> Free, as I understand it, but not yet open-source. I'm no lawyer, but I
> read the new license agreement pretty carefully yesterday and it lists
> commercial use, personal use, even ratio-based service-provider use.
> And it's not just Sun Cluster it's all the N1 stuff, JES, Identity
>
> As Sun recently released its entire application
> stack, it is now viable to run the enterprise
> availability tools right in one's rack at home.
Most of these products have been available for free
download for education and research use for some
time.
> There are two products in the aforementi
I see. Thank you very much!
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi,
I put 'free trial' in quotes for exactly that reason; so that folks
don't attach any message to it, but _do_ know what we're talking
about. So much for that idea :) Thanks for your interest.
Regards,
Michelle
OpenSolaris Doc Community
>DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s
Yep, this is what you get when you have stable API at the core and well
builded and configured GNU userland. Welcome to Nexenta world! :-)
I also cross-posting opensolaris-discuss@, so other folks will look at
your screenshots and will see how fast Nexenta OS progressing!
Thanks Pedro!
On Thu, 2
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> of interest in maintaining them, even Ultra-1
> support for those who
> >> feel that they are happy to run the risk of 64
> bit on UltraSPARC-I.
> >
> >This, to me, would be a far more worthwhile
> project.
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 07:29:02PM -0500, Eric Enright wrote:
> On 12/7/05, Derek Cicero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Stephen Lau wrote:
> > > Whoops. The ReleaseNotes link should be fixed real soon.
> > > You can look through the putback logs for build 28 on the Nevada
> > > community page to s
On 12/7/05, Derek Cicero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Lau wrote:
> > Whoops. The ReleaseNotes link should be fixed real soon.
> > You can look through the putback logs for build 28 on the Nevada
> > community page to see if anything changed in power management..
>
> This is fixed. Sorry fo
Things for Community CD/DVD (and OpenSolaris 12/05)
review:
To: Belenix, Schillix and all other OpenSolaris
distros
NVIDIA® GeForce 6150 and NVIDIA nForce 430 - based
motherboards from Asus and other OEMs/IHVs
1. You may want to recheck the auto-recognition of
Nvidia Geforce cards versus Nvidi
On 12/7/05, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can live with that.
Even I had to eventually stop pack-rat-collecting any piece of Sun
hardware that came my way. I started out then saying "nothing slower
than a U1", then now its "nothing goes home unless I actually have a
use for it that
>On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> of interest in maintaining them, even Ultra-1 support for those who
>> feel that they are happy to run the risk of 64 bit on UltraSPARC-I.
>
>This, to me, would be a far more worthwhile project. Yes, the US-I
>is long in the tooth, but I've neve
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 19:56, Stephen Lau wrote:
> Peter Tribble wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 18:12, Stephen Lau wrote:
> >
> >>Build 28 is now available for download at
> >>http://www.opensolaris.org/os/downloads/
> >>
> >>Please make sure you update your tools (SUNWonbld) package, and please
Stephen Lau wrote:
Peter Tribble wrote:
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 18:12, Stephen Lau wrote:
Build 28 is now available for download at
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/downloads/
Please make sure you update your tools (SUNWonbld) package, and
please read the release notes. There are three new kn
Michelle Olson wrote:
Hi,
Glad the pointers were useful--here is one for Solaris Volume Manager
(SVM) for Sun Cluster.
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-4520/6manpiehp?a=view
It would be the 'free trial' volume management solution instead of
QFS. There are plans to integrate ZFS in Sun
Peter Tribble wrote:
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 18:12, Stephen Lau wrote:
Build 28 is now available for download at
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/downloads/
Please make sure you update your tools (SUNWonbld) package, and please
read the release notes. There are three new known issues for this bu
Hi,
Glad the pointers were useful--here is one for Solaris Volume Manager
(SVM) for Sun Cluster.
