I've not done any controlled testing, but I'm getting about ~45MB/sec from
Vista x64 to snv_81 using CIFS over Gigabit Ethernet. I dragged a 20GB file
across and rougly timed it.
This test server currently has two 7200.11 750GB 32MB seagate drives in a ZFS
mirror.
This message posted from
Yes - this would be a great box for a low power webserver, DNS server,
low vol mailserver, firewall etc. Very useful.
My only disappointment is with the IDE disk interface - would have
preferred SATA and the addition of 1, or more, eSATA ports.
PS: How deep is the unit? IOW, can you mount 2
David Clack wrote:
Hi,
No fans, no noise.
I really designed it for Solaris X86 and Real Time Java.
It's going to be the same price range as Siemens MicroPC 427b,
Bechoff, MPL or PDSI.
Just more ports of everything.
Dave
Any pictures online?
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the info. What's the noise level? Possible price range?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
We will try to reproduce the problem here. There could be
a bug in our code. If we couldn't reproduce it then we're
going to need your help :)
Afshin
Jeff Cheeney wrote:
Brian M wrote:
I reinstalled using CXDE 1/08 and decided to try using the built-in CIFS
server instead of Samba.
I have
Have you tried to upgrade bios ?
I've tried F5, F6, F7, F8a beta, and F8b beta on the GA-G33M-DS2R :(
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, David Clack wrote:
Hi All,
Just wondered if I could get a quick poll on the need for a 24V DC 1U
industrial PLC.
How many actual watts does it draw when idle?
I agree with the other comments, SATA would be preferred.
John Weeks did a presie not long ago and showed a
David Clack wrote:
Hi,
BlueWonder has a 24V DC to 12V converter internally.
I'm sure I can get one for 48V.
What application are you thinking of using BW for ?
A client of mine sometimes has requests for a small 48V system to go
with Telco power systems (the majority of which are 48V).
Hi,
This is to announce Nexenta Builder 1.0!
Recently released NexentaCore 1.0 is especially well suited to serve as
a platform for application distributions due to Nexenta Builder 1.0, an
open source packaging solution included as part of NexentaCore that
enables the simple creation of
Hi,
Actually BlueWonder was designed for managing the non power generating
portions of a power plant.
That's why we ported the Hilscher ProfiBus driver to Solaris X86.
The serial ports are optically isolated from the main motherboard
components.
Dave
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 19:07 +1300,
Hi,
BlueWonder has a 24V DC to 12V converter internally.
I'm sure I can get one for 48V.
What application are you thinking of using BW for ?
Dave
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 16:47 +1300, Ian Collins wrote:
David Clack wrote:
Hi All,
Just wondered if I could get a quick poll on the need
Hi,
No fans, no noise.
I really designed it for Solaris X86 and Real Time Java.
It's going to be the same price range as Siemens MicroPC 427b, Bechoff,
MPL or PDSI.
Just more ports of everything.
Dave
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 11:44 -0800, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the
David Clack wrote:
Hi All,
Just wondered if I could get a quick poll on the need for a 24V DC 1U
industrial PLC.
I'd be interested in a 48V version.
Ian
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi All,
Just wondered if I could get a quick poll on the need for a 24V DC 1U
industrial PLC.
I've been working with a vendor in Taiwan and now have one in my lab,
it takes SX86 10 U4 B12b and OpenSolaris without any issues and I just
completed the HCT test on it.
These are the
Changes since SchilliX-0.6.1:
- Updated to use OpenSolaris Nevada Build 82
- Applied a patch t the hsfs filesystem module (see directory patches)
to work around a cpio hard link handling bug.
- SchilliX-0.6.2 now includes a SVr4 package database in an unpacked
Hi,
So I checked with have sata on the MB just not the headers.
I took about six weeks to create this motherboard.
Give me your requirements for the system and I'll see what we can
build.
BTW no sound chip on this system.
Dave
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 14:36 -0800, Alan DuBoff wrote:
On
Brian M wrote:
I reinstalled using CXDE 1/08 and decided to try using the built-in CIFS
server instead of Samba.
