105T061852Z
system/virti...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20
On 11/17/10 08:11 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/16/10 01:04 AM, Bruno Damour wrote:
Hello,
In the repository (http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/release)
I see :
system/x...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20101105T061852Z
system/virti...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20101105T061851Z
...
Does that mean that xvm is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/16/2010 2:16 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
>> You concatenate the two parts and mount the resulting .iso file
>> - just fine.
>
>
> They're actually separate ISO files -- not a physical file split.
>
That's not true. Not according to the page you d
On 11/16/10 08:06 AM, Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
did you download the repository or connect through
the web?
I have tried both and have problems both ways.
Part B of the repository will not mount up under any
filesystem type. after lofiadm the iso /dev/lofi/1
mount fails with not a hsfs filesystem.
On 11/16/10 01:04 AM, Bruno Damour wrote:
Hello,
In the repository (http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/release)
I see :
system/x...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20101105T061852Z
system/virti...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20101105T061851Z
...
Does that mean that xvm is supported to use solaris 11 express as Dom
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> All rights not expressly granted above are hereby reserved. If you want to
> use the Programs for any purpose other than as permitted under this
> agreement, [...] you must obtain a valid license permitting such use.
>
I think that S11Express include more then enough p
I stand corrected. Concat the two parts together worked... Thanks
> Build 150 repository was two parts that were not
> concats. Instructions for that repository were to
> rsync the different repos after mounting the
> individual iso's
> I would think that would not change.
>
--
This message posted
> > did you download the repository or connect through
> > the web?
> >
> > I have tried both and have problems both ways.
> >
> > Part B of the repository will not mount up under
> any
> > filesystem type. after lofiadm the iso /dev/lofi/1
> > mount fails with not a hsfs filesystem. Part A
> wor
> did you download the repository or connect through
> the web?
>
> I have tried both and have problems both ways.
>
> Part B of the repository will not mount up under any
> filesystem type. after lofiadm the iso /dev/lofi/1
> mount fails with not a hsfs filesystem. Part A works
> fine.
You conc
did you download the repository or connect through the web?
I have tried both and have problems both ways.
Part B of the repository will not mount up under any filesystem type. after
lofiadm the iso /dev/lofi/1 mount fails with not a hsfs filesystem. Part A
works fine.
When attempting to acces
Mike Brancato wrote:
> Really? That seems to disregard the license. Does buying support then
> modify your license to include non-development or prototyping-related
> activities?
Yes.
--
-Alan Coopersmith-alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineerin
Just to clarify, what is my path forward from OS 2009.06?
The release is for development, prototyping, etc. To quote the license: "only
for the purpose of developing, testing, prototyping and demonstrating your
applications, and not for any other purpose."
I'm doing none of those things. I'm
Thanks for the info. Unfortunately it seems I'm not able to use VirtualBox for
testing the upgrade way, since b134b seems to be crashing there. i.e. I just
see first boot message (Solaris & Oracle copyright) then just something what
looks like a stackdump (backtrace) and then immediate reboot...
> It's likely that it will work for you if you install
> from the text
> installer media, but automated installation requires
> that level of OBP.
I'd have to use a text-based installer anyway, since
anything that no longer includes Xsun won't support anything
other than an XVR-100 that would wor
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Karel Gardas wrote:
> interesting would be to know if the upgrade from OS 2009.06 is working well
> or not.
I haven't tried that exact path, but I have image-update'd from
OpenIndiana to something that looks quite similar to Solaris 11
Express (build 150 instead
On 11/15/10 04:20 PM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
Well you know some of us home users aren't going to be happy.
*Supported on sun4v and sun4u based systems with OBP
(Open Boot PROM) level 4.17 or higher.
$ uname -a;prtdiag -v|tail -2
SunOS paradox 5.11 snv_97 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000
OBP
On 16/11/2010, at 9:50 AM, Nicholas George wrote:
On 15 November 2010 17:13, Paul Griffith wrote:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris11/index.html
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris11/downloads/index.html
Can someone post the MD1 and SHA256 hashes
Well you know some of us home users aren't going to be happy.
>*Supported on sun4v and sun4u based systems with OBP
>(Open Boot PROM) level 4.17 or higher.
$ uname -a;prtdiag -v|tail -2
SunOS paradox 5.11 snv_97 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000
OBP 4.16.4 2004/12/18 05:18
POST 4.16.3 2004/11/05 20:
On 15 November 2010 17:13, Paul Griffith wrote:
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris11/index.html
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris11/downloads/index.html
Can someone post the MD1 and SHA256 hashes for the ISO files, please?
Nicholas
--
Nicholas Ge
On 11/15/10 02:03 PM, Karel Gardas wrote:
interesting would be to know if the upgrade from OS 2009.06 is working well or
not.
