Re: [osol-discuss] FYI: Re: Installation of OpenSolaris inlogic partition

2007-01-04 Thread Darren J Moffat
Deepak Bhatia wrote: Hi Moinak, Regarding the installatin and building Solaris Nevada Open Source, we need to perform the following basic step Change GATE to the name of the top-level directory (e.g., testws). Change CODEMGR_WS to the top-level path (e.g., /aux0/testws). Change STAFFER to your

Re: [osol-discuss] FYI: Re: Installation of OpenSolaris inlogic partition

2007-01-04 Thread James Carlson
Darren J Moffat writes: This one doesn't though because STAFFER is set to 'nobody' and MAILTO is set to $STAFFER. That means that by default you won't get email sent on build completion. Untrue. Nightly does this: # Set default value for STAFFER, if needed. if [ -z

Re: [osol-discuss] FYI: Re: Installation of OpenSolaris inlogic partition

2007-01-04 Thread Darren J Moffat
James Carlson wrote: Darren J Moffat writes: This one doesn't though because STAFFER is set to 'nobody' and MAILTO is set to $STAFFER. That means that by default you won't get email sent on build completion. Untrue. Nightly does this: # Set default value for STAFFER, if needed.

Re: [osol-discuss] FYI: Re: Installation of OpenSolaris inlogic partition

2007-01-04 Thread James Carlson
Darren J Moffat writes: I _never_ set STAFFER on any of my builds, and it works fine for me. The only things I ever set are NIGHTLY_OPTIONS, CODEMGR_WS, PARENT_WS, and CLONE_WS I notice that you put that in there as part of a bunch of other fixes, none of which have a synopsis that

Re: [osol-discuss] What's the status of virtual consoles?

2007-01-04 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Normally I'd suggest checking the vconsole-discuss list instead, but it seems to be mostly spam - much higher than other OpenSolaris lists for some reason (is it not spam filtered or set up with the same admin settings as the rest of us who have to filter spam on our lists?). I do know the team

Re: [osol-discuss] What's the status of virtual consoles?

2007-01-04 Thread Richard Lowe
Alan Coopersmith wrote: Normally I'd suggest checking the vconsole-discuss list instead, but it seems to be mostly spam - much higher than other OpenSolaris lists for some reason (is it not spam filtered or set up with the same admin settings as the rest of us who have to filter spam on our

[osol-discuss] Recent putback of PSARC 2006/356 Reliable Datagram Sockets

2007-01-04 Thread Cyril Plisko
Hi ! On Dec 20 the putback for PSARC 2006/356 Reliable Datagram Sockets 6433451 Solaris support for Reliable Datagram Sockets over Infiniband - RDS (2006/356) went into the ON. Among other things there were afew files carried over from OpenIB project. For example :

Re: [osol-discuss] Recent putback of PSARC 2006/356 Reliable Datagram Sockets

2007-01-04 Thread Stephen Lau
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 08:27:41PM +0200, Cyril Plisko wrote: 57 /* 58 * Sun elects to include this software in Sun product 59 * under the OpenIB BSD license. That last sentence sounds a bit odd to me. While only Sun gets to decide what to include in Sun product, we are talking about

Re: [osol-discuss] Recent putback of PSARC 2006/356 Reliable Datagram Sockets

2007-01-04 Thread Bonnie Corwin
Cyril Plisko wrote: Hi ! On Dec 20 the putback for PSARC 2006/356 Reliable Datagram Sockets 6433451 Solaris support for Reliable Datagram Sockets over Infiniband - RDS (2006/356) went into the ON. Among other things there were afew files carried over from OpenIB project. For example :

[osol-discuss] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] project proposal __/__ WAS: Re: Re: Re: Is M

2007-01-04 Thread W. Wayne Liauh
Who else is interested? Thoughts? If this question were asked a year ago, I would have raised my both hands. But things have changed a lot. It took me a while to get used to not using the Moz suite, but now I don't even install Seamonkey in my Linux partitions. Second, when we criticize

