On 7/26/07, Kaiwai Gardiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/07/07, Mark Haywood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
On 7/26/07, Aubrey Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/26/07, Kaiwai Gardiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/07/07, Aubrey Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
Alan Burlison wrote:
I agree, the opensolaris-help forum is *not* well signposted enough, and
the first one we point people at is opensolaris-discuss, so that needs
fixing.
Absolutely! Go to http://opensolaris.org/os/discussions/ and first on
the list is opensolaris-discuss. This is what it
Manoj Joseph wrote:
Absolutely! Go to http://opensolaris.org/os/discussions/ and first on
the list is opensolaris-discuss. This is what it says:
OpenSolaris: discuss
OpenSolaris General Discussion. All topics involving OpenSolaris are
open for discussion.
Should we be surprised if
What makes you think Novell's legal team have as little subtlety and smarts as
SCO's? There are other options.
[b]Bruce Lowry, Novell Spokesman, Aug 2007[/b]
We're not interested in suing people over Unix,
Novell spokesman
Bruce Lowry said. We're not even in the Unix
business anymore.
Opensolaris CE originally installed as b65 but BFUd to b67. (SPARC,
running on U60).
I cannot complete the solaris registration wizard, and so cannot run the
update manager. I have created a valid sun online account, which lets me
into sun connection. However, the error Your login information
On 8/17/07, Dick Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17/08/07, Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The update manager wont' be any use to you anyway since it is only
providing data for Solaris 10 not Solaris Express releases.
Is there any reason it ships with SXCE?
It's the first
Alan Burlison wrote:
Manoj Joseph wrote:
Absolutely! Go to http://opensolaris.org/os/discussions/ and first on
the list is opensolaris-discuss. This is what it says:
OpenSolaris: discuss
OpenSolaris General Discussion. All topics involving OpenSolaris are
open for discussion.
Should we be
Aubrey Li wrote:
On 7/26/07, Kaiwai Gardiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/07/07, Mark Haywood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
On 7/26/07, Aubrey Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/26/07, Kaiwai Gardiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/07/07, Aubrey Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
To list your snapshots:
/usr/sbin/zfs list -H -t snapshot -o name
Then you could use that in a for loop:
for i in `/usr/sbin/zfs list -H -t snapshot -o name` ;
do
echo Destroying snapshot: $i
/usr/sbin/zfs destroy $i
done
The above would destroy all your snapshots. You could put a grep on
What makes you think Novell's legal team have as
little subtlety and smarts as SCO's? There are other
options.
The SCO suit caused a havoc, b/c the authorship ( thus the copyright
ownership) is a big mess in Linux. Linus never bothered to keep track of who
owned what, and/or verify
Folks,
If you use netpipe for latency measurements, I would like to hear about
your experience especially about the stability and accuracy of the
benchmark.
Thanks,
Rao.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 8/16/07, Giles Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First we get the new T2 being GPL'ed.
Now it looks like we will have IBM servers preloading Solaris.
http://www.physorg.com/news106499717.html
Is Sun planning to leave the hardware market?
Jonathon Swartz said:
Despite having what's
When I come to think of it, Solaris looks ok. The
problem is that Firefox browsing doesnt look as good
as Windows Firefox (it is a distinct difference).
That is why I made this thread. My mistake, to blame
it on Solaris. Although it looks better now. Thanx
for you help.
Actually, I feel
Hi everyone,
See http://blogs.sun.com/security/entry/
trusted_extensions_admin_scripts_offered
:-)
Cheers,
--
Dave Walker
Client Solutions, Sun Microsystems UK
Tel: +44 780 3079264
http://blogs.sun.com/davew/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 00:23 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Why would they want to leave the hardware market? Are they not turning a
profit?
I heard someone mention a potential buyout by IBM, this sounds more
plausible than Sun leaving the hardware market...not that IBM and Sun would
be a
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 10:14 -0700, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
Side note, $14million seems an awful lot for just
some drivers.
Matthew
At that time it was well accepted that the (then) big bad Sun Micro
used the licensing fee as a pretense to underwrite part of SCO's legal
expenses
Side note, $14million seems an awful lot for just
some drivers.