I have a very simple setup (simply trying to share some ZFS filesystems to my
Mac). No domains, no Active Directory, etc. I think I have everything setup
according to the
A quick calculation of throughput based on your screenshots shows less than
800 kiB/s. That is very low.
Currently I get about 7.5 MiB/s using CIFS, and that is still too slow for
me, even though it is 10x faster than you are getting. Using ftp, I can get
a transfer rate of over 90 MiB/s
I did a couple of tests, in most of tests, importance could not play its role.
With following configuration,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] zonecfg -z global info dedicated-cpu
dedicated-cpu:
ncpus: 2-20
importance: 4
[EMAIL PROTECTED] zonecfg -z zoneA info dedicated-cpu
dedicated-cpu:
Mark Haywood wrote:
Rocky wrote:
No. Bit 1 is not for C1E. C1E is a hardware feature
that you really
don't want to disable. It should provide good power
management savings
all on its own.
OK, many thanks. Any other ideas on how to progress this? I'm getting the
same syslog messages on
Actually, I'd like to move this thread to the storage-discuss alias.
See you there.
Janice Chang wrote:
Hi Jerry. Thank you for your inquiry.
Would appreciate some examples showing the permissions set from Windows
and what is seen vs. what is expected on the Solaris server.
Thanks!
Rocky wrote:
No. Bit 1 is not for C1E. C1E is a hardware feature
that you really
don't want to disable. It should provide good power
management savings
all on its own.
OK, many thanks. Any other ideas on how to progress this? I'm getting the
same syslog messages on a number of
Rocky wrote:
ssdt_1_CpuPm.dsl contains the following ASL for
\PR.CPU1:
Scope (\_PR.CPU1)
{
Name (HI1, 0x00)
Name (HC1, 0x00)
Name (TLD1, 0x00)
Method (_PDC, 1, NotSerialized)
{
CreateDWordField (Arg0, 0x08, CAP1)
Store (CAP1, PDC1)
If
Roman Morokutti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Warning:
== Never use cpio to do this kind of work!
cpio has a bug with hard link handling that will cause real
problems if you use the outdated mkisofs that currently comes
with Solaris.
Just to understand this right. Do
ssdt_1_CpuPm.dsl contains the following ASL for
\PR.CPU1:
Scope (\_PR.CPU1)
{
Name (HI1, 0x00)
Name (HC1, 0x00)
Name (TLD1, 0x00)
Method (_PDC, 1, NotSerialized)
{
CreateDWordField (Arg0, 0x08, CAP1)
Store (CAP1, PDC1)
If (LEqual
http://wiki.linuxquestions.org/wiki/Mkisofs
On Feb 11, 2008 2:10 AM, Roman Morokutti [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Joerg,
you wrote:
Warning:
== Never use cpio to do this kind of work!
cpio has a bug with hard link handling that will cause real
problems if you use
No. Bit 1 is not for C1E. C1E is a hardware feature
that you really
don't want to disable. It should provide good power
management savings
all on its own.
OK, many thanks. Any other ideas on how to progress this? I'm getting the
same syslog messages on a number of systems and SpeedStep
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, David Clack wrote:
Hi,
So I checked with have sata on the MB just not the headers.
I took about six weeks to create this motherboard.
Give me your requirements for the system and I'll see what we can
build.
BTW no sound chip on this system.
Hi David,
I have to
A quick calculation of throughput based on your screenshots shows less than 800
kiB/s. That is very low.
Currently I get about 7.5 MiB/s using CIFS, and that is still too slow for me,
even though it is 10x faster than you are getting. Using ftp, I can get a
transfer rate of over 90 MiB/s
Ahh so NexentaCP is now called NexentaCore. Hopefully this is the last time
you'll have to change the name :)
I for one welcome our new NexentaCore overlords.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Hi Jerry. Thank you for your inquiry.
Would appreciate some examples showing the permissions set from Windows
and what is seen vs. what is expected on the Solaris server.
Thanks!
Janice
Jerry Backlin wrote:
I'm using sharesmb (b82) in my home office server with XP W2K clients.
Upgrades
Have you tried to upgrade bios ?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
32 matches
Mail list logo