Re: [osol-discuss] Recent putback of PSARC 2006/356 Reliable Datagram Sockets

2007-01-04 Thread Cyril Plisko
On 1/4/07, Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 08:27:41PM +0200, Cyril Plisko wrote: 57 /* 58 * Sun elects to include this software in Sun product 59 * under the OpenIB BSD license. That last sentence sounds a bit odd to me. While only Sun gets to decide what

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] project proposal __/__ WAS: Re: Re: Re: Is M

2007-01-04 Thread Martin Bochnig
W. Wayne Liauh wrote: If this question were asked a year ago, I would have raised my both hands. But things have changed a lot. It took me a while to get used to not using the Moz suite, but now I don't even install Seamonkey in my Linux partitions. Second, when we criticize Firefox, we

Re: [osol-discuss] Recent putback of PSARC 2006/356 Reliable Datagram Sockets

2007-01-04 Thread Richard Lowe
Cyril Plisko wrote: On 1/4/07, Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 08:27:41PM +0200, Cyril Plisko wrote: 57 /* 58 * Sun elects to include this software in Sun product 59 * under the OpenIB BSD license. That last sentence sounds a bit odd to me. While only Sun

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] project proposal __/__ WAS: Re: Re: Re: Is M

2007-01-04 Thread Martin Bochnig
Martin Bochnig wrote: W. Wayne Liauh wrote: p.s. The SUNWqemu packages are slightly delayed (due to a spontanous travel), but are in the works. Literally and in this minute. PLease expect them tomorrow evening or something. Will the accelerator be a part of the SUNWqemu

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Recent putback of PSARC 2006/356 Reliable Datagram Sockets

2007-01-04 Thread Cyril Plisko
On 1/4/07, Richard L. Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IANAL, of course. So am I, and since the discussion rapidly shifts to law sphere (I should saw it coming before I started !) I'd better stop here. -- Regards, Cyril ___

[osol-discuss] bug or change of semantics?

2007-01-04 Thread Thomas Maier-Komor
Hi, I observed the following behavior concerning the readability of directory content that I don't understand. This occurred on both Solaris releases with UFS filesystems. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/a$ uname -a SunOS azalin 5.10 Generic_118833-33 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-2500 [EMAIL

Re: [osol-discuss] bug or change of semantics?

2007-01-04 Thread Casper . Dik
Hi, I observed the following behavior concerning the readability of directory content that I don't und erstand. This occurred on both Solaris releases with UFS filesystems. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/a$ uname -a SunOS azalin 5.10 Generic_118833-33 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-2500 [EMAIL

Re: [osol-discuss] Recent putback of PSARC 2006/356 Reliable DatagramSockets

2007-01-04 Thread Roland Mainz
Cyril Plisko wrote: [snip] 26 * Copyright (c) 2005 SilverStorm Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved. 27 * 28 * This software is available to you under a choice of one of two 29 * licenses. You may choose to be licensed under the terms of the GNU 30 * General Public License

Shipping lsof with Solaris ? / was: Re: [osol-discuss] problem with /tmp FS still up

2007-01-04 Thread Roland Mainz
Peter Tribble wrote: On 1/1/07, wb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a /tmp FS for swap, and a really big file crout* inside. The /tmp was 95% up. I decided to remove the crout file. The problem, is the /tmp is not decreasing, but still growing. How could I make it decrease?

Re: [osol-discuss] bug or change of semantics?

2007-01-04 Thread Thomas Maier-Komor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I observed the following behavior concerning the readability of directory content that I don't und erstand. This occurred on both Solaris releases with UFS filesystems. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/a$ uname -a SunOS azalin 5.10 Generic_118833-33 sun4u sparc

[osol-discuss] Obtaining nameservice-independent user_attr and publickey data from a shell script ?

2007-01-04 Thread Roland Mainz
Hi! Is there a nameservice-independent way to obtain the values for user_attr and publickey from a shell script (if not I would propose to add a extension to getent) ? Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED] \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, CJAVASunUnix

Re: [osol-discuss] Obtaining nameservice-independent user_attr and publickey data from a shell script ?

2007-01-04 Thread Martin Bochnig
Roland Mainz wrote: Hi! Is there a nameservice-independent way to obtain the values for user_attr and publickey from a shell script (if not I would propose to add a extension to getent) ? Maybe getuserattr() or getauthattr() ? nameservice-independence is probably done via

Re: [osol-discuss] Obtaining nameservice-independent user_attr and publickey data from a shell script ?