Karel
Yes, I just finished upgrading from Opensolaris b134 (note, NOT b134b). It
booted up fine. You just have to follow the instructions in the release notes.
F
On 11/15/10 11:03 AM, Karel Gardas wrote:
interesting would be to know if the upgrade from OS 2009.06 is working well or
not.
Yes, the process is described here and was noted in the release
announcement:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/821-1479/gklaa?l=en&a=view
-Shawn
___
Hi Glynn
Those are good news.
Now OpenIndiana at home and Solaris 11 at work ;)
What I haven't seen (not much time anyway) is the migration path for those on
b134.
Will it be 134.0.2 on pkg.opensolaris.org,
and then to 151 on pkg.oracle.com/solaris/relese ?
regards
- Pablo
--
This message
interesting would be to know if the upgrade from OS 2009.06 is working well or
not.
Karel
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
> discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Paul Griffith
>
> Solaris 11 Express:
>From the What's New: (Amongst many other things)
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris11/documentation/sol
aris-expre
On 16/11/2010, at 5:49 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
[mailto:opensolaris-
discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Paul Griffith
Solaris 11 Express:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris11/index.html
http://www.oracle.
> From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
> discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Paul Griffith
>
> Solaris 11 Express:
>
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris11/index.html
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-
> storage/solaris11/
> And realistically, having the source code is nice and all, but how many
> people really compile ON anyways? Most folks just want something they can
> download, install, and use.
Right.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-disc
On Sun, 03 Oct 2010 15:11:46 +0200, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
"Frank Batschulat" wrote:
>> SCA and CDDL doe not matter in that case.
>
> The CDDL matters in this case as Sun did not pay for the work.
I guess that is something you have to sort out with a lawyer
to get your problems if the
On Sun, 03 Oct 2010 14:55:17 +0200, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
Frank Batschulat wrote:
> 1) I contributed code _before_ signing the SCA
Joerg, the code you contributed without an SCA where the hsfs changes
that
were done under the umbrella of a regular contract with you.
SCA and CDDL doe
Message
From: Robert Milkowski
To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Sun, October 3, 2010 2:36:05 PM
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 11 Express
On 02/10/2010 19:11, Octave Orgeron wrote:
> At the end of the day, companies that use Linux in production pay Red Hat and
>
On 10/ 4/10 08:49 AM, Volker A. Brandt wrote:
Robert Milkowski writes:
I don't know - perhaps Oracle should consider a special license for
up-to 2-socekt x86 servers which would allow production deployments for
free with no support?
No, they should make available such a special licens
> From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
> discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Robert Milkowski
>
> I don't know - perhaps Oracle should consider a special license for
> up-to 2-socekt x86 servers which would allow production deployments for
> free with no
Robert Milkowski writes:
[...]
> Well, it is all
> about mind share.
> Quite often they tend to deploy the OS they are mostly familiar with on
> their more critical infrastructure where they do want a higher level of
> support. And unfortunately they will chose Linux more often.
I fully agree. Th
On 02/10/2010 19:11, Octave Orgeron wrote:
At the end of the day, companies that use Linux in production pay Red Hat and
Novell for support and it's not all that different from paying a support
contract with Sun Oracle.
Not necessarily so. I know many companies with lots of x86 servers
run
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
- Original Message
From: Uros Nedic
To: OpenSolarisDiscuss
Sent: Sun, October 3, 2010 9:50:53 AM
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 11 Express
I believe that some people has copyright conflicts with Oracle,
after they acquired SUN. While I
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
- Original Message
From: Joerg Schilling
To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org; knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com
Sent: Sun, October 3, 2010 6:24:15 AM
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 11 Express
Orvar Korvar wrote:
> Actually, I also spoke to a marketing
Octave Orgeron wrote:
> Exactly what my discussion was like. They thought it was clear enough in the
> license because of the "production use" clause. So hopefully, they'll update
> the
> OTN license and make it clear that it's free for personal or hobbyist use.
> And
> realistically, having
and Consultant
Web: http://unixconsole.blogspot.com
E-Mail: unixcons...@yahoo.com
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
- Original Message
From: Orvar Korvar
To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Sun, October 3, 2010 4:12:55 AM
Subject: R
I believe that some people has copyright conflicts with Oracle,
after they acquired SUN. While I tentatively understood it,
I believe that the best way to sort it out is finding some good
lawyer, and see what can be done if anything can be done at all.
My intention here is to move this discussion
"Edward Ned Harvey" wrote:
> Suppose I'm wrong about this. It will only matter if we hear any news about
> the German government prosecuting Oracle. So until that happens, Joerg, the
> whole argument is moot.
You are uninformed on this topic and for this reason, your claims do not match
reali
> From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
> discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Edward Ned Harvey
>
> if you modified a file which is
> copyright
> Oracle, and you gave those modifications to Oracle, and agreed to let
> Oracle
> continue distributing it, la
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
