Philip Machanick wrote:
From what I've seen so far, a current-model Dell should be OK except wireless
may be a while off ready. I have a budget I have to spend this year (in
practice this means by end October) but my serious use will start next year so
provided wireless is being worked on that
> SchilliX won't be able to compete with GNU/Solaris as
> a desktop. In the Linux and BSD world, distributions
> need to find a niche to remain popular. For SchilliX,
> this might be servers and the "authentic Solaris
> experience". You've done a great job packaging
> OpenSolaris in a usable form,
Yoseph..
can you please correct your mail id, it is bouncing.
On 10/24/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.Unable to deliver message to the following recipients, due to being unable to connect successfully to the destina
Philip Machanick wrote:
From what I've seen so far, a current-model Dell should be OK except wireless
may be a while off ready. I have a budget I have to spend this year (in
practice this means by end October) but my serious use will start next year so
provided wireless is being worked on that
SchilliX won't be able to compete with GNU/Solaris as a desktop. In the Linux
and BSD world, distributions need to find a niche to remain popular. For
SchilliX, this might be servers and the "authentic Solaris experience". You've
done a great job packaging OpenSolaris in a usable form, but other
>From what I've seen so far, a current-model Dell should be OK except wireless
>may be a while off ready. I have a budget I have to spend this year (in
>practice this means by end October) but my serious use will start next year so
>provided wireless is being worked on that would be OK.
Anyone
Thank you for the clarification. GNU/Solaris sounds like it will be the ideal
OpenSolaris desktop.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Guys,
let me clarify a little bit on what GNU/Solaris distro is.
The idea behind it is simple: do not re-invent the wheel and try to
re-use existing 17000 high quality Debian packages, Debian
infrastracture(read Dpkg, APT repositories, Debootstraps, installation
program, utilities, developer's po
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I had earlier installed OpenSolaris 03/05 x86 platform system, but now I am
planning to upgrade it to Solaris 10/05 release without any installation .
Is there anyway where I can upgrade without disturbing the existing system.
much like the way of up2date/yum on Li
>Jake Maciejewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>Let us face reality...
>
>Belenix has been developped by starting with SchilliX
>and modifying it.
Um ... I'd strongly object to this statement! It is correct
that 2 ideas were taken from the earlier discussions on this
list:
* Using
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005, Sean Sprague wrote:
> Does anyone know whether I will ever (or possibly when I
> might) be able to get my Ultra 60 to speak wireless? I know
> that Bob Palowoda asked some time ago, but is there any
> update please?
I dunno about internal PCI cards, but you could always attac
For innovative college students looking for the next
big thing in software engineering:
Coming to an OpenSolaris project near you:
http://www.xpcgear.com/42i1cardreader.html
~Ken Mays @ EarthLink, Inc.
__
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple trave
ken mays wrote:
Joerg,
I have X.org 6.8.2 libraries, binaries, and header
packages built for Solaris 8/9/10 (x86/SPARC) over at
Blastwave. Could these work for you?!?
I have Schillix 0.2 so do I need to know something to
port X.org over to Schillix that you know of or is
everything just a ./con
Joerg,
I have X.org 6.8.2 libraries, binaries, and header
packages built for Solaris 8/9/10 (x86/SPARC) over at
Blastwave. Could these work for you?!?
I have Schillix 0.2 so do I need to know something to
port X.org over to Schillix that you know of or is
everything just a ./configure & smake ?!?
Jake Maciejewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't understand why X is a priority. You provide fluxbox as a window
> manager instead of a full desktop like GNOME, KDE, or XFCE. You don't provide
> GUI web browsers like Firefox and Konqueror, email apps like Thunderbird and
> Evolution, or an
powwop wrote:
Hi All,
the following is what I've tried for mounting,
mount -F hsfs /dev/dsk/c1t0d0 /cdrom
I usually mount with the command
mount -F hsfs /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s2 /cdrom
with these errors
mount:No such device
mount: cannot mount /dev/dsk/c1t0d0
mount -F iso9660 /dev/dsk/c1t0d
Debian GNU/Solaris will offer similar options as a standard Debian
Update feature. It will also bring full set of graphical tools, such as
integrated into GNOME desktop update-notifier, Synaptic, etc.
First Alpha release is planned at November.
Erast
On Sun, 2005-10-23 at 16:13 +0530, Nikhil wro
Hi All,
the following is what I've tried for mounting,
mount -F hsfs /dev/dsk/c1t0d0 /cdrom
with these errors
mount:No such device
mount: cannot mount /dev/dsk/c1t0d0
mount -F iso9660 /dev/dsk/c1t0d0
with these errors
mount: Operation not applicable to FSType iso9660
Cheers.
powpow...
This
> What kind of CDROM device is that? ATAPI? SCSI? USB?
> Firewire?
IDE.
>
> Did you change the hardware configuration (e.g.
> after installing
> Solaris, changed an ATAPI CDROM from master device to
> slave device)?
no.
>
> After running "devfsadm -v" (probes for new devices),
> does the ou
At : http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/usr/src/cmd/svc/startd/utmpx.c
I happened to go through utmpx_write_boottime(void) : linenumber:354
---
354 utmpx_write_boottime(void)
355 {
356 time_t tstamp;
357 struct stat stbuf;
358
359 /*
360 * The D
rmformat command wasn't found. Cheers.
It's beginning to sound like you have a less than perfect
installation of Solaris.
I would re-install Solaris from the latest Solaris Express builds and
ensure that the installation completes successfully.
MC
--
Martin 'MC' Brown, http://MCslp.com
Hi All,
rmformat command wasn't found. Cheers.
powpow...
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hey Bob!
I can't remember why I would bring up wireless on an Ultra 60.
No doubt I misquoted you ;-)
Maybe I was refering to an Ultra IIi based laptop. I don't use wireless on workstations but short of writing
the drivers yourself you could use the ASUS WL-330-g wireless/ethernet bridge/a
Thanks Frank.
now coming to my actual problem..
what if /var/adm/utmpx or /var/adm/wtmpx are removed or corrupted ? the dependents like who, uptime will be in soar bussiness then... I mean they will try to get the system boot time ("system boot" message) , what if they do not find the message an
>Hello
> I had earlier installed OpenSolaris 03/05 x86 platform system, but now I am
>planning to upgrade it to Solaris 10/05 release without any installation .
>Is there anyway where I can upgrade without disturbing the existing system.
>much like the way of up2date/yum on Linux systems.
> Regard
Hello
I had earlier installed OpenSolaris 03/05 x86 platform system, but now I am planning to upgrade it to Solaris 10/05 release without any installation . Is there anyway where I can upgrade without disturbing the existing system. much like the way of up2date/yum on Linux systems.
Regards,
N
> Does anyone know whether I will ever (or possibly
> when I
> might) be able to get my Ultra 60 to speak wireless?
> I know
> that Bob Palowoda asked some time ago, but is there
> any
> update please?
I can't remember why I would bring up wireless on an Ultra 60. Maybe I was
refering
to an
Hello,
as far as I know, I can find a bootable Solaris 10 installer CD/DVD from Sun's
site, the Solaris Express CD.
I tried to find any document explaining how to build such a CD by myself
directly from OpenSolaris sources/binaries, with no success.
If the license permits, I'd love to be able to
28 matches
Mail list logo