2007-01-04 Thread Martin Bochnig
Martin Bochnig wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Hi! Is there a nameservice-independent way to obtain the values for user_attr and publickey from a shell script (if not I would propose to add a extension to getent) ? Maybe getuserattr() or getauthattr() ? nameservice-independence

Re: [osol-discuss] Obtaining nameservice-independent user_attr and publickey data from a shell script ?

2007-01-04 Thread Martin Bochnig
Martin Bochnig wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Hi! Is there a nameservice-independent way to obtain the values for user_attr and publickey from a shell script (if not I would propose to add a extension to getent) ? Maybe getuserattr() or getauthattr() ? Plus getpublickey()

Re: [osol-discuss] Obtaining nameservice-independent user_attrand publickey data from a shell script ?

2007-01-04 Thread Roland Mainz
Martin Bochnig wrote: Martin Bochnig wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Is there a nameservice-independent way to obtain the values for user_attr and publickey from a shell script (if not I would propose to add a extension to getent) ? Maybe getuserattr() or getauthattr() ? Plus getpublickey()

Re: [osol-discuss] Obtaining nameservice-independent user_attr and publickey data from a shell script ?

2007-01-04 Thread Martin Bochnig
Martin Bochnig wrote: Martin Bochnig wrote: Maybe getuserattr() or getauthattr() ? Plus getpublickey() Or don't those work with files as NS ?? *shrug* Exclusively from a shell script, no C? Can't you analyse the files in /etc directly then? Which other tools can be expected to

Re: [osol-discuss] Obtaining nameservice-independent user_attrand publickey data from a shell script ?

2007-01-04 Thread Roland Mainz
Martin Bochnig wrote: Martin Bochnig wrote: Martin Bochnig wrote: Maybe getuserattr() or getauthattr() ? Plus getpublickey() Or don't those work with files as NS ?? *shrug* Exclusively from a shell script, no C? Yes... Can't you analyse the files in /etc directly then? No,

[osol-discuss] Community leads: final reminder on contributors/core contributors

2007-01-04 Thread Stephen Hahn
If you're a community lead, and you (or your fellow leads) have not replied to my inquiries regarding a list of contributors and core contributors, please take this last chance to read my messages sent in November 2005 and June 2005 and submit an initial list. Interim lists were

Re: [osol-discuss] Obtaining nameservice-independent user_attrand publickey data from a shell script ?

2007-01-04 Thread Martin Bochnig
Roland Mainz wrote: Exclusively from a shell script, no C? Yes... Can't you analyse the files in /etc directly then? No, because in the case that the matching entries in /etc/nsswitch.conf contain more than files you need nameservice-specific calls, one for I finally get

Re: [osol-discuss] Obtaining nameservice-independent user_attrand publickey data from a shell script ?

2007-01-04 Thread Martin Bochnig
Roland Mainz wrote: No, because in the case that the matching entries in /etc/nsswitch.conf contain more than files you need nameservice-specific calls, one for YP, one for NIS, one for NIS+, one for LDAP etc. - and you would have to care about the lookup order and fallback behaviour if a

[osol-discuss] Re: What's the status of virtual consoles?

2007-01-04 Thread Dev Mazumdar
One more thing that should be discussed is mouse support ala Linux/BSD's gpm Now one thing that would totally rock is the ability to cut from a VC and paste in an Xterm - Linux/BSD don't support this functionality. best regards Dev Mazumdar This message posted from opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] Debug the Dynamic Linker

2007-01-04 Thread DEEPAK BHATIA
I am working with Dynamic Linker of Solaris (rtld forlder). I have made some changes in the Dynamic linker and build with debug option. Now I want to debug my dynamic linker. Can anyone please suggest how to proceed ? How do I tell the OS to invoke my dynamic linker instead of the original

[osol-discuss] libc_pic.a not found

2007-01-04 Thread DEEPAK BHATIA
Hi, While building the dynamic linker using dmake all, the build process failed because of libc_pic.a library not found in /usr/lib/pics. It there any patch available for the same ? Thanks Deepak Bhatia This message posted from opensolaris.org