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-4520/6manpiehp?a=view
It would be the 'free trial' volume management solution instead of
QFS. There are plans to integrate ZFS in Sun Cluster, but will not be
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 18:12, Stephen Lau wrote:
> Build 28 is now available for download at
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/downloads/
>
> Please make sure you update your tools (SUNWonbld) package, and please
> read the release notes. There are three new known issues for this build
> concerni
On 12/7/05, James Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> While I can understand why no 4m, What I would like is something a bit
> easier, i just want ultraI support, the CPU no the u1 platform. I
> would like to use my old Sun ultra 2 motherboard rev 6. To run Solaris
> 10. This is just CPU s
Hi
While I can understand why no 4m, What I would like is something a bit
easier, i just want ultraI support, the CPU no the u1 platform. I
would like to use my old Sun ultra 2 motherboard rev 6. To run Solaris
10. This is just CPU support, no need to support old hardware like le,
Since the u2 pl
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> of interest in maintaining them, even Ultra-1 support for those who
> feel that they are happy to run the risk of 64 bit on UltraSPARC-I.
This, to me, would be a far more worthwhile project. Yes, the US-I
is long in the tooth, but I've never encoun
On 12/7/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> It's a resurrection of biblical proportions.
>
We could wait for the "second coming of Christ" or just accept that I
will have my old sun4m hardware around for a while and it will run
Solaris 8 for a while.
But never 10.
I can live w
> Well, there is nothing wrong with Linux in its place.
> Just so long as
> I don't have to trust it long term. Like Windows, it
> seems to work
> for a while and then it just doesn't anymore. For
> unknown reasons
> too. Perhaps that is just my experience however.
I fail to see how Linux coul
>Secondly, there's the problem of re-integrating, testing, and then
>supporting the code. For stale platforms that've fallen off the end
>of the service life (ones, incidentally, that can still run existing
>old releases just fine and that likely have rings run around them by
>cheaper modern hard
On 12/7/05, Bill Rushmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Charles Monett wrote:
>
> > Fine, it might have been dead, and probably (almost) useless, but that
> > would be
> I think it would be a pointless effort to "port" OpenSolaris to sun4m.
> Have you ever tried to run Solaris
Charles Monett writes:
> I just dont see the point in stonewalling support unless it was
> something earlier than a sun4m- reiterating the question for
> purposes of clarity - what would it take to get it back into
> something that would result in a usable sun4m OpenSolaris system?
> There really c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
UNIX admin wrote:
> Dennis, those guys are just about as clueless as a Linux-loving geek can get.
agreed, such answers generate only more FUD, long ago i decided to
ignore them, life eventualy takes care of then and shows them how wrong
they are
>
> T
On 12/7/05, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dennis, those guys are just about as clueless as a Linux-loving geek can get.
>
> They don't have the experience to comprehend what they're being told -- after
> all, if they knew anything about anything, they wouldn't be enamoured with
> Linux.
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Charles Monett wrote:
Fine, it might have been dead, and probably (almost) useless, but that would be
enough for some to fill in the blank spaces if they were left on their own for
those who'd even want to touch that code outside of Sun- if just for the
ability to add in s
When others have said build 22 they mean of Solaris 10 not Solaris
Nevada this was over 3 years ago or in other words thats 84 builds ago
(note builds are usually two weeks long but the last builds of Solaris
10 overlapped with the opening builds of Solaris Nevada (ie what became
the first parts of
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 06:56, nice wrote:
> After a kernel module was loaded successfully, how to communicate wite this
> kernel module like change the status of the kernel module.
>
> In Linux, I can use /proc file to do that. But, In solaris, /proc file is
> just used for processors.
As you no
Thank you very much for the pointers. I've started to study the Clustering
documentation in detail.
One additional question: will QFS also be available for free?
QFS is mentioned quite a bit as the part of the redundant features that make up
a HA cluster. However, it appears that either a 60 day
>
>Even if the code was pulled early, there's no real reason to drop out
>a workable release of code(t hat is, something that would build cleanly
>for sun4m, not just raw code known not to work without u nobtainable
>tools) for perfectly runnable machines. It'd not be much, but something
>based of
Dennis, those guys are just about as clueless as a Linux-loving geek can get.
They don't have the experience to comprehend what they're being told -- after
all, if they knew anything about anything, they wouldn't be enamoured with
Linux.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
33 matches
Mail list logo