Matthew
At that time it was well accepted that the (then) big bad Sun Micro used the
licensing fee as a pretense to underwrite part of SCO's legal expenses against
Linux. Microsoft paid much more (I believe it was $50
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 13:40 -0400, Brandorr wrote:
On 8/17/07, Kaiwai Gardiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 13:21 -0400, Brandorr wrote:
On 8/16/07, Giles Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First we get the new T2 being GPL'ed.
Now it looks like we will have IBM
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 10:25 -0700, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
What makes you think Novell's legal team have as
little subtlety and smarts as SCO's? There are other
options.
The SCO suit caused a havoc, b/c the authorship ( thus the copyright
ownership) is a big mess in Linux. Linus never
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 13:21 -0400, Brandorr wrote:
On 8/16/07, Giles Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First we get the new T2 being GPL'ed.
Now it looks like we will have IBM servers preloading Solaris.
http://www.physorg.com/news106499717.html
Is Sun planning to leave the hardware
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Smith
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 9:55 AM
To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] remove snapshots
To list your snapshots:
/usr/sbin/zfs list -H -t snapshot -o name
Please take me off your list.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan
Burlison
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 10:45 AM
To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] This
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Stephen Potter
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 10:49 AM
To: Valerie Bubb Fenwick
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] [ogb-discuss] This is not a Solaris helpdesk
Valerie
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Alan Burlison wrote:
They post because it is the first mailing list we refer to on the site that
looks even vaguely appropriate. That's our fault, not theirs, and I'm going
to attempt to improve the situation. It may be a chicken-and-egg situation,
but hiding our heads
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Alan Burlison wrote:
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Btw, on the topic of this page, newbies might not be the best name for
this page. newbie or NOOB is often perceived as a derogatory
term... I don't want us to be perceived as elitest...
I don't personally feel it is
On 8/17/07, Kaiwai Gardiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 13:21 -0400, Brandorr wrote:
On 8/16/07, Giles Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First we get the new T2 being GPL'ed.
Now it looks like we will have IBM servers preloading Solaris.
According to the web page, SXCE releases should come every other week. I
haven't seen an announcement for over a month. Has this process stalled, or has
the focus changed because of the Indiana project?
The last time I asked, the announcement came a few hours later. Let's see if
lightning can
I just ran into a little setback.Upon installation,one of the disks is not
being recognized by the system and when I tried to format it I get a disk not
recognized message.I then went on to do an auto select since the exact drive is
not in the list and it said that auto configuration had
[b]McNeely: We had to pay SCO more money so we could open the code. [/b]
Nobody here has yet explained how Sun managed to legitimately open-source code
without getting permission from Novell. The fact that SCO agreed to this and
Sun paid them money to do so seems to be irrelevant in light of
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 14:26 -0700, Al wrote:
[b]McNeely: We had to pay SCO more money so we could open the code.
[/b]
Nobody here has yet explained how Sun managed to legitimately
open-source code without getting permission from Novell. The fact that
SCO agreed to this and Sun paid them
Al wrote:
Nobody here has yet explained how Sun managed to legitimately open-source
code without getting permission from Novell.
And no one here is likely to divulge the contents of confidential
contracts signed between Sun and other companies either. Sun's
lawyers and execs know the
Allen Wittenauer wrote:
...
As a sidenote, while the Solaris DHCP server back-end is supposed to
be pluggable, example code was (and probably still is) non-existent
unless you grovel through the (Open)Solaris codebase. When I last
asked Dave Miner about it a few years ago, he said he didn't
On 17/08/07, Gary Gendel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to the web page, SXCE releases should come every other week. I
haven't seen an announcement for over a month. Has this process stalled, or
has the focus changed because of the Indiana project?
From
Nobody here has yet explained how Sun managed to legitimately open-source
code without getting permission from Novell. The fact that SCO agreed to this
and Sun paid them money to do so seems to be irrelevant in light of the
recent court decision.
What does Novell have to do with Sun's
Al wrote:
[b]McNeely: We had to pay SCO more money so we could open the code. [/b]
Nobody here has yet explained how Sun managed to legitimately open-source
code without getting permission from Novell. The fact that SCO agreed to this
and Sun paid them money to do so seems to be irrelevant
Lu, Baolu wrote:
On Thursday, August 16, 2007 6:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lu, Baolu wrote:
OpenSolaris does support SATA controllers, but there are some
comments. I am not familiar with the VT8237R chipset, but I
can share with you my experiences on Intel chipsets.
On the Intel server
36 matches
Mail list logo